Airbnb and Booking Holdings are two of the biggest online travel companies in the world. They help millions of people find places to stay and things to do when they travel. In 2025, both companies showed strong business results and made progress on their climate and sustainability goals.
This article looks at how each company performed in the first quarter of 2025 and compares their efforts to cut carbon emissions and reach net-zero targets.
Airbnb: Navigating Economic Headwinds
In Q1 2025, Airbnb reported revenue of $2.3 billion, marking a 6% year-over-year increase. This growth was primarily driven by an 8% rise in nights and experiences booked, totaling 143.1 million.
However, the company faced some challenges. There was a small drop in the Average Daily Rate (ADR) and economic uncertainty in the U.S. As a result, net income fell to $154 million, down from $264 million in Q1 2024.

Adjusted earnings stood at $417 million, representing an 18% margin. Despite challenges, Airbnb still generated $1.8 billion in free cash flow. This kept their cash strong at $11.5 billion in cash and equivalents. The company also repurchased $807 million of its Class A common stock during the quarter.
Booking Holdings: Leveraging International Demand
Booking Holdings posted strong Q1 2025 results, with revenue reaching $4.8 billion, an 8% increase year-over-year. Gross bookings totaled $46.7 billion, up 7%, driven by 319 million room nights booked.
The company’s adjusted earnings rose 21% to $1.1 billion, with a margin of 22.9%. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) came in at $24.81, surpassing analyst expectations. Free cash flow was robust at $3.2 billion, and the company returned $2.1 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.

Both companies show strong financial performance. However, Booking Holdings leads in revenue and profit. It benefits from a diverse portfolio and a global presence. Airbnb, however, showcases resilience and strong cash flow generation, even amid economic uncertainties.
Now, let’s see how they perform in terms of the ESG and sustainability front, particularly on their emission reductions and net-zero efforts.
Airbnb: Advancing Toward Net-Zero by 2030
Airbnb aims to reach net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in its global operations by 2030. This goal includes Scopes 1, 2, and some Scope 3 categories. This commitment relies on science-based targets approved by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
Carbon Emission Reductions
Airbnb aims to reduce its absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 78.4% from a 2019 baseline by 2030. By the end of 2023, Airbnb had reduced about 82% of these emissions compared to the 2019 baseline. This drop came from using energy more efficiently and buying renewable energy to match 100% of its office needs.

In 2023, Airbnb kept its San Francisco headquarters on CleanPowerSF’s SuperGreen program. This means they continue using 100% renewable electricity from California wind and solar. This accounts for about 16% of their global office electricity use.
Scope 3 Emissions
About 92% of Airbnb’s total emissions come from Scope 3 sources, mostly from suppliers. Airbnb plans to cut Scope 3 emissions intensity by 55% per million dollars of gross profit by 2030, using 2019 as the baseline.
By the end of 2023, Airbnb reduced its Scope 3 emissions intensity by nearly 55% compared to 2019. This improvement happened even as business grew, thanks to better operations and more renewable energy use by key suppliers.
Supplier Engagement
In 2023, Airbnb continued its Supplier Sustainability Program, which launched in 2022. By the end of 2023, over 80 suppliers took part. These suppliers made up about 47% of Airbnb’s supplier-related emissions. The program asks suppliers to measure, report, and cut their greenhouse gas emissions, supporting Airbnb’s larger climate goals.
Carbon Offsetting and Nature-Based Solutions
Since 2021, Airbnb has invested in high-quality nature-based carbon credits. In 2023, the company kept up its investments, supporting projects that protect forests, restore ecosystems, and reduce powerful greenhouse gases. It bought 25% more credits in 2023 than the previous year.
Airbnb also stayed active in the LEAF Coalition, a group working to stop tropical deforestation. The company also launched a climate contribution tool in Germany, allowing guests to support sustainability projects when booking stays.
Beneficiaries include Pina Earth (protecting forests), MoorFutures® (restoring peatlands), and Tradewater (destroying polluting gas tanks in emerging markets), alongside other environmental initiatives.
Booking Holdings: Comprehensive Climate Action Plan
Booking Holdings aims for net-zero GHG emissions by 2040, ten years later than Airbnb. They set interim goals to cut absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 95% and Scope 3 emissions by 50% by 2030, using 2019 as a baseline. These targets have been validated by the SBTi.
Carbon Emission Reductions
By the end of 2024, Booking Holdings had reduced its absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 85% compared to 2019. This big cut came from switching to 100% renewable electricity in its offices. Also, 98% of energy attribute certificates were bought in the same country where the electricity is used.

Scope 3 Emissions:
Scope 3 emissions, accounting for 99% of the company’s total GHG emissions, were reduced significantly by the end of 2024 compared to 2019.
Booking Holdings worked with key vendors covering about 50% of its 2023 emissions. They encouraged these vendors to measure, report, and cut their GHG emissions. This effort also aimed to enhance data quality in this area.

Sustainable Travel Initiatives:
Booking Holdings aims for over 50% of its bookings to be made on more sustainable offerings across its platforms by 2027. As of 2023, over 40% of bookings were made on such offerings.
Over 1.4 million accommodations have shared their sustainability practices. Also, more than 16,000 partners have received third-party sustainability certifications.
Industry Collaboration and Advocacy:
In 2023, Booking.com teamed up with the United Nations Tourism Organization and launched an online training series. This series helps travel providers improve the sustainability of their accommodations.
The company also worked with BeCause, an enterprise software provider. This partnership allows real-time updates on accommodations with third-party sustainability certifications. With it, travelers can make informed choices.
Who’s Leading the Green Getaway? A Side-by-Side Look

Airbnb and Booking Holdings both aim for net zero, but their approaches differ. Airbnb aims for net zero in Scopes 1 and 2 by 2030. They have reduced operational emissions by 25% since 2019 and now use 100% renewable energy. Its supplier engagement is growing, though Scope 3 data is limited.
On the other hand, Booking Holdings targets full-scope net zero by 2040, validated by SBTi. It has cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 41% and Scope 3 by 25%, while expanding its Sustainable Travel Badge program and engaging over 400 suppliers. Booking shows broader Scope 3 action, while Airbnb excels in direct operations.
Both Airbnb and Booking Holdings have made significant strides in their sustainability and net-zero efforts. They set ambitious targets and implemented comprehensive strategies to reduce their carbon footprints. Their initiatives not only show corporate responsibility but also contribute to the broader goal of combating climate change within the travel industry.
- INTERESTING READ: Amazon Unveils Carbon Credit Investment Service: A Game Changer for Corporate Sustainability
The post Airbnb vs. Booking Holdings: Who’s Winning the Battle for Financial Growth and Green Goals? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
![]()
-
Climate Change11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

