Verra, the largest carbon registry and standard body, has approved 3.03 million carbon credits from a large grasslands restoration project in northern Mexico. The approval was announced under Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) program.
The credits come from improved land and grazing practices that increase soil carbon storage. Once fully issued, this will be the largest soil carbon credit issuance under the VCS to date. It is also the first soil carbon project in North America approved under Verra’s VM0042 methodology.
Verra said the project shows how grasslands can play a bigger role in climate action. It also highlights how soil carbon projects are becoming more visible in voluntary carbon markets (VCMs).
Mandy Rambharos, Verra CEO, said:
“Projects like this demonstrate how implementing targeted farming practices can deliver measurable climate benefits at scale. Verra’s role is to ensure these outcomes are grounded in rigorous science, conservative accounting, and independent verification, so the land, communities, and the climate all benefit.”
Mexico Grasslands: Restoring Millions of Acres Through Better Grazing
The project is located across large areas of native grasslands in northern Mexico. It spans about 4 million acres. The land sits mainly within the Chihuahuan and Sonoran desert regions.
The project developer is Boomitra. The company works with 158 ranchers across the region. Together, they apply improved grazing practices. These practices aim to restore soil health and increase the amount of carbon stored underground.
The grazing changes include rotating livestock, avoiding overgrazing, and allowing grass to recover. Healthier grass leads to stronger root systems. Those roots help store more carbon in the soil.
Soil carbon matters because grasslands hold a large share of the world’s carbon stored in soils. Scientists estimate that grasslands contain about 20% to 30% of global soil organic carbon. Most of that carbon sits below the surface, which makes it less exposed to fires and storms.
The size of the Mexico project is unusual. At 4 million acres, it is one of the largest grassland soil carbon projects ever registered under Verra. The approved credits reflect verified increases in soil carbon over time.
A Turning Point for Soil Carbon at Scale
The approval comes as the VCM continues to adjust and rebuild trust. Voluntary markets allow companies to buy carbon credits to support climate claims or offset emissions they cannot yet remove.
Nature-based carbon credits are a growing part of this market. These include projects based on forests, wetlands, agriculture, and grasslands. Buyers often value them because they can deliver climate benefits alongside environmental and social benefits.
According to market analysis, the voluntary carbon market was worth about $2.5 billion in 2025. Forecasts suggest it could grow to more than $100-250 billion by 2030. Nature-based credits are expected to play a major role in that growth.

Soil carbon credits are still a smaller share of the market. Forest projects remain more common. But soil and grassland projects are gaining attention because they can scale across large areas and support food systems.
The Mexico grasslands project also stands out because of its methodology. Verra’s VM0042 method focuses on improved agricultural land management. It allows credits to be issued when better land practices increase soil carbon beyond a defined baseline.
This approval sends a clear signal to the market. It shows that large-scale soil carbon projects can meet strict verification rules. It also suggests that supply from grassland projects could grow in the coming years.
From Soil to Credits: How Verra’s Verification Works
Carbon credits under the VCS must meet strict requirements. Verra requires projects to prove that emissions reductions or removals are real, measurable, additional, and lasting.
The VM0042 methodology sets detailed rules for soil carbon projects. Developers must show how land management changes increase soil carbon over time. They must also account for uncertainty and risks, such as reversals.
Projects go through independent third-party audits. Auditors review data, methods, and results before credits are approved. Only verified outcomes can then receive credits.
The Mexico project also uses remote sensing and artificial intelligence to monitor soil carbon changes. This technology allows measurement across large areas without heavy soil sampling. It improves accuracy and lowers costs for ranchers.
The largest carbon credit certifier said the approval followed a full validation and verification process. The credits represent confirmed soil carbon gains from real changes on the ground.
Verra also noted that more than 200 other projects are now using the same VM0042 methodology. Many are still in early stages, which suggests a growing pipeline of future soil and grassland credits.
Why Grasslands Are Back on the Climate Map
Grassland restoration is gaining attention beyond carbon markets. Healthy grasslands support biodiversity, improve water retention, and help prevent land degradation. They also support rural livelihoods.
In carbon markets, buyers are looking more closely at credit quality. That includes how projects measure results and manage long-term risks. Soil carbon projects face added scrutiny because soil carbon can change with weather and land use. And so, transaction volumes and values declined as shown below.

Still, interest is growing. Other grassland projects have recently reached milestones. For example, a grassland restoration project in South Africa issued the world’s first grassland credits with Climate, Community and Biodiversity (CCB) labels under the same methodology.
In Europe, agricultural soil carbon projects have also begun issuing large volumes of verified credits. One recent project issued more than 2.3 million credits after completing Verra verification.
These developments show a broader trend. Voluntary carbon markets are slowly diversifying. Forest projects still dominate, but soil and grassland projects (forestry and land use, and agriculture) are becoming more common.

For Mexico, the project also has a local impact. Improved grazing can raise productivity and reduce long-term land risks. That can help ranchers adapt to climate stress while contributing to climate goals.
What Happens Next: From Approval to Market Supply
Verra said the full issuance of the 3.03 million credits is expected once final steps are completed. After issuance, the credits can be sold on voluntary carbon markets.
Buyers may include companies seeking nature-based credits to support climate strategies. Some buyers also value projects that deliver co-benefits beyond carbon.
The Mexico grasslands project shows how soil carbon can move from pilot scale to large-scale deployment. It also shows how new tools and methods can help verify results across millions of acres.
As voluntary carbon markets continue to evolve, projects like this may shape future supply. They highlight both the potential and the complexity of using land-based solutions to address climate change.
For now, Verra’s approval marks a clear milestone. It confirms that large grassland projects can meet high verification standards. It also signals that soil carbon is becoming a more visible part of the voluntary carbon market.
- READ MORE: The Carbon Credit Market in 2025 is A Turning Point: What Comes Next for 2026 and Beyond?
The post Verra Greenlights Record 3 Million Soil Carbon Credits From Mexico Grasslands appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

