Sustainable Aviation Fuel
Understanding HEFA
HEFA fuels are produced through a hydroprocessing technique that converts biomass-derived oils, such as vegetable oils and animal fats, into high-quality renewable diesel and jet fuel.
The process involves the removal of impurities, sulfur, and oxygen from the feedstock, resulting in a fuel that meets stringent quality specifications. The final product closely resembles conventional petroleum-based fuels, allowing it to be seamlessly integrated into existing distribution networks and engines.
Definition of Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA)
Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) is a term used to describe a type of renewable aviation fuel derived from biomass feedstocks.
HEFA fuels are produced through a hydroprocessing method that involves the conversion of triglycerides (such as vegetable oils or animal fats) into a mixture of hydrocarbons with properties similar to petroleum-based jet fuel.
The production process of HEFA involves several steps. First, the feedstock (vegetable oils or animal fats) undergoes a process called hydrotreating or hydrodeoxygenation. In this step, the triglycerides are treated with hydrogen under high pressure and temperature, resulting in the removal of oxygen from the molecules. This helps to improve the stability and properties of the fuel.
After hydrotreating, the resulting product is a mixture of hydrocarbons, including n-paraffins, iso-paraffins, and cycloparaffins, which have similar characteristics to traditional jet fuel. This mixture is then further refined and blended to meet the required specifications for aviation fuel.
HEFA fuels offer several advantages over conventional jet fuels. They are considered a drop-in fuel, which means they can be used in existing aircraft engines without requiring any modifications to the infrastructure or engine design. HEFA fuels also have lower carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions compared to conventional jet fuels, making them a more environmentally friendly alternative.
These fuels have gained attention and interest as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels in the aviation sector. HEFA is one of the approved pathways under the International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO) framework for sustainable aviation fuels.
In the quest for cleaner and more sustainable energy sources, Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) have emerged as a promising solution. HEFA fuels are a type of renewable diesel and jet fuel derived from biomass feedstocks. They offer significant environmental benefits, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and compatibility with existing infrastructure, making them an attractive alternative to fossil fuels. This article delves into the technology behind HEFA, its advantages, and its potential impact on the energy landscape.
Benefit of Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA)
Environmental Benefits
HEFA fuels offer several environmental advantages over conventional fossil fuels. First and foremost, they significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The production of HEFA fuels emits up to 90% less carbon dioxide compared to traditional fossil fuels. This reduction is achieved by utilizing biomass feedstocks that absorb carbon dioxide during their growth, creating a closed carbon cycle. Furthermore, HEFA fuels have lower particulate matter and sulfur emissions, contributing to improved air quality and reduced health hazards.
Compatibility and Infrastructure
One of the key advantages of HEFA fuels is their compatibility with existing infrastructure. They can be used in conventional diesel and jet engines without any modifications or significant changes to the fueling infrastructure. This compatibility eliminates the need for expensive retrofits and allows for a seamless transition to cleaner fuels. Additionally, HEFA fuels can be blended with conventional fuels in various proportions, further facilitating their adoption and gradual implementation.
Energy Security and Economic Benefits
HEFA fuels offer improved energy security by diversifying the energy mix and reducing reliance on imported petroleum. By producing fuels domestically from renewable feedstocks, countries can enhance their energy independence and reduce exposure to volatile oil markets. Moreover, the production of HEFA fuels can stimulate rural and agricultural economies by creating new markets for biomass feedstocks and providing opportunities for local farmers and producers.
Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) Production
The production of Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) involves several key steps.
Here is an overview of the typical process:
Feedstock Selection: The first step is selecting a suitable feedstock, which can include vegetable oils (such as soybean oil, palm oil, or rapeseed oil) or animal fats. Feedstock availability, cost, and sustainability considerations are taken into account during this stage.
Pretreatment: The selected feedstock undergoes pretreatment to remove impurities and prepare it for further processing. This step may involve filtering, heating, and degumming to remove any solid particles, moisture, or contaminants.
Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO): The pretreated feedstock is then subjected to a hydrodeoxygenation process, often performed in the presence of a catalyst. This step involves mixing the feedstock with hydrogen gas under high pressure and temperature. The catalyst helps break down the triglycerides in the feedstock and facilitates the removal of oxygen atoms from the molecules.
