ENGIE North America has partnered with CBRE Investment Management to grow its battery storage presence across the U.S. The deal includes a 2.4 GW portfolio made up of 31 battery energy storage projects spread across Texas and California.
It’s one of ENGIE’s biggest operating partnerships in the country and ranks among the largest battery storage asset transactions in the sector.
Even after the deal, ENGIE remains in control. The company will continue to operate the assets while CBRE brings in new capital to support future growth.
Massive Deal with CBRE Boosts Engie’s Clean Energy Ambitions
ENGIE North America is based in Houston, Texas. It’s part of the global ENGIE Group, investing more than €10 billion each year to lead the global energy transition.
The press release revealed that the 2.4 GW battery storage capacity spans 31 projects in the ERCOT and CAISO markets. ENGIE remains the majority owner and operator of the assets. CBRE Investment Management, which has over $149 billion in assets, joins as a strategic partner in this large-scale clean energy expansion.
Robert Shaw, Managing Director, Private Infrastructure Strategies at CBRE Investment Management, commented,
“We are excited to partner with ENGIE on this high-quality, scaled battery storage portfolio with a strong operating track record. This investment reflects our proven strategy of investing in infrastructure 2.0 assets that leverage the breadth of the CBRE IM platform and benefit from strong contracted revenue and macro digitalization and decarbonization tailwinds.”
Thus, this partnership supports ENGIE’s strategy to accelerate clean energy deployment.
Dave Carroll, Chief Renewables Officer and SVP, ENGIE North America, said,
“We are delighted that ENGIE and CBRE IM are partnering in this industry-leading transaction, supporting 2.4 GW of storage that will support the growing demand for power in Texas and California. The scale of this portfolio reflects ENGIE’s commitments to meeting the energy needs of the U.S. and increasing the resilience of the ERCOT and CAISO grids. CBRE IM’s investment reflects their confidence in ENGIE’s proven track record in developing, building, operating and financing renewable assets, both in North America and globally.”
North America’s Battery Storage Market Set to Soar by 2030
The battery energy storage market in North America is on a strong growth path. According to Grand View Research, the market is projected to hit $10.72 billion by 2030, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30.7% from 2024 to 2030.
Back in 2023, the market brought in around $1.65 billion in revenue. Among all applications, the commercial sector led the way, generating the highest revenue that year.
With rising demand for grid stability, clean energy integration, and backup power, battery storage systems are quickly becoming a key part of North America’s energy future.
North America battery energy storage systems market, 2018-2030 (US$M)

Another company that is growing its solar footprint across North America is SolarBank Corporation (NASDAQ: SUUN; Cboe CA: SUNN; FSE: GY2).
Recently, it signed a $100 million deal with a California-based real estate and infrastructure investor, CIM Group, to support solar projects of 97 megawatts (MW) across the country.
SolarBank also develops renewable energy projects in Canada and the USA, and its Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) project in Ontario is of paramount priority.
Leading the Storage Surge
In North America, ENGIE now has more than 11 GW of renewable and battery storage projects, both operating and under construction.
Of this, 25 grid-scale storage projects already deliver nearly 2 GW of capacity, and another 2 GW is being built. Globally, ENGIE aims to reach 10 GW of energy storage capacity by 2030.
Battery storage plays a key role in the energy transition. It helps balance the grid by storing electricity from renewable sources and releasing it when demand spikes or supply drops. This improves reliability and reduces emissions.
More Than Just Storage: ENGIE’s Full Energy Stack
ENGIE’s energy solutions go beyond batteries. The company delivers on-site solar with integrated storage, helping businesses reduce their energy costs while using clean power during peak demand hours.
It also develops district energy systems and central plants that provide heating, cooling, and electricity for large campuses, hospitals, and data centers.
In addition, ENGIE
- Builds microgrids for backup power during outages
- Designs electric vehicle charging stations for fleets.
- Upgrade HVAC systems, lighting, and building controls to boost energy efficiency.
- Converts organic waste into renewable natural gas
ENGIE supplies renewable energy directly to customers through long-term contracts and Renewable Energy Credits. It has been offering retail electricity in North America since 2002 and continues to support clients with customized green energy solutions, including both physical and virtual power purchase agreements.
Notably, its community solar programs have 100 MW of solar energy capacity.
Engie’s 2045 Net Zero Target
ENGIE has set bold climate targets. It plans to reach net zero across all scopes by 2045. By 2030, it aims for 80 GW of renewable capacity and wants renewables to make up 58% of its total electricity mix.
Recently, the company also signed a preliminary agreement with Cipher Mining Inc. to expand its renewable energy portfolio to supply 300 MW of clean wind energy to a new data center in Texas. This marks ENGIE’s entry into the AI-driven data infrastructure space with a sustainable twist.

Its greenhouse gas targets for 2030 include removing 43 million metric tons from electricity, heat, and cooling, 52 million metric tons from fossil gas use, and zero emissions from its operations.

ENGIE’s energy services also help customers avoid up to 45 million metric tons of emissions, making it a key player in global decarbonization.
In 2023, it reduced the carbon intensity of its energy production to 131.4 grams of CO₂ equivalent per kilowatt-hour, marking a 13.4% drop from 2022 and a 70.3% decrease since 2012.
The company’s Scope 1 emissions, which cover direct CO₂ emissions, dropped by more than 5.5 million tons throughout the year. It fell from 30 million tons in 2022 to 24.5 million tons in 2023, a total reduction of 18.2%.

ENGIE’s new partnership with CBRE Investment is a big step toward a cleaner energy future. By growing its battery storage projects in Texas and California, ENGIE is helping make the power grid more reliable and supporting America’s energy transition.
The post ENGIE Supercharges 2.4 GW Battery Storage in Texas & California with CBRE Partnership appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

