Connect with us

Published

on

When it comes to the way the U.S. covers the news, what precisely has changed over the years?

In a word, monetization.

Until the late 20th Century, news was a service, offered to the American people 30 minutes each day with little or no profit motive.  Now, it’s an extremely lucrative industry, fed by content carefully crafted to provide huge hits of dopamine into the brains tens of millions of addicts, 24 hours a day.

Want to see Trump held accountable for trying to overthrow the U.S. government?  You’re not alone, and do we have something for you!

Believe Trump is being persecuted by the radical left that is ruining this country, led by the Biden crime family? Tune in to this crap over here!

Where there are large amounts of money to be made, only a fool thinks he’ll find any honesty and decency that remain intact.

What Happened to the “News?”

Renewable Energy

The Positive Effects We’ve Had on Others Are Profound, Whether We Know It or Not

Published

on

There’s a theory that most people underestimate the positive effects they’ve had on other people.

Yes, that’s the theme of “It’s a Wonderful Life,” but it’s also the core of the 1995 film “Mr. Holland’s Opus,” in which a music teacher who deemed that his life had been a failure because he never completed writing a great symphony, is gently and beautifully corrected. Please see below.

The Positive Effects We’ve Had on Others Are Profound, Whether We Know It or Not

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Renewable Energy Concepts Can’t Violate the Laws of Physics

Published

on

In the early days of 2GreenEnergy, my people and I were vigorously engaged in finding solid ideas in cleantech that needed funding in order to move forward.

I vividly remember a conversation with a guy in Maryland who was trying to explain the (ostensible) breakthrough that he and his team had made in hydrokinetics. When I was having trouble visualizing what we was talking about, he asked me to “think of it as a river in a box.”

“Oh!” I exclaimed. “You mean you take a box full of standing water, add energy to it get it moving, then extract that energy, leaving you with more energy that you added to it.”

“Exactly.”

I politely explained that the laws of physics, specifically the first and second laws of thermodynamics, make this impossible.

He wasn’t through, however, and insisted that, in his office, his people had constructed a “working model.”

Here’s where my tone descended into something less than 100% polite. I told him that he may think he has a working model, but he’s wrong; if he believes this, he’s ignorant; if he doesn’t, but is conducting this conversation anyway, he’s a fraud.

“But don’t you want to come see it?” he implored.

“No. Not only would not fly across the country to see whatever it is you claim to have built, I wouldn’t walk across the street to a “working model” of something that is theoretically impossible.”

I tell this story because the claim made at the upper left is essentially identical.  You’re pumping water up out of a stream, and then claiming to extract more energy when the water flows back into the stream.

Of course, social media today is rife with complete crap like this.  We’ve devolved to a point where defrauding money out of idiots is rapidly replacing baseball as our national pastime.

Renewable Energy Concepts Can’t Violate the Laws of Physics

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

What Canada Has that the U.S. Doesn’t

Published

on

Until recently, I would have moose, maple syrup, and frozen tundra.

Now I would say: decency, honesty, and class.

What Canada Has that the U.S. Doesn’t

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com