Connect with us

Published

on

EU CBAM

The European Union’s (EU) upcoming carbon border tax is causing waves of anxiety among British green energy producers. As per the new directive, “British wind and solar farms exporting power to continental Europe from 2026 could face CO2 fees, despite producing no emissions, unless the UK and EU agree to amend the carbon border tax.

Thus, industry leaders fear that this new policy could penalize the UK’s green energy sector. They are apprehensive that their efforts to combat climate change could be undermined, potentially disrupting trade relationships.

What is the Carbon Border Tax?

The EU’s carbon border tax, officially known as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), is designed to prevent “carbon leakage”. This happens when companies shift production to countries with weaker climate regulations, thereby undermining global efforts to reduce emissions. The tax aims to level the playing field by imposing fees on imported goods from countries with less stringent climate policies.

Will the EU CBAM Impact British Renewable Exports?

A few days ago, Reuters reported that industry experts revealed how charges outlined in a little-known clause of the CO2 levy law could impact the revenues of renewable energy projects in the UK. This could further add to already-high EU power prices and even lead to higher emissions.

Andy Berman, deputy director of the industry group Energy UK pointed out that it’s a two-way problem. She added,

“(It) disincentivizes clean power in the UK at the moment in which we’re trying to ramp up the provision of clean power, and it’s going to increase (power) prices in northern Europe.”

Catherine Stewart, the UK Treasury’s deputy director for trade policy also expressed her views on EU’s tax policy by stating,

“It is an issue that we are conscious of and one that we have raised, that the UK has raised, with the EU.”

Despite the UK’s commitment to reducing emissions and its robust green energy sector, industry leaders fear that the carbon border tax might negatively impact British companies. The concern is that the tax will be applied to all imports, regardless of the exporting country’s green credentials and carbon footprint.

EUsource: Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – European Commission (Europa.eu)

Let’s elaborate on the potential impact on the renewable industry and trade relations at large.

Economic Feasibility at Risk

Analysts warn that the additional costs could render it “uneconomic” to export surplus clean power from Britain to Europe, especially during periods of low demand, high renewable generation, and low power prices.

Aurora Energy Research’s analysis, shared with Reuters, indicates:  

  • Up to 3 GWh of renewable power could be curtailed by 2030 if the fee discourages exports. This capacity is enough to supply 2,000 homes annually.
  • Adding a tax on exports essentially reduces the profit margin every time exports occur. By 2030, the carbon border fee could reduce the revenue British renewable projects earn for their power by 5%.

The research firm highlighted key facts about the renewable capacity buildout based on government policy and market forces.

1. Increasing power demand

Europe aims to decarbonize and achieve Net Zero emissions by 2050, primarily by electrifying its economy and expanding renewable energy to cut emissions. Growing demand for Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) boosts investment in renewables. Enhanced energy efficiency lowers power demand.

2. Strong policy support and Government ambition

Government ambition pushes deploying renewables and robust policy support fosters investor confidence. Sudden policy changes or lack of support can harm investor confidence in renewables within a country.

3. Rising fuel and carbon prices

High gas prices have led to a switch back to coal generation. New market players have increased speculation and volatility, a trend expected to continue. Independent Commodity Intelligence Services (ICIS) estimates carbon prices will reach €90 per tonne by 2030.

4. Phase-out of thermal capacity

As Europe phases out coal and older, unabated gas assets to meet decarbonization goals, it creates opportunities for low-carbon alternatives to meet rising power demand. The retirement of thermal capacity strains system requirements like frequency and voltage control, which cannot be fully met by renewables alone.

Impact on Wholesale Prices and Emissions

Market Screener has reported two interesting analyses:

Aurora Research: The company analyzed the consequence of the reduction in cheap British electricity exports. It can potentially spike wholesale power prices by up to 4% in markets like Ireland and Northern Ireland which rely heavily on UK imports.

AFRY Services: The research firm indicated that if European countries increase coal and gas power generation to cover the shortfall, CO2 emissions could rise by 13 million tonnes annually. This increase is equivalent to the emissions of 8 million cars.

The figure shows that: Failure to remove renewables barriers leads to 80% higher CO2 price in 2030 significantly raising wholesale electricity prices for European industry & consumers.

EU CBAMsources: Aurora Energy Research, EIKON, S&P

Can Renewable Exports Avoid CO2 Fees?

A European Commission spokesperson stated that renewable power exports could avoid CO2 fees if they meet specific criteria and prove their origin. However, industry experts argue this is challenging. They assume that most electricity traded across interconnectors is anonymous, making it difficult to calculate the carbon content.

They have also voiced concerns, stating the tax penalizes sectors leading the fight against climate change. RenewableUK stressed the need for a system that rewards green energy credentials without unnecessary barriers. They called for policies that consider the actual carbon footprint of imports rather than applying a blanket approach.

Linking Carbon Markets: A Viable Solution

One potential solution is linking the EU and UK carbon markets, which would exempt UK power producers from the tax. 

Alistair McGirr, SSE’s Group Head of Policy and Advocacy noted,  

“Linking the carbon markets could prevent UK exporters from paying a tax to the EU that could otherwise benefit the UK budget.”

Despite this suggestion, neither Brussels nor London has shown enthusiasm for the idea.

Former UK climate change minister Graham Stuart also spoke in favor of linking carbon markets that could be explored under the post-Brexit Trade and Cooperation Agreement. The European Commission spokesperson added that the EU is open to linking its carbon market with others, but it “must stem from a mutual wish from both parties.”

Green Enhancing, Not Green Washing: Bolstering EU’s Carbon Markets

We discovered a significant aspect of tax implication on industry and consumers from the latest press release of the Council of EU.

Notably, the Council adopted its position on the Green Claims Directive to tackle greenwashing and help consumers make informed greener choices. The directive sets minimum requirements for substantiating, communicating, and verifying environmental claims. This move follows a 2020 study revealing that over half of environmental claims are vague, misleading, or unfounded. Thus, reliable, comparable, and verifiable claims are essential for informed consumer decisions.

Alain Maron, Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region, responsible for climate change, environment, energy, and participatory democracy has commented on this move, 

“Today, we reached an important agreement to fight greenwashing by setting rules on clear, sufficient and evidence-based information on the environmental characteristics of products and services. Our aim is to help European citizens to make well-founded green choices.”

Organizations like Anew Climate, Rubicon Carbon, and others, hailed the EU’s progress on the Green Claims Directive (GCD) but called for further action to ensure it supports transparent and credible green claims, vital for achieving net zero. Key recommendations include:

  • Reliable Green Claims: Ensure claims are reliable, comparable, and verifiable across the EU to prevent greenwashing.
  • Simplified Framework: Avoid unnecessary administrative burdens and support the use of all types of carbon credits, not just EU-originated removal credits.
  • Uniformity in Standards: Align with existing frameworks like the CRCF and ICVCM to avoid overlap and enhance international consistency.

They collectively believe adopting these measures will boost voluntary private-sector investment in climate mitigation. It would also advance the Green Deal and strengthen Europe’s competitive market.

CBAMsource: EU-CBAM

This analysis emphasizes the need for dialogue between UK and EU policymakers to ensure the tax does not sabotage the global fight against climate change. Furthermore, a balanced approach is crucial for British Green Energy to recognize its efforts while minimizing trade disruption. Overall, the future of UK-EU trade and the global climate agenda hinges on achieving this equilibrium.

The post EU’s Latest Carbon Border Tax Sparks Concerns for British Green Energy appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

AstraZeneca Turns Up the Heat: New Program Tackles Industry’s Toughest Emissions

Published

on

AstraZeneca Turns Up the Heat: New Program Tackles Industry’s Toughest Emissions

Industrial heat production makes up a large share of global emissions. About 18% of all greenhouse gas emissions come from heat used in factories, plants, and manufacturing processes. This type of heat is hard to decarbonize because it often requires high temperatures that are still powered by fossil fuels like natural gas. 

To tackle this challenge, AstraZeneca, together with Secaro and ERM, launched the Clean Heat Program. The initiative helps companies measure, plan, and reduce industrial heat emissions across their supply chains.

Rob Williams, Senior Director of Sustainable Procurement at AstraZeneca, said:

“It’s clear that a programme like this is the fastest and most effective way to decarbonise heat in our supply chain. We are long-term partners with Secaro and ERM, and now we’re expanding relationships with peers, buyers from other industries and suppliers to plan, fund and launch the projects that will make heat decarbonisation a reality.”

Industrial Heat: The Hidden Carbon Giant

Fossil fuels still supply most industrial heat energy today. Cleaner alternatives like electrification, hydrogen, or biofuels often cost more. They also require new technology and infrastructure.

Despite its importance, industrial heat has received less focus than clean electricity or transport. In many industries, heat drives fundamental operations, from making chemicals to processing food. Because of this, experts say improving how heat is produced is key to cutting industrial emissions.

Clean Heat Program: Turning Plans into Action

In March 2026, AstraZeneca teamed up with ERM and Secaro to launch the Clean Heat Program. This initiative aims to help companies reduce emissions tied to industrial heat across their supply chains.

By combining data tools, technical support, and financing options, the program aims to make it easier for industrial facilities to adopt low-carbon heat solutions and accelerate decarbonization.

AstraZeneca is joining as a founding partner. The company has its own near‑term climate goals. By 2026, it aims to cut 98% of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions from operations compared to a 2015 baseline.

Astrazeneca
Source: Astrazeneca

The pharma giant has already achieved 88.1% reduction by the end of 2025. Its long‑term target is to reach net zero by 2045, including deep cuts in emissions across its suppliers and partners.

The Clean Heat Program is designed to go beyond simple planning. It aims to help companies move from studying options to actually acting on decarbonizing heat.

The program combines:

  • Supply chain data tools that show where heat is used and emitted.
  • Technical support to find practical ways to reduce emissions.
  • Financing options to help companies afford projects that cut heat emissions.

Secaro maps heat emissions across supply chains while ERM designs bankable projects, heat pumps, biomass conversion, and electrification upgrades. Notably, financing leverages EU funds and carbon credit revenue to de-risk upfront costs, moving companies from analysis to implementation.

Unlike many efforts that focus on one plant or site, the program looks at supplier networks. This broader view helps companies pinpoint where changes will have the biggest impact.

Why High-Temperature Heat Is Hard to Replace

Industrial heat is one of the largest sources of industrial emissions. According to the International Energy Agency, around 70% of industrial energy demand goes to producing heat for processes such as steel, cement, and chemicals.

Industrial Heat Emissions vs Net-Zero Pathway IEA
Estimates based on industrial CO₂ emissions data from the International Energy Agency. Around 70–75% of industrial energy use is for heat, according to IEA analysis.

Estimates from IEA data show that heat-related emissions are about 6.5 gigatonnes of CO₂ each year. This underscores the significant decarbonization needed.

The same analysis suggests that these emissions must drop to less than 1 gigatonne by 2050. This pathway needs quick action from various industries. It also requires strong investment in technology and changes in supply chains to cut emissions in high-temperature processes.

Industrial heat often uses natural gas or other fossil fuels. While electricity can now come from wind or solar, renewable options for high‑temperature heat are still emerging. Solutions such as electrification, biomass fuels, or hydrogen require new equipment and deep planning.

Electrification technologies work for low-temperature heat below 200°C. But industries that need higher heat still rely on fossil fuels. Secaro’s data show that 80% of industrial energy consumption is tied to heat, and 60% of these come from natural gas.

This complexity makes industrial heat one of the hardest parts of decarbonization — even for companies with net‑zero goals. In many cases, heat emissions make up a large share of a company’s direct emissions, known as Scope 1 emissions. 

