Connect with us

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Wind Energy Conferences: Are They Worth it?

Rosemary just got back from a conference and, like many of us recently, feels discouraged. Attendees and meetings were insightful, but the presentations and panels lacked impact. Allen has often felt the same. The two unpack their issues with recent wind energy conferences and discuss possible solutions to make them more valuable.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Pardalote Consulting – https://www.pardaloteconsulting.com
Weather Guard Lightning Tech – www.weatherguardwind.com
Intelstor – https://www.intelstor.com

Allen Hall: Welcome to the special edition of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall, along with my great co host, Rosemary Barnes, who is just back, fresh back from the Australia Wind Energy 2024 Conference in, of all places, Melbourne, Australia. And Rosemary and I were just talking offline about some of the proceedings and the events that happened in Melbourne, and I thought it’d be a good discussion to get out into the greater uptime audience.

Rosemary, first off, welcome back, and can you give us just a couple of just top level what was going on in Melbourne australia at this wind energy conference?

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, it was actually really focused on offshore wind this time. We I would say two thirds, three quarters, maybe more of the sessions were like explicitly about offshore wind, it seemed, and when it wasn’t explicitly about it, then people were trying to shoehorn it in, which.

On the one hand, it makes sense because that’s the, next big exciting thing coming. But on the other hand, we have literally zero offshore wind currently, and we have many things that could be improved with our current onshore wind rollout. I did think that there, it was a bit unbalanced in that way.

This conference, it was amazing in terms of everybody shows up to it. I, I think I was just back to back meetings the entire time really targeted at all the people that I, Wanted to talk to for, the various projects that I’ve got going on. So in that sense, it was incredibly successful and and had a great time.

But yeah, when I did find the time to step into some of the presentations, which is what you pay for after all, it’s 1, 500 for two days. And yeah, the sessions that I went to, they’re just getting. Worse and worse. It feels less and less like anybody cares what the experience is like for the attendees, what they might be hoping to get out of it.

And it’s just purely about extracting money from everybody, extract money from the exhibitors, extract money from the sponsors, extract money from the keynote speakers. People don’t realize that the keynote speakers are all, they’re all paying to stand up there and speak to you like, like a lot.

Yeah, pretty significant amount. And some of them are good, but you don’t know ahead of time. And for the most part, people pay their 10 grand or whatever it is and stand up there and give you a sales pitch. And that’s not valuable to the majority of the audience. Yeah, another complaint just on the panel discussions.

The panels are just way too big. You have a panel with 10 different people on it you spend half of the session just introducing everybody and then they’ve got to give their little pitch about their company because they’ve got to get something out of it. And then, yeah, there’s not, there’s too many people to have an actual discussion, usually not many, or maybe not any questions from the audience, certainly not addressed in a meaningful way.

And you have sessions like a session on, it sounds like it should be interesting session on supply chain challenges. That’s a huge challenge for for wind everywhere in the world at the moment including Australia. And. You have a, an hour long session and they mentioned the word supply chain, but it’s just Oh yeah, and obviously supply chain is an issue.

And then, move on to talk about something else.

Allen Hall: And let me ask you about that. Let me ask you about that because I’ve been to a number of conferences this year and I don’t want to name the ones I’ve been to specifically, but the attendance in the discussions was quite small, typically, unless it was a technical subject, something that people were having problems with out in the field.

Thanks A couple I remember from this year or last year was like concrete foundations and problems with concrete foundations on turbines, right? That’s a big issue. Another one was lightning damage or qualification of damage to blades and trying to quantify what’s cat one versus cat five.

Trade and industry standard, that was well attended. But some of these that are policy driven or politically driven discussions are just not well attended. Is that the same thing you’re seeing on Australia?

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. It’s actually interesting that you should mention foundations because that was the sole good keynote that I saw was a guy from total ground engineering who has a, his He presented some very compelling information about why the current standards for foundations are becoming less and less appropriate as the turbines get bigger and presented some innovative solutions towards that.

So that was a win. That was probably the sole interesting thing that I actually learned from sitting in the audience. Yeah, I and you’re right that they’re not very well attended because probably everyone is thinking the same thing as me, that this is not the point of the conference anymore.

The point is that people that you meet and yeah, early, like a few years ago when I moved back to Australia and I found myself with no network in Australian wind industry. So I went to the conferences and, I needed to Randomly chat to people and bump into people and pull people aside after a presentation to talk to them.

But this time, every single conversation I had gotten in touch with them. Either I already knew them or I had planned out ahead of time and got in touch on LinkedIn. So yeah, I’d say that the last bit of value that’s left at these, the conferences that way that they’re being run is the app that they have where you can actually, search by company, say who’s going to be there from the different companies and then.

You figure out who you want to talk to and send them a message. They also had a semi cool feature where you can send a meeting request. And if you put your availability in the calendar, then it will hook you up and you go into this room. It had a real speed dating vibe about it.

Everyone’s just like awkwardly looking around for who they’re supposed to be meeting. And then, yeah which, yeah, it was funny but that’s actually useful. But yeah, it’s just, it is becoming pretty hard to justify the price and. I don’t know. It’s been years since I went to a European conference.

So maybe they’re following this same same business model as the Australian and American ones now. But the last one I went to in Europe, it was really about the information, that they had people presenting and they would ask people to talk because they thought they had something interesting to say, not because they wanted them to pay a lot of money.

To get up there and talk. Yeah, so I just really think that they’ve got to rein it in a little bit. Get at least keep your panels of a moderate size. I know you’ve got to let every sponsor have a spot on the panel, keep it at a size that where it’s possible to have some sort of interesting communication happening.

Get a moderator that actually knows how to moderate with the audience in mind, okay. Given the session title and the participants, what are the audience going to want out of this? And then, keep people on track. Don’t allow it to become just like a a sales broacher of them, verbal sales broacher for their company talk about the things that people are hoping to learn about otherwise, are people going to keep on going?

Maybe it’s irrelevant, but I would have thought that exhibitors are only paying because. The number of people that come through the door and the same with the sponsors of the conference. They’re not going to want to sponsor. Yeah. Like 10, 000 keynote that has three people in the audience attending.

I could, you know what? They could better spend that money on sponsoring social media content instead and get a much wider view. Yeah. Viewership, listenership.

Allen Hall: Let me ask you why you think this is, because I have a couple of thoughts and I’m going to throw some at the wall here and you tell me what sticks.

First, is that they choose conference venues that are super exclusive slash expensive, like overly done. And so those conference places cost an enormous sum of money to book, to hold, and to then to make some money on as a conference exhibitor or a conference holder. The economics are not in your favor when you do that.

Used to be when we held conferences, I’ve been to a lot of Holiday Inn, Ramada kind of conferences in the United States, a lot less expensive, more attendance just because the entrance fee went down, then the hotel wasn’t as expensive. I think cause you’re, you mentioned the 1, 500 to attend.

There’s a reason why that is, I, was it one of those fancy Melbourne hotels or conference centers?

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Yeah. It’s in the Melbourne convention center, which they all, they always are that. Yeah. They’re all there. And then. It’s fine. It’s nice, but it’s also expensive. You want to stay close.

So then your accommodation is expensive too.

Allen Hall: See that, that, that doesn’t help the attendees. So if you want people like Rosemary and me to attend, you need to be usually a notch down from that, generally speaking, because 1, 500 is 1, 500. It’s, it is real money. That if we’re a small business, both of us run small businesses, our own business, 1, 500 comes right out of our pocket and it better be worth it.

And what Roseberry is saying, and I think what I’m saying is it’s not worth, some of these conferences are not worth it right now.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. And it’s the time cost as well. Everybody’s the same. And actually I did meet up with a few people that are like, Oh my God, did you buy a delegate’s pass?

Why would you do that? It’s obviously you only need the exhibition pass. So that let. Yeah. Okay. I am. I’m starting to come around to that, but I do think that for 1, 500, if you had good sessions it should be allowing you to put your finger on the pulse and figure out, what’s the vibe of wind energy in Australia at the moment.

What are the big problems people are having and then, some potential solutions, some people talking about things that are coming up that you might not have heard about yet. I do think that there’s a lot of value in that, but they’re not trying to get good speakers. And not trying to make it good for attendees.

And I just think surely it can’t continue much longer of this because it’s worse and worse every year.

Allen Hall: So let me ask you about this, the second question I had about attending. Is it because the speakers are less technical? More salesy, more executive office people rather than frontline direct hands on knowledge of what are their expertises, be it blaze, be it nacelles, generators, whatever.

That it then draws less of a crowd because then you do think, yeah, I’m going to see an executive vice president for this large operator. It’s maybe interesting, but I’m not going to take anything really out of this.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, and because they’ve all, they’re just giving the same talking points that they give.

Yeah, the higher level, the less interesting, probably, or less. Surprising what they have to say is going to be, I think personally, yes, I prefer, yeah, the European conferences that I used to go to did tend to be a lot more technical and I personally like that, but I’ve also been to some that are more based at a, at a higher level industry in general, because even though, yeah, I’m a really technical person, I still need to know what’s happening in the industry here.

Yeah. And in Australia, there’s not, no one’s designing wind turbines in Australia. We’re buying them and installing them and, I still need to know, Oh, what’s the problem this year? Is it community acceptance of new wind farms? Is it getting enough cranes on site? Is it transmission?

Is it yeah, like lightning damage causing problems on sites or, Anything like that I still want to yeah get my finger on the pulse. That’s a big part of why I would go to a conference like that. And it did, we did get that to a certain extent in this conference but yeah very little.

And yeah, even this same conference a few years ago was better. It still annoyed me at the time, but

Allen Hall: Do you think these exhibits and conferences need a steering committee to help guide them as to what would be important topics to discuss? I feel like we’re missing that right now.

Rosemary Barnes: I think with this particular conference, it’s not it’s an international conference organization group.

They’re not Australian. And I think that it shows that they are Not really, like conferences are nicer. If I think of, for example one conference that used to go to a lot in Europe was Winter Wind and it’s about, yeah, like wind turbines in cold climates. Have you been?

Allen Hall: Yes, I have.

Rosemary Barnes: The organizers were all from, yeah, the Nordics.

They really cared about. Making sure that wind energy was suitable for these cold climates and that the technologies were improving. And, like they started the conference because they wanted to improve knowledge and improve the the state of the industry in that niche.

And so it kind of permeates through the whole thing. They invite speakers who they’ve, cause they’re like involved in the field and they’re paying attention all year round to who’s saying what, and then, they’ll pick out, oh, this person has something really interesting to say, let’s invite them to be a keynote speaker.

And, it’s it’s just a totally different experience. And I can’t even recall the cost of it. It’s not like it was a cheap conference. It wasn’t in a shoddy venue or anything like that. There were, all these in beautiful places. One time I went to one at at Aura.

Actually, you went to one at Åre too, I remember saying. Yeah, it’s like a ski, Swedish ski resort. The conference venue has saunas on the, bottom floor and so it’s not, they’re not cutting corners on, that aspect of the conference junket, but the value that you get, if you want to know, if you’re entering that kind of part of the industry that you need to know about what matters in cold climate wind.

You’re guaranteed to find that out there. And if you go year after year, you are guaranteed to find out, what has the progress been and to meet relevant people and everything. So I just think that it’s much easier to get a good value conference from a, like a small organization that is really dedicated to, The topic of the conference, we need someone within the Australian wind industry to start up a better conference.

Allen Hall: And. Do you think that the attendees are mostly technical people or sales people, or is it a 50, 50 mix there?

Rosemary Barnes: There’s so few technical people in Australia. Like it’s just the industry is not technical here, if that makes sense. Not nearly to the definitely not to the extent of Europe and not even nearly to the extent of the U. S. So you never hear people like that presenting.

Allen Hall: Because that, I think that was the key to Winter Wind the last time I attended. It was focus on this problem. Let’s hear some solutions to this problem. Let’s try to understand the problem a little bit better. Here are some possible ways to address this.

So it was a problem solving session and I think you were right.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. And they come in from all different sides as well, cause they’ll have the, like I was there representing LM wind power. And like I didn’t even present every year because you didn’t always have something new to say, but you are basically, doing the company line, giving us the sales brochure and presentation format.

Yeah. Okay. Those sessions were usually a bit boring, but then they would also invite people who were operating wind farms and they’d be like, Oh, we have, brand X turbines and their icing system sucks. Look at all the different ways that it sucks. This is all the ways that it broke. And it, it’s so valuable, that information, because obviously, no one the manufacturer of that system is not going to, broadcast that knowledge.

But that’s how, yeah the industry can improve and what problems there are, then many people can, step in to solve them.

Allen Hall: Isn’t it fun when you see a contrarian point of view at these conferences too, like you see the OEMs and they have a certain sort of cadence to them and they’re pretty similar.

Then you get this one rogue scientist or engineers that comes in and just goes, I’ve worked out in the field, I’ve used these components, they’re terrible, here’s why, and this is what we should be doing about it. Those sort of discussions set the tone for the conference, I think. In terms of how good you feel about when you leave them Oh, something happened.

It may not have been, I may not agree with this person, but at least I now am thinking about this problem in a wider context. And that helps move the industry forward. Did you feel like the industry moved forward after you finished the conferences in Australia?

Rosemary Barnes: No. No, and I don’t recall hearing a rogue voice either.

Allen Hall: Yeah, that’s the, I think that’s the issue, right? Is that we need a Rosemirror on the panel to go, that’s garbage, and here’s why, and this is what we should be doing about it. Gets the discussion going, gets the blood flowing, gets people into seats. That kind of discussion.

Rosemary Barnes: They mention supply chain, they mention transmission, but they’re not really, um, there’s no, I didn’t hear anything new, any new ideas for solving that, any anything that would really, that I feel would like really give people the knowledge and the drive that they need to go out and, make things happen in those spaces.

So I think it’s a wasted opportunity.

Allen Hall: All right. So how do we make these conferences better?

