Connect with us

Published

on

Solar energy is experiencing a remarkable surge in the U.S., driven by significant new installations and strong policy support. This growth is largely due to developers completing projects in the last year and opening new opportunities in 2025. Amid this surge, SolarBank, a leading North American solar company, is pivotal in developing commercial, industrial, and community solar projects in the U.S.

Thus, as the U.S. energy landscape undergoes a major shift, wind and solar are set to lead the charge in powering the nation’s future. With this transformation underway, solar energy will play an even bigger role in the coming years.

Solar Power Fuels America’s Clean Energy Boom

According to recent EIA’s Short-Term Energy Outlook projections, solar power generation is set to experience remarkable expansion, rising 75% from 163 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh) in 2023 to 286 billion kWh by 2025.

Supply chain issues, grid connection delays, and tariff increases on imported modules pose challenges, but federal and state incentives continue to support solar’s momentum. While obstacles remain, reforms and incentives offer hope for accelerated growth in the coming years.

In 2023, renewables—including wind, solar, hydro, biomass, and geothermal—accounted for 22% of the U.S.’s 4,017 billion kWh of electricity generated, amounting to 874 billion kWh.

solar US power

Moving on, IEA says, the U.S. is set to add significant solar PV capacity, leading the renewable energy surge with nearly 500 GW projected by 2030. Utility-scale solar sees steady growth, driven by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and federal tax credits, even as residential expansion slows due to California’s new net-metering rules and high interest rates.

IEA U.S. Solar Energy 2030 Forecast

Solar forecast
Source:: IEA

Nonetheless, America’s solar sector continues to expand rapidly, with significant growth in both stand-alone utility-scale solar capacity and hybrid solar-plus-storage installations.

Stand-Alone Utility-Scale Solar Capacity

According to S&P Global’s latest solar report, in 2024, annual additions to stand-alone utility-scale solar capacity reached around 11,190 megawatts (MW), bringing the total capacity to an impressive 92,832 MW. This increase underscores the growing role of large-scale solar projects in meeting the nation’s energy needs.

However, utility-scale solar in the U.S. still lags behind wind energy in terms of total operating capacity. The country currently operates about 116 GW of solar capacity. This excludes residential and most behind-the-meter systems. Around 93 GW comes from stand-alone projects without battery storage or other technologies.

Standalone solar

Hybrid Solar-Plus-Storage

The hybrid solar-plus-storage segment is also experiencing remarkable progress. Data from S&P Global indicates that by October 1, 2024 (YTD), annual additions in this category include 6,257.2 MW of solar capacity and 2,814.8 MW of storage capacity. These additions bring the total operating hybrid solar capacity to 22,826.2 MW and the total storage capacity to 9,925.7 MW.

This growth reflects the increasing integration of energy storage systems with solar installations, which enhances grid reliability and enables efficient energy use.

The expansion of both stand-alone and hybrid solar capacities demonstrates solar’s critical contribution to the U.S. energy transition and its ability to support a cleaner, more sustainable power grid

hybrid solar plus

The Solar Industry Thrives Amid Federal Policy Shifts

A report from PV Magazine sheds light on the current hurdles in the U.S. solar industry as federal policy debates intensify. There are ongoing discussions about scaling back the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and cutting support from the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office, which has raised concerns within this sector.

New tariffs on Chinese imports could increase the cost of solar projects, potentially slowing installations in the short term. However, the rapid growth of the domestic solar supply chain offers a silver lining. This growth, particularly in Republican-majority states, highlights the bipartisan support for clean energy investments.

Local Momentum and Distributed Solar Opportunities

Moreover, this expansion of local manufacturing could play a key role in reducing the impact of potential policy rollbacks. As a result, the long-term growth prospects of the solar industry remain strong, and it continues to be a vital part of the nation’s renewable energy future.

Notably, renewable energy projects have already brought in $106 billion in investments and created thousands of jobs across U.S. communities. Public demand for affordable, clean energy remains strong, especially in areas benefiting from solar projects. This local momentum will likely keep solar growing, even if federal incentives face cuts.

Furthermore, distributed solar systems offer a major opportunity. These systems deliver power where it’s needed. This reduces costs and boosts energy independence. Federal incentives, like the IRA’s domestic content bonus, have encouraged developers to use local materials, supporting the industry’s growth.

Looking forward, many solar projects will focus on energy communities. This shift signals continued solar expansion and a bright future for the industry in the U.S., with solar playing a key role in sustainable, localized energy solutions. One such company, leading by example is SolarBank.

SolarBank: Powering a Sustainable Future with Innovative Solar Solutions

In the age of solar, SolarBank is delivering clean and renewable energy solutions for the digital age. Listed on NASDAQ as SUUN, the company believes in “harnessing the power of the sun to provide sustainable energy as long as it shines.”

With a market cap of $53.33 million and an enterprise value of $53.60 million, SolarBank focuses on driving sustainable profit growth. Its top solar projects include Ontario’s small FIT solar gardens and New York’s community solar farms, which will expand into large-scale data center projects over 100 MW.

  • It projects the North American solar PV market to grow to $120.74 billion by 2027, with a remarkable compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.7% from 2020 to 2027.

This strong growth highlights the increasing demand for solar energy solutions across the region. Furthermore, the company strategically targets carbon-intensive markets with high electricity costs and favorable renewable energy policies.

It is expanding its expertise in rooftop and ground-mount solar. It is also moving into commercial and industrial behind-the-meter projects, battery storage, EV charging stations, and data center power solutions. These efforts meet the rising demand for low-carbon digital infrastructure.

More Than a Decade of Strong Revenue Growth

SolarBank
Source: SolarBank

Source: SolarBank

Advancing Community Solar Initiatives

As mentioned earlier, community solar is significantly reshaping the U.S. energy landscape. As of 2023, 23 states and the District of Columbia have implemented policies supporting community solar projects.

These efforts have resulted in over 8 GW of installed capacity, with projections indicating growth to 14 GW by 2028, driven by an annual expansion rate of 1.5 GW. Moreover, the deployment of community solar-plus-storage systems is expected to rise by 219% by 2028.

Notably, SolarBank is also developing community solar projects in New York and Maryland, with over 250 MW currently in progress.

SolarBank’s $49.5M Qcells Deal

The company recently announced a $49.5 million deal with Qcells, a subsidiary of South Korea’s Hanwha Solutions, to sell four solar projects in upstate New York. These ground-mount projects—Gainesville, Hardie, Rice Road, and Hwy 28—have a combined capacity of 25.577 MW and have passed the CESIR process, confirming grid connection feasibility.

Under engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreements, Qcells will develop the sites. SolarBank will manage operations and maintenance post-construction, with the projects serving as community solar systems, providing shared clean energy benefits without the need for home installations.

Supporting Renewable Energy for Data Centers

Electricity use from cloud computing, AI, and cryptocurrency is set to double by 2026, pushing companies to invest heavily in clean energy. And this rising demand is adding about 15 GW of renewable energy capacity each year.

These investments not only meet power needs but also boost brand image, improve resilience, and comply with stricter regulations. SolarBank supports this shift by delivering tailored energy solutions for modern industries.

Expands into BESS with $3M Boost

SolarBank Corporation is advancing its clean energy strategy by entering the battery energy storage market with $3 million in financing from RE Royalties Ltd. The funds will support three 4.99 MW Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) projects in Ontario.

The company got involved in the projects through its $45 million acquisition of Solar Flow-Through Funds Ltd., which was completed in July 2024. It aims to capitalize on the market forecast by Fortune Business Insights that predicts project growth at a 16.3% annual rate and reaching $31.2 billion by 2029. Thus, this acquisition expanded the company’s renewable energy assets and opportunities in energy storage.

SolarBank’s Strong Visibility to Continued Growth

SolarBank
Source: SolarBank

In conclusion, solar energy’s rapid expansion is crucial to the U.S. energy transition, offering a reliable path to decarbonize the power sector. SolarBank, through its focus on commercial, industrial, and community solar projects, is playing a key role in this shift. As technology advances and supportive policies continue, solar’s growing influence will help shape a cleaner and more sustainable energy future


Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: SUUN.

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.

Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.

The post SolarBank Sparks Solar Surge: A Bright Future for the U.S. Renewable Energy appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business

Published

on

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) just rolled out a major revision to its Net-Zero Standard, Version 2.0. It changes how companies set climate targets, how much room they actually have to hit those targets, and how carbon credits fit into a credible net-zero strategy. Below, we break down what’s changing, when it takes effect, and why it matters even if your business isn’t formally an SBTi participant.

Key takeaways

  • SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
  • Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
  • The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
  • Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
  • Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.

Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.

However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.

In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.

How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?

SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.

Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.

What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?

The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.

Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation
Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises Focus on short-term climate progress
Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning
We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits

What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?

Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.

The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.

Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.

Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.

Old Net Zero Standard New Net Zero Standard
Grounded in net-zero by 2050 Grounded in net-zero by 2050
Climate leadership is reducing emissions Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions
Make a long-term commitment to net-zero Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles
Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal
  • Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal and asset decarbonization plan
  • Adds SBTi’s Asset Transition Method
  • Decarbonization targets are set through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps
  • Ambitious but achievable path based on starting point, financial resources, technology
  • Multiple pathways for unique opportunities and constraints of industries and companies
Businesses who fall behind targets lose status
  • “Best efforts” basis creates flexibility on progress to targets
  • Businesses that miss targets can keep status if they used “every lever” in their control
  • Minimum progress rules will be provided in the SBTi Assurance Manual
Ignores voluntary carbon projects
  • Uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions
  • 2027–2034: Mitigation is recognized. Carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted.
  • 2035 forward: Mitigation with carbon removal credits is required, with durability matching.

When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?

Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).

Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.

What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?

The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.

Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.

Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.

How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.

  1. Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
  2. Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
  3. Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.

How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:

  1. Reducing electricity consumption,
  2. Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
  3. Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.

V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.

The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.

The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.

How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.

Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.

Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:

  1. An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
  2. An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
  3. A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.

What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?

This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.

The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.

  1. Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
  2. Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
  3. Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.

Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.

Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.

How must companies neutralize residual emissions?

At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.

What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?

Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.

  1. Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
  2. Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
  3. Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.

How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard

As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.

We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.

FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision

What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?

It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.

What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?

The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.

When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?

If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.

Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?

They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.

What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?

Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.

What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?

Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.

Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.

The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD

Published

on

For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable

Published

on

A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com