The latest move in the sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) sector is Boeing’s partnering with Norway’s Norsk e-Fuel to help develop one of Europe’s first large-scale Power-to-Liquids (PtL) facilities.
This partnership aligns with the aviation industry and ICAO member states’ goal to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Also, Boeing’s investment will boost SAF production in the Nordics and globally.
Steve Gillard, Boeing’s regional sustainability director for Europe, Middle East, Türkiye, Africa and Central Asia.
“Our support of and collaboration with Norsk e-Fuel underscores the importance of using fossil-free energy to accelerate SAF production, which is key to reducing aviation’s carbon emissions towards 2050. Our partnership to advance e-fuels will help mobilize the commercialization of SAF in the Nordics and across the world, increasing accessibility and availability for our customers as we help build a robust SAF ecosystem.”
Boeing and Norsk e-Fuel Power Up Sustainable Aviation
Norsk e-Fuel, a Norway-based company that supplies fuels to the aviation industry, is pioneering SAF production through its innovative Power-to-Liquids (PtL) process. The company aims to accelerate the transition to renewable aviation by producing electro-SAF (e-SAF).
So What is e-SAF?
Well, this advanced fuel is created by using fossil-free power to generate green hydrogen, which is then combined with recycled CO₂ from biogenic sources. Notably, the CO2 is extracted from the air using innovative Direct Air Capture (DAC) systems.
- The result is a synthetic jet fuel that reduces greenhouse gas emissions by over 90% compared to traditional jet fuel.
Revolutionary Tech Powers Sustainable Fuel Production
Norsk e-Fuel combines cutting-edge technologies to create sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). The process includes Axens and Paul Wurth’s advanced Reverse-Water-Gas-Shift (RWGS) and Fischer-Tropsch units, along with the Gasel® upgrading unit. All these technologies boost energy efficiency and reduce emissions.
Second, Sunfire’s innovative electrolyzer, based on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Cells (SOEC), uses steam and CO₂ to produce renewable syngas in one step. Next, the Smart integration of waste heat increases plant output, delivering 30% more fuel with the same energy input compared to gas-fired systems.
Lastly, Climeworks adds direct air capture technology to remove CO₂ directly from the atmosphere. Powered by renewable energy, it uses advanced filters to capture and release CO₂ for use or storage. Together, these technologies transform aviation fuel into a cleaner, greener solution.
Scaling Up: Large-Scale Facilities for a Cleaner Future
As a project developer, Norsk e-Fuel is establishing large-scale production sites to meet the aviation industry’s demand for sustainable fuels. The company works with strategic investors and key partners to bring industrial-scale Power-to-Liquid production to life. Its efforts focus on building a new value chain for sustainable fuels to drive renewable aviation forward.
Lars Bjørn Larsen, CCO of Norsk e-Fuel remarked on this partnership, saying:
“Our goal is to make e-fuels competitive with and eventually replace fossil fuels in critical infrastructures as SAF needs to become readily accessible and affordable for advancing aviation’s decarbonization. Boeing’s investment will further accelerate our project pipeline and will facilitate the broader aviation industry’s transition to net-zero emissions.”
Boeing’s investment in Norsk e-Fuel will aid the EU’s SAF volume targets. It will also boost energy security and the long-term competitiveness of aviation in the Nordic region. Overall, this collaboration has the potential to shape policies for the global SAF industry’s economic viability.
- READ MORE: British Airways Commits £9M to Carbon Removal Credits. Can this Propel Aviation to Net Zero?
Clearing the Skies with SAF
Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is transforming the way aircraft are powered by offering a cleaner energy source. It helps reduce the aviation industry’s carbon footprint and dependence on fossil fuels. Despite its benefits, SAF made up only 0.53% of global commercial fuel use in 2024, as per the press release.
- In Europe, the RefuelEU SAF initiative is driving change. It aims to gradually increase SAF’s share to 6% by 2030 and 70% by 2050.
- For e-SAF, like the fuel Norsk e-Fuel produces, the targets are even more ambitious—1.2% by 2030 and 35% by 2050.
