SHEIN has become one of the biggest names in fast fashion, selling affordable clothes online to customers around the world. The company had revenues of around US$30–32 billion in 2023 and offered nearly 600,000 items for sale at any given time. However, SHEIN is also facing criticisms over its rising carbon footprint and net-zero initiatives.
The Fast Fashion Industry’s Environmental and Carbon Footprint
SHEIN’s business model uses artificial intelligence (AI) to spot fashion trends and produce clothes quickly in small batches. Items are then shipped directly to consumers, often by air. This model helps reduce the amount of unsold inventory, giving the company huge revenues. However, this approach also adds significantly to the company’s carbon footprint.

SHEIN’s 2023 Sustainability Report shows that total greenhouse gas emissions increased. They rose from 9.17 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO₂e) in 2022 to 16.68 Mt CO₂e in 2023. That’s an 81% increase in just one year.

To put that into perspective, this is more than the annual emissions from 4 average coal-fired power plants. Most emissions come from the company’s supply chain and transportation. These areas are hard to control, but they cause most of its environmental impact.
Where SHEIN’s Carbon Emissions Come From
Greenhouse gas emissions are categorized into three groups or “scopes.” Scope 1 refers to emissions from a company’s direct operations, like its offices and warehouses. Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from the energy it purchases, like electricity. Together, these made up less than 1% of SHEIN’s total emissions in 2023.
The company reports that 72% of the electricity used at its facilities came from renewable sources last year, an increase from 68% in 2022. However, the bulk of SHEIN’s emissions—over 99%—fall under Scope 3. These emissions happen indirectly in the company’s value chain. They occur during manufacturing, shipping, and packaging.

In 2023, 61% of emissions came from supply-chain operations, while 38% were linked to transportation. To reduce these, SHEIN has begun sourcing more products from regions closer to its customers, like Brazil and Turkey. This “nearshoring” helped the company save over 314,000 tons of CO₂e by avoiding long-distance shipping routes.
Net-Zero Goals and Emissions Strategy
In response to growing environmental concerns, SHEIN has made several public commitments to reduce its carbon footprint. The company plans to reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by 25% by 2030, using 2023 levels as a starting point. It also aims to use only renewable electricity in its direct operations by the same year.
Longer-term, SHEIN has committed to achieving net-zero emissions across its value chain by 2050. These goals have been submitted to the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and were recently approved.
- The path to net zero includes a 42% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions and a 25% reduction in Scope 3 emissions by 2030.

The company aims to reach its climate goals by:
- Expanding renewable energy use
- Improving energy efficiency at supplier sites
- Reducing transportation emissions
In addition, SHEIN is preparing to rely less on air freight and more on rail and sea, which are less carbon-intensive. While these steps show progress, they will need to be scaled up to significantly lower the company’s total emissions in the coming years.
Supply‑Chain Initiatives and Efficiency Improvements
SHEIN has launched several projects aimed at cutting emissions across its supply chain:
- Energy audits and efficiency upgrades at 28 supplier sites—cutting about 46,000 t CO₂e/year.
- Encouraging rooftop solar at 31 factories, with 10 in progress—cutting around 12,140 t CO₂e.
- Nearshoring to Turkey and Brazil reduced emissions by 314,805 t CO₂e, and cutting air transport saved another 49,578 t CO₂e.
- Logistics partnerships using electric or hybrid vehicles, saving about 54,614 t CO₂e.
These actions are aimed at tackling Scope 3 emissions, which are harder to manage but represent the majority of SHEIN’s carbon output. By supporting its suppliers and improving logistics, the company is starting to take responsibility for its broader environmental impact.
Criticism and Greenwashing Concerns
Despite its climate pledges, SHEIN has faced strong criticism from environmental groups and industry observers. The company has a key issue: its emissions are increasing more quickly than revenue. This shows that its business model doesn’t match its climate goals.
Critics also argue that SHEIN’s reliance on Scope 3 reductions, which are outside of its direct control, makes its net-zero targets difficult to achieve in practice.
There are also concerns about labor practices and the credibility of some of its sustainability claims. In 2024, SHEIN disclosed child labor violations found during supplier audits. Labor watchdogs still report bad working conditions and very long hours at some factories.
In Italy, regulators are looking into the company for possible greenwashing. This means they may have misled consumers about their environmental achievements. SHEIN got a low score of 2.5 out of 100 in a recent ranking by Stand.earth. The report noted that the company’s emissions increased by almost 50% in just one year.

These issues show that while SHEIN is making some progress, it still has a long way to go in proving that its climate promises are genuine and effective.
Can SHEIN Match Its Speed With Sustainability?
SHEIN’s efforts to reduce emissions and improve sustainability are a step in the right direction. The company is starting to work with suppliers, cut transportation emissions, and invest in cleaner energy. Getting its net-zero targets approved by SBTi adds credibility to its climate strategy.
However, the real test will be whether SHEIN can turn its goals into measurable reductions. Emissions continue to rise, which means the company must scale up its efforts quickly to stay on track. Expanding renewable energy, improving factory efficiency, and reducing overproduction will be key.
Fast fashion, by nature, is resource-intensive. For SHEIN to become a leader in sustainability, it must go beyond statements and show that net-zero efforts can match the speed and scale of its business.
- READ MORE: Clean Energy Beats Fossil Fuel in Historic $3.3T Global Energy Investment in 2025, IEA Report
The post Can Fast Fashion Go Green? SHEIN’s Net-Zero Ambitions Under Scrutiny appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测


