Connect with us

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

US Moving Back to Coal? Iowa Sticks with Wind

Energy Secretary Chris Wright visits Iowa to announce plans to end wind energy subsidies, despite Iowa generating 60% of its electricity from wind power that has become cheaper than fossil fuels. While the Trump administration pushes to revive coal and reduce renewable research funding, market forces continue driving utilities toward wind and solar.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

This week’s news flash is about power and politics. And the two collided in Iowa of all places.

Iowa is farm state in the middle of America’s heartland crucial for presidential hopefuls. It’s the first major contest where candidates rise or fall. Smart politicians know: upset Iowa voters at your own peril.

But here’s what makes this interesting. Iowa generates more electricity from wind than any other state. Sixty percent of their power comes from those spinning turbines. Wind energy has become Iowa’s economic engine.

The irony? US Energy Secretary Chris Wright just visited Ames National Laboratory in Iowa. He praised the lab as a premier scientific institution. Then he dropped a bombshell: it’s time to end government support for wind energy.

Wright says wind power has been subsidized for thirty-three years. Time to compete without training wheels.

But here’s what he didn’t mention: wind energy is now one of the cheapest sources of electricity in America. Even without subsidies, renewables cost less than oil, gas, and coal.

Energy costs are everything in America. What we pay for electricity determines what we pay for everything else. Manufacturing, artificial intelligence, keeping the lights on at home.

Energy Secretary Wright talks about reindustrializing America. He wants to win the race on artificial intelligence. Stop upward pressure on electricity prices.

Those are noble goals. But here’s the twist: the cheapest electricity in America comes from wind and solar power. Not oil. Not gas. Not coal.

The Lazard LCOE analysis proves it year after year. Renewable energy costs have plummeted while fossil fuel prices remain volatile.

Iowa figured this out years ago. They didn’t choose wind power because they love polar bears. They chose it because it’s cheap, reliable, and keeps electricity bills low.

Wright’s DOE budget would slash renewable energy research by more than fifty percent. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory would lose half its funding.

But markets don’t care about politics. They care about profits. And the lowest-cost energy wins every time.

Here’s where the story gets complicated.

Wright is absolutely right about one thing: America depends too heavily on China for critical minerals. Sixty percent of rare earth elements. Ninety percent of processing.

These materials power our phones, electric cars, and military equipment. China’s grip on this supply chain threatens national security.

The Energy Department will invest one billion dollars to bring mining and processing home. Smart move.

But here’s the irony: many of these critical minerals are essential for wind turbines and solar panels. The very technologies Wright wants to defund.

Alaska holds forty-nine critical minerals. Refining them increases their value by six hundred fifty percent.

So which is it? Do we want energy independence through domestic mining? Or do we want to slow the industries that need those materials most?

Wind turbines do need rare earth magnets. Solar panels need refined silicon. Energy storage needs lithium and cobalt.

You can’t have domestic energy security without domestic renewable energy. They’re the same fight, they are just wearing different uniforms.

Recently, Secretary Wright commissioned five scientists to review climate assessments. Their conclusion: carbon dioxide warming appears less economically damaging than believed.

Climate activists call this science denial. Wright calls it getting discourse back to facts.

But here’s what both sides miss: the economics have already decided.

Wind power in Iowa didn’t grow because of climate regulations. It grew because Iowa farmers could lease their land for guaranteed income. Because utilities could buy cheap electricity. Because manufacturers wanted stable energy costs.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says human influence on warming is established fact. Wright says climate change isn’t the world’s greatest problem.

Meanwhile, Iowa keeps building wind farms. To save money on electric bills.

The beauty of market economics? You don’t need to agree on the problem to agree on the solution.

Cheap energy is cheap energy. Whether you’re a climate scientist or a climate skeptic.

Mother Nature doesn’t vote. But she does send the bill.

Solar and wind stocks soared after a leaked Treasury document revealed the Trump administration’s plans for safe harboring of renewable projects. Instead of killing renewable tax credits, they’re preserving most of them.

The guidance requires actual construction to start, not just spending five percent of costs. But it allows work to begin offsite and maintains four-year completion windows.

NextEra Energy stock jumped about 5% on the news. First Solar surged around 13%

Why the market optimism? Because investors understand something politicians sometimes forget: cheap energy creates wealth.

Iowa’s wind industry will survive these changes. Why? Because wind power in Iowa is profitable with or without tax credits. The economics work.

That’s the difference between subsidizing infant industries and supporting mature technologies that already win on price.

The market has spoken.

Here’s the final chapter in our energy story.

Secretary Wright renewed the National Coal Council charter, terminated under President Biden. Coal supports hundreds of thousands of jobs, he says. Adds tens of billions to the economy.

True enough. Coal built industrial America. Coal powers steel mills. Coal byproducts build roads and fertilize crops.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: even with government support, coal can’t compete with wind on price. Utility companies know this. They’re retiring coal plants and building wind farms.

Not because bureaucrats order them to. Because shareholders demand profits.

Iowa proves the point. This state didn’t abandon coal for environmental virtue. They embraced wind for economic advantage.

Coal will always have a role in steelmaking and chemical production. But for electricity generation? The future is blowing in the wind.

Literally.

You’ve heard six stories about America’s energy future. They seem disconnected. Politics and science. Markets and ideology. Iowa and Washington.

But they’re really one story wearing six different masks.

The story is this: energy costs drive everything else. The cheapest energy source wins. Not eventually. Not after government picks winners and losers. Now.

Wind power generates more electricity in Iowa than any other source. Not because politicians mandated it. Because Iowa farmers, utilities, and businesses chose it.