Currently, less than 10% of sites use biofuels or other renewable energy. Industry forecasts suggest that renewable heat may reach only 15% of industrial use by 2028 unless strong action is taken.

CURRENT INDUSTRIAL HEAT EMISSIONS AND FUTURE RENEWABLE HEAT FORECAST

Pressure’s On: Regulators, Investors, and Rising Energy Costs

Pressure to cut heat emissions is growing from both regulators and investors. New rules such as the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and updated disclosure requirements from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) require more detailed emissions reporting and climate risk disclosure.

Companies that ignore their emissions might face penalties. They could also lose contracts with buyers who want cleaner supply chains.

Energy price volatility also plays a role. Firms that rely on fossil fuels for heat may face wide swings in energy costs. Decarbonizing heat can help companies stabilize fuel expenses and reduce exposure to price shocks, which investors increasingly watch closely.

Tools and Support for Heat Decarbonisation 

Secaro’s data platform is central to the program. It now offers heat-specific insights, which show where emissions are highest and highlight chances for change. The platform links buyers, suppliers, and solution providers to highlight high‑impact decarbonization actions.

ERM steps in with its technical expertise. It helps companies assess options and build project plans to attract investment.

These can include:

  • Higher energy efficiency
  • Switching to low-carbon fuels
  • Installing heat recovery systems
  • Adopting new technologies, like high-temperature heat pumps

Financing is also part of the program. Many industrial heat projects stall because of upfront costs. The initiative aims to connect companies with financing options, including funds based in the European Union and other mechanisms that help lower financial barriers.

Markets Are Warming Up: Forecasts for Industrial Decarbonization

Efforts like the Clean Heat Program are significant as the market for industrial decarbonization is growing. A recent market outlook projects that global industrial heat decarbonization could grow steadily over the next decade.

From 2025 to 2033, the market is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 6%, reaching an estimated $380 billion by 2033.

industrial heat and decarbonization market forecast

Technologies such as industrial heat pumps are also gaining traction. These devices can reuse waste heat and reduce energy losses. A market forecast shows that the global industrial heat pump market will rise to over 13,150 units by 2035. Revenues may exceed $9.1 billion by that time.

Even though many low‑carbon heat solutions exist, adoption has been slow. For example, only a small share of industrial sites in some sectors currently use renewable heat sources. Without stronger action, forecasts suggest renewable heat may reach only around 15% of industrial heat use by 2028.

A Clear Path for Companies and Supply Chains

The Clean Heat Program offers companies a way to close the gap between their climate goals and the real challenges of industrial heat. It helps companies move beyond early analysis and toward real projects that reduce emissions, improve energy security, and meet investor and regulatory expectations.

For supply chain partners and smaller suppliers, the program can lower barriers to entry. Many small and mid‑tier suppliers struggle to access data, technical support, or financing. This initiative aims to change that by giving a clearer path to decarbonization. If widely adopted, this approach could help reduce significant emissions from industrial heat worldwide and support broader climate goals.

The post AstraZeneca Turns Up the Heat: New Program Tackles Industry’s Toughest Emissions appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Reliance and Samsung C&T $3B Green Ammonia Deal Powers India’s Hydrogen Exports

Published

on

India’s clean energy transition is entering a new phase. Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) has signed a long-term green ammonia supply agreement with Samsung C&T Corporation. The deal, worth over $3 billion, will run for 15 years starting in the second half of FY2029.

This agreement reflects a structural shift in global energy markets. India is positioning itself not just as a clean energy producer, but as a future exporter of green fuels.

At the same time, the deal highlights a growing global race to secure long-term supplies of low-carbon energy. As industries look to decarbonize, green hydrogen and ammonia are becoming critical building blocks of the future energy system.

India’s Hydrogen Vision Meets Global Demand Reality

The agreement aligns with India’s broader policy push. Led by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, the National Green Hydrogen Mission aims to turn the country into a global hub for hydrogen production and exports.

The government has proposed around $2.2 billion in funding through 2030. Its targets are ambitious. India plans to build at least 5 million metric tonnes of annual green hydrogen capacity, supported by 125 GW of new renewable energy.

The economic and environmental impact could be substantial. Investments may exceed ₹8 lakh crore. The mission could create over 600,000 jobs while cutting fossil fuel imports by ₹1 lakh crore. In addition, it aims to reduce around 50 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions each year.

INDIA GREEN HYDROGEN

However, market realities remain complex. As of August 2025, about 158 hydrogen projects were under development. While announced capacity is already more than double the government’s target, only a small fraction is under construction or operational. This gap highlights execution risks.

Reliance Builds a Fully Integrated Green Energy Platform

To capture this opportunity, Reliance is building a deeply integrated clean energy ecosystem. The company is not only producing green hydrogen but also controlling the entire value chain.

This includes renewable power generation, energy storage, hydrogen production, and downstream products like green ammonia. A key focus is domestic manufacturing of critical technologies such as solar modules, battery systems, and electrolysers.

This strategy serves two purposes:

  • First, it reduces costs by localizing supply chains.
  • Second, it strengthens India’s position as a manufacturing hub for clean energy technologies.

At the center of this ecosystem is the Dhirubhai Ambani Green Energy Giga Complex in Jamnagar. Spread across 5,000 acres, it will house multiple gigafactories producing solar panels, batteries, electrolysers, fuel cells, and power electronics.

reliance green hydrogen
Source: Reliance

In parallel, Reliance is developing a large renewable energy project in Kutch. By combining solar, wind, and storage, the project will provide round-the-clock clean electricity. This power will feed into hydrogen and ammonia production facilities in Jamnagar.

The company has also committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2035, placing it among the more aggressive corporate climate targets globally.

Samsung’s Offtake Deal Brings Stability to the Green Hydrogen Market

The partnership with Samsung C&T plays a crucial role in addressing one of the hydrogen sector’s biggest challenges—demand uncertainty.

By securing a 15-year offtake agreement, Reliance gains revenue visibility. This makes it easier to finance large-scale projects. At the same time, Samsung C&T Corporation benefits from a stable and cost-competitive supply of green ammonia.

The company operates across more than 40 countries and is active in trading industrial materials and developing renewable energy projects. Access to green ammonia strengthens its ability to decarbonize operations and expand its clean energy portfolio.

This is particularly important as global companies face rising pressure to meet environmental, social, and governance (ESG) targets. Green ammonia can be used in fertilizers, as a hydrogen carrier, and even as a shipping fuel. Therefore, securing supply early provides a strategic advantage.

From Slow Start to Rapid Scale: McKinsey and PwC Map Hydrogen Growth

Global demand trends add another layer to the story. According to McKinsey & Company, clean hydrogen demand could reach between 125 and 585 million tonnes per year by 2050. This is a sharp increase from today’s levels, where nearly 90 million tonnes of hydrogen are still produced using fossil fuels.

In the near term, demand growth is expected to remain gradual. McKinsey notes that traditional sectors like fertilizers and refining will drive early adoption as they switch from grey to cleaner hydrogen. However, newer applications—such as steelmaking, synthetic fuels, and heavy transport—will likely scale up after 2030, accelerating overall demand.

green hydrogen
Source: McKinsey

While long-term demand looks strong, short-term growth is expected to be gradual. Insights from PwC suggest that hydrogen demand will remain limited until 2030.

There are several reasons for this. First, most current projects are still in early stages and operate at relatively small scales. Many electrolyser facilities today have capacities below 50 MW. Even planned projects, which may exceed 100 MW, are still small compared to existing fossil-based hydrogen plants.

Second, infrastructure development takes time. Building pipelines, storage systems, and export terminals can take seven to twelve years. Without this infrastructure, large-scale hydrogen trade cannot take off.

As a result, PwC expects stronger demand growth after 2030, with a more rapid acceleration after 2035. This timeline aligns with broader climate goals and the need to scale clean energy systems globally.

green hydrogen demand
Source: PwC

Challenges Still Loom Over the Sector

Despite growing momentum, the green hydrogen sector faces several hurdles. High production costs remain a major barrier. In many regions, green hydrogen is still more expensive than fossil-based alternatives.

In addition, global standards are still evolving. Different countries use different definitions for “green” or “low-emission” hydrogen. This creates uncertainty and complicates international trade. Demand visibility is another concern. Although many projects have been announced, actual uptake depends on policy support, pricing mechanisms, and technological progress.

These challenges explain why only a small portion of announced capacity has moved into construction or operation so far.

In conclusion, the Reliance-Samsung deal highlights a key turning point. It shows how large-scale, long-term agreements can unlock investments and accelerate project development.

At the same time, it signals India’s growing role in the global hydrogen economy. With strong policy backing, rising investor interest, and integrated industrial strategies, the country is building a foundation for large-scale exports of green fuels.

The post Reliance and Samsung C&T $3B Green Ammonia Deal Powers India’s Hydrogen Exports appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Who Will Drive the Next Wave of Carbon Credit Demand? Insights from AlliedOffsets

Published

on

Who Will Drive the Next Wave of Carbon Credit Demand? Insights from AlliedOffsets

The voluntary carbon market (VCM) lets companies buy carbon credits to offset their greenhouse gas emissions. AlliedOffsets, a data and technology firm for carbon offsetting, tracks this market closely. Their database covers more than 36,000 projects, over 28,000 buyers, and billions of tons of carbon that have been issued or retired. 

The VCM is growing fast. Over the last five years, most buyers have come from technology, telecommunications, and energy. Other sectors, like industrials, manufacturing, financial services, and aviation, also participate, though in smaller amounts.

The United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Japan have the most buyers, showing that developed countries lead the market.

As the market grows, new companies and sectors are expected to join. AlliedOffsets studied over 130,000 companies to predict who will likely buy carbon credits next. This helps sellers, project developers, and policymakers focus their efforts where demand is likely.

LtB Model: Predicting the Next Wave of Credit Buyers

AlliedOffsets uses a model called Likelihood to Buy (LtB). It looks at companies active before and since 2024, and even those that have never bought credits publicly. The company stated:

“Ranking specific companies’ likelihoods and identifying patterns in their unifying traits informs market suppliers and intermediaries about who to pivot engagement towards. Understanding the features that play the greatest roles in determining companies’ likelihoods, meanwhile, is vital for highlighting wider drivers for the growth of the market, which serve as levers for policymakers and signals for companies themselves.”

The model includes data from 36 global registries, covering both non-anonymous purchases and retirements. It looks at several key factors that affect a company’s likelihood to buy, including:

  • Abatement potential – how easy it is for the company to reduce emissions.
  • Data center usage – companies with large data centers use more energy and may buy more credits.
  • Headquarters country – companies in the US, UK, and China lead predicted purchases.
  • Internal carbon pricing – companies with higher carbon costs buy more credits.
  • Net-zero targets – companies with short-term or long-term climate goals are more likely to buy.
  • Sector – aviation, energy, and tech tend to buy more due to rules and public pressure.
  • Annual profit or loss – profitable firms are more able to purchase carbon credits.
factors for Likelihood to Buy VCM
Source: AlliedOffsets

The model also uses SHAP analysis to show which factors influence predicted buying the most. Companies that recently bought credits are weighted higher. Some sectors, like aviation, are manually marked as high-likelihood because of rules like CORSIA, which requires airlines to offset emissions.

AlliedOffsets also separates companies into new entrants and returning buyers, helping track demand trends.

Forecasted Carbon Credit Demand

AlliedOffsets predicts that new and returning buyers will need about 281 million credits per year. This comes from over 11,500 companies with characteristics similar to current buyers.

