Connect with us

Published

on

Until recently, the Brazilian team running the COP30 UN climate summit next month had stated strongly that they had no plan to produce a negotiated cover decision at the end of the talks – but that position may be starting to shift as some governments are now said to be seeking one.

COP30 President André Corrêa do Lago told Climate Home News late Wednesday after the pre-COP meeting in Brasilia that he was listening to those requests.

“As the presidency, if I feel that the countries are willing to analyse the possibility of a cover decision, of course I will take it into consideration. Because I truly want COP30 to be a country-led COP,” he said in an interview.

A cover decision is a text agreed by governments that is not tied to any specific agenda item and spans various issues that countries want to address. From COP25 to COP27, cover decisions offered political guidance on climate action and put topics that were crucial to some delegations – but not covered by the formal agenda – on the table for future discussions.

At COP26, for example, a cover decision on the Glasgow Climate Pact mentioned fossil fuels for the first time, calling for efforts towards the phase down of unabated coal power. At COP27 in Sharm El-Sheikh, the cover decision marked the launch of both the Just Transition Work Programme and the Loss and Damage Fund, from then on thrusting them decisively into the negotiations. 

    In July, Corrêa do Lago told Climate Home that he personally did not like the idea of ​​a cover decision because he preferred “a more constructive, transparent and open diplomacy”. He has not changed his view on how he wants to see business done at COP30.

    After a day of intense consultations with countries following the pre-COP meeting in Brasilia on Monday and Tuesday, the veteran Brazilian diplomat reiterated that he is not keen on a cover decision because it tends to “create a certain mystery” and “suddenly appears” in the midst of difficult negotiations.

    “The other problem is that cover decisions have statistically proven to have no subsequent follow-up,” Correa do Lago added, arguing that “most countries felt a little abused by the cover decisions”.

    ‘Several countries’ want a cover decision

    However, the game-changer this time around could lie in how such a document is landed and what it represents.

    “The current situation is different,” said the incoming COP president. “Several countries are openly calling for a cover decision,” he explained. He emphasised that he had even received such a request in the bilateral meetings he held on Wednesday with some countries, without specifying which.

    Those who have indicated they would support a cover decision in closed-door meetings include both developing and developed countries, as a way to give prominence to issues that are critical to their positions and interests, or could be complicated to address under set agenda items.

    For Corrêa do Lago, if the COP30 conference begins with a cover decision already in mind, it could avoid the last-minute scramble and element of surprise that has occurred in the past, and instead “constitute a true element of negotiation”.

    Vehicle for a ‘race to the top’

    Some civil society organisations that follow the COP process have also called for COP30 to conclude with an ambitious cover decision.

    Andreas Sieber, associate director of global policy and campaigns at 350.org, argues that a cover decision would be the most credible way to confront the gap in climate action head-on.

    “A cover decision is no magic bullet to solve negotiation challenges, but it offers the best-placed procedural vehicle to balance different elements of the ambition package, allowing a race to the top instead of zero-sum trade-offs,” he wrote in an op-ed for Climate Home.

    Comment: Why COP30 needs a cover decision to succeed

    Over the past month, the possibility has also been raised that such a document could be presented as a so-called “omnibus decision” rather than a cover decision. 

    It is unclear what the difference would be, as the UN climate talks have never produced an omnibus decision – but the suggestion is that an omnibus decision would amalgamate key elements of COP30, including those that do not have a clear place in the talks.

    Either way, issues of relevance to multilateral climate policy that are tricky to resolve or need strong political backing to drive them forward outside the talks could find a home in such a decision.

    Home for finance goals and NDC gap?

    Natalie Unterstell, president of the Brazilian Talanoa Institute, explained that a cover decision could be an option for formally incorporating a new climate finance target for adaptation which the poorest countries are pushing for.

    Sieber added that this could be the space for countries to identify steps forward for the Baku to Belém Roadmap to $1.3 Trillion on boosting climate finance in the next 10 years, so that it does not end up as little more than an informational report.

    Countries trail COP30 clash over global response to shortfall in national climate plans

    Others have suggested a COP30 cover decision could be the place where countries set out how they plan to bridge the expected large gap in planned emissions reductions and the cuts needed to keep global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as they pledged to aim for in the Paris Agreement.

    Even with the growing possibility of having a cover or an omnibus decision in Belém, Corrêa do Lago said he would prefer the COP to proceed as normal – with the approval of the agenda at the start, negotiations on the agreed items, and then “to make decisions” on that basis. 

    However, he warned that even approving the agenda “could be a challenge because several countries are requesting new agenda items that we know would be very difficult to reach consensus on”.

    The post COP30 president hints Brazil may be open to a cover decision in Belém appeared first on Climate Home News.

    https://www.climatechangenews.com/2025/10/16/cop30-president-hints-brazil-may-be-open-to-a-cover-decision-in-belem/

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    UN report: Five charts showing how global deforestation is declining

    Published

    on

    The amount of forest lost around the world has reduced by millions of hectares each year in recent decades, but countries are still off track to meet “important” deforestation targets.