Hydrotreating: After the hydrodeoxygenation step, the resulting mixture of hydrocarbons is further processed through hydrotreating. Hydrotreating involves the removal of sulfur, nitrogen, and other impurities from the hydrocarbon stream. This step helps improve the stability and quality of the final HEFA fuel product.
Refining and Blending: The hydrotreated mixture is then refined through various refining processes, including distillation, fractionation, and purification. These processes help separate and purify the hydrocarbon components, resulting in a refined product with properties similar to traditional jet fuel. The HEFA fuel is then blended with conventional jet fuel to meet the required specifications and ensure compatibility with existing aircraft engines.
Testing and Certification: Before the HEFA fuel can be used in aviation, it undergoes rigorous testing and certification to ensure it meets the necessary quality and performance standards. This includes testing for key parameters such as flashpoint, density, viscosity, and combustion characteristics. Certification bodies and regulatory authorities play a crucial role in verifying and approving the HEFA fuel for use in aircraft.
It’s important to note that specific details of the HEFA production process may vary depending on the technology and equipment used by different producers. Continuous research and development efforts are ongoing to optimize the process, increase efficiency, and reduce costs associated with HEFA production.
Challenges and Future Outlook of Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA)
HEFA fuels hold immense promise, several challenges need to be addressed for their widespread adoption. These include ensuring a sustainable and scalable supply of biomass feedstocks, addressing concerns related to land use changes and competition with food production, and reducing production costs to enhance economic viability. Ongoing research and development efforts are focused on overcoming these challenges and further optimizing the HEFA production process.
While Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) fuels offer promising benefits, they also face certain challenges and have considerations for their future outlook:
Feedstock Availability: The production of HEFA fuels requires a significant amount of feedstock, such as vegetable oils or animal fats. Ensuring a sustainable and reliable supply of feedstock can be a challenge, as it may compete with food production or have other environmental and social implications. Developing alternative feedstock sources, such as algae or cellulosic biomass, could help address this challenge.
Cost Competitiveness: HEFA fuels currently face cost challenges compared to traditional jet fuels due to the higher costs associated with feedstock production, conversion technologies, and refining processes. As the demand for renewable aviation fuels increases, advancements in production technologies and economies of scale may help improve cost competitiveness.
Certification and Standardization: The certification and standardization of HEFA fuels are crucial for their widespread adoption. Establishing consistent quality standards, sustainability criteria, and certification processes is essential to ensure the integrity and compatibility of HEFA fuels with existing aviation infrastructure and engines.
Regulatory Support: Continued regulatory support and policy frameworks are necessary to incentivize the production, distribution, and use of HEFA fuels. Governments and international organizations play a vital role in creating favorable conditions, such as blending mandates, tax incentives, and research and development funding, to drive the adoption of sustainable aviation fuels.
Technological Advancements: Ongoing research and development efforts are needed to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of HEFA production processes. Innovations in catalysts, reactor designs, and process optimization can lead to higher yields, improved energy efficiency, and reduced environmental impacts.
Despite these challenges, the future outlook for HEFA fuels remains promising. The aviation industry is actively seeking sustainable alternatives to reduce its carbon footprint and comply with emission reduction targets. HEFA fuels, as one of the approved pathways, can play a significant role in decarbonizing aviation. With continued advancements, increased investment, and supportive policies, HEFA fuels have the potential to become a commercially viable and environmentally sustainable solution for the aviation sector.
Conclusion for Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA)
Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) is a renewable aviation fuel derived from biomass feedstocks.
It is produced through a hydroprocessing method that converts triglycerides into a mixture of hydrocarbons with properties similar to traditional jet fuel. HEFA fuels offer several advantages, including being a drop-in fuel for existing aircraft engines and having lower carbon dioxide emissions compared to conventional jet fuels. HEFA has gained recognition as a viable pathway to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainability in the aviation industry.
Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) fuels represent a significant step towards achieving a cleaner and more sustainable energy future. With their environmental benefits, compatibility with existing infrastructure, and potential economic advantages, HEFA fuels offer a viable alternative to conventional fossil fuels. Continued investment in research, innovation, and policy support can accelerate the deployment of HEFA fuels and contribute to a greener and more resilient energy sector worldwide.
https://www.exaputra.com/2023/05/hydroprocessed-esters-and-fatty-acids.html
Renewable Energy
From RFK — Sr.