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. So I think the first thing is that just choosing which ones to go to. Then the organizers of those conferences should be making sure that they are focused on what the attendees are getting out of it.

And that probably means. Picking good keynote speakers based on what they have to say, rather than what their their job title is, how, high up their job title is and also when you’re going to have panels, keep the panel to a meaningful size, make sure everybody is actually going to talk about the topic that people have come to listen to them talk about and get moderators for the panels that actually know how to keep everything focused on, what’s providing value for the audience.

Allen Hall: Yeah I’m with you on that I think keeping the costs down, I’m okay going to a lesser hotel to have a conference, totally fine, because I’m not there to it’s not a vacation for me. It is a learning experience, and it’s a vacation for some, obviously, we’ve been to some conferences in San Diego, and the reason a lot of people go there, especially from Denmark and cold places, is because it’s a nice, warm, sandy beach to be on for a while, so a vacation spot does turn into more attendance.

However, in those conferences that I’ve attended, the sessions, no one’s in them. They’re all out at the beach, so that’s a problem. So again, getting back to What the conference is about, what the talks are about, they need to figure that out and get that I think a committee together that is our industry people that said, these are the hot button topics that will bring people in and focus on those.

And you’re right, Rosemary, the moderators is a big problem. And when you just ask a person that was sitting at a desk at a large OEM or an operator and that’s their, their day job is running this thing. And then you ask them to be in front of this group of people and to hold this panel discussion.

That’s not their expertise. They may not be that good at it. And it just leads to this kind of wishy washy discussion that doesn’t really go anywhere. And I think you and I have been on too many of the, seen too many of those and we’re like, oh, that’s shame. If they had a good moderator here. There’ll be a lot more information coming out of it because the people, the panel people up on the dais there are smart.

They have information in their head. You need to extract it out. You need to give them the opportunity to speak their knowledge and get out of the way. The best moderators are the ones you don’t remember. Those are the best. And sometimes we just don’t have that. It’s hard, right? You and I speak a lot on YouTube and the internet and on podcasts.

It’s hard, right? It’s not an easy thing to do.

Rosemary Barnes: And I feel I would be unfair if I didn’t mention there are quite a few good Australian conferences, but none just focused on, on wind as far as I can recall. Anyway, there’s yeah, the clean energy council does some good events and I am kicking myself about not going, I don’t have the energy to go to another one next week.

So yeah there is that one. There’s a smart energy council also. Does good events. And there was one called all energy, which is pretty good too, but they’re all like more, more broad, can’t get into the technical stuff. And then, the other one, it’s not a conference that’s the event, but the everything electric show that I’ve done a couple of times from the guys from fully charged show.

Yeah. They’re incredibly audience focused and yeah, they take great care in making sure they get good moderators. Yeah, they get a lot of YouTubers to come and present because, they know how to make it fun for the audience. And they’re appealing, they’re not appealing to a professional audience.

They’re appealing to just, people who like, like cars, like home electrification. Yeah, and, the exhibitions, they’re fantastic, but so are the presentations, and I think that’s a pretty good example of how, like, why can’t it be more like that for professionals too we could also enjoy ourselves and learn a lot.

Allen Hall: Rosemary, this has been great. I’m glad you gave us the post exhibition conference data dump. Because I think we all have been thinking this the last couple of years about these conferences we’ve attended and have invented. And so I think we hit you at just the right time.

Rosemary Barnes: Yes, I’m feeling good.

I got through it, but yeah, you definitely did catch me at the right time if you wanted a big rant.

Allen Hall: Thanks Rosemary for being on the podcast. We love having you as one of our co hosts and we’ll see you next week.

https://weatherguardwind.com/wind-energy-conferences-are-they-worth-it/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

California a “Failed State?”

Published

on

Disgusting. It’s one thing that “news” in the United States has largely been replaced by incendiary opinions. But it’s even worse that so many of these opinions are so grossly ill-informed.

In its quest to move to the middle of the political spectrum, CNN has integrated a few hard-right commentator, like Jennings.  Fine; I get that.  But do they have to be morons?

In particular, can’t CNN do better than to refer to California as a “failed state?”  If California were a nation it would be the fourth largest economy on the planet, having recently overtaken Japan.

California a “Failed State?”

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

North Carolina needs more certainty before committing to an expensive new gas plant

Published

on

Despite massive uncertainty across the economy, Duke Energy is plowing ahead with its plan to build new fossil gas-fired power plants to serve data center, manufacturing, and other large customer load that may not even show up. Duke has asked the NC Utilities Commission for permission to build a combined-cycle (CC) gas plant in Person County, North Carolina, at the site of Duke’s Roxboro coal plant.

