Across Canada—and around the world—Indigenous Peoples are bearing the brunt of climate change, not because of their own emissions or consumption patterns, but because of long-standing colonial systems that continue to marginalize their rights and voices. “Climate colonialism” refers to how global climate responses, extractive economies, and market-based solutions to environmental crises reinforce colonial structures and power imbalances. These systems often lead to the exploitation of Indigenous lands and resources while ignoring or undermining Indigenous sovereignty, knowledge, and governance.
Colonialism and the Environmental Frontlines
In Canada, the legacy of settler colonialism is embedded in ongoing industrial and state projects that threaten Indigenous territories and lifeways. Although Indigenous Peoples consistently raised concerns, Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) was never fully realized, as the project moved forward without meaningful resolution or satisfaction of those concerns by the developers.
The Site C hydroelectric dam on Treaty 8 territory flooded thousands of hectares of land that are vital to the cultural and subsistence practices of the Athabaskan and Cree-speaking Peoples. Despite court challenges and community opposition, the project proceeded, highlighting the systemic disregard for Indigenous governance in energy development.
Similarly, in Alberta, the Athabasca tar sands—one of the world’s most significant industrial projects—have devastated the lands, water, and health of nearby First Nations, including the Mikisew Cree and Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation. In both cases, colonial environmental governance continues to prioritize profit and national energy agendas over Indigenous well-being and rights.
According to the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), over 120 major resource development projects are located within 200 km of First Nations communities across Canada. These projects pose ecological risks and contribute to cumulative social, economic, and health harms.
Global Parallels: Carbon Colonialism and Market Mechanisms
Climate colonialism also plays out globally through international carbon markets and finance mechanisms. Programs like REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) were initially promoted as conservation strategies to reduce global carbon emissions. However, many Indigenous Peoples in the Global South have criticized REDD+ for criminalizing traditional land use practices, restricting access to forests, and enabling land grabs under the guise of carbon offsetting.
These market-based mechanisms commodify forests and lands for their carbon sequestration potential without acknowledging the historical and cultural stewardship Indigenous Peoples have with these landscapes. A similar trend is emerging in Canada as provinces and corporations explore Nature-Based Climate Solutions and carbon offsetting projects on Indigenous lands—again, often without full community participation or consent.
A Call for Decolonial Climate Justice
To dismantle climate colonialism, climate policy must shift from top-down, technocratic solutions to frameworks grounded in decolonial justice, Indigenous law, and local/regional community-led approaches. Indigenous Peoples are not only protectors of biodiversity and climate stewards but also inherent and treaty rights holders whose jurisdiction and authority must be recognized and respected.
Indigenous climate leadership is gaining ground through movements like Indigenous Climate Action, Idle No More, and the Land Back movement, which assert that returning land to its rightful stewards and restoring ecological and traditional governance are foundational to achieving real climate solutions. These movements challenge the extractivist logic embedded in mainstream environmentalism and offer powerful alternatives rooted in relationality, reciprocity, and responsibility to land and future generations.
Reference Points
- Assembly of First Nations, Resource Development Reports: https://www.afn.ca
- The Red Nation, The Red Deal: https://therednation.org
- Tuck, Eve and Yang, K. Wayne (2012). Decolonization is Not a Metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society.
- McGregor, Deborah (2021). Indigenous Environmental Justice and Sustainability (Various works, York University): https://profiles.laps.yorku.ca/profiles/dmcgregor/
- Indigenous Environmental Network: https://www.ienearth.org
Blog by Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock
(Image Credit: Casey Horner, Unsplash)
The post Climate Colonialism: Unpacking the Global Systems Impacting Indigenous Territories appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.
Climate Colonialism: Unpacking the Global Systems Impacting Indigenous Territories
Climate Change
Maine Presses Pause on Large Data Centers. Will Other States Follow Its Lead?
The moratorium is the first of its type to pass a legislative chamber, but about a dozen other states have pending proposals.
Maine is now the first state to pass a moratorium on the development of large data centers, and others may follow.
Maine Presses Pause on Large Data Centers. Will Other States Follow Its Lead?
Climate Change
Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule
The Trump EPA’s repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding revokes the agency’s authority to regulate climate pollution. Environmental activists are mourning the loss while vowing to resurrect it.
A procession of mourners representing sea level rise, melting permafrost, ecocide and other climate calamities grieved the demise of a groundbreaking climate rule outside the Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 9 headquarters in downtown San Francisco on Tuesday.
Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule
Climate Change
IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day
Global oil demand is expected to be almost one million barrels per day less than was forecast before the Iran war, as shortages and soaring costs prompt drastic cutbacks by consumers and businesses, a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Wednesday.
With the closure of the Strait of Hormuz choking off supplies and keeping prices high, less oil is being used to make products such as jet fuel, LPG cooking gas and petrochemicals, the Paris-based IEA said in its monthly oil report, forecasting the biggest quarterly demand drop since the COVID pandemic.
The Iran war “upends our global outlook”, the government-backed agency said, adding that it now expects oil demand to shrink by 80,000 barrels per day in 2026 from last year.
Before the conflict began, the IEA said in February it expected oil demand to rise by 850,000 barrels per day this year, meaning the difference between the pre-war and current estimates is 930,000 barrels a day, or 340 million barrels a year.
That could have a significant impact on the outlook for planet-heating carbon emissions this year.
At an intensity of 434 kg of carbon dioxide per barrel of oil – the estimate used by the US Environmental Protection Agency – the annual reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from oil for 2026, compared with the pre-war forecast, is similar to the amount emitted by the Philippines each year.
Harry Benham, senior advisor at Carbon Tracker, told Climate Home News that he expects at least half of the reduction in oil demand to be permanent because of efficiency gains, behavioural change and faster electrification.
The oil shock is leading to oil being replaced, especially in transport, with electricity and other fuels, just as past oil shocks drove lasting reductions in consumption, he said. “The shock doesn’t delay the transition – it reinforces it,” he added.
Demand takes a hit
While demand for oil has fallen significantly, supplies have fallen even further. Supply in March was 10 million barrels a day less than February, the IEA said, calling it the “largest disruption in history”.
This forecast relies on the assumption that regular deliveries of oil and gas from the Middle East will resume by the middle of the year, the IEA said, although the prospects for this “remain unclear at this stage”.
Last month, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the CERAWeek oil industry conference that prices were not high enough to lead to permanent reductions in demand for oil, known as demand destruction.
But the IEA said on Wednesday that “demand destruction will spread as scarcity and higher prices persist”.
Industries contributing to weaker demand for oil include Asian petrochemical producers, who are cutting production as oil supplies dry up, the report said, while consumers are cutting back on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which is mainly used as a cooking gas in developing countries, the IEA said.
Flight cancellations caused by the war have dampened demand for oil-based jet fuel, the IEA said. As well as cancellations caused by risk from the conflict itself, airports have warned that fuel shortages could lead to disruption.
Across the world, governments, businesses and consumers have sought to reduce their oil use after the war. The government of Pakistan has cut the speed limit on its roads, so that people drive at a more fuel-efficient speed, and Laos has encouraged people to work from home to preserve scarce petrol and diesel.
Nepal’s EV revolution pays off as oil crisis causes pain at the pumps
Consumers in Bangladesh are seeking electric vehicles (EVs) to avoid fuel queues and, in Nigeria, more people are seeking to replace petrol and diesel generators with solar panels, Climate Home News has reported.
In the longer term, the European Union is considering cutting taxes on electricity to help it replace fossil fuels and France is promoting EVs and heat pumps.
IEA urged to help “future-proof” economies
Meanwhile, the IEA came under fire last week from energy security experts, including former military chiefs, who signed an open letter in which they accused the agency of offering “only a temporary response to turbulent markets”, calling for stronger structural action “to future-proof our economies”.
They said that besides releasing emergency oil stocks and offering advice on how to reduce oil demand in the short term, the IEA should show countries how to reduce their exposure to volatile oil and gas markets.
The IEA has also been under pressure from the Trump administration to talk less about the transition away from fossil fuels.
This article was amended on 15 April 2026 to correct the drop in 2026 forecast oil demand from “nearly a billion” to “nearly a million”
The post IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day appeared first on Climate Home News.
IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits



