Disseminated on behalf of SolarBank Corporation
The US solar industry began 2025 with mixed signals. Wood Mackenzie’s US Solar Market Insight Q2 2025 reported an addition of 10.8 gigawatts-direct current (GWdc) in Q1. This marks a 7% drop from last year and a steep 43% fall from Q4 2024. Rising costs, trade tensions, and changing policies have strained project development and consumer demand.
Let’s study the various segments of solar and their performance in this quarter.
Utility-Scale Solar Slows Down but Stays Resilient
Utility-scale solar added 9 GWdc, slightly down from the previous quarter and Q1 2024. Still, it remained a strong segment. Texas led with 2.7 GWdc, nearly double Florida’s numbers. Both states focused heavily on large-scale solar projects. Notably, Texas, Florida, Ohio, Indiana, and California made up 65% of utility-scale additions.
Mixed Results Across Distributed Solar Segments
Residential solar struggled, adding only 1,106 MWdc – the lowest since Q3 2021. High interest rates, economic concerns, and uncertainty about solar tax credits held back homeowners. California topped the list with 255 MWdc installed, but this was the weakest output since Q3 2020.
On a positive note, commercial solar grew by 4% year-over-year to 486 MWdc, mainly due to California’s NEM 2.0 projects. However, it saw a seasonal dip of 28% compared to Q4 2024.

Community Solar Faces Headwinds but Holds Promise
Community solar projects, which are shared local installations, added 244 MWdc in Q1 2025. This was a sharp 22% year-over-year decline and a significant drop from Q4 2024’s surge. Maine and Massachusetts saw steep declines, while New York’s output fell slightly but still represented over half of the national community solar market.
Despite this downturn, installed capacity in 2025 is expected to exceed 2023 levels, reaching about 1.5 GWdc. New York and Illinois drive growth, with a community solar pipeline nearing 5 GWdc. However, grid interconnection delays and needed infrastructure upgrades slow progress.

Encouragingly, emerging markets may expand. Proposed legislation in several states could unlock over 1.5 GWdc of extra community solar capacity. Still, without new programs, national growth might stall. Wood Mac predicts a 6% average annual decline in community solar through 2030, but future legislative successes could change that.
Amid this uncertainty, SolarBank has remained resilient. The company recently announced a 2.4 MWdc community solar project in Nova Scotia.
SolarBank’s (SUUN) Nova Scotia Project Reflects Market Momentum
SolarBank Corporation (NASDAQ: SUUN) is going forward. The company recently announced the 2.4 MWdc Sydney Project in Nova Scotia, which will produce about 2,730 MWh of clean energy annually. It can potentially power 221 homes and offset nearly 1,900 tons of CO₂. The ground-mounted community solar power project, owned by AI Renewable Flow-Through Fund (“AI Renewable”), is a major step into Canada’s clean energy market.
The news lifted SolarBank’s stock (NASDAQ:SUUN) to $1.82 on June 16, up from $1.415 on June 13. The strong investor response highlights ongoing interest in clean energy opportunities (including those in jurisdictions outside the United States where government support remains strong), even as the broader market weathers policy and economic uncertainty.
SolarBank has developed over 100 MW of renewable energy projects in North America and has a pipeline of more than 1 gigawatt.
- In the U.S., the company completed over 50 MW of community solar installations. Now, it applies that experience to the Canadian market, where demand for clean energy is rising and government support is growing.
SolarBank North American Growth Strategy

Its portfolio includes community solar, utility-scale systems, virtual net metering projects, and behind-the-meter installations. This variety keeps the company agile, maximizes returns, and fosters low-risk, high-reward partnerships.
SEE MORE:
- SolarBank Expands Community Solar in New York with 14.4 MW Project
- The 7.2 MW North Main Community Solar Project in New York
How Shifting Trade Policy Is Disrupting US Solar Growth?
The US solar market is facing a tough trade and tariff environment in 2025. Earlier this year, the Trump administration added a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico starting March 4. While most solar panels aren’t imported from these countries, key parts like inverters and trackers are, which has pushed up production costs.
On top of that, aluminum tariffs under Section 232 increased from 10% to 25%, and later to 50% by June, making trackers and module frames even more expensive.
Tariffs on Chinese goods also soared, reaching 145% at one point due to fentanyl-related measures, before settling at 30% after a rollback deal on May 12. These changes have made the solar market more expensive and unpredictable.
- The US added 8.6 GW of new solar module manufacturing capacity in Q1 2025, bringing the total to 51 GW.
Upstream production remains sluggish. Only one new domestic cell plant, i.e., ES Foundry’s 1 GW facility in South Carolina, opened this year. There were no new launches in wafer or polysilicon production.
However, in these turbulent times, SolarBank has shown resilience. A recent collaboration with Qcells, involving the use of U.S.-manufactured solar modules, is one example of how the company is preparing for multiple future scenarios.
Why Investors Are Watching Closely?
Despite the hurdles, the US solar industry remains a key player in the country’s energy transition. In Q1 2025, solar accounted for 69% of all new power capacity added, showing its continued dominance. With long-term demand rising from data centers and domestic manufacturing, the sector’s growth potential remains strong.
To keep that momentum, the industry will need stable policies, steady investment, and better solutions for grid connections and supply chain issues.
The recent rebound in NASDAQ:SUUN stock reflects growing investor confidence. It signifies that SolarBank can be a potential long-term bet. While near-term challenges exist, the outlook for solar remains promising, and smart investors are taking note.
- READ MORE: SolarBank and CIM Group Announce $100M Financing to Power 97 MW of U.S. Renewable Energy Projects
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.
Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post US Solar Market Slows in 2025 – Here’s How SolarBank (NASDAQ:SUUN) Is Still Gaining Ground appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