SACE has argued against the need for this gas power plant in the Certificate of Public Need and Necessity (CPCN) docket, submitting testimony to the Commission on Monday, June 9, 2025. Here’s a summary of that testimony (prepared by Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.), which explains what this all means for Duke’s billpayers, and how Duke can make changes within its control to protect customers and reduce pollution. These recommendations include:

  • Not approving this new gas power plant because the risks that it will increase bills are too high. Instead, Duke should improve the processes that are holding back lower-cost renewables and storage, then use renewables and storage to meet new load.
  • Instead of approving this specific gas plant, the Commission should order Duke to use an all-source procurement process to determine a portfolio of flexible assets that can meet the utility’s needs based on real-world costs.
  • In the event the Commission approves this gas plant, it should protect customers from high bills due to volatile gas prices by instituting a fuel cost sharing mechanism for the fuel costs spent to run this plant.

Duke Doesn’t Need this Risky Gas Power Plant

Duke’s claim that it needs this fossil gas power plant is based on outdated analysis. In this CPCN docket, Duke relies on its 2023 Carbon Plan Integrated Resource Plan (CPIRP) modeling and the CPIRP supplemental update and analysis filed in January 2024. The world has changed dramatically since then, and it is important that the Commission review the latest information before approving expenditures that will impact customer bills for decades.

Duke’s load forecast – once based on steady, predictable growth – is now subject to significant uncertainty as 1) data center developers look around the country for the best deal and the fastest interconnection to the grid and 2) manufacturers announce projects and then pull back as political uncertainty changes the economics of those projects. Under Duke’s current rate structure, prospective companies and site developers do not need to commit much money to become part of Duke’s load forecast. They have very little “skin in the game,” and Duke currently does not have policies in place to change this. If the Commission allows Duke to build an expensive fossil gas plant for load that doesn’t materialize, Duke’s remaining customers will be on the hook to pay for it.

Duke’s own load forecast updates since 2023 show that there are wild swings in its predictions. In the Spring of 2023, Duke anticipated 8 new large load projects during its 10-year planning forecast period, requiring an average of 169 MW each. Then for Fall 2023 (the supplemental update filed in January 2024), Duke anticipated 35 projects requiring an average of 111 MW each. In Summer 2024, Duke changed its forecast again, projecting 39 projects requiring an average of only 103 MW. And in May 2025, Duke filed an update showing a reduction in the number of projects back down to 35 but a dramatic increase in average need – back up to 169 MW. Duke’s forecasts will continue to show swings up and down – both in the number of projects and megawatts – until Duke has policies in place that require more commitment from the companies that knock on its door requesting service. Duke also has not published information regarding the location of these loads – the latest forecast applies to all of Duke Energy in both North and South Carolina.

It is also important to know that that this gas plant isn’t needed to meet growing load from existing customers or to replace retiring coal plants (according to Duke’s own testimony). This gas plant is being justified by new manufacturing and data centers claiming they will be operating somewhere in Duke Energy Progress or Duke Energy Carolinas territory in North or South Carolina.

Even if the load shows up, this plant won’t be needed for long

Even Duke admits that it doesn’t “need” this fossil gas power plant for very long. These kinds of power plants, combined-cycle plants, are typically used about 80% of the time, i.e. they are “baseload” power plants. But even absent federal carbon regulations, Duke expects this power plant’s usage to decline significantly throughout its 35-year lifetime (from 80% in 2030 decreasing to 46% by 2040 and only 13% by 2050 onwards). As cheaper renewables and storage with zero fuel costs are brought online, they will displace this plant. Duke is proposing to build a giant power plant that will very quickly run less and less – but Duke’s customers will continue to pay for it until 2065—15 years past a state law requiring Duke’s generation fleet to be carbon neutral. This represents a significant change in how power plants are built and run, and this is not in the best interest of Duke’s billpayers. To add insult to injury, Duke hasn’t even procured all of the equipment needed to build this plant, so the costs could skyrocket even more than they already have since last year’s carbon plan proceeding.

Renewables are flexible, would protect customers, and would reduce pollution

Duke’s model only chose a gas plant to meet this capacity need because of limits Duke imposed on the model. Duke claims it cannot interconnect renewables and storage fast enough to meet this capacity need, but the reasons it cannot interconnect those resources faster are all within Duke’s control. As Synapse recommends, Duke needs to update its processes that are holding back renewables and storage from serving customers with low-cost and low-risk resources. These processes include interconnection and transmission planning.

SACE has been advocating for improvements to these processes for years, and Duke has made changes to both its interconnection process and transmission planning. Duke was one of the first utilities in the Southeast to implement cluster studies in its interconnection process, and it is in the midst of the first scenario-based transmission planning exercise in the region. But is there evidence that these updates have helped if Duke continues to limit solar and storage in its future resource modeling? Given the much quicker interconnection process recently demonstrated in Texas, this raises the question of how hard Duke is really trying to streamline renewables interconnection.

Modular, flexible resources such as wind, solar, and energy storage can be adjusted in quantity based on market conditions. As our testimony from Synapse states, “This modularity, combined with the fact that solar and wind have zero exposure to fuel price volatility once they are constructed, makes these resources particularly valuable in the face of trade tariff uncertainty.”

The bottom line is that the Commission needs a lot more certainty about load growth and costs before committing Duke’s billpayers to any type of large fossil gas power plant. We simply do not have that now.

The post North Carolina needs more certainty before committing to an expensive new gas plant appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

North Carolina needs more certainty before committing to an expensive new gas plant

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Ultimate Guide To Understanding Every Type Of Solar Panel

Published

on

Are you thinking of switching to solar but feeling overwhelmed by the wide range of panel options available in the market? 

You’re not alone, as many others feel the same way. 

In a sun-drenched country like Australia, where electricity prices seem to climb every year, more households are turning to solar as a smart, sustainable solution.  

The reason for this energy transition is apparent: harnessing clean, renewable energy gives you energy freedom, saves you costs on electricity bills, and reduces your reliance on fossil fuels, lowering your carbon footprint.   

Moreover, solar panels are not only good for the planet; they’re an investment for your future!  

But with so many types of solar panels, how do you know which one is right for you? 

  • Which panels perform best in Australia’s diverse climate?
  • What type suits your roof, your budget, and your energy needs?
  • And most importantly, are they really worth the cost? 

Well, in this comprehensive guide, we’ll explain the above questions and everything you need to know about solar panels in Australia.  

From solar panel types to benefits and efficiencies, this ultimate guide on all types of solar panels in Australia will help you find the most suitable panels for your home and financial needs. 

So, tag along to learn more details!  

What Are Solar Panels? | Breaking Down the Power of the Sun!

Let’s begin by addressing a very basic question: What is a solar panel, and how does it work? 

A solar panel is a device that converts sunlight into electricity using photovoltaic (PV) cells. Instead of burning fossil fuel, these different types of solar panels generate clean, renewable energy with Australia’s abundant sunlight.

How Solar Panels Work: A Simple Breakdown!

At the core of every solar panel, there is a set of photovoltaic (PV) cells. These cells are responsible for converting sunlight into usable electricity.  

When sunlight hits these cells, it excites electrons within the silicon-based material, creating an electric current. This current is then captured and converted into alternating current (AC) through an inverter, making it suitable for household or commercial use.  

However, solar panels cannot store energy for later use. Therefore, you might need to add battery storage to keep your home illuminated at night or during low-light hours. 

Are They Worth It for Australians?

Solar panels are generally a smart investment for most Australians due to the country’s high solar exposure, government incentives, and rising electricity costs.  

With abundant sunshine, households in most Australian cities can generate a significant portion of their electricity needs from solar. This energy switch can be a significant key to reducing power bills while enhancing grid stability. 

For example,  a 6.6 kW solar system can save households $1,000–$2,500 per year, depending on usage and feed-in tariffs. They can reduce your power bills by up to 70% 

Moreover, the federal Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme (SRES), energy-saving schemes and various state rebates and incentives significantly reduce the upfront cost of solar systems.

So, with all these long-term savings, generous incentives, and positive environmental impact, solar panels offer a sustainable solution, making them a worthwhile financial and environmental investment for all.  

What Are the Most Popular Types of Solar Panels Available in Australia?

types of solar panels

Australia’s strong solar market offers various solar panel options tailored to different needs, budgets, and property types. Homeowners can access high-quality solar technologies from both local and international manufacturers, creating a global bond.  

However, instead of making a blind choice, it’s wise to understand the different types of panels, as each has different efficiency, durability, and cost advantages.  

So, before moving further, let’s have a glimpse at the most popular types of solar panels currently available in Australia:  

Monocrystalline Solar Panels: Premium Efficiency and Longevity

Monocrystalline solar panels are the most efficient type of solar panel. They are made from a single, pure crystal structure, which allows electrons to move more freely, resulting in higher efficiency.   

These panels are easily recognizable by their dark black color and rounded edges. While they are more than other types, their high efficiency and longevity make them a great investment. 

What are the Pros? 

  • High performance in low-light and high-temperature conditions. 
  • Sleek, modern look. 
  • Lower long-term cost per watt. 
  • Best for homeowners with limited roof space.  
  • Incredible longevity and efficiency.  

Talking about Cons: 

  • Monocrystalline panels are expensive. 
  • The manufacturing process results in silicon waste. 

Polycrystalline Solar Panels: Reliable and Cost-Effective

Polycrystalline solar panels are made from multiple crystal structures, which gives them a blue hue with a speckled look.  

They are less efficient than monocrystalline panels but are also less expensive. These panels are great for those with ample roof space and a tighter budget.  

What are the Pros? 

  • More affordable than Monocrystalline panels. 
  • Leaves less waste during production. 
  • Offer decent performance for residential use. 
  • Easier manufacturing process.

Talking about Cons: 

  • Less efficient. 
  • Require more space than Monocrystalline panels. 
  • Lower the aesthetic appeal of homes. 

Thin-Film Solar Panels: Lightweight and Versatile

Thin-film solar panels are the most affordable but least efficient type, with energy efficiency ranging from 7% to 18%. They are made by layering photovoltaic materials onto a surface.  

These panels are flexible, lightweight, and ideal for industrial and commercial use in Australian landscapes. 

The types include: 

  • Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) Panels 

Cadmium telluride is the most common thin-film panel, constituting about 5% of solar panel sales. These panels can achieve an efficiency rating of 9% to 15%. 

They are made from cheaper, toxic materials such as cadmium telluride and cadmium sulphide, which can pose environmental and health risks. 

  • Amorphous Silicon (A-Si) Panels 

Amorphous silicon panels use a different technology that makes them very flexible. Instead of using crystalline silicon wafers, these panels use a thin silicon strip with a rubber-like texture. 

These panels are incredibly lightweight, versatile, non-toxic, and cheap, but have a low efficiency rating of about 7%. 

  • Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) Panels 

CIGS panels are the most efficient thin-film panels available. They are composed of copper, gallium, indium, and selenide layers placed on a base of steel, glass, plastic, and other materials. 

These panels can be installed where standard panels cannot fit. They have a high enough efficiency rating of 12% to 15%.  

Bifacial Solar Panel: Power from Every Angle!

Bifacial solar panels can generate power from both sides, capturing sunlight that hits the front of the panel and light that reflects onto the back. It’s like double the sides, double the Power! 

This can increase energy production by up to 30%. They are ideal for ground-mounted solar systems or buildings with reflective roofing.  

Concentrated PV Cell (CVP)

Concentrated PV cells are the most efficient type of solar panel available today. They use lenses or curved mirrors to focus sunlight onto a small area of high-efficiency solar cells.   

However, they require direct sunlight and a cooling system to function effectively. They are more suitable for large-scale commercial projects in sunny locations.   

Solar Panel Types by Efficiency and Longevity: A Detailed Comparison

Type Efficiency Lifespan Perfect for
Monocrystalline 18–22% 25+ years Homeowners with limited roof space or those prioritizing efficiency and longevity.
Polycrystalline 15–17% 20–25 years Budget-conscious users with ample roof space.
Thin-Film 10–13% 10–20 years Large buildings, factories, and unconventional surfaces like car roofs or windows.

5 Factors to Look for While Installing a Solar Panel in Australia

Choosing the right panel is just half the job, where installation quality and system design play a huge role in overall performance. 

So, here we’ve listed what to consider before installing a solar panel on your property:

1. Sun Exposure and Roof Orientation

Proper sun exposure is a significant factor for maximizing energy production. In Australia, a north-facing roof typically captures the most sunlight.  

Also, ensure your roof is free of large trees, chimneys, or other shading.

2. Solar Panel Efficiency

Higher solar panel efficiency means more power, which ultimately leads to faster return on investment (ROI). This is especially important if your roof area is limited or you live in a rented property.

3. Durability and Warranty

Look for panels that offer 25-year performance warranties and 10–15-year product warranties.  

These warranties can provide long-term peace of mind and potentially save you significant repair or replacement costs.  

4. Installer Credentials

Once you decide to install solar, choose Clean Energy Council (CEC) accredited installers.  

They’ll help make sure your system follows Australian rules and let you know about rebate eligibility criteria.  

5. Proper Installation and Aftercare

Lastly, the installer will mount the solar panels on your roof and connect them to a solar inverter.  

After the installation, the system will need to be inspected by a certified electrician. Then, a monitoring app will track how much electricity your system produces and how much you use.

Some Other Hidden Factors That Might Impact Your Solar Setup!

While planning a solar installation, most people focus on the obvious elements like panel type, system size, and cost.  

However, beyond these core considerations, there are several lesser-known factors that can quietly influence the efficiency, longevity, and overall success of your solar setup.   

This includes: 

  • Hail Rating of the Panel 

This rating indicates how well solar panels can withstand hail impacts. Panels are typically tested by firing ice balls at them to simulate hail.  

A higher hail rating means better durability in hail-prone areas, reducing the risk of cracks and performance loss. Crystalline panels can handle hail hitting speeds up to 50 mph, while thin-film panels are thinner and less resistant. 

  • Temperature Tolerance of the Panel 

Solar panels become less efficient at high temperatures. Temperature tolerance, often measured as a temperature coefficient, tells you how much performance drops per degree above 25°C.  