They chose it because wind power in Iowa costs less than coal. Less than natural gas. Less than anything else that plugs into the grid.

Secretary Wright can defund renewable research. President Trump can eliminate tax credits. Congress can support coal.

But they can’t repeal the law of supply and demand.

Iowa will keep building wind farms. Iowa will continue to build solar farms.

The wind blows free. The sun shines free. Coal must be dug. Oil must be drilled. Gas must be fracked.

Which would you choose if you were paying the bills?

The future is renewable because the future is profitable.

https://weatherguardwind.com/us-coal-iowa-wind/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

As Europe Shuns Chinese Turbines and Components, Who Will Fill the Gap?

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

As Europe Shuns Chinese Turbines and Components, Who Will Fill the Gap?

While most of Europe has spent most of this year itemizing reasons it cannot, should not, and will not use Chinese wind turbines or components, accusations and arm-twisting tactics have garnered most of the attention.

But we invite you to consider a future – maybe just five, or ten years from now?- in which those same countries and companies are eagerly awaiting orders from wind turbine manufacturing facilities in… India.
What?!
You know that the country has a lot of installed wind.

You may think – and many in the industry would agree – that India’s blade manufacturers are a few revs behind blade-makers elsewhere in the world. But the country is newly committed to manufacturing and it’s busy installing more – provided that it’s made in India, with Indian technology, by Indian workers.
Of course, similar domestic-focused policy currents are running through European countries – where wind OEMs are almost inarguably a decade ahead of Indian manufacturers. But there’s an important reason why we say, “watch India” in wind turbine manufacturing.

It’s because you might learn something.

If you follow The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast, you probably heard this discussion a few weeks ago. It wasn’t the headline story – we try to highlight as many major news items and trends that we can, and follow up as credible information becomes available. India’s quiet moves to strengthen its own renewable energy industries didn’t grab the headlines. But it comprised a good bit of our panelists’ discussion.

With India’s expanding manufacturing capacity, and Suzlon’s strategic offerings for the European market (Blue Sky), there are reasons for European developers to take a closer look at Indian manufacturers.

If Europe continues to squelch deals with Chinese manufacturers due to data security issues, India is a relatively obvious candidate to fill the void, for several reasons:

  • The country has depth and breadth in R&D: India (Suzlon, specifically) has a track record of involvement and relationships across the continent, as it operates research and development centers in Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark.
  • Indian service providers have reach: Inox and Adoni Wind operate multiple wind turbine manufacturing plants and wind farms throughout several Indian states, and Apraava Energy has been commissioning wind projects, working with multiple OEMs, for more than 16 years.
  • The country’s energy sector has size: Tata Power is estimated to be worth about US$16 billion and employs 22,000 people.

And major manufacturers from other countries have had a strong presence in the country for years:

  • GE Vernova has turbine blade and nacelle manufacturing operations and multiple tech/R&D centers in India;
  • Vestas has a R&D technology center in Chennai; and
  • China’s SANY Wind has had assembly facilities in India since 2017, and in 2024, it signed a licensing agreement with JSW allowing SANY to manufacture blades and generators for JSW – enabling JSW Neo Energy to produce wind turbine generators and major components in-country.

So while there is hard data suggesting that India is already a global hub for wind turbines, sometimes the real strength comes from soft skills. Like sharing information.

We’ve noticed that Indian manufactures aren’t stingy with information. They share what they learn in the field and on the shop floor, so that the whole industry can move faster to solve problems. That bodes well for the industry overall, and particularly well for companies who figure out how to solve problems that some manufacturers aren’t even ready to admit to having.

We’ll be watching India with a great deal of interest in the coming months. Subscribe to The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast and follow along with us.

We’re not financial analysts. We’re engineers who watch the wind industry very closely. This is what we’ve noticed, and we thought it was worth sharing.

Where do you think you’ll be looking for solutions, components, and service providers in the next few years or the next decade? Tell us what you think. We’d love to hear from you.

Uptime Wind Energy Podcast Logo

As Europe Shuns Chinese Turbines and Components, Who Will Fill the Gap?

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

When You Write for Idiots, You Can Get Away with Anything

Published

on

To the author of the meme here:

“Either” refers to two choices; “any” refers to three or more.

More importantly, it’s amazing how shamelessly the ultra-right wing exaggerates.  The left side of the Democratic party would like to see the United States look like social democracies in places like Scandinavia.  Having government programs that benefit the common person, e.g., Social Security, public schools, emergency relief, libraries, environmental responsibility, etc., does not equate to Stalinism.

When You Write for Idiots, You Can Get Away with Anything

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Are Muslims “Dangerous?”

Published

on

Some of my old prep school chums from the Class of 1973 convene via Zoom approximately every six weeks for a 90-minute discussion of current events, science, and anything else that sounds interesting.

Our professions range from medicine, law, finance, and business management. All from highly ranked colleges.  Over 50% hold doctorate degrees.

Here’s something I find fascinating about the group: it includes one right-wing conservative.  I don’t mean a Reaganite; I mean a Trump supporter.  This guy is incapable of any thought that doesn’t come directly from Nexsmax.

It’s almost eerie how closely he toes the line of the far-right.  Yesterday he echoed the Newsmax talking point and told the group that all Muslims holding public office are “very dangerous” and should be removed.

Now, the rest of us are sitting there, dumbfounded at this idea, unwilling waste our breath on this racist and utterly preposterous concept.

All this raises the question: How are our political viewpoints formed?  How much of this is genetics?  Epigenetics?  Early childhood experiences? How do take a boy from among the best environments and turn him into someone who struggles to understand the most basic principles on which our country was founded?

https://www.2greenenergy.com/2026/11/09/principles-country-was-founded/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com