Carbfix has made a big move in Europe’s battle against climate change. It received the first permit for onshore carbon dioxide (CO2) storage under EU law. This project, based in Iceland, makes history by allowing the underground storage of CO2 in line with the EU’s strict climate policies. It is the first time the EU has formally approved an onshore geological storage project under its 2009 CCS Directive.
Carbfix’s storage method uses Iceland’s natural basalt rock to turn captured CO2 into solid minerals. This innovative approach supports the EU’s Green Deal, which aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030.
The mineral storage operator shows that carbon capture and storage (CCS) can work well on land. This sets a strong example for other European countries.
Understanding the Science Behind Carbfix’s CCS Tech
The Carbfix process is both simple and groundbreaking. First, carbon dioxide is captured from industrial sources or directly from the air. Then it is dissolved in water and injected into underground rock formations.

In Iceland, natural basalt rock reacts with CO2 solution. This forms solid carbonate minerals that trap carbon permanently. Carbfix’s method is different from other carbon storage methods. Instead of keeping gas trapped under rock layers, it turns gas into stone. This process removes the risk of leakage in the long run.
Key features of the project include:
-
Location: The site is in Iceland, where volcanic basalt is plentiful and ideal for mineralizing CO2.
-
Technology: The CO2 reacts with minerals in the rock to form stable solids in under two years.
-
Safety: The National Energy Authority of Iceland (Orkustofnun) checked the project to ensure it follows EU safety rules for geological storage.
Carbfix’s innovative technology has already been used in smaller pilot projects in Iceland, including at the Hellisheiði geothermal power plant. Getting a permit under the EU’s tough rules is a major step for wider use in Europe.
Highlighting the growing importance of CCS technology in Europe’s climate strategy, Carbfix CEO, Edda Sif Pind Aradóttir stated:
“With this first onshore storage permit in Europe, Iceland also retains a certain leadership role in building a new industry that is essential to both the EU’s and IPCC’s climate goals.”
Why the EU Supports Carbon Capture and Storage
The European Union is focused on cutting greenhouse gases to fight global warming. Technologies like CCS play a key role in achieving this.
The European Commission’s Industrial Carbon Management Strategy says that by 2050, the EU will store around 250 million tonnes of CO2 each year. This will be in underground storage.
Total carbon capture could reach around 450 million tonnes yearly, which includes some CO2 that is used instead of stored. This could account for 7-8% of the region’s emissions.

The EU’s climate plan encourages both public and private investment in carbon storage projects. Experts estimate that suitable sites in Europe could store up to 300 million tonnes of CO2 per year by 2030.
The European Climate Law requires net-zero emissions by 2050. This law pressures all sectors, including heavy industry, to cut or offset their emissions.
While the company is pioneering onshore CCS, most EU CCS capacity and projects focus on offshore storage, especially in the North Sea region.
By 2030, Europe might reach a storage capacity of 140 million tonnes per year. However, only about 66 million tonnes per year is expected in EU member states. Most of the onshore projects are small, mainly in Denmark and the Netherlands.

Iceland’s Carbfix project is unique as an onshore basalt mineralization site. The Carbfix permit allows storage of up to about 106,000 tonnes of CO2 annually, totaling around 3.2 million tonnes over 30 years.
It proves that onshore CO2 storage is possible within the EU’s legal framework. It opens the door for similar projects in other member countries. By proving that this kind of storage is safe and effective, Carbfix is leading the way for other innovators to follow. It also opens opportunities for generating carbon credits.
The Growing Role of Carbon Markets
With more companies and governments trying to lower emissions, the demand for carbon credits is growing. These credits allow companies to pay for carbon reductions elsewhere if they cannot cut emissions directly.
Projects like Carbfix generate carbon credits by permanently removing CO2 from the atmosphere. This makes them especially attractive to buyers seeking high-quality, verifiable carbon offsets.
Recent projections indicate the average EU carbon price could reach about €92/t CO2e in 2025. It could rise to €130/t by 2026 and €195/t by 2030.

Analysts expect the global carbon market to more than double in size by 2030, possibly reaching $100 billion. More storage projects like Carbfix are starting up that can increase the supply of high-quality carbon credits. As a result, the market will stabilize and new investment opportunities will arise.
Carbon credit markets help create a circular carbon economy. In this system, captured emissions are reused or stored permanently, preventing them from entering the atmosphere. As countries strengthen their climate commitments, demand for such credits will likely increase.
A Model for Future Projects
Carbfix could serve as a model for future carbon storage projects across Europe and beyond. Other European countries are already exploring similar opportunities. Reports say that up to 10 new onshore storage projects might start in the next five years. This is especially true in areas with volcanic or sedimentary rock formations.
To support this growth, the EU is working on clearer rules and funding support for carbon capture projects. This includes easier permitting, better carbon pricing, and more public-private partnerships. The Innovation Fund and Horizon Europe are two major EU programs supporting climate technology, including CCS.
Experts agree that CCS must grow quickly to meet climate targets. Renewable energy and energy efficiency are vital. However, technologies like Carbfix can cut emissions in tough industries, which include cement, steel, and chemicals.
The Carbfix carbon storage permit marks the beginning of a new phase in Europe’s climate journey. As the EU looks to scale up CCS efforts, the success of onshore projects will be crucial. With the right policies and technologies in place, the region could become a global leader in carbon storage innovation.
The post Carbfix Secures First EU Permit for Onshore Carbon Capture and Storage appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