The demand by project type is expected to have this composition:

VCM demand by project type AlliedOffsets
Source: AlliedOffsets

Demand for forestry projects is rising, partly because of forward contracts, which made up 55% of the 147 million credits negotiated in 2025. 

carbon credit offtakes annual 2025 Sylvera
Source: Sylvera

By country, the greatest demand will come from the U.S., China, UK, France, Germany, and Brazil. 

VCM credits forecasted demand by country and sector
Source: AlliedOffsets

Aviation will be a big factor because airlines must offset emissions under CORSIA rules. Energy and technology companies in the US, like AT&T, IBM, and Ingram Micro, are likely to enter or re-enter the market.

Moreover, new entrants will expand the buyer base, per AlliedOffsets analysis. These include consumer goods, professional services, healthcare, and industrial firms. Many come from countries with fewer buyers so far, like Turkey and Belgium.

Financial Impact of Returning and New Buyers 

AlliedOffsets estimates that new and returning buyers will spend around $2.27 billion per year. Sector contributions are expected as follows, with aviation and energy leading the pack:

  • Aviation: over $800 million per year (about one-third of total).
  • Energy and Technology & Telecommunications: substantial ongoing purchases, over $300 million a year.
  • Consumer services, industrials, financial services, professional services: smaller but steady spend.

sectors expected to lead VCM demand forecast
Source: AlliedOffsets

Returning buyers bought nearly 7 million credits in previous years. ExxonMobil accounted for 66% of these purchases through both forward contracts and OTC deals. Other companies, like ArcelorMittal, invest in low-emission technology, reducing the need to buy credits.

New entrants, especially airlines, will increase activity. Credits purchased for CORSIA compliance must match emissions for international flights to and from ICAO member states.

Overall, growth in both returning and new buyers shows that corporate demand for carbon credits is likely to rise sharply. Companies that belong to initiatives like RE100, SBTi, Race to Zero, or NZBA are more likely to participate in the voluntary carbon market.

A Turning Point and Future Forecasts: Supply, Demand, and Policy Drivers

In 2025, the voluntary carbon credit market saw big changes. Total retirements fell to about 168 million tonnes, and new issuances dropped to around 270 million tonnes, the lowest since 2020.

Despite this, spending rose to roughly $1.04 billion, up from $980 million in 2024. The average price per credit also climbed to about $6.10, showing that buyers are paying more for high-quality, trusted credits rather than just buying large amounts.

carbon credit price 2025 MSCI

Companies are now choosing credits with strong monitoring and real climate impact. Nature-based projects, like afforestation and reforestation, did better than older REDD+ credits.

Forward contracts also grew, with over $12 billion signed in 2025, even though these will deliver only about 10 million credits a year through 2035. This shows that many companies want to secure the future supply of trusted credits. These trends match forecasts from AlliedOffsets, where demand is expected to rise for durable, high-quality carbon credits.

AlliedOffsets keeps expanding its database, now covering over 60,000 companies. Adding historical emissions data and checking with initiatives like the Forest Stewardship Council and Science Based Targets will improve forecasts.

Analysts expect supply limits may appear in forestry and land use projects as demand grows. Engineered removals, chemical processes, and industrial projects will also get more attention. Large investments by companies like Google and Amazon, which pledged $100 million to superpollutant removal projects by 2030, are expected to drive this.

Returning and new buyers, led by aviation, energy, and tech, will shape the next wave of demand. Understanding these patterns helps policymakers, intermediaries, and project developers plan supply and engagement strategies.

The voluntary carbon market is entering a new growth phase, driven by rules, climate commitments, and better forecasting tools. With models like Likelihood to Buy, market participants can plan ahead. Forestry, renewable energy, and industrial projects are likely to see the biggest benefits as corporate demand grows worldwide.

The post Who Will Drive the Next Wave of Carbon Credit Demand? Insights from AlliedOffsets appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com