Renewable Energy
The IEC Standard That’s Costing Wind Farms Millions (And the Industrial Fix That Already Exists)
Weather Guard Lightning Tech
The IEC Standard That’s Costing Wind Farms Millions (And the Industrial Fix That Already Exists)
How proven industrial technology exposed a fundamental flaw in wind turbine lightning protection – and what every wind professional needs to know about it
The Phone Call That Unintentionally Created a Case Study
This scene plays out in O&M buildings across the US from March through November; it starts when an early-morning call comes into the operations center of a large wind farm.
“We’ve got more lightning damage,” the site supervisor reports. “CAT 4 damage, about 15 meters down from the tip. That’s the third one this month.”
“We need to shut it down and call a ropes team.”
When the O&M supervisor pulls up the damage reports from the past year, something doesn’t add up. According to IEC 61400-24 standards – the international specification that governs wind turbine lightning protection – nearly all lightning damage should occur within 2 meters of the blade tip.
But the operational data tells a different story entirely.

The Multi-Million Dollar Problem Nobody’s Talking About
Often, when operators investigate their lightning blade damage, what they find in their data runs contrary to what the experts predict. This is why Weather Guard collects real lightning data from the field.
The examples cited in this study were documented on eight sites in Texas and Oklahoma that we monitored in the summer of 2024. Their GE Vernova turbines, equipped with the industry-standard (IEC standard LPL1 certified) LPS system, had experienced damage patterns that completely contradicted engineering specifications. According to the standards:
- 71-99% of damage is expected to be seen within 2 meters of the blade tip
- Only 4% of damage will occur beyond 10 meters from the tip
Here’s what was actually happening:
- Only 45.6% of damage was within 2 meters of tip
- 28.5% of damage occurred between 2 and 10 meters from the tip, and
- 25.9% of damage beyond 10 meters from the tip
That’s a massive increase in the most expensive type of damage, impacting spar caps and shear webs that require $150,000 repairs and months of unanticipated downtime.
What the operations team was seeing wasn’t unusual. Across the industry, wind professionals see the same disturbing patterns, but few understand what the data really shows – and it’s an expensive problem.
How Aerospace Engineers Fixed the Same Problem
While wind turbine manufacturers currently struggle with this problem, aerospace engineers already solved it in other critical applications. Major airplane manufacturers including Boeing, Airbus, Gulfstream, and Embraer have been using an advanced lightning protection solution for years with proven results.
The “secret” solution? StrikeTape Lightning Diverters.
Instead of trying to force lightning to attach at specific points (the wind turbine approach), aerospace engineers guide lightning energy along controlled pathways that protect critical structures.
That’s exactly what StrikeTape does. The same technology that’s proven in aerospace applications has been adapted to provide the same protection for wind turbine blades.
The Study That Shook the Industry
When RWE, the German energy giant, decided to test StrikeTape at one of their US wind farms, they unknowingly initiated one of the most important lightning protection studies in wind energy history.
In 2024, Weather Guard analyzed operational data from eight wind farms across Texas and Oklahoma – all using GE Vernova turbines, all in similar lightning-prone environments. Seven farms used the industry-standard GE Vernova SafeReceptor ILPS protection. One farm in West Texas applied StrikeTape to drive lightning towards the GE Vernova receptor system.
The results were stunning.
StrikeTape-protected site:
- 74 lightning events
- 3 damage incidents
- 4.0% damage rate
Seven conventionally-equipped farms:
- 2,038 lightning events
- 415 damage incidents
- 20.4% average damage rate
StrikeTape achieved an 80.4% reduction in lightning damage compared to the seven nearby wind farms.
While the collected data is dramatic enough to be surprising, the results make sense considering how traditional lightning protection for wind turbines is designed, and why it doesn’t work the way it should.
Why Traditional Lightning Protection Is Fundamentally Flawed
To understand why this matters, let’s walk through how wind turbine lightning protection was developed, and how it currently works.
The SafeReceptor ILPS system, installed on virtually every LM Wind Power blade since 2011, uses a two-receptor approach. The idea is simple: attract lightning to specific points on the blade tip, then conduct the energy safely to ground through insulated pathways. The theory, on paper, is brilliant.
The standard system is:
- IEC61400-24 Level 1 certified
- Validated by Germanischer Lloyd
- Designed from the results of 90,000+ lightning-protected blades
- Ideally ILPS would intercept >98% of lightning strikes
- Withstands 200kA strikes
In reality, it’s fallen short. Spectacularly.
Why Traditional Lightning Protection Is Fundamentally Flawed
To understand why this matters, let’s walk through how wind turbine lightning protection was developed, and how it currently works.
The SafeReceptor ILPS system, installed on virtually every LM Wind Power blade since 2011, uses a two-receptor approach. The idea is simple: attract lightning to specific points on the blade tip, then conduct the energy safely to ground through insulated pathways. The theory, on paper, is brilliant.
The standard system is:
- IEC61400-24 Level 1 certified
- Validated by Germanischer Lloyd
- Designed from the results of 90,000+ lightning-protected blades
- Ideally ILPS would intercept >98% of lightning strikes
- Withstands 200kA strikes
In reality, it’s fallen short. Spectacularly.
The problem isn’t that the system doesn’t work – it’s that it’s optimized for the wrong type of lightning. Independent research using eologix-ping lightning strike sensors on wind turbines reveals something shocking:
Lightning strikes that cause damage average only -14kA.
These lower-amplitude strikes slip past traditional protection systems and hit blades in structurally critical areas far from the intended attachment points. These strikes cause damage that “doesn’t fit” the type we expect to see, but in fact, makes perfect sense – and costs the industry millions.
The $2.4 Million Math Problem
Let’s talk about what this means in dollars and cents.
Traditional Lightning Protection (Industry Average):
- Damage rate: 20.4% of lightning events
- Average cost per incident: $160,000 (repair + downtime)
- For 100 lightning events: $3,264,000 in damage costs
StrikeTape Protection (RWE Sand Bluff Performance):
- Damage rate: 4.0% of lightning events
- Average cost per incident: $160,000
- For 100 lightning events: $640,000 in damage costs
Net savings: $2,624,000 per 100 lightning events
And here’s the kicker: StrikeTape installs in just 15-30 minutes per blade, requiring no special equipment. It doesn’t void warranties, and regulatory approval is not required.
Field-Proven Success
StrikeTape isn’t an experimental technology; it’s based on lightning protection systems that have proven effective in critical industrial applications.
How StrikeTape Works
Segmented lightning diverters like StrikeTape consist of a series of small metal segments mounted on a flexible, non-conductive substrate with small gaps between each segment. When lightning approaches, the diverter creates an ionized channel in the air above the surface. This channel provides a preferred path for lightning, directing it safely toward the blade’s LPS receptors.
Lightning doesn’t flow through the diverter itself, as it would in a solid conductor, but instead jumps from segment to segment through the air gaps. This “stepping” action through ionized air channels greatly reduces the amount of destructive heat and current that would otherwise pass through the blade structure.



Current industrial users include
- Boeing
- Airbus
- Gulfstream
- Embraer
- SpaceX
Instead of trying to outsmart lightning, it gives lightning what it wants: the path of least resistance.
When adapted for wind turbines, StrikeTape installs near the existing tip receptors on both the pressure and suction sides of blades. It doesn’t replace the SafeReceptor system; it makes it work better.
The Industry Leaders Who Have Already Adopted
Word about StrikeTape’s performance is spreading quickly through the wind industry. Major operators are implementing the technology.
US Wind Energy Operators:
- Ørsted
- RWE
- Invenergy
- American Electric Power (AEP)
- BHE Renewables
- NextEra
Turbine Manufacturers:
- Siemens Gamesa
- GE Vernova
- Suzlon
These aren’t companies that take risks with unproven technology. They’re adopting StrikeTape because the technology is proven, and the data is undeniable.
What This Means for Wind Professionals
If you’re managing wind assets, StrikeTape can fundamentally change how you think about lightning risk.
The traditional approach:
- Trust that IEC 61400-24 certification means real-world performance
- Accept 20.4% damage rates as “normal”
- Budget for expensive repairs as a cost of doing business

The StrikeTape approach:
- Reduce damage rates to <4.0% with proven technology
- Save substantial amounts annually on lightning damage
- Install during routine maintenance windows
- Benefit from proven industrial reliability
The Uncomfortable Truth About Industry Standards
Here’s what’s really uncomfortable about this story: the industry has been relying on standards that don’t reflect real-world performance.
IEC 61400-24 testing occurs in laboratory conditions with specific strike parameters. But those conditions don’t match what’s actually happening in the field, where lower-amplitude strikes are causing the majority of damage.
The wind industry isn’t unique in this regard. Many industries have experienced similar gaps between laboratory standards and field performance. (The automobile industry perhaps being the most obvious.)
The difference is that wind energy operates in an environment where every failure is expensive, highly visible, and takes a long time to correct.
The Financial Impact That Can’t Be Ignored
The math is compelling. The real question isn’t whether StrikeTape makes financial sense – it’s how quickly you can implement it.
We’re witnessing a fundamental shift in wind turbine lightning protection. The old paradigm of accepting high damage rates as inevitable is giving way to proven industrial solutions that actually work.
What’s Next for Lightning Protection
Early adopters have experienced significant advantages:
- Reduced lightning damage frequency
- Lower O&M costs
- Improved turbine availability
- Enhanced asset reliability
Meanwhile, operators who rely on traditional protection will continue experiencing the expensive damage patterns that have plagued the industry for years.
- Reduced lightning damage frequency
- Lower O&M costs
- Improved turbine availability
- Enhanced asset reliability
- What are our actual lightning damage rates vs. our protection system’s claimed performance?
- How much are we spending annually on lightning-related repairs and downtime?
- Can we afford NOT to implement proven solutions that reduce these costs by over 80%
The data from RWE’s West Texas wind farm provides clear answers. The remaining question – if or when lightning protection standards will change to reflect what we now know – cannot be answered by individual operators. In the meantime, it is up to independent wind professionals to act on this data to protect their assets.
Technical Study Information
Key details of the study are below. Readers who need additional information should contact Weather Guard Lightning Tech.
Study methodology: Analyzed operational data from 8 wind farms (907 total turbines) across Texas and Oklahoma, all operating GE Vernova turbines.
Damage classification: Used industry-standard 5-category system, with Categories 4-5 representing structural damage requiring extensive repairs.
Financial calculations: Based on actual repair costs ($10,000-$150,000) plus business interruption costs ($10,000-$150,000) per incident.
Performance improvement: An 80.4% relative risk reduction, representing significant improvement over conventional protection, was seen on the site with StrikeTape installations. Ongoing field studies have StrikeTape reducing damages by 100% in some cases.
For Additional Information
For a full analysis of this study, or for StrikeTape technical specifications, materials testing data and additional information, contact Weather Guard Lightning Tech.
+1 (413) 217-1139
500 S. Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
References
Kelechava, Brad. Standards Supporting Wind Power Industry Growth, ANSI Wind Power, April 23, 2020. Accessed 8/5/2025 at https://blog.ansi.org/ansi/standards-wind-power-growth-turbine-iec-agma/
Myrent, Noah and Haus, Lili. Blade Visual Inspection and Maintenance Quantification Study, Sandia Blade Workshop October 19, 2022.Accessed 8/5/2025 at https://www.sandia.gov/app/uploads/sites/273/2022/11/EPRI-Blade-Maintenance-Quantification-October19_2022-21.pdf Kaewniam, Panida, Cao, Maosen, et al. Recent advances in damage detection of wind turbine blades: A state-of-the-art review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol 167, October 2022. Accessed 8/5/2025 at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032122006128
https://weatherguardwind.com/the-iec-standard-thats-costing-wind-farms-millions-and-the-industrial-fix-that-already-exists/
Renewable Energy
How To Generate Power Off-Grid?
The post How To Generate Power Off-Grid? appeared first on Cyanergy.
https://cyanergy.com.au/blog/how-to-generate-power-off-grid/
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Carbon Footprint1 year ago
US SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Why airlines are perfect targets for anti-greenwashing legal action
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Some firms unaware of England’s new single-use plastic ban