    These are the findings of the Global Forest Resources Assessment – a major new report from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization – which says that an estimated 10.9m hectares (Mha) of land was deforested each year between 2015 and 2025.

    This is almost 7Mha less than the amount of annual forest loss over 1990-2000.

    Since 1990, the area of forest destroyed each year has halved in South America, although it still remains the region with the highest amount of deforestation.

    Europe was the only region in the world where annual forest loss has increased since 1990.

    Agriculture has historically been the leading cause of deforestation around the world, but the report notes that wildfires, climate change-fuelled extreme weather, insects and diseases increasingly pose a threat. 

    The Global Forest Resources Assessment is published every five years. The 2025 report compiles and analyses national forest data from almost every country in the world over 1990-2025.

    Carbon Brief has picked out five key findings from the report around deforestation, carbon storage and the amount of forest held within protected areas around the world.

    1. Rates of deforestation are declining around the world


    Rates of annual deforestation, in thousands of hectares, in South America, Asia, Africa, North and Central America, Oceania and Europe over 1990-2000 (dark blue), 2000-15 (medium blue) and 2015-25 (light blue). Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2025

    In total, around 489Mha of forest have been lost due to deforestation since 1990, the new report finds. Most of this – 88% – occurred in the tropics.

    This breaks down to around 10.9Mha of forest lost each year between 2015 and 2025, a reduction compared to 13.6Mha of loss over 2000-15 and 17.6Mha over 1990-2000.

    Deforestation refers to the clearing of a forest, typically to repurpose the land for agriculture or use the trees for wood. 

    The chart above shows that South America experiences the most forest loss each year, although annual deforestation levels have halved from 8.2Mha over 1990-2000 to 4.2Mha over 2015-25.

    Annual deforestation in Asia also saw a sizable reduction, from 3.9Mha over 1990-2000 to 2Mha over 2015-25, the report says.

    Europe had the lowest overall deforestation rates, but was also the only region to record an increase over the last 35 years, with deforestation rates growing from 126,000 hectares over 1990-2000 to 145,000 hectares in the past 10 years.

    Despite the downward global trend, FAO chief Dr Qu Dongyu notes in the report’s foreword that the “world is not on track to meet important global forest targets”. 

    In 2021, more than 100 countries pledged to halt and reverse global deforestation by 2030. But deforestation rates in 2024 were 63% higher than the trajectory needed to meet this 2030 target, according to a recent report from civil society groups.

    The goals of this pledge were formally recognised in a key text at the COP28 climate summit in Dubai in 2023, which “emphasise[d]” that halting and reversing deforestation and forest degradation by 2030 would be key to meeting climate goals. 

    2. Global net forest loss has more than halved since 1990


    Forest area net change by country between 1990 and 2025, in hectares. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2025 

    The new report finds that forests cover more than 4bn hectares of land, an area encompassing one-third of the planet’s land surface.

    More than half of the world’s forested area is located in just five countries: Russia, Brazil, Canada, the US and China.

    The map above shows that, overall, more forest is lost than gained each year around the world. There was 6.8Mha of forest growth over 2015-25, but 10.9Mha of forest lost.

    The annual rate of this global net forest loss – the amount that deforestation has exceeded the amount regrown – has more than halved since 1990, dropping from 10.7Mha over 1990-2000 to 4.1Mha over 2015-25.

    The report says this change was due to reduced deforestation in some countries and increased forest expansion in others. However, the rate of forest expansion has also slowed over time – from 9.9Mha per year in 2000-15 to 6.8Mha per year in 2015-25.

    There are many driving factors behind continuing deforestation. Agriculture has historically been the leading cause of forest loss, but wildfire is increasingly posing a threat. Wildfires were the leading driver of tropical forest loss in 2024 for the first time on record, a Global Forest Watch report found earlier this year. 

    The new UN report says that an average of 261Mha of land was burned by fire each year over 2007-19. Around half of this area was forest. Around 80% of the forested land impacted by fires in 2019 was in the subtropics – areas located just outside tropical regions, such as parts of Argentina, the US and Australia.

    The report notes that fire is widely used in land management practices, but uncontrolled fires can have “major negative impacts on people, ecosystems and climate”. 

    It adds that researchers gathered information on fires up as far as 2023, but chose to focus on 2007-19 due to a lack of more recent data for some countries. 

    A different report from an international team of scientists recently found that fires burned at least 370Mha of land – an area larger than India – between March 2024 and February 2025. 

    3. Many countries are hugely increasing their forest area


    Top 10 countries for annual net gain (blue) and net loss (red) of forest area over 2015-25, in 1,000 hectares per year. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2025

    Globally, deforestation is declining, but the trend varies from country to country.

    The chart above shows that some nations, such as China and Russia, added a lot more forest cover than they removed in the past decade through, for example, afforestation programmes.

    But in other countries – particularly Brazil – the level of deforestation far surpasses the amount of forest re-grown.

    Deforestation in Brazil dropped by almost one-third between 2023 and 2024, news outlet Brasil de Fato reported earlier this year, which was during the time Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva took over as president. The new UN report finds that, on average, Brazil lost 2.9Mha of forest area each year over 2015-25, compared to 5.8Mha over 1990-2000. 

    Russia’s net gain of forest cover increased significantly since 1990 – growing from 80,400ha per year in 1990-2000 to 942,000ha per year in 2015-25.

    In China, although it is also planting significant levels of forest, the forest level gained has dropped over time, from 2.2Mha per year in 2000-15 to 1.7Mha per year in 2015-25.

    Levels of net forest gain in Canada also fell from 513,000ha per year in 2000-15 to 82,500ha per year in 2015-25.

    In the US, the net forest growth trend reversed over the past decade – from 437,000ha per year of gain in 2000-15 to a net forest loss of 120,000ha per year from 2015 to 2025.

    Oceania reversed a previously negative trend to gain 140,000ha of forests per year in the past decade, the report says. This was mainly due to changes in Australia, where previous losses of tens of thousands of hectares each year turned into an annual net gain of 105,000ha each year by 2015-25.

    4. The world’s forests hold more than 700bn tonnes of carbon


    Changes in forest carbon stock by region and subregion of the world over 1990-2025. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2025

    The “carbon stock” of a forest refers to how much carbon is stored in its trees and soils. Forests are among the planet’s major carbon sinks.

    The new report estimates that forests stored an estimated 714bn tonnes, or gigatonnes, of carbon (GtC) in 2025.

    Europe (including Russia) and the Americas account for two-thirds of the world’s total forest carbon storage.

    The global forest carbon stock decreased from 716GtC to 706GtC between 1990 and 2000, before growing slightly again by 2025. The report mainly attributes this recent increase to forest growth in Asia and Europe.

    The report notes that the total amount of carbon stored in forests has remained largely static over the past 35 years, but with some regional differences, as highlighted in the chart above.

    The amount of carbon stored in forests across east Asia, Europe and North America is “significantly higher” now due to expanded forest areas, but it is lower in South America, Africa and Central America.

    Several studies have shown that there are limitations on the ability of forests to keep absorbing CO2, with difficulties posed by hotter, drier weather fuelled by climate change.

    A 2024 study found that record heat in 2023 negatively impacted the ability of land and ocean sinks to absorb carbon – and that the global land sink was at its weakest since 2003. 

    Another study, published in 2022, said that drying and warming as a result of deforestation reduces the carbon storage ability of tropical forests, especially in the Congo basin and the Amazon rainforest. 

    5. Around one-fifth of the world’s forests are located in protected areas


    The percentage of forest land in Asia, Africa, Europe, South America, Oceania and North and Central America contained inside protected areas (dark blue) and outside protected areas (light blue) in 2025. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2025

    The amount of forested land located in protected areas increased across all regions between 1990 and 2025.

    For an area to be considered “protected”, it must be managed in a way that conserves nature.  

    Around 20% of the world’s forests are located in these protected areas, the new report finds, which amounts to 813Mha of land – an area almost the size of Brazil.

    Nearly every country in the world has pledged to protect 30% of the Earth’s land and sea by 2030. However, more than half of countries have not committed to this target on a national basis, Carbon Brief analysis showed earlier this year. 

    Almost 18% of land and around 8% of the ocean are currently in protected areas, a UN report found last year. The level is increasing, the report said, but considerable progress is still needed to reach the 2030 goal. 

    The new UN report notes that Europe, including Russia, holds 235Mha of protected forest area, which is the largest of any region and accounts for 23% of the continent’s total forested land.

    As highlighted in the chart above, 26% of all forests in Asia are protected, which is the highest of any region. The report notes that this is largely due to a vast amount of protected forested land in Indonesia. 

    Three countries and one island territory reported that upwards of 90% of their forests are protected – Norfolk Island, Saudi Arabia, Cook Islands and Uzbekistan.

    The post UN report: Five charts showing how global deforestation is declining appeared first on Carbon Brief.

    UN report: Five charts showing how global deforestation is declining

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Federal Appeals Court Pauses Litigation Over Florida’s Alligator Alcatraz

    Published

    on

    The Trump administration had sought the stay of proceedings in the case, arguing its attorneys were furloughed during the government shutdown. The plaintiffs say the administration is picking and choosing which cases to litigate.

    A federal appeals court paused litigation Wednesday brought by environmental groups over Florida’s Alligator Alcatraz, the hastily assembled Everglades detention site where the Trump administration aims to incarcerate and deport thousands of undocumented migrants.

    Federal Appeals Court Pauses Litigation Over Florida’s Alligator Alcatraz

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Breach of Contract or Constitutional Crisis?

    Published

    on

    An appellate court will determine how to handle the Trump administration’s cancellation of hundreds of climate and environmental justice grants.

    The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, heard arguments Thursday on whether the Trump administration’s cancellation of billions of dollars in environmental and climate grants earlier this year violated the Constitution or was merely a contract dispute.

    Breach of Contract or Constitutional Crisis?

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com