Meta Platforms and Amazon.com just announced their latest quarterly earnings. Both showed strong financial results despite a tough global economy. Both companies are investing in clean energy, carbon reduction, and sustainability. They aim to meet the rising energy demand from artificial intelligence (AI) and data centers. However, while Amazon’s stock soars after the announcement, Meta’s stock dips.
The results show a big shift in tech companies. They are connecting financial growth to climate responsibility and long-term resilience. Let’s examine how these tech giants perform financially and sustainably.
Amazon’s Revenue and Cloud Strength Push Q3 Growth
Amazon reported $180.2 billion in revenue for the third quarter of 2025, up 13% year over year. The company’s net income surged to $21.2 billion, or $1.95 per diluted share, compared to $9.9 billion a year earlier.
The strongest gains came from Amazon Web Services (AWS), which grew 20% year over year to $33.0 billion in revenue. Amazon’s cloud division is its most profitable part. It supports thousands of companies around the globe and helps boost AI and digital tools.
Amazon’s retail business did better than expected. Prime Day sales and rising advertising revenue helped. Advertising revenue climbed 28% to US $14.7 billion.
With its strong quarter, Amazon’s stock increased about 12% in after-hours trading. Analysts say the company’s long-term plan is key to growth. It focuses on cloud computing, renewable energy, and automation.
Meta Reports Higher Profits but Faces Market Pressure
Meta Platforms, which owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, reported $51.2 billion in revenue for Q3 2025. This is a 26% increase compared to last year. Net income reached $2.7 billion, or $1.05 per share.
The company noted higher ad spending, strong engagement on its apps, and early gains from its AI-driven recommendation systems. Despite these strong results, Meta’s stock dropped more than 11% after the results came out. Investors were concerned about the company’s rising costs for infrastructure and AI chips.
CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated that Meta will keep “building responsibly for the long term.” He emphasized that AI systems and the metaverse will be key investment areas until 2026.
Big Tech’s Race to Power AI With Clean Energy
AI development is driving record electricity demand. Data centers already consume around 415 terawatt-hours (TWh) of power globally each year, or about 1.5% of total electricity use. By 2030, consumption could more than double to 945 TWh, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).
Both Meta and Amazon are addressing this surge by pairing AI growth with clean energy expansion.
- Amazon is the largest corporate buyer of renewable energy in the world. It has over 550 wind and solar projects. Together, these projects generate more than 33 gigawatts (GW) of capacity as of 2025. They supply power to AWS data centers, logistics hubs, and fulfillment sites across 27 countries.
- Meta sources 100% renewable energy for its global operations and data centers. It has added 10 GW of clean energy capacity since 2020 and continues to invest in solar and wind farms in the U.S., Spain, and Singapore.
These efforts are part of a larger trend in tech: replacing fossil fuel power with firm, clean sources such as nuclear, geothermal, and long-duration storage, to ensure 24/7 reliability.
Amazon’s Net-Zero Roadmap
Amazon aims to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2040, a decade ahead of the Paris Agreement target. To get there, it is cutting emissions across transportation, operations, and packaging.
Key steps include:
- Deploying over 145,000 electric delivery vans by 2030.
- Using sustainable aviation fuel for Amazon Air.
- Reducing plastic packaging and promoting circular economy programs.
- Investing in carbon removal projects, including reforestation and direct air capture systems.
In 2024, Amazon reduced its carbon intensity — emissions per dollar of revenue — by 16% from its 2021 baseline. The company is testing green hydrogen and battery storage. This will help stabilize renewable energy supplies for its warehouses and data centers.
Meta’s Net-Zero and Carbon Removal Efforts
Meta reached net-zero emissions for its operations (Scope 1 and 2) in 2020. Now, it’s focusing on Scope 3 emissions, which come from suppliers and user activity.
By 2030, Meta aims to reach full net-zero emissions across its value chain. It is buying more renewable energy and improving server designs for better efficiency. It is also investing in carbon removal projects, like reforestation and biochar.
The company’s circular-hardware program reuses old data-center servers. This effort recycles materials and cuts electronic waste by almost 60% since 2022. Its new data centers in Texas and Denmark will run entirely on wind and solar power, helping to balance AI’s growing energy demand.
Meta also launched a “climate science hub” across Facebook and Instagram to share verified climate information and encourage community-level sustainability actions.
Investor Takeaway: Profits Up, Pressures High, Climate Still Central
Amazon’s strong revenue and cloud success show its resilience. However, the company is dealing with rising costs from its AI expansion and logistics network. Analysts expect AWS growth to remain steady as enterprise clients expand AI workloads.
Meta’s profits were better than expected. However, the company’s high capital spending raised worries about short-term margins. Reality Labs, which works on AR/VR and metaverse products, had a $3.7 billion operating loss in Q3. However, executives noted that AI integration is boosting user engagement and ad performance.
Both companies play key roles in the AI economy and clean energy transition, even with short-term ups and downs.
Clean Energy and Tech: A Shared Future
Amazon and Meta are boosting their clean energy efforts. This shows a big change in the industry. As AI and data grow, having reliable low-carbon electricity is now a key advantage.
- By 2030, Amazon’s projects might create enough renewable energy to offset 30 million metric tons of CO₂ each year. This is about the same as the emissions from 8 million cars.
- Meta’s ongoing efficiency programs have cut data center energy use by 30% per computing task compared to 2020, even as total workloads grow.
Both companies are exploring new power sources. They are looking into small modular reactors (SMRs) and advanced geothermal systems. This aims to provide clean energy for their global networks without interruption.
For Amazon and Meta, the latest earnings reports tell a story of growth tied to responsibility. Their revenues are up, AI investment continues, and sustainability remains at the center of their long-term strategies.