Lower coefficients mean better performance in hot climates. So, here are the temperature coefficients for different panel types: 

    • Monocrystalline: -0.3% to -0.4% / °C  
    • Polycrystalline:  -0.4% to -0.5% / °C 
    • Thin-film: -0.2% to -0.3% / °C 
  • Fire Rating of the Solar Panel 

Solar panels and mounting systems must meet fire safety standards. The fire rating is usually classified in Class A, B, or C, reflecting the system’s resistance to fire spread and ignition.  

Class A is the most fire-resistant, which is crucial in wildfire-prone regions like Australia. 

  • Light-Induced Degradation (LID) 

LID (Light-Induced Degradation) is a common issue in crystalline solar panels, where they lose about 1–3% of their performance during the first few hours or days of sun exposure.  

It happens when sunlight reacts with tiny amounts of oxygen left in the silicon during manufacturing.  

This reaction slightly disrupts the silicon structure, reducing the panel’s efficiency. 

How to Choose the Right Solar Panels for Your Property?

Every home has different setups, so the solar panel installation process also varies from home to home. Here’s a stepwise checklist to help tailor the perfect setup: 

Step 1: Assess Your Energy Needs 

Before choosing solar panels, look at how much electricity your home uses. Check your electricity bills to calculate your average daily usage in kWh 

If you’re planning to expand or add things like an electric vehicle or a home addition, consider how that might increase your energy needs in the future. 

Step 2: Evaluate Roof Size and Position 

In Australia, your roof’s position and condition matter greatly for solar energy generation. Therefore, while installing the panel, you should consider: 

  • Roof orientation, as south-facing roofs typically capture the most sunlight.
  • Proper tilt and shading for minimal shading from trees, chimneys, or nearby buildings.
  • Larger roofs offer more installation space, while older roofs may need repairs, so check the roof size and condition first. 

However, if you have limited space, go for high-efficiency monocrystalline panels, and Polycrystalline might be a better value for plenty of space. 

Step 3: Set a Budget 

Solar Power System prices vary widely from place to place. But with our 440W Tier-1 Panels and 5kW Wi-Fi Inverter in a 6.6kW Solar Power System, you can enjoy the benefits of solar power without a hefty price tag. 

  • For 6.6 kW System: 

Original Price starts from $3,690.00 

Cyanergy’s VIC Offer Price starts from $890.00 

  • For 10.12kW System 

Original Price starts from $5,770.00 

Cyanergy’s VIC Offer Price starts from $2,970.00 

  • For 13kW System 

Original Price starts from $7,130.00 

Cyanergy’s VIC Offer Price starts from $4,330.00

Step 4: Find a Trustworthy Installer & Factor in Rebates 

Federal STC rebates and various state-based incentives can save you thousands off your upfront cost, so look for a certified, experienced installer who can help you claim them.

So, Which Solar Panel Type Should You Use?

Honestly, there is no specific answer to this question. The panel type and effectiveness depend on several factors, including your installation location, budget, and aesthetic preferences.  

However, here we’ve shared a quick guide based on different situations to make your purchase decision easier:  

Different Scenarios Recommended Type
Limited roof space or rental property Monocrystalline
Tight budget with big roof space Polycrystalline
Flexible portable solutions Thin film
Need long-term high output Monocrystalline
Off-grid or rural installations Thin-Film or Hybrid

Some of the Best Solar Panels in Australia (2025 Edition)

Best Solar Panels in Australia

When choosing the best solar panel brands in Australia, performance, durability, and warranties matter most. 

  1. SunPower
    • Efficiency: Up to 22.8%
    • Warranty: 40 years (industry-best!)
    • Why Choose: Premium performance and extreme durability
  1. REC Solar
    • Efficiency: Up to 21.9% 
    • Warranty: 25 years
    • Why Choose: Excellent value for performance, strong Australian support
  1. Q CELLS
    • Efficiency: Up to 21.4%
    • Warranty: 25 years
    • Why Choose: Robust tech with good performance in varying light conditions
  1. Jinko Solar
    • Efficiency: Up to 21%
    • Warranty: 25 years 
  1. LONGi Solar
    • Efficiency: 20%
    • Warranty: 25 years
    • Why Choose: Solid mid-range performer, good balance of cost and quality 

For any queries, contact Cyanergy. Here, our solar experts will provide the best solution based on your preferences.  

Remember, with the right panel type, a trusted installer, and a bit of planning, you can enjoy decades of clean, affordable electricity. 

Your Solution Is Just a Click Away

The post Ultimate Guide To Understanding Every Type Of Solar Panel appeared first on Cyanergy.

Ultimate Guide To Understanding Every Type Of Solar Panel

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com