ReFuelEU Aviation, part of the EU’s Fit for 55 package, promotes SAF as the most effective way to lower aviation emissions. Fuel suppliers must blend SAF with traditional jet fuel at EU airports. This regulation supports the EU’s climate goals and will cut aviation CO2 emissions by over 60% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels.
The increased use of SAF also improves air quality by reducing harmful pollutants like CO, NOx, and PM, especially near airports. By embracing SAF, the aviation industry takes a major step toward a sustainable, cleaner future.
Boeing’s “Avoid First, Remove Second” Strategy to Cut Carbon Emissions
Boeing follows an “Avoid First, Remove Second” strategy to lower its carbon footprint. The focus is on avoiding Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by using renewable energy, energy-efficient systems, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). For emissions that are hard to reduce, Boeing invests in permanent carbon removal to support long-term carbon reduction.
Over the past four years, Boeing has voluntarily offset emissions from its manufacturing sites and business travel. In 2023, these offsets met strict global standards, ensuring they were measurable, verified, and tracked. Boeing also followed the aviation sector’s CORSIA framework for offsets.
The company plans to cut fossil fuel use by investing in renewable energy, energy-efficient infrastructure, and conservation efforts. For harder-to-reduce emissions, Boeing will increase investments in permanent removal technologies.
Sustainability Target
Boeing aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030. By the end of 2023, it reduced Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 26% from 2017 levels. It also plans to use 100% renewable electricity to boost clean energy use and conservation efforts.
5 Key Areas to Decarbonize Aerospace
The company’s sustainability report also revealed that they are working with customers and governments to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. And they are focussing on five key areas:
- Fleet Renewal: New airplanes are 20%-30% more efficient than older ones.
- Operational Efficiency: Boeing helps improve flight operations, air traffic management, and maintenance to cut emissions by up to 10%.
- Renewable Energy: Research on SAF and renewable energy drives sustainability in aviation.
- Advanced Technology: Boeing invests in cleaner designs, efficient propulsion, and advanced digital tools.
- Market-Based Measures: The company offsets emissions from business travel and invests in permanent carbon removal projects.
As Boeing brings its leadership in the SAF industry to this strategic partnership, Norsk e-Fuel adds its advanced technology and a strong network of partners. This includes Norway’s largest air carrier, Norway. Together, they aim to make sustainable aviation a reality, supporting global efforts to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.
The post Boeing’s Big Move: Boosting EU Aviation with Norsk e-Fuel’s SAF appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Most businesses that decide to act on their net-zero targets reach the same point of friction. Buying carbon credits has meant tracking down brokers, sitting through sales calls, and requesting a quote just to learn a price, sometimes with limited proof of what you are buying.
The earnings calls that quietly reframed climate from sustainability question to operating risk.
Three earnings calls in the last 18 months tell the story without any help from a press release.
Hershey, May 2024: cocoa price exposure compresses margin, and the company attributes part of the cost shock to West African weather. Olam, July 2024: coffee climate exposure quantified in the annual report. JBS, January 2025: supply chain climate disclosures expanded materially in response to investor pressure and regulatory expectation. None of these companies issued the announcement as climate news. They issued it as financial news. The climate-linked supply chain risk did not arrive with a sustainability framing; it arrived as a P&L line.
You are probably reading this article because you suspect the same thing is happening to your business. This piece walks through what is showing up on which earnings calls, how procurement and finance leaders are quantifying the exposure, and what serious corporates are doing about it before the regulator asks.
Where climate risk has already appeared in earnings
The pattern is consistent across resource-intensive sectors. A weather event compresses supply, the price spikes, the cost flows through the income statement, and the analyst on the call asks whether the event is anomalous or structural. Increasingly, the honest answer is the second one.
Cocoa is the cleanest example. The 2023 to 2024 West African harvest fell sharply on the back of erratic rainfall and disease. Cocoa futures more than tripled. Companies with concentrated West African sourcing absorbed the cost; companies with diversified sourcing absorbed less. The exposure was not climate as ESG topic. It was climate as cost of goods.
Coffee follows the same pattern. Brazilian and Vietnamese harvests have moved on weather more sharply across the last several seasons. Roasters with long-tenor supplier relationships and origin diversification have managed the volatility; roasters with spot-market exposure have not. Wheat, sugar, palm oil, beef: the same dynamic in different commodities, a pattern the IPCC AR6 Working Group II report projects will intensify across agricultural systems through mid-century.
What this means: climate risk is no longer a footnote in the 10-K. It is a line item the CFO has to explain on the call.
The three commodity exposures that hit margin first
For most companies with material Scope 3 exposure, three exposures dominate the near-term P&L risk.
- Concentrated single-origin sourcing in a climate-vulnerable region. If your tier-one supply for any material commodity sits in one geography, you have a concentration risk that climate amplifies. Diversification across origins is the obvious hedge, but it takes years to build and requires relationships you cannot acquire by tender.
- Supplier financial fragility under climate stress. Smallholder farmers, who supply a large share of the global cocoa, coffee, and palm oil market, do not carry the balance sheets to absorb yield shocks. When yields collapse, they exit. When they exit, your supply base shrinks, and the surviving suppliers raise prices. The risk is structural, not cyclical.
- Logistics and storage exposure to extreme weather. Hurricane disruptions to Gulf shipping, drought-driven Panama Canal restrictions, flooding in European inland waterways: each of these has moved input costs in the last three years, a pattern documented in Munich Re’s natural catastrophe data. The exposure shows up as a one-quarter event in the financial press but accumulates over time on the cost line.
TCFD and ISSB disclosure changes
The disclosure architecture has now caught up with the risk. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, whose recommendations are now embedded in the ISSB’s IFRS S2 climate standard, requires companies to disclose climate-related risks across physical and transition categories, with quantification where possible.
For physical risk specifically (the climate-linked supply chain risk you are reading about), the disclosure must address both acute exposures (extreme weather events) and chronic exposures (gradual changes in temperature, precipitation, and growing seasons). The disclosure must address the time horizon over which the risk is material, the parts of the value chain exposed, and the financial impact under different scenarios.
The CSRD imposes similar requirements under European law, with double materiality (both financial and impact materiality) embedded in the assessment. The practical effect: your auditors and your investor relations team now need a defensible answer to the climate-linked supply chain risk question, and the answer needs to be quantified.
What procurement and finance can do now
Three actions matter near-term.
Map your exposure. Most companies do not have a clear view of which tier-one and tier-two suppliers sit in which climate-vulnerable geographies. Without the map, you cannot quantify the risk, and without the quantification, you cannot disclose it credibly. The map is the foundation, and World Resources Institute climate risk research provides useful public tooling to start.
Diversify and deepen, in that order. Diversification across origins reduces concentration risk, but the deeper move is to invest in the resilience of the suppliers you already have. Regenerative practices, agroforestry, soil health interventions: these reduce yield volatility under climate stress and protect your input cost trajectory.
Embed the climate spend inside procurement, not outside it. Treating climate risk as a sustainability cost line subordinates it to the ESG budget. Treating it as a procurement and resilience investment puts it in the budget that matters, which is the cost-of-goods budget that the CFO defends quarterly.
Nature-based supply chain investments are the asset class designed for exactly this purpose. They sit inside the value chain, they reduce climate-linked supply risk, they generate verifiable Scope 3 reductions, and they produce the documentation an auditor and a regulator can both test.
If you are quantifying climate-linked supply chain risk in advance of the next earnings cycle or the next disclosure period, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help you map your exposure and structure a Dual-Value Model response that addresses reduction, resilience, and disclosure-readiness in a single program. Schedule a consultation.
More and more small and medium-sized businesses are hearing the same question from their larger customers: What is your carbon footprint? That question now travels down entire supply chains, and it arrives next to tender requirements, certification criteria, and rising customer expectations.
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy11 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits