Connect with us

Published

on

New research from RSPCA Queensland and Greenpeace Australia Pacific paints a dire reality of the impact deforestation is having on native wildlife.

To read the full report, click here.

Thor the koala recovering after surgery. Image: RSPCA Queensland

An ongoing animal welfare crisis

Queensland and New South Wales are a global deforestation hotspot. The bushland being cleared in these states is rich in native animal life, yet many species are already listed as threatened: like koalas, gliders and many bird and reptile species.

From 2016-2020, 2.4 million hectares of forest and woodland habitats were bulldozed in NSW and Queensland.

Our new report, co-authored with RSPCA Queensland, reveals the shocking impact that this deforestation has on native wildlife populations.

In the 2.4 million hectares of destroyed forest and bushland, 100 million animals were killed, injured or displaced.

This figure includes up to:

4.5 million mammals

9.3 million birds

and over 96 million reptiles

Koalas killed

Koalas were listed as endangered in 2022 in NSW and Queensland, just 10 years after first being listed as vulnerable.

Deforestation is not only wiping out vast swathes of koala habitat, but is also causing habitat fragmentation, which puts koalas at increased risk of injury, displacement or death.

Fragmentation occurs when large areas of habitat are broken up into smaller areas. In order to move from one patch of bushland to another, koalas are forced to travel on the ground, putting them at increased risk of dog attacks and road incidents, as well as shock and stress.

The total number of koalas losing habitat and presumed killed in NSW and Queensland would be 5,998 over five years, or 1,200 every year.

Deforestation in Queensland. Image: Paul Hilton

Wildlife hospitals stretched to the limit

The Greenpeace forest campaign team recently visited RSPCA Queensland’s Wacol wildlife hospital, south-east of Brisbane, to get an inside look at deforestation’s impact on wildlife.

We met a range of different species receiving care at RSPCA, including koalas, brushtail possum joeys, kookaburras and flying foxes.

During our visit, we spoke with Tim Portas, Wildlife Veterinary Director at Wacol. Watch our interview with him below.

“It does actually make me wonder if I’m still on this earth in 20 or 30 years whether I will look back at this… and think I was here to see the last of Queensland’s koalas”

– Tim Portas, RSPCA Queensland

The Wacol facility was built to accommodate roughly 8,000 animals each year. However, the real figure currently sits at around 24,000. That’s three times more than the facility’s capacity.

RSPCA Queensland staff attend to a kookaburra at their Wacol facility.
Image: Greenpeace Australia Pacific

The main culprit? Beef production.

Beef production continues to drive Australia’s deforestation crisis.

From 2016 to 2020, 90% of bushland destruction in NSW and Queensland was directly linked to beef production.

Housing development, forestry, and energy projects do play a part in Australia’s deforestation levels, but comparative to the beef industry, their impact is minimal – just 1% of deforestation that occurs in NSW and Queensland is linked to these projects.

The Way Forward

Existing nature laws in Australia are weak, not enforced, and are failing our native wildlife. Our government must urgently step up and commit to ending Australia’s deforestation and extinction crises.

“The devastating scale of animal deaths and injuries outlined in the report demands urgent action. Alongside our colleagues at RSPCA Queensland, we’re calling for a stronger national nature law that will halt nature destruction and end the extinction crisis in Australia.”

– Gemma Plesman, Senior Campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific

Join the campaign to get strong nature laws protecting nature and wildlife by signing our petition to the Australian government now.

100 million animals killed, injured or displaced every year

Climate Change

China and Brazil join pledge to triple global nuclear energy capacity

Published

on

China, Brazil, Italy and Belgium have joined a pledge, launched at COP28 two years ago, to triple global nuclear energy capacity between 2020 and 2050.

Ministers from these four countries announced their support at this week’s Nuclear Energy Summit in Paris, increasing the total number of backers to 38.

At the summit, Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Guoqing said China endorsed the pledge to help tackle climate change and strengthen energy security. “To deliver such ambitious goals we should uphold multilateralism, strengthen solidarity and cooperation and resist unilateralism and protectionism,” he said.

In the last 15 years, China has added more nuclear energy capacity than the rest of the world combined, mainly through large conventional reactors. The country is also planning to become a nuclear exporter, constructing its Hualong One reactor in Pakistan and Argentina.

Sama Bilbao y León, head of World Nuclear Association (WNA), said the new endorsements add “tremendous momentum” to the initiative.

Victor Ibarra, head of the nuclear energy programme at the climate think tank Clean Air Task Force (CATF), said that these endorsements reflect growing recognition for nuclear as a “reliable source of clean, firm power”.

He added that “geopolitical tensions and instability in oil and gas markets” highlight the risks of relying on “volatile fuel supplies”, motivating countries to seek a “more flexible, innovation-driven approach to the energy transition”.

In a report from last year, the International Energy Agency (IEA) heralded a “new era of growth” for nuclear power, as demand for clean electricity rises to power electric vehicles, data centres and artificial intelligence.

A 2026 WNA report projects the tripling goal is achievable if current planning targets hold. On the other hand, Jacopo Buongiorno, nuclear science and engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) told Climate Home News last August that meeting the target would need a supply chain scale-up of “epic” proportions.

    Nuclear emerging in Global South

    As the construction of new reactors has stagnated in the US and Europe over the last decade, large emerging economies like China, India, the UAE and South Korea have taken the lead. Now, Brazil is also voicing support.

    Brazil’s foreign ministry said in a statement that the country would develop nuclear power responsibly and with “elevated standards for safety, protection and non-proliferation”.

    In an interview with Deutsche Welle last week, Brazil’s energy minister Alexandre Silveira said that Brazil’s “future is nuclear”. Silveira has proposed replacing fossil fuel power plants in the Amazon with small modular reactors (SMR), of which only two exist in the world: one in China and one in Russia.

    Brazil’s foreign ministry said the country’s large uranium reserves offer it energy security. Uranium is the main fuel used in nuclear reactors, but it requires a refining process known as “enrichment” before it can be used to produce power.

    Caio Victor Vieira from the Brazilian climate think tank Talanoa Institute, said nuclear expansion offers only “limited” economic benefit for Brazil, given that the country already sources almost 90% of its electricity from clean sources – mostly hydropower.

    He said Brazil’s signing of the pledge “is better understood as a diplomatic and strategic move” to support nuclear globally. “If Brazil were to pursue additional nuclear capacity in the future, it would require a broader domestic policy debate,” he added.

    Deep divisions persist as plastics treaty talks restart at informal meeting

    Europeans divided on nuclear

    About half of the pledge’s signatories are European but the continent has long been divided on the issue of nuclear power. France – which derives two-thirds of its power supply from nuclear – has championed this technology, with Germany pulling in the opposite direction.

    At the summit on Tuesday, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen weighed into this debate, calling Europe’s move away from “reliable, affordable” nuclear in the last 30 years a “strategic mistake” that “should change”.

    She added that the oil and gas crisis in the Middle East – which has raised the cost of electricity in gas-reliant countries – “gives a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities” that come from phasing out nuclear capacity.

    “Europe has been a pioneer in nuclear technology and could once again lead the world in it. Next-generation nuclear reactors could become a European high-tech high-value export”, she said.

    She argued that nuclear and renewables should be used in combination, as renewable energy is cheap but intermittent and often best produced far from where it is needed so nuclear energy, storage and improved grids are needed for a reliable energy system.

    Ursula von der Leyen, president of the EU Comission speaking at the Nuclear Energy Summit in Paris. (Photo: France's Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs)
    Ursula von der Leyen, president of the EU Commission speaking at the Nuclear Energy Summit in Paris. (Photo: France’s Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs)

    Europe’s move away from nuclear was led by its biggest economy Germany. Following Von der Leyen’s comments, German environment minister Carsten Schneider said that subsidising new reactors would require “very large amounts of money that would then not be available elsewhere”.

    “Clean, safe electricity from wind and solar energy is affordable, has long been a driver of the energy transition and does not produce radioactive waste,” Schneider said.

    However, German chancellor Friedrich Merz has indicated he would not oppose classifying nuclear as a clean energy source. His centre-right party governs in coalition with Schneider’s centre-left party

    Japan’s anti-nuclear stance has also softened. The country shut down all reactors after the 2011 Fukushima disaster but is now restarting some, though it faces resistance over waste storage.

    In the United States, the Trump administration has continued Biden-era support for nuclear energy—pushing new SMRs while weakening safety oversight and exempting reactors from some environmental reviews.

    The post China and Brazil join pledge to triple global nuclear energy capacity appeared first on Climate Home News.

    China and Brazil join pledge to triple global nuclear energy capacity

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Trump Claims Indian Investment Will Make Long-Standing Plans for Brownsville Refinery a Reality

    Published

    on

    Plans for an oil refinery in Brownsville, Texas, stalled after a permit fight. Now the developer has rebranded as America First Refining.

    Trump claimed a “massive win” this week when he announced that the Indian private energy company Reliance Industries is investing in a proposed oil refinery in Brownsville, Texas.

    Trump Claims Indian Investment Will Make Long-Standing Plans for Brownsville Refinery a Reality

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Warming Waters Threaten Seafood Supply

    Published

    on

    Fish are evolving ever smaller in order to survive temperature increases, new research warns. It’s a biological shift that will rob billions of meals from those who rely on fish for protein.

    In the world’s waters, fish are making a quiet, biological retreat. The once simple rules of the ocean—grow larger than potential predators—are being rewritten as temperatures reach record highs. Desperate to survive, fish are hitting the fast-forward button on life in a biological shift that will soon impact what ends up on dinner tables globally.

    Warming Waters Threaten Seafood Supply

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com