Short-term market swings show investor caution. Still, both companies are building the digital and environmental infrastructure for the next decade of tech growth.
In the race to power AI with clean energy, they show that profitability and sustainability can grow together if backed by the right investments, partnerships, and long-term visions.
The post Amazon Stock Rises, Meta Falls: Q3 Earnings Show Split Paths in AI and Clean Energy appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Most businesses that decide to act on their net-zero targets reach the same point of friction. Buying carbon credits has meant tracking down brokers, sitting through sales calls, and requesting a quote just to learn a price, sometimes with limited proof of what you are buying.
The earnings calls that quietly reframed climate from sustainability question to operating risk.
Three earnings calls in the last 18 months tell the story without any help from a press release.
Hershey, May 2024: cocoa price exposure compresses margin, and the company attributes part of the cost shock to West African weather. Olam, July 2024: coffee climate exposure quantified in the annual report. JBS, January 2025: supply chain climate disclosures expanded materially in response to investor pressure and regulatory expectation. None of these companies issued the announcement as climate news. They issued it as financial news. The climate-linked supply chain risk did not arrive with a sustainability framing; it arrived as a P&L line.
You are probably reading this article because you suspect the same thing is happening to your business. This piece walks through what is showing up on which earnings calls, how procurement and finance leaders are quantifying the exposure, and what serious corporates are doing about it before the regulator asks.
Where climate risk has already appeared in earnings
The pattern is consistent across resource-intensive sectors. A weather event compresses supply, the price spikes, the cost flows through the income statement, and the analyst on the call asks whether the event is anomalous or structural. Increasingly, the honest answer is the second one.
Cocoa is the cleanest example. The 2023 to 2024 West African harvest fell sharply on the back of erratic rainfall and disease. Cocoa futures more than tripled. Companies with concentrated West African sourcing absorbed the cost; companies with diversified sourcing absorbed less. The exposure was not climate as ESG topic. It was climate as cost of goods.
Coffee follows the same pattern. Brazilian and Vietnamese harvests have moved on weather more sharply across the last several seasons. Roasters with long-tenor supplier relationships and origin diversification have managed the volatility; roasters with spot-market exposure have not. Wheat, sugar, palm oil, beef: the same dynamic in different commodities, a pattern the IPCC AR6 Working Group II report projects will intensify across agricultural systems through mid-century.
What this means: climate risk is no longer a footnote in the 10-K. It is a line item the CFO has to explain on the call.
The three commodity exposures that hit margin first
For most companies with material Scope 3 exposure, three exposures dominate the near-term P&L risk.
- Concentrated single-origin sourcing in a climate-vulnerable region. If your tier-one supply for any material commodity sits in one geography, you have a concentration risk that climate amplifies. Diversification across origins is the obvious hedge, but it takes years to build and requires relationships you cannot acquire by tender.
- Supplier financial fragility under climate stress. Smallholder farmers, who supply a large share of the global cocoa, coffee, and palm oil market, do not carry the balance sheets to absorb yield shocks. When yields collapse, they exit. When they exit, your supply base shrinks, and the surviving suppliers raise prices. The risk is structural, not cyclical.
- Logistics and storage exposure to extreme weather. Hurricane disruptions to Gulf shipping, drought-driven Panama Canal restrictions, flooding in European inland waterways: each of these has moved input costs in the last three years, a pattern documented in Munich Re’s natural catastrophe data. The exposure shows up as a one-quarter event in the financial press but accumulates over time on the cost line.
TCFD and ISSB disclosure changes
The disclosure architecture has now caught up with the risk. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, whose recommendations are now embedded in the ISSB’s IFRS S2 climate standard, requires companies to disclose climate-related risks across physical and transition categories, with quantification where possible.
For physical risk specifically (the climate-linked supply chain risk you are reading about), the disclosure must address both acute exposures (extreme weather events) and chronic exposures (gradual changes in temperature, precipitation, and growing seasons). The disclosure must address the time horizon over which the risk is material, the parts of the value chain exposed, and the financial impact under different scenarios.
The CSRD imposes similar requirements under European law, with double materiality (both financial and impact materiality) embedded in the assessment. The practical effect: your auditors and your investor relations team now need a defensible answer to the climate-linked supply chain risk question, and the answer needs to be quantified.
What procurement and finance can do now
Three actions matter near-term.
Map your exposure. Most companies do not have a clear view of which tier-one and tier-two suppliers sit in which climate-vulnerable geographies. Without the map, you cannot quantify the risk, and without the quantification, you cannot disclose it credibly. The map is the foundation, and World Resources Institute climate risk research provides useful public tooling to start.
Diversify and deepen, in that order. Diversification across origins reduces concentration risk, but the deeper move is to invest in the resilience of the suppliers you already have. Regenerative practices, agroforestry, soil health interventions: these reduce yield volatility under climate stress and protect your input cost trajectory.
Embed the climate spend inside procurement, not outside it. Treating climate risk as a sustainability cost line subordinates it to the ESG budget. Treating it as a procurement and resilience investment puts it in the budget that matters, which is the cost-of-goods budget that the CFO defends quarterly.
Nature-based supply chain investments are the asset class designed for exactly this purpose. They sit inside the value chain, they reduce climate-linked supply risk, they generate verifiable Scope 3 reductions, and they produce the documentation an auditor and a regulator can both test.
If you are quantifying climate-linked supply chain risk in advance of the next earnings cycle or the next disclosure period, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help you map your exposure and structure a Dual-Value Model response that addresses reduction, resilience, and disclosure-readiness in a single program. Schedule a consultation.
More and more small and medium-sized businesses are hearing the same question from their larger customers: What is your carbon footprint? That question now travels down entire supply chains, and it arrives next to tender requirements, certification criteria, and rising customer expectations.
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy11 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits