On September 20, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced over $3 billion in funding for 25 projects across 14 states. These initiatives are a part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Investing in America agenda, which aims to boost domestic production of advanced batteries and essential materials like lithium.
Unlocking DOE’s $3B Boost for a Stronger U.S. Battery Industry
Notably, this effort builds on the administration’s previous commitment of nearly $35 billion to strengthen U.S. critical minerals and battery supply chains. The $3 billion in grants for these new projects will help expand EV and energy storage production while reducing reliance on foreign supply chains, particularly China’s.
Furthermore, the selected projects will be administered by the U.S. DOE’s Office of Manufacturing and Energy Supply Chains (MESC). The main goals of the funding are:
- Build a robust domestic battery supply chain, including the production of key battery components like cathodes, anodes, and electrolyte materials. These elements are crucial for both current and next-generation battery technologies.
- Focus on constructing, expanding, and retrofitting facilities for battery production, recycling, and the processing of critical minerals, such as lithium, graphite, and manganese.
U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm emphasized the importance of this initiative, stating,
“We’re witnessing a manufacturing revival in America, thanks to the Investing in America agenda. By establishing the U.S. as a leader in battery manufacturing, we’re not only creating high-paying jobs but also securing our energy future and strengthening our global leadership.”
Battery manufacturing investment in the United States from 1st quarter 2022 to 2nd quarter 2024

Source: Statista
- READ MORE: The Clean Energy Powerhouses: US Lithium Imports Soar 49% and Argentina’s Copper Ambitions
Key Projects in Lithium Extraction and Recycling, A S&P Global Report
Arkansas and Texas
Among the new projects, the DOE awarded the two largest grants—$225 million each—for direct lithium extraction (DLE) initiatives. These projects will be based in Arkansas and Texas, both part of the Smackover Formation. SWA Lithium LLC, a joint venture of Standard Lithium Ltd. and Norway’s Equinor ASA, is one of the recipients. Their Arkansas-based project aims to produce 45,000 metric tons of battery-grade lithium carbonate per year.
The DOE also selected Terravolta Resources LLC for another $225 million grant for a DLE project located in the Texarkana region. This project will focus on producing 25,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate annually.
Another significant investment includes a $200 million grant to Cirba Solutions US Inc., which plans to build a lithium-ion battery recycling facility in Columbia, SC. The plant will recycle batteries from EVs, energy storage systems, and consumer electronics, processing up to 60,000 metric tons per year.
South Carolina and Michigan
The Cirba Solutions project is one of five selected facilities in South Carolina. It is joined by a $198.7 million grant awarded to EnerSys Advanced Systems Inc. to establish a new lithium-ion battery cell plant in Piedmont, SC, set to begin production in 2028 with an initial capacity of 5 GWh.
In Michigan, four projects were highlighted, including a $145 million grant for Revex Technologies Inc. to collaborate with Eagle Mine LLC, a subsidiary of Canada’s Lundin Mining Corp., on the REV Nickel Project. This initiative aims to process Eagle Mine waste and spent batteries to recover valuable materials.
Additionally, Mitra Future Technologies Inc. received a $100 million federal grant for a facility in Muskegon, focused on producing lithium iron phosphate cathode materials for electric vehicles, energy storage, and defense applications.
On the West Coast
The DOE also selected Group14 Technologies Inc. to negotiate a $200 million award for a silane production facility in Moses Lake, Washington. This facility will manufacture silicon-based anode materials. Furthermore, Form Energy Inc. received a $150 million grant to support its production of iron-air battery storage systems at a factory in Weirton, West Virginia.
Meanwhile, Reuters reported Albemarle is slated to receive $67 million for a project in North Carolina aimed at producing commercial quantities of anode material for next-generation lithium-ion batteries. Additionally, Honeywell will be awarded $126.6 million to build a commercial-scale facility in Louisiana that will produce a key electrolyte salt essential for lithium batteries.
The media agency also noted that DOE intends to grant DOW Chemical Company $100 million to manufacture battery-grade carbonate solvents for lithium-ion battery electrolytes. Others in the pipeline include Clarios Circular Solutions, in partnership with SK ON and Cosmo Chemical will receive $150 million for a project in South Carolina to recycle lithium-ion battery production scrap materials from SK ON, the battery division of SK Innovation.

A Bold Step Toward Economic and Energy Security
John Podesta, Senior Advisor to President Biden for International Climate Policy, remarked on the importance of securing EV and battery supply chains.
“The administration is using every tool available to onshore and ‘friend-shore’ supply chains. This will boost national security, strengthen our economy, and help combat the climate crisis,”
The press release mentions, the battery sector will see a total investment of $16 billion, which includes contributions from private companies. However, a significant purpose of the selected projects is job creation. Considering this, more than half of the 25 projects have committed to labor agreements and can potentially create 8,000 construction jobs and over 4,000 long-term operating jobs.
The next step for these projects involves a negotiation process with the DOE before funding is finalized. Environmental reviews will also be completed during this time. This groundbreaking investment boosts domestic battery manufacturing and strengthens the country’s leadership in the global clean energy transition.
Shifting Dynamics in the U.S. Battery Market
Batteries are crucial to enhancing the U.S. energy grid, powering homes and businesses, and supporting EVs. It’s a known fact that China has dominated the battery market, controlling key minerals like lithium, and rare earth elements. However, U.S. production is rising.
S&P Global forecasts suggest that domestic battery capacity will surge to 603 GWh by 2027 and 1,169 GWh by 2030, boosting the U.S. share of global battery capacity to 16%. In contrast, China’s share is expected to fall from 78% in 2023 to 58% by 2030.

The market research firm also noted, that China, which is the prime hub for big lithium-ion battery makers such as CATL and BYD, accounted for 82.2% of US battery imports in the second quarter of 2024.
The U.S. is intensifying efforts to boost domestic battery manufacturing by implementing robust measures to protect its interests. Furthermore, The Biden administration is introducing new tariffs on Chinese products, including lithium-ion batteries and EVs.
Lael Brainard remarked to S&P Global that these “tough, targeted measures” aim to counter unfair trade practices by China, enhancing the resilience of the U.S. supply chain. In response, China’s government criticized the tariffs, labeling them as a reflection of U.S. protectionism.
This effort not only propels the US battery industry forward but also drives innovation and minimizes dependence on foreign suppliers. All in all, it would position the country as a leader in clean energy, ensuring access to crucial materials, mainly lithium remains domestic.
The post DOE Supercharges the U.S. Battery and Critical Minerals Industry with $3 Billion Boost appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

