Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, reported record results in the third quarter of 2025. Driven by soaring demand for artificial intelligence (AI) chips, the company’s profit jumped 39% year-on-year to NT$452.3 billion ($14.77 billion).
Revenue rose 30.3% to NT$989.9 billion ($33.1 billion), beating analyst forecasts and setting a new quarterly record. TSMC’s strong performance shows that it is the backbone of global AI and high-performance computing.
Chief Executive C.C. Wei said AI demand is growing faster than expected, noting:
“AI demand continues to be very strong — stronger than we thought three months ago.”
TSMC raised its 2025 revenue growth forecast to the mid-30% range. This shows confidence that the AI boom will stay strong in the coming years. How about the company’s sustainability and net zero aims? Let’s find out.
AI and HPC Fuel Record-Breaking Quarter

The main growth driver came from high-performance computing (HPC), which includes AI, 5G, and data center chips. This segment made up 57% of TSMC’s total quarterly sales. It shows how AI infrastructure spending is changing the semiconductor market.
Most of TSMC’s production now focuses on its most advanced technologies:
- 3-nanometer chips: 23% of total wafer revenue
- 5-nanometer chips: 37%
- 7-nanometer chips: 14%
Together, these advanced nodes made up 74% of total wafer sales. Smaller and more efficient chips are key for training AI models. They also power cloud computing and support next-gen mobile devices.
TSMC supplies chips to many of the world’s biggest tech firms, including NVIDIA, Apple, and AMD. Each company is growing its data center capacity. They need this to support AI systems that use thousands of processors. These processors must run all day and night.
Industry analysts estimate that global AI infrastructure spending will exceed $1 trillion within the next few years. McKinsey estimates companies will cumulatively invest $5.2 trillion into AI-related data center capacity by 2030. As the leading manufacturer of advanced AI chips, TSMC is positioned to capture a major share of that investment.

TSMC’s share price has surged nearly 48% year-to-date, reaching around $298 per share in late October 2025. The stock briefly hit a high of $311, marking its strongest performance in over two years.
Investor optimism is rising. This is due to record profits, strong demand for AI chips, and growing global manufacturing capacity. The chart shows steady growth since April. That’s when AI infrastructure spending picked up among major clients like Nvidia and Apple.

Record Expansion Amid Global Competition
TSMC is investing heavily to keep up with soaring demand. The company increased its 2025 capital expenditure to $40–42 billion, slightly higher than previous guidance. Much of this spending supports expansion in both Taiwan and the United States.
The chipmaker is already building two major factories in Arizona, part of a long-term plan to invest over $100 billion in U.S. manufacturing. These sites will produce advanced 3- and 4-nanometer chips for American customers such as Apple and NVIDIA.
This expansion also helps TSMC reduce geopolitical risks amid U.S.–China trade tensions. The company is confident in its Chinese business. However, it is diversifying production. This helps protect against possible export restrictions or tariff changes.
TSMC’s strong performance has boosted its stock price significantly. Shares have gained about 38% year-to-date, reaching record highs as investors bet on sustained growth from AI and high-performance computing.
Managing Challenges in a Shifting Global Landscape
Despite its success, TSMC faces several headwinds. The global semiconductor supply chain remains fragile, with persistent material shortages and high equipment costs. Rising labor expenses in the United States could also affect profit margins for new facilities.
In addition, competition is intensifying. Samsung Electronics and Intel are making advanced 2-nanometer chips. They want to compete directly with TSMC. Each is seeking partnerships with major tech companies to secure long-term contracts.
Still, TSMC maintains a strong technological lead. Its 3-nanometer process is already in mass production, while its 2-nanometer chips are expected to enter commercial use in 2026. These chips provide better performance and use less power. This is crucial for AI workloads that run non-stop in data centers.
TSMC’s Net-Zero Push Strengthens Its Global Reputation
Beyond financial results, TSMC is also expanding its efforts to reduce environmental impact. Making computer chips uses a lot of energy. Between 2015 and 2023, the industry’s power use more than doubled — from about 58,000 GWh to 131,000 GWh.
Some chip factories use as much electricity as a small town. In 2024, chip production emitted about 185 million metric tons of CO₂ equivalent from making integrated circuits. The entire semiconductor sector’s emissions were close to 500 million metric tons CO₂e. This accounts for about 0.5% to 1.3% of global carbon emissions. This shows a mix of growing industry output and continuing efficiency gains.

Because of this, many chipmakers plan to reach net-zero emissions by 2040 to 2050. They are also switching to renewable energy and improving efficiency to lower their environmental impact.

TSMC is switching to cleaner and more efficient methods. Key sustainability goals and actions include:
- Net-zero emissions by 2050: TSMC has pledged to reach full carbon neutrality across its operations.
- Renewable energy target: The company aims to use 100% renewable electricity by 2040.
- Energy efficiency improvements: Over the past five years, TSMC has cut energy intensity by about 15%, according to its latest ESG report.
- Water recycling: Its plants now recycle more than 85% of water used in production, a vital step in water-scarce regions like southern Taiwan.
- Supplier collaboration: TSMC works with its global partners to develop low-carbon manufacturing materials and reduce waste.
The company is on the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices and the CDP Climate Change A List. This shows its leadership in corporate climate action.
TSMC’s environmental strategy also aligns with customer expectations. Many of its clients, like Apple, NVIDIA, and AMD, aim for net-zero. They prefer suppliers who can show clear carbon reductions. This alignment helps the company secure long-term contracts while supporting the broader clean energy transition in tech manufacturing.
The Future: AI Chips and Green Tech Shape the Next Decade
The global semiconductor industry continues to expand rapidly, fueled by AI, electric vehicles, and digital infrastructure. According to the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS) organization, worldwide chip sales could grow 15.4% in 2025, reaching nearly US $728 billion.
For TSMC, most of that growth will come from:
- AI and data-center chips used in training large language models.
- Automotive semiconductors for self-driving and electric vehicles.
- 5G and IoT technologies, which connect billions of smart devices.
As more countries invest in digital and AI ecosystems, the need for efficient, low-carbon chip production will rise. TSMC’s focus on sustainability gives it a competitive edge as a responsible manufacturer adapting to global climate goals.
By 2030, analysts expect AI chips to make up more than 25% of TSMC’s total revenue, compared with less than 10% in 2020. The combination of strong AI demand, ongoing capacity expansion, and environmental innovation positions TSMC to remain the world’s leading semiconductor foundry well into the next decade.
TSMC’s record-breaking third-quarter profit confirms its role at the center of the global AI revolution. With AI and high-performance computing driving over half its sales, the company is expanding aggressively while balancing sustainability goals.
- READ MORE: TSMC Stock Gains on 38% Semiconductor Market Share, AI Breakthroughs, and Sustainability Efforts
The post TSMC Posts Record Q3 2025 Earnings as AI Chip Demand Soars 39% and Sustainability Strengthens appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

