US utility analysts anticipate that discussions on first-quarter 2024 earnings calls will continue to be driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and data center power demand. Analysts highlighted data centers as a key theme, expecting talks on various aspects surrounding it.
Data Centers Powering Up Utility Investor Excitement
Data centers are power-hungry and their exploding energy needs create ripple effects on the power sector. The International Energy Agency estimates that power use in data centers will increase from 200 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2022 to 1,050 TWh in 2026, the same energy demand as Germany.

The company serving the largest data center market in the world, Dominion Energy Inc., currently focuses on building the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project, the nation’s largest once operational. The company has proposed delaying fossil fuel retirements and adding gas capacity due to anticipated growth in its service areas.
Dominion has also outlined a $43.2 billion capital plan for 2025–2029 following a 16-month business review.
Another analyst at Scotia Capital (USA), Andrew Weisel, noted that data centers’ robust demand for continuous power generates excitement among utility investors. However, questions remain about how customers will pay for increased capital expenditure (capex) and how companies will raise capital. These concerns arise from stubbornly high interest rates.
While Scotia Capital lowered target prices across the US utility sector due to rising interest rates, analysts expect companies to stick to their 2024 and long-term financial forecasts. Moreover, experts emphasized that utilities are generally in a good financial position and are likely to reaffirm their growth plans.
NextEra Energy Inc., the largest electric utility based on market cap, reported first-quarter 2024 adjusted earnings that surpassed expectations and reaffirmed its 6% to 8% long-term earnings per share (EPS) growth rate. The company expects adjusted EPS of $3.23 to $3.43 for 2024, followed by adjusted earnings of $3.45 to $3.70 per share for 2025 and $3.63 to $4.00 for 2026.

Analysts at BMO Capital Markets noted that the improvement in forward power prices has outpaced the movement in regional gas hub pricing. This indicates tightening conditions in the power market and validating investors’ optimistic outlook on the sector.
BMO expects Constellation, NRG Energy, and Vistra Corp. to experience a 33% increase in EPS compared to the previous year. Additionally, NextEra Energy, with nearly 60 GW of renewable generation capacity, could benefit from the increasing electricity needs of data centers.
Capitalizing on AI Boom and Surging Energy Demand
Among independent power producers, analysts anticipate a significant focus on strategies to capitalize on the growing demand for AI. This follows Talen Energy Corp.’s affiliate Cumulus Growth Holdings LLC’s sale of a hyperscale data center campus in Pennsylvania to Amazon Web Services Inc. for $650 million.
The facility boasts a capacity of up to 960 MW for data centers and will be powered by Talen’s 2,494-MW Susquehanna Nuclear power plant in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.
Recent reports from Morgan Stanley suggest that similar deals could emerge, highlighting the potential for merchant nuclear power plants to provide on-site generation for tech companies constructing data centers in the US. The reports identify generation assets totaling nearly 22 gigawatts (GW) as well-positioned to take advantage of this trend.
The reports also projected that AI power demand causing massive growth of data centers will rise to an annual average of 70% through 2027. Thus, electric utilities, particularly the regulated ones would invest in renewable energy and storage initiatives to cope with the demand.
In fact, renewable energy developers secured contracts for at least 4,012.6 MW of capacity in the 12 months. Tech companies will use them to power US data centers partially or entirely, per S&P Global Commodity Insights data.
Lagging Behind the Quick Pace
While some utilities are racing to power data centers, some may not be quick enough to keep pace.
Rudy Garza, CEO of CPS Energy, highlights the urgency of meeting the massive power demands of these facilities, which often require hundreds of megawatts of electricity in short timeframes, unlike traditional industrial plants with longer lead times.
This immediate need for power presents a formidable challenge for utilities striving to keep pace with the relentless growth of data-driven industries.
Philip Nevels of AES Corp. echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the monumental task of accommodating the anticipated surge in capacity needs driven by AI and data centers. Nevels further acknowledges the inherent limitations in scaling up renewables fast enough to meet the escalating demand.
Meanwhile, Kevin Chandra of Austin Energy underscores the importance of collaborative planning to address the spatial distribution of data center loads effectively. Shaun Hoyte of Consolidated Edison Inc. emphasizes the critical role of redundancy and resiliency in grid planning to mitigate potential disruptions caused by the increasing concentration of data centers.
Sunny Elebua of Exelon Corp. acknowledges the benefits of load growth in advancing decarbonization efforts and optimizing grid utilization. However, Elebua also highlights the challenges posed by the retirement of baseload generation and the evolving supply stack, emphasizing the importance of ensuring resource adequacy amidst these transitions.
In navigating these complexities, utilities recognize the need for state-level support to streamline regulatory processes and facilitate the rapid deployment of energy infrastructure to meet data center demands.
In summary, the proliferation of AI and data centers is reshaping the energy landscape, presenting both opportunities and challenges for utilities worldwide. As the demand for data-driven services continues to escalate, proactive collaboration, strategic planning, and innovative solutions are essential to ensure a resilient and sustainable energy future.
The post Data Centers Power Demand Fuel U.S. Utility Q1 Earnings Discussions appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

