The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has introduced a transformative climate disclosure rule aimed at revolutionizing the reporting landscape for public companies.
This proposed rule seeks to mandate detailed disclosure of emissions, climate risks, and strategies for achieving net zero emissions, marking a significant leap towards corporate transparency and sustainability.
Key Aspects of the Proposed Rule
At the core of the SEC’s proposed rule lies a call for comprehensive reporting, compelling companies to provide detailed insights into their climate-related facets. This includes the delineation of risks associated with climate impact, emissions data, and robust plans for achieving net zero emissions.
One of the primary objectives of the SEC’s proposal is to arm investors with consistent, comparable, and meaningful climate-related information. This will enable investors to make more informed decisions, considering a company’s environmental impact and climate risk profile in their investment strategies.
Moreover, standardizing reporting obligations across companies issuing securities is another key aspect of the proposal. This seeks to establish uniformity in disclosures, potentially reducing discrepancies and enhancing the overall quality of information provided by companies.
Most notably, SEC’s proposed rule will significantly impact the practices of accounting, auditing, and assurance for public companies and their service providers. It involves adapting existing frameworks to accommodate the new reporting requirements.
It may also call for developing new methods and standards for evaluating and reporting climate-related information.
Overall, the proposed climate disclosure rule cover two major aspects:
- Climate-Related Financial Impacts: The regulation tackles how climate-related impacts should be included in financial statements (e.g. balance sheet, income statement, cash flow).
- Narrative Disclosures: The rule also involves narrative disclosures in form SK. It will likely include discussions on risks, business strategy impacts, and metrics like greenhouse gas inventory.
Implications and Challenges for Companies
The SEC’s disclosure rule also poses a number of implications and challenges.
The first one is increased reporting obligations for companies. They will face additional reporting demands that may require thorough data gathering, accurate presentation, and strengthened internal controls to comply with the new regulations.
Companies also have to go along the transition from voluntary to regulated disclosure. This represents a significant change, requiring gradual efforts until they become accustomed to the new reporting requirements.
However, for companies that are already complying with similar disclosure rules, it would be easier for them to embrace the proposed changes. Given the overlap with other existing regulations, determining the costs of the SEC’s rule alone would be hard.
But according to the SEC, the required reporting will cost a small publicly listed firm about $420,000 a year on average. For a larger company, it will be $530,000 a year.

Role of Carbon Credits and RECs
The SEC’s proposed rule acknowledges the relevance of carbon offsets and renewable energy credits (RECs), underlining their importance in climate-related reporting. Companies increasingly leverage these instruments for decarbonization, establishing market-based mechanisms to advance sustainability goals.
However, discussions have emerged regarding the adequacy of the SEC’s requirements, raising concerns about the need for more comprehensive disclosures. It’s crucial for investors and stakeholders to understand how the use of these credits impacts a company’s risk profile, business strategy, and long-term financial implications.
In particular, the proposed rule outlines the following key areas for disclosure:
- Climate-Related Risk: Companies’ use of voluntary carbon markets in their transition risk strategy.
- Business Strategy Alignment: How the use of carbon credits or offsets aligns with a company’s business model, strategy, and future outlook.
- Targets and Goal Disclosure: Requirements for companies to disclose if their sustainability targets involve the utilization of RECs and offsets.
While the proposed rule has been in existence for about 18 months, awaiting finalization, stakeholders have actively engaged in the process, submitting over 20,000 comments during a consultation period.
However, the final timeline for its completion remains uncertain, leaving companies in a state of anticipation regarding the impending changes.
How to Prepare for SEC’s Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule: A Roadmap for Companies
Despite the uncertain timeline, companies are advised to prepare by focusing on “no regret” actions, according to Matt Handford, Principal, Climate Change and Sustainability at Ernst & Young. He further shared insights on how companies can better prepare for the new disclosure requirements.
Key areas to focus on per Handford’s advice include the following:
Emissions Understanding and Accounting:
Companies need to treat emissions data with the same rigor as financial data, ensuring completeness, accuracy, and reasonableness of their emissions inventory.
Data Hygiene and Quality Assurance:
Emphasis should be on the quality of data and the reliability of sources, underpinning robust documentation and validation processes.
Reassessment of Climate-Related Claims:
Companies are reassessing their public claims related to carbon neutrality and net zero targets, ensuring robust strategies and execution plans to meet these objectives.
Engaging Internal Stakeholders:
Collaboration across various internal departments, including finance and legal, is pivotal to comprehensively address climate-related disclosures and strategies.
The SEC’s proposed climate disclosure rule represents a transformative era in corporate reporting, mandating transparency and accountability regarding climate-related information. As businesses gear up for these regulatory changes, thorough preparation and collaborative approach will be crucial in meeting the evolving disclosure obligations and steering towards a more sustainable future.
The post A Deep Dive into SEC’s Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule for Sustainability appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

