Fossil fuels and climate change are increasing electric bills for Georgia Power customers. The Georgia Public Service Commission is currently considering approval of Georgia Power’s plan for the future, called an Integrated Resource Plan or IRP. That plan will not protect customers from further bill increases driven by fossil fuels and climate change; in fact, the Georgia Power plan doubles down on fossil fuels that risk high bills directly and further drive climate change, which drives high bills through extreme weather events and storms.
You may have heard recent announcements from Georgia Power and the Public Service Commission (PSC) that they have negotiated a “base rate freeze” in exchange for not having a rate case “this year.” “This year” happens to be the first time two Georgia PSC commissioners are coming before the voters in five years. Georgia Power and the PSC make this sound like customers should expect their electricity bills to stop increasing. But that’s not the full picture. Georgia Power can increase bills in three ways over the next year:
- In a resource procurement docket later this year,
- In a docket to cover costs to recover from storms and extreme weather, and
- In a docket to recover fuel costs
Fuel Costs Drive Up Bills
Over the past few years, Georgia Power customer bills have increased significantly, with the largest single increase coming when Georgia Power had to adjust bills in reaction to high gas prices. Further increases will happen when Georgia Power adds storm costs and another fuel cost to bills.
Electric utilities, including Georgia Power, have passed all fuel costs directly to customers since the oil crisis of the 1970s. That means that if fuel prices go up, those additional costs do not impact the returns that Georgia Power shareholders receive; they only impact Georgia Power’s customer bills.
Georgia Power requests PSC approval for an update to the fuel cost portion of customer bills about every 3 years. If Georgia Power has under-recovered fuel costs to date, in other words, if Georgia Power paid more for fuel than it expected, it will ask the Commission to increase the fuel cost portion of customer bills.
Georgia Power’s 2025 Capacity Mix by Fuel Type, Source: Georgia Power’s 2025 Integrated Resource Plan
Georgia Power has increased the share of its power that is generated by gas, which was its largest source of capacity in 2025. Georgia Power’s IRP proposed further increases in gas capacity, which will increase the risk of higher and higher customer bills as the price of gas fluctuates. “Natural” gas is a global commodity, and volatility in gas prices can be driven by any number of factors, as was seen when prices hit record volatility in the first quarter of 2022 and remained high that entire year in reaction to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, among other issues.
It is basic common sense that if a system relies more on fuel-based resources, particularly resources with fuels that have volatile prices, the fuel costs that are passed on to customers will be higher and more volatile. Fuel cost is simple multiplication: the MWh generated by a fuel type multiplied by the price of fuel for that generator. Georgia Power can hedge and enter into various contracts for different fuels that can change the overall impact of the fuel cost on the margins, but the only way to reduce exposure to high and volatile bills is to reduce reliance on these fuels to supply electricity. Again, Georgia Power’s IRP proposes to do the opposite. It proposes to add 8,000-9,000 MW of new gas to meet load growth from data centers and manufacturing, while only adding 1,000 MW-4,000 of new renewable resources. This is despite the fact that renewables continue to be the least costly and are faster to deploy than gas.
“Renewable energy sources like wind and solar power are needed to meet rapidly growing energy demand in the United States amid near-term obstacles to increasing natural gas capacity,” NextEra CEO John Ketchum, June 10.
Climate Change Drives Up Bills
The second way that fossil fuels are driving up Georgians’ electricity bills is by further contributing to climate change.
The links between carbon dioxide emissions and a warming climate have been known for decades; yet, Georgia Power is proposing to continue to operate two large coal plants far into the future despite this knowledge and despite the other known pollution from coal power plants. Communities that live in the shadows of these coal plants deserve clean air and water.
Just as destructive but perhaps more insidious is electric utilities claiming to reduce emissions while building new methane gas power plants. It is true that the burning of methane, or “natural” gas, produces less carbon dioxide per MWh than coal. But it is also true that methane is leaked directly into the atmosphere throughout the process of drilling for, transporting, storing, and burning methane gas. And methane is a more potent greenhouse gas in the near term. In fact, the replacement of coal with gas to generate electricity is likely a major contributor to the fact that we are seeing worse and worse impacts of climate change every year.
I don’t need to remind anyone in the Southeast of the devastation we saw across the region, including in Georgia, from Hurricane Helene last year. That devastation led Georgia Power and other utilities to fix damage to their infrastructure to get the lights back on for their customers. This is an important role for the utility, but it can be expensive, particularly when storms are so destructive.

As part of its proposal to skip a rate case until 2028, Georgia Power proposes a separate process in the Spring of 2026 to get approval from the PSC to add a charge on customer bills for the costs associated with storms through the end of 2025. That includes a whopping $862 million as of March 31, 2025.
Going into 2025’s hurricane season with warmer-than-average ocean surface temperatures and cuts to NOAA and the weather service, that figure is expected to go up.
If you’re in a Hole, Stop Digging
If fossil fuels and climate change are already leading to high bills, adding more fossil fuels is not a solution. If you are in a hole and trying to get out, the first step is to stop digging yourself deeper into that hole.
If the Georgia Public Service Commission really wanted to protect customers from high and volatile bills, in the near and long-term future, it would direct Georgia Power to reduce, not increase, its use of fossil fuels.
The post Freezing Out Georgia Customers: Election Year Deal with Georgia Power Won’t Keep Electric Bills from Rising appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
Renewable Energy
Ørsted Installs at Sunrise Wind, Pentagon Blocks 7.5 GW
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Ørsted Installs at Sunrise Wind, Pentagon Blocks 7.5 GW
Allen covers Ørsted’s first turbine install at Sunrise Wind, Cadeler’s fleet expansion, the Pentagon’s 7.5 GW onshore backlog, and the UK’s £154B onshore wind opportunity.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Happy Monday, everyone.
While headlines this week captured courtrooms and bankruptcy filings and permitting backlogs, out on the open water and deep inside factory order books, the wind turbines kept getting built.
Let us start off the coast of New York. Friday morning, April seventeenth, Ørsted installed the first wind turbine generator at Sunrise Wind — a 924-megawatt project, 84 turbines when complete. This is the same Sunrise Wind that was shut down just four months ago. The same Sunrise Wind that won a preliminary injunction in February. The same Sunrise Wind the Trump Administration chose not to appeal. And now the first turbine stands above the water. Cadeler’s wind turbine installation vessel Wind Scylla is doing the work. She just finished the same job at Revolution Wind. Ørsted says first power flows to New York later this year. Commercial operation the second half of 2027. Six hundred thousand homes on the grid.
Now follow us across the Atlantic. In the Polish Baltic Sea, another Cadeler vessel just began her maiden campaign. Her name: Wind Mover. Delivered last November from Hanwha Ocean in Korea, ahead of schedule. This new M-class installation vessel now sits at the 1.2-gigawatt Baltic Power offshore wind farm, installing Vestas V236 turbines — 15 megawatts apiece. Wind Mover’s sister vessel, Wind Osprey, is moving to the United Kingdom to start work at East Anglia Three. Cadeler has doubled its fleet in twelve months. By mid-2027, twelve vessels — the largest offshore wind installation fleet in the industry.
While turbines go up on the eastern side of the Atlantic, on the western side a different kind of wait is setting in. Bloomberg reported last week that the Pentagon is sitting on a backlog of at least 30 proposed American wind farms — 7.5 gigawatts of onshore capacity. Paperwork stalled. The issue is Section 10-32, the Defense Department’s review to ensure turbines do not interfere with military radar or aviation. Jason Grumet, head of the American Clean Power Association, calls it direct obstruction. His group sent a letter to the Pentagon earlier this month. The deadline for a response was April eighth. That deadline came and went. Seven point five gigawatts, waiting.
Now turn to the United Kingdom, where the direction could not be more different. A new report commissioned by Renewable UK and written by consultants at Everoze says expanding Britain’s onshore wind supply chain between now and 2050 could add £56 billion in economic value. That is on top of another £98 billion already expected — a total of £154 billion. UK onshore capacity is set to grow from 16 gigawatts today to more than 50 gigawatts by 2050. Seventy percent of lifecycle spend already stays in the UK. The report points to blades, towers, nacelles, drivetrains, and electrical gear for substations as the highest-value opportunities.
So let us step back. One turbine above the water off Long Island. A new vessel installing 15-megawatt machines in the Polish Baltic. Seven point five gigawatts of American onshore wind held up in Washington. And £56 billion staked on British onshore.
The policy fights are loud. The legal fights are louder. But this past week, the turbines went up.
That is the state of the wind industry for the 20th of April, 2026.
Join us for the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast tomorrow.
Renewable Energy
Big Money Still Controls Planet’s Energy
When I was in college in the 1970s, I recall hearing people say, “We’ll have solar energy when the Rockefellers own the sun.”
Nothing’s changed too much in half a century.
Renewable Energy
Even Trump’s Endorsement Can’t Ruin This Guy’s Chances in His Race for Office
It’s hard to imagine how certain politicians can lose in the 2026 midterms, even with “the kiss of death” (Trump’s endorsement).
This guy’s district in Texas is largely the panhandle, far from the more educated and sophisticated parts of the state in Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Austin.
He’s a physician and retired admiral.
If for some horrible reason I lived in a town in that district, perhaps called Buzzardsbreath, TX, I would probably vote for him myself, even with Trump’s endorsement.
Even Trump’s Endorsement Can’t Ruin This Guy’s Chances in His Race for Office
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits

