Connect with us

Published

on

Welcome to Carbon Brief’s China Briefing.

Carbon Brief handpicks and explains the most important climate and energy stories from China over the past fortnight. Subscribe for free here.

Snapshot 

EV INVESTIGATION: China deemed the “formal” launch of the EU’s investigation into Chinese subsidies for electric vehicles as a “naked act of protectionism”, but refrained from making similarly strong public remarks during a visit from EU trade commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis.

DOUBLING NUCLEAR: The China Nuclear Energy Association said China can greenlight six to eight new nuclear power units a year, with the technology’s share of electricity doubling to 10% by 2035 and then 18% by 2060.

TREE RULES: China reformed communal forest tenure systems to encourage environmental protection and provide another revenue stream for low-income rural households. The rules could encourage the development of carbon sinks – or increase logging activity.

SPOTLIGHT: As China’s “belt and road initiative” celebrates its tenth anniversary, Carbon Brief asked four experts what it could mean for climate action in the decade ahead.

NEW SCIENCE: Studies found that citizens experience relatively limited levels of “energy justice” under China’s implementation of energy transition policies and, separately, that there were “substantial health co-benefits” from residential decarbonisation, particularly in northern China.

Key developments

EU split over Chinese EV probe 

EV SPLIT: The European Commission has “formally launched” an anti-subsidies probe into electric vehicles manufactured in China, a process that should last one year, reported Bloomberg. The investigation was triggered by a request from France, according to the Hong-Kong based news outlet the South China Morning Post (SCMP). France has already changed “eligibility rules” to “make sure French state cash is not benefiting Chinese carmakers”, reported Reuters. But German chancellor Olaf Scholz has opposed the commission’s move on the grounds that “our economic model should not be based or rely on protectionism”, reported another Reuters article. The bloc’s solar, wind and battery manufacturers have also sought support to compete against cheap Chinese competition, reported SCMP. German-language business newspaper Handelsblatt said the EU plans policies to make its wind industry more competitive with Chinese manufacturers. 

CHINA’S REACTION: Beijing repeated its “strong dissatisfaction” with the investigation, calling it “a naked act of protectionism”, reported state news agency Xinhua. However, Bloomberg noted that China did not “publicly” share that criticism during commission executive vice-president Valdis Dombrovskis’ four-day trip to the country, shying away from confrontation amid “a broader push to stabilise geopolitical relationships [and] an economic slowdown at home”. Another Bloomberg article said that Tesla will be a significant focus of the EU investigation, having “enjoyed perks in China that other international companies struggled to obtain”. Elsewhere, Xie Zhenhua, China’s special envoy for climate change, “stressed the importance of opposing trade protectionism” at a summit in China, reported CGTN, a state-affiliated Chinese media outlet. The Communist party-backed People’s Daily published a commentary under the “Zhongyin” byline – a nom de plume for top party leadership – saying the fact that “more than 60% of the world’s new energy vehicles are produced and sold in China” was an example of the country’s economic dynamism.

METALS SCRAP: Meanwhile, debate continues over China’s dominance of critical mineral supply chains, with the Financial Times reporting comments by US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm saying the situation could make the global energy transition “infinitely more complex”. China’s export of germanium, used for making solar panels and other technologies, fell to “zero” in August after the government imposed export controls, reported TechSpot. At the same time, China has told local EV companies to procure chips and other components domestically to “set up a self-sufficient EV supply chain”, reported DigiTimes Asia. However, Reuters reported that US firm AXT and a number of unnamed Chinese firms had received export licences in September for “gallium and germanium products” for certain customers.

Growing role for nuclear 

10% BY 2035: Nuclear power’s share is expected to double to 10% of China’s electricity by 2035 and then grow to 18% by 2060, with installed capacity climbing from 57 gigawatts (GW) today to 400GW by 2060, according to the China Nuclear Energy Association (CNEA), Reuters reported. The outlet said China expected to approve “six to eight new nuclear power units” every year from now on. The state-run newspaper China Daily quoted Wang Binghua, the director of CNEA’s nuclear energy public communication committee, as telling the Paper: “In the context of achieving both the carbon goals and ensuring economic growth, nuclear energy has demonstrated its irreplaceable advantages.” According to the outlet, he said reaching the 10% projection would cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by about 920m tonnes over this period. (For more background, see Carbon Brief’s Q&A: How China is using nuclear power to reduce its carbon emissions.)

SHIFTING VIEWS: Meanwhile, China Daily published comments made in a speech by  International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director general Rafael Grossi, who said that the public’s view towards nuclear energy has shifted. He stated that the “emergency” brought about by climate change was “undeniable” and that nuclear energy could play a “positive role” as part of the solution. “In the past few years, we have not been vocal enough about the benefits of nuclear power, but that page has been turned,” he added.  

New forestry rules

CARBON SINKS: China released a plan to reform its communal forest tenure system in order to “enhance farmers’ incomes and promote green growth”, reported state news media CGTN. One aim of the plan is to “improve forest quality”, the outlet said, adding that “green industries, such as ecological tourism, maintaining healthy forests and environmental education” will be established. Business news outlet 21st Century Daily noted in an opinion column that the plan “encourages eligible places to carry out forestry carbon sink projects and establish a forestry carbon sink trading market”. The Legal Daily reported that the measures call for provinces to “strengthen the supply capacity of important primary forest products…and encourage provinces, cities and counties with forest resources to cultivate forestry ‘pillar industries’”. In an email to subscribers, consultancy Trivium China said the reforms could lead to greater logging activity.

CCER TRADING: Meanwhile, business news outlet Jiemian published comments by experts on the inclusion of forestry carbon sinks in China’s certified voluntary emission reductions scheme (CCERs). They explained some of the risks involved in the scheme, including guarding against oversupply, filling “legal gaps” in the policy framework and finalising mechanisms for distributing the proceeds of credit sales.

China’s ‘key role’ at COP28

CLIMATE DIPLOMACY: COP28 president-designate Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber wrote in an opinion article for state news agency Xinhua that China will play a “key role” in delivering on a COP28 agenda that “aims at fast-tracking an equitable and orderly energy transition, fixing climate finance, and focusing on people’s lives and livelihoods, while underpinning everything with full inclusivity”. He added that China is critical both for “driving clean energy adoption” in the global south and for supplying funding to support other developing nations’ energy transitions. Separately, China News quoted Zhang Jun, China’s permanent representative to the United Nations, as saying that China’s climate actions stand in sharp contrast to the “empty promises” of western nations. Elsewhere, Foreign Policy said foreign minister Wang Yi is expected to travel to the US in October to manage their “increasingly frosty relations” and to “pave the way for a highly anticipated, but still unscheduled meeting between US president Joe Biden and Chinese president Xi Jinping”. 

COAL CONTINUES: Meanwhile, speaking at a forum in Beijing, China’s climate envoy Xie Zhenhua said that the “complete phasing-out of fossil fuels is not realistic”, reported Reuters. This came as Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post covered a report from energy consultancy Rystad Energy finding that “China will increase its coal consumption until 2026 and will only record declines after 2027”.

Spotlight 

How will China’s belt and road initiative impact climate action?

China will host the third Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation this month, as “2023 mark[s] the 10th anniversary of the belt and road initiative (BRI)”, Reuters reported. More than 110 countries are set to attend

The BRI is a global infrastructure project that aims to develop transcontinental trade routes between China and the rest of the world. With China having stated an intention to pivot the initiative towards low-carbon energy development, Carbon Brief asks leading experts what impact the BRI might have on climate action in the decade ahead. Their responses have been edited for clarity and length.

Prof Kevin P Gallagher, director of the Boston University Global Development Policy Center:

As the BRI moves into its second decade, China can solidify its pivot toward low-carbon development in the global south. According to our research at the Boston University Global Development Policy Center, in the early stages of the BRI the majority of China’s overseas energy finance was…in fossil fuels in general and coal-fired power plants in particular. Emissions from the operating Chinese-financed power plants around the world now emit upwards of 245m tonnes of CO2 annually, roughly the energy-related CO2 emissions from the entire country of Spain or Thailand annually. In 2021, China announced it would not build new coal-fired power projects abroad and to step up support for low-carbon development. Moving forward, China could pledge to ramp up overseas financing for low carbon development and adopt a green project pipeline facility to ensure alignment with these directives. 

Prof Lin Boqiang, dean of the China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy, Xiamen University:

In some countries along the “belt and road”, despite the rapid growth of energy demand, the development of green energy is limited due to their relatively backward economic and technological level and the lack of advanced clean-energy technology and facilities. Through the construction of renewable energy projects, such as wind and solar power, China can provide technical, financial and experience support to host countries to promote the development and upgrading of their renewable energy industries. By providing more clean-energy supplies to these countries…China helps them reduce their dependence on traditional energy sources and promotes energy transformation and green development. At the same time, some countries along the belt and road have problems such as unstable energy supply, energy poverty and low energy efficiency…Cooperation to develop renewable energy projects…will help these countries improve their energy security and promote sustainable development along the belt and road.

Yasiru Ranaraja, founding director of the Belt and Road Initiative Sri Lanka (BRISL)

China’s commitment to shift the BRI towards low-carbon energy development has significant implications for climate action in the coming decade…China, through the BRI, has emerged as a crucial player in advocating a three-phase approach to low-carbon development: funding, construction and operation. Under the BRI umbrella, numerous infrastructure projects…are dedicated to green development…For example, in Sri Lanka, the Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT), which is an investment development project under BRI, has embraced green technology since its inception in 2014.

This terminal has witnessed a remarkable increase in cargo volumes over the years while prioritising environmental sustainability. The shift to electric cranes has resulted in a 45% reduction in CO2 emissions and a 95% decrease in diesel consumption…Additionally, more than 80% of the terminal’s electricity comes from solar technology. The terminal’s success story…exemplifies how commercial prosperity and environmental protection can coexist harmoniously.

Prof Christoph Nedopil Wang, director of the Griffith Asia Institute, Griffith University:

China controls almost all parts of the green-energy supply chain – from critical minerals for batteries to wafer production for solar, from manufacturing wind turbines to the necessary financing. Without China’s cooperation, a green-energy transition is hardly achievable – whether in the BRI or beyond…BRI countries, meanwhile, must improve their energy planning, energy policy and power markets to be able to attract sufficient Chinese investments in green energy. This should include a phase-down of fossil subsidies and better utilisation of blended finance to reduce financing cost for green energies, as well as longer-term green energy PPAs (power purchase agreements). A big question remains on the accelerated phase-down of Chinese sponsored coal-fired power plants and replacement with green energy. A recent study by the Green Finance & Development Center and Climate Smart Ventures shows significant financial benefits for Chinese sponsors of plants in Vietnam and Pakistan when accelerating retirement and replacement.

Watch, read, listen

PEAK OIL: The Financial Times explored the tension that exists between China’s role as the largest global consumer of oil and the minor role that oil plays in China’s energy mix, following comments by the chief executive of one of China’s largest oil companies that “perhaps this year China’s domestic oil demand will reach a peak”.

CRITICAL MINERALS: In the third part of a series on China and energy geopolitics, the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies discussed China’s importance for the critical minerals used in new energy supply chains and what its dominance could mean for the future. 

METHANE RESEARCH: The Woodrow Wilson Center interviewed Dr Hu Tao, founder of the Lakestone Institute for Sustainable Development, on his institute’s work on methane mitigation from food waste and manure in China, as well as on his views on how China’s voluntary carbon credit scheme (CCERs) could mitigate agricultural methane.

MARKET MECHANISMS: Caixin published part of the upcoming report on China’s “carbon neutral strategy and path selection”, written by the Boao Forum for Asia Academy. The report advocates improving market mechanisms to support a “just” energy transition, such as research investment, carbon markets, power grid pricing and funding non-renewable “clean” energy solutions. 

New science 

Costs and health benefits of the rural energy transition to carbon neutrality in China
Nature Communications

A study found that residential decarbonisation “would remarkably improve air quality in northern China, yielding substantial health co-benefits”. Decarbonising rural cooking and heating, the researchers added, “would triple contemporary energy consumption from 2014 to 2060”, which would considerably reduce energy poverty in China. The effects would be most strongly felt in Shandong, Heilongjiang, Shanxi and Hebei provinces.

Assessing energy justice in climate change policies: an empirical examination of China’s energy transition
Climate Policy

A new study explored “key aspects of energy transition policy implementation in China” through the lens of distributional, recognition and procedural justice. From a case study assessing China’s ‘coal-to-gas’ energy transition policy in rural regions, it found a “markedly low” level of procedural justice, linked to poor access to political participation and low transparency. It also found “insufficient acknowledgment of the needs of specific groups” during the energy transition. By contrast, the level of distributional justice, defined as equitable allocation of benefits, was “reasonably high”. 

China Briefing is compiled by Anika Patel and edited by Wanyuan Song and Simon Evans. Please send tips and feedback to china@carbonbrief.org.

The post China Briefing 5 October: EV investigation; Forest rules; BRI and climate   appeared first on Carbon Brief.

China Briefing 5 October: EV investigation; Forest rules; BRI and climate  

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Let’s make good trouble for Climate Justice Education

Published

on

Dear people, we’ve had a sweet few years and built a movement sweeping across North America to bring quality climate change and climate justice education to our children and youth, building their interdisciplinary capacity to understand the climate crisis and build solutions. Five states — California, Connecticut, Illinois, New Jersey and New York — now mandate climate change education. This movement has given me hope because the impact of education ripples out for generations. Climate change and justice education is a critical solution to the crisis.

We are soon to lose the ground we have traveled by the Trump administration’s actions. Public education is under attack and in real peril. Climate change science resources on government websites have gone dark. Federally funded organizations are taking down curricular offerings that are grounded in justice and equity out of fear. The very vocabulary of the single most important challenge of our time is being banned.

Big Oil has been influencing under-resourced educators and infiltrating schools in the U.S. for decades and a recent report from Canada paints a stark picture of the depth and deliberate nature of the manipulation. In Oklahoma, the oil and gas industry has even found a way to extract value out of underfunded schools by filling the void in training and curriculum development with industry propaganda. Science lessons, developed by the Oklahoma Energy Resources Board are pro fossil fuel extraction propaganda and omit any references to climate change or toxic water and air pollution.

It takes some effort these days to not fall into despair. I love learning about all the small acts of disruption and sabotage. I love that the climate change education folks have gathered together to say ‘hell no.’ We are proud to be in partnership with CLEAN and ISKME who are moving curriculum and resources taken down from government and government funded websites to the OER Commons, a public digital library of open educational resources. (Sign up here for a series of webinars on the future of Climate Literacy).

It’s never too late to make sure that our movement of climate education for all isn’t stopped and ensure that our young people get the quality climate change education they deserve. Education Unions are fighting back, community based climate justice education organizations are fighting back. Communities across the country continue to fight for justice in our school systems. Our youth continue to organize for the Climate Justice Education Bill here in Minnesota. There are many ways to engage in good trouble. The future is in our hands and hearts. Will you join us?

Susan Phillips

Susan Phillips
Executive Director

The post Let’s make good trouble for Climate Justice Education appeared first on Climate Generation.

Let’s make good trouble for Climate Justice Education

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Proposing A Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience: A Vision for the Future

Published

on

In the face of escalating climate change challenges, Indigenous Peoples worldwide remain steadfast as the stewards of the Earth’s most ecologically vital regions. Their knowledge systems, sciences, and philosophies have sustained human and non-human relations with nature for millennia, offering profound insights into resilience and adaptation. Recognizing this, establishing a Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience would be a monumental step toward leveraging Indigenous expertise in shaping a sustainable future.

This imagined Indigenous-led institution would provide a global platform for Indigenous Nations to unify their voices and influence climate policy, adaptation strategies, and resource management. Free from political interference, this Centre would operate on co-definition, co-design, and co-development principles—ensuring the perspectives of Indigenous communities, ecosystems, and non-human relations are equally represented in shaping the planet’s future.

Serving as a hub of innovation and action, where Indigenous leaders, scientists, policymakers, educators, and knowledge keepers collaborate on meaningful solutions. The Centre would focus on preserving Indigenous ways of knowing and integrating them into cutting-edge climate science, policy development, and implementation strategies.

Four Critical Pillars of Climate Action

To address the pressing issues of climate change, the Centre would focus on four fundamental pillars universally recognized within climate action frameworks:

  1. Climate Change Adaptation

Adaptation is the process of adjusting to current and expected climate conditions. Indigenous knowledge systems have long mastered adaptation, developing ways to work harmoniously with natural cycles. The Centre would facilitate:

  • Knowledge-sharing hubs that connect Indigenous Nations and researchers across different regions, ensuring that adaptation strategies are customized to diverse environments, from the Arctic to the Amazon.
  • Community-driven initiatives focus on reviving traditional ecological knowledge, such as sustainable water management, climate-resilient agriculture, and nature-based solutions to prevent soil erosion, flooding, and habitat loss.
  • Education and training programs tailored for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities to implement adaptation solutions that honour the land, promoting resilient food systems, wildfire mitigation, and habitat restoration.
  • Developing climate-resilient infrastructure using Indigenous construction methods that have been perfected over generations, such as passive heating and cooling techniques, eco-friendly building materials, and sustainable urban planning.
  1. Climate Change Mitigation

 Mitigation focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing natural carbon sinks. Indigenous Nations have maintained balanced ecosystems for centuries, making them essential leaders in climate mitigation. The Centre would:

  • Advocate for sustainable land management practices, such as rotational grazing, agroforestry, and controlled burns, which have been scientifically proven to increase biodiversity and carbon sequestration.
  • Support Indigenous-led renewable energy projects, including off-grid solar, wind, and hydroelectric initiatives that provide clean energy while respecting the land and natural cycles.
  • Develop policies promoting circular economies, reducing dependency on extractive industries, and fostering regenerative economic practices that emphasize environmental harmony over mass consumption.
  • Enhance forest and ocean conservation efforts by expanding Indigenous land tenure rights and supporting Indigenous-led initiatives that protect rainforests, mangroves, and marine ecosystems—some of the planet’s most significant carbon sinks.
  1. Resilience and Restoration

 Resilience is about building stronger ecosystems and communities in response to climate disruptions. Indigenous approaches recognize that nature itself is a regenerator, and human intervention should focus on supporting these natural cycles. The Centre would:

  • Implement land and water healing initiatives, applying Indigenous ecological restoration practices such as wetland renewal, seed banking, and permaculture to revitalize degraded ecosystems.
  • Promote Indigenous architecture and urban planning models, ensuring that future city and community development aligns with land-based principles rather than extractive, unsustainable infrastructure.
  • Establish cooperative agreements with global institutions, ensuring Indigenous ecological governance is fully integrated into international resilience strategies, from the UN to grassroots environmental organizations.
  • Develop Indigenous-led disaster response frameworks, incorporating traditional knowledge in disaster mitigation, early warning systems, and emergency response planning.
  1. Policy and Governance

 Effective climate action requires policy reform grounded in Indigenous worldviews. This Centre would advocate for Indigenous-led policies at the global level and work towards embedding Indigenous governance in national and international climate strategies. This includes:

  • Creating an Indigenous Climate Policy Advisory Council that influences global climate agreements, ensuring that Indigenous perspectives are represented at climate negotiations such as COP summits.
  • Establishing legal protections for Indigenous lands, advocating for international recognition of Indigenous land rights as essential to climate mitigation and biodiversity protection.
  • Partnering with governments, academic institutions, and NGOs to promote co-managed conservation areas where Indigenous governance and traditional ecological knowledge inform land-use policies.
  • Leading policy reform efforts to ensure Indigenous values—such as the Seven Generations Model—are incorporated into long-term climate planning, shifting away from short-term profit-driven models.

The Professions Needed for Success

To operate effectively, the Centre would require a diverse range of Indigenous professionals, including:

  • Climate Scientists & Environmental Researchers – Experts in Indigenous earth sciences, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration.
  • Traditional Knowledge Keepers & Elders – To ensure teachings and methodologies are rooted in cultural wisdom and land-based traditions.
  • Community Planners & Architects – Specialists in sustainable Indigenous urban design and eco-friendly infrastructure.
  • Legal Experts & Policy Advocates – Champions for Indigenous rights in climate governance and policy frameworks.
  • Agricultural and Forestry Specialists – Practitioners of regenerative farming and forest management.
  • Water and Marine Experts – Leaders in protecting freshwater and oceanic ecosystems.
  • Data Analysts & AI Specialists – To integrate Indigenous knowledge with emerging technologies for climate modelling.

How This Centre Benefits the World

The proposed Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience would benefit Indigenous communities and serve as a transformative model for non-Indigenous Nations. By demonstrating effective climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, the Centre would inspire global partnerships that prioritize ecosystem health over profit-driven agendas.

Examples of its impact include:

  • Guiding governments in climate-resilient land management through Indigenous stewardship models.
  • Assisting corporations in transitioning to sustainable business practices, ensuring economic growth aligns with ecological responsibility.
  • Providing training for urban and regional planners to integrate Indigenous land-use principles into modern cities, fostering more resilient communities.
  • Enhancing conservation efforts by implementing Indigenous-led biodiversity protection initiatives, ensuring that conservation efforts do not displace Indigenous communities but rather empower them as stewards of the land.

A Call to Action

Indigenous Peoples are not passive observers in the climate discourse; they are the solution-bearers. It is time for the world to listen, learn, and act—for the benefit of all life on Mother Earth. By establishing a Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience, we take a monumental step toward securing a future that honours the land, respects ancestral knowledge, and provides a sustainable path forward for all.

(Disclaimer: The proposed Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience is not a project in progress by the author—it provides information and inspiration for consideration by academics, NGOs, and climate leaders. All ideas presented are open-source, and organizations and individuals are welcome to use the information to benefit climate change initiatives and projects.)

– By Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

(Image Credit: ChatGPT AI-Generated Image)

The post Proposing A Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience: A Vision for the Future appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

Proposing A Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience: A Vision for the Future

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Decolonizing Urban and Regional Planning: Haudenosaunee Knowledge, Stewardship, and Climate Adaptation

Published

on

As an Indigenous geography scholar and researcher, I increasingly focus on the realities of climate change and its profound impact on ecology. In a recent class I co-instructed at the Queen’s University School of Urban and Regional Planning, I introduced students to ancestral Indigenous planning, centring on a 12th-century Iroquoian community model. The discussion illuminated how human interactions with the land and natural resources were determinants of community planning and fundamental to sustaining the delicate balance of human and non-human relations.

Exploring the interrelationship of people and place through the cultural geography of the Haudenosaunee, we delved into how identity itself is shaped by land and its natural actors. For a class filled with aspiring urban and regional planners—along with three practicing city planners—the experience was transformative. It quickly became apparent that planning must move beyond rigid zoning practices and embrace place-based autonomy, where decision-making aligns with the rhythms and needs of the land itself.

Haudenosaunee Knowledge and Climate Adaptation

The prevailing mindset in modern urban and regional planning has long been dictated by frameworks rooted in industrialization, urban sprawl, and resource extraction. Much of the profession adheres to highly regulated, standardized practices that prioritize short-term economic gain over long-term environmental sustainability. Yet Indigenous planning offers a profound alternative that considers the interconnectedness of people, land, and ecological cycles.

This perspective challenges the conventional notion that humans design space for habitation; instead, it asserts that we must enhance and harmonize with the natural rhythms of place. When we examined Haudenosaunee planning principles, students responded with genuine curiosity and awe. Concepts such as ensuring the autonomy of water sources were central to settlement adaptation, using topography for protection, and identifying prime lands for cultivation were revelatory for many.

The more students engaged with this knowledge, the more they recognized that contemporary urban and regional planning must evolve to address the growing need for sustainable living. Climate change is no longer a future concern—it is here and reshaping our landscapes. If planners and policymakers fail to integrate climate adaptation and Indigenous value systems into their frameworks, they risk perpetuating unsustainable models that continue to degrade the environment.

The Iroquoian Longhouse: A Model for Sustainable Design

A compelling example of Indigenous planning is the Iroquoian longhouse, a structure that served as both shelter and a communal space. Built from natural materials such as elm bark, the longhouse was constructed with deep respect for the land—only taking what was necessary, ensuring sustainability, and allowing trees to replenish. The longhouse’s design reflected a life-cycle systems approach; structures were built for 30 to 40 years before being returned to the earth, where they naturally decomposed and reintegrated into the landscape.

Image Source: Wikimedia Commons (‘Exterior View of Traditional Iroquois Longhouse’).

The students were fascinated by the idea that communal spaces were designed with a finite yet renewable existence. In contrast, modern urban development often prioritizes permanence and expansion, creating structures that outlive their usefulness, contributing to urban decay and environmental strain. What if, instead, our urban centers were designed with adaptability in mind? What if materials used in construction aligned with ecological cycles rather than being treated as disposable waste?

The Power of Education in Transforming Urban Planning

Education systems are critical in fostering openness to new ideas and methodologies. However, much of the current urban planning curriculum is rooted in post-war suburban development models emphasizing efficiency, uniformity, and mass production. Integrating Indigenous value systems, environmental determinants, and climate change considerations into planning education is essential in fostering a holistic, future-focused approach to community development.

The challenge, of course, lies in decolonizing the profession itself. Innovation in urban and regional planning is often stifled in favour of “tried and true” practices prioritizing economic stability over ecological well-being. Yet, if planners are to truly serve the needs of future generations, they must expand their thinking beyond conventional models. Indigenous planning philosophies, such as those practiced by the Haudenosaunee, represent just one of the hundreds of cultural contributions that can help reshape human-centred design into more inclusive and regenerative.

A Call to Action: Expanding Thought, Embracing Change

If climate change is to be effectively addressed in community development, it must be at the forefront of planning discussions, not an afterthought. Recognizing the significance of place-based planning, environmental stewardship, and Indigenous knowledge systems is not an elective enhancement but a necessary revolution.

Urban and regional planning must evolve beyond rigid regulations and embrace the knowledge that has sustained Indigenous communities for millennia. The interconnectedness of land, water, climate, and human habitation must become central to planning efforts. This requires an intentional shift in education that welcomes new perspectives, cultural inclusivity, and Indigenous methodologies as fundamental learning components. It is not merely about integrating Indigenous knowledge for inclusion but about recognizing its profound value in creating sustainable, resilient, and thriving communities.

In the face of climate change, the question is no longer whether we need change but whether we are willing to embrace it. The wisdom of Indigenous planning offers a pathway forward, one rooted in reciprocity, sustainability, and deep respect for the land. Now is the time to expand our thinking, decolonize our approaches, and integrate climate consciousness into planning.

For the future of our communities, ecosystems, and generations, we must choose transformation over stagnation, reciprocity over exploitation, and sustainability over short-term convenience.

– By Rye Karonhiwanen Barberstock

(Header Image Credit: A.C., Licenced, Unsplash+)

The post Decolonizing Urban and Regional Planning: Haudenosaunee Knowledge, Stewardship, and Climate Adaptation appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

Decolonizing Urban and Regional Planning: Haudenosaunee Knowledge, Stewardship, and Climate Adaptation

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com