Solar energy is experiencing a remarkable surge in the U.S., driven by significant new installations and strong policy support. This growth is largely due to developers completing projects in the last year and opening new opportunities in 2025. Amid this surge, SolarBank, a leading North American solar company, is pivotal in developing commercial, industrial, and community solar projects in the U.S.
Thus, as the U.S. energy landscape undergoes a major shift, wind and solar are set to lead the charge in powering the nation’s future. With this transformation underway, solar energy will play an even bigger role in the coming years.
Solar Power Fuels America’s Clean Energy Boom
According to recent EIA’s Short-Term Energy Outlook projections, solar power generation is set to experience remarkable expansion, rising 75% from 163 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh) in 2023 to 286 billion kWh by 2025.
Supply chain issues, grid connection delays, and tariff increases on imported modules pose challenges, but federal and state incentives continue to support solar’s momentum. While obstacles remain, reforms and incentives offer hope for accelerated growth in the coming years.
In 2023, renewables—including wind, solar, hydro, biomass, and geothermal—accounted for 22% of the U.S.’s 4,017 billion kWh of electricity generated, amounting to 874 billion kWh.
Moving on, IEA says, the U.S. is set to add significant solar PV capacity, leading the renewable energy surge with nearly 500 GW projected by 2030. Utility-scale solar sees steady growth, driven by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and federal tax credits, even as residential expansion slows due to California’s new net-metering rules and high interest rates.
IEA U.S. Solar Energy 2030 Forecast
Nonetheless, America’s solar sector continues to expand rapidly, with significant growth in both stand-alone utility-scale solar capacity and hybrid solar-plus-storage installations.
Stand-Alone Utility-Scale Solar Capacity
According to S&P Global’s latest solar report, in 2024, annual additions to stand-alone utility-scale solar capacity reached around 11,190 megawatts (MW), bringing the total capacity to an impressive 92,832 MW. This increase underscores the growing role of large-scale solar projects in meeting the nation’s energy needs.
However, utility-scale solar in the U.S. still lags behind wind energy in terms of total operating capacity. The country currently operates about 116 GW of solar capacity. This excludes residential and most behind-the-meter systems. Around 93 GW comes from stand-alone projects without battery storage or other technologies.
Hybrid Solar-Plus-Storage
The hybrid solar-plus-storage segment is also experiencing remarkable progress. Data from S&P Global indicates that by October 1, 2024 (YTD), annual additions in this category include 6,257.2 MW of solar capacity and 2,814.8 MW of storage capacity. These additions bring the total operating hybrid solar capacity to 22,826.2 MW and the total storage capacity to 9,925.7 MW.
This growth reflects the increasing integration of energy storage systems with solar installations, which enhances grid reliability and enables efficient energy use.
The expansion of both stand-alone and hybrid solar capacities demonstrates solar’s critical contribution to the U.S. energy transition and its ability to support a cleaner, more sustainable power grid
The Solar Industry Thrives Amid Federal Policy Shifts
A report from PV Magazine sheds light on the current hurdles in the U.S. solar industry as federal policy debates intensify. There are ongoing discussions about scaling back the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and cutting support from the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office, which has raised concerns within this sector.
New tariffs on Chinese imports could increase the cost of solar projects, potentially slowing installations in the short term. However, the rapid growth of the domestic solar supply chain offers a silver lining. This growth, particularly in Republican-majority states, highlights the bipartisan support for clean energy investments.
Local Momentum and Distributed Solar Opportunities
Moreover, this expansion of local manufacturing could play a key role in reducing the impact of potential policy rollbacks. As a result, the long-term growth prospects of the solar industry remain strong, and it continues to be a vital part of the nation’s renewable energy future.
Notably, renewable energy projects have already brought in $106 billion in investments and created thousands of jobs across U.S. communities. Public demand for affordable, clean energy remains strong, especially in areas benefiting from solar projects. This local momentum will likely keep solar growing, even if federal incentives face cuts.
Furthermore, distributed solar systems offer a major opportunity. These systems deliver power where it’s needed. This reduces costs and boosts energy independence. Federal incentives, like the IRA’s domestic content bonus, have encouraged developers to use local materials, supporting the industry’s growth.
Looking forward, many solar projects will focus on energy communities. This shift signals continued solar expansion and a bright future for the industry in the U.S., with solar playing a key role in sustainable, localized energy solutions. One such company, leading by example is SolarBank.
SolarBank: Powering a Sustainable Future with Innovative Solar Solutions
In the age of solar, SolarBank is delivering clean and renewable energy solutions for the digital age. Listed on NASDAQ as SUUN, the company believes in “harnessing the power of the sun to provide sustainable energy as long as it shines.”
With a market cap of $53.33 million and an enterprise value of $53.60 million, SolarBank focuses on driving sustainable profit growth. Its top solar projects include Ontario’s small FIT solar gardens and New York’s community solar farms, which will expand into large-scale data center projects over 100 MW.
- It projects the North American solar PV market to grow to $120.74 billion by 2027, with a remarkable compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.7% from 2020 to 2027.
This strong growth highlights the increasing demand for solar energy solutions across the region. Furthermore, the company strategically targets carbon-intensive markets with high electricity costs and favorable renewable energy policies.
It is expanding its expertise in rooftop and ground-mount solar. It is also moving into commercial and industrial behind-the-meter projects, battery storage, EV charging stations, and data center power solutions. These efforts meet the rising demand for low-carbon digital infrastructure.
More Than a Decade of Strong Revenue Growth
Source: SolarBank
Advancing Community Solar Initiatives
As mentioned earlier, community solar is significantly reshaping the U.S. energy landscape. As of 2023, 23 states and the District of Columbia have implemented policies supporting community solar projects.
These efforts have resulted in over 8 GW of installed capacity, with projections indicating growth to 14 GW by 2028, driven by an annual expansion rate of 1.5 GW. Moreover, the deployment of community solar-plus-storage systems is expected to rise by 219% by 2028.
Notably, SolarBank is also developing community solar projects in New York and Maryland, with over 250 MW currently in progress.
SolarBank’s $49.5M Qcells Deal
The company recently announced a $49.5 million deal with Qcells, a subsidiary of South Korea’s Hanwha Solutions, to sell four solar projects in upstate New York. These ground-mount projects—Gainesville, Hardie, Rice Road, and Hwy 28—have a combined capacity of 25.577 MW and have passed the CESIR process, confirming grid connection feasibility.
Under engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreements, Qcells will develop the sites. SolarBank will manage operations and maintenance post-construction, with the projects serving as community solar systems, providing shared clean energy benefits without the need for home installations.
Supporting Renewable Energy for Data Centers
Electricity use from cloud computing, AI, and cryptocurrency is set to double by 2026, pushing companies to invest heavily in clean energy. And this rising demand is adding about 15 GW of renewable energy capacity each year.
These investments not only meet power needs but also boost brand image, improve resilience, and comply with stricter regulations. SolarBank supports this shift by delivering tailored energy solutions for modern industries.
Expands into BESS with $3M Boost
SolarBank Corporation is advancing its clean energy strategy by entering the battery energy storage market with $3 million in financing from RE Royalties Ltd. The funds will support three 4.99 MW Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) projects in Ontario.
The company got involved in the projects through its $45 million acquisition of Solar Flow-Through Funds Ltd., which was completed in July 2024. It aims to capitalize on the market forecast by Fortune Business Insights that predicts project growth at a 16.3% annual rate and reaching $31.2 billion by 2029. Thus, this acquisition expanded the company’s renewable energy assets and opportunities in energy storage.
SolarBank’s Strong Visibility to Continued Growth
In conclusion, solar energy’s rapid expansion is crucial to the U.S. energy transition, offering a reliable path to decarbonize the power sector. SolarBank, through its focus on commercial, industrial, and community solar projects, is playing a key role in this shift. As technology advances and supportive policies continue, solar’s growing influence will help shape a cleaner and more sustainable energy future
- FURTHER READING: Top Solar Titans and How They Power the Green Energy Transition
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: SUUN.
Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post SolarBank Sparks Solar Surge: A Bright Future for the U.S. Renewable Energy appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Most businesses that decide to act on their net-zero targets reach the same point of friction. Buying carbon credits has meant tracking down brokers, sitting through sales calls, and requesting a quote just to learn a price, sometimes with limited proof of what you are buying.
The earnings calls that quietly reframed climate from sustainability question to operating risk.
Three earnings calls in the last 18 months tell the story without any help from a press release.
Hershey, May 2024: cocoa price exposure compresses margin, and the company attributes part of the cost shock to West African weather. Olam, July 2024: coffee climate exposure quantified in the annual report. JBS, January 2025: supply chain climate disclosures expanded materially in response to investor pressure and regulatory expectation. None of these companies issued the announcement as climate news. They issued it as financial news. The climate-linked supply chain risk did not arrive with a sustainability framing; it arrived as a P&L line.
You are probably reading this article because you suspect the same thing is happening to your business. This piece walks through what is showing up on which earnings calls, how procurement and finance leaders are quantifying the exposure, and what serious corporates are doing about it before the regulator asks.
Where climate risk has already appeared in earnings
The pattern is consistent across resource-intensive sectors. A weather event compresses supply, the price spikes, the cost flows through the income statement, and the analyst on the call asks whether the event is anomalous or structural. Increasingly, the honest answer is the second one.
Cocoa is the cleanest example. The 2023 to 2024 West African harvest fell sharply on the back of erratic rainfall and disease. Cocoa futures more than tripled. Companies with concentrated West African sourcing absorbed the cost; companies with diversified sourcing absorbed less. The exposure was not climate as ESG topic. It was climate as cost of goods.
Coffee follows the same pattern. Brazilian and Vietnamese harvests have moved on weather more sharply across the last several seasons. Roasters with long-tenor supplier relationships and origin diversification have managed the volatility; roasters with spot-market exposure have not. Wheat, sugar, palm oil, beef: the same dynamic in different commodities, a pattern the IPCC AR6 Working Group II report projects will intensify across agricultural systems through mid-century.
What this means: climate risk is no longer a footnote in the 10-K. It is a line item the CFO has to explain on the call.
The three commodity exposures that hit margin first
For most companies with material Scope 3 exposure, three exposures dominate the near-term P&L risk.
- Concentrated single-origin sourcing in a climate-vulnerable region. If your tier-one supply for any material commodity sits in one geography, you have a concentration risk that climate amplifies. Diversification across origins is the obvious hedge, but it takes years to build and requires relationships you cannot acquire by tender.
- Supplier financial fragility under climate stress. Smallholder farmers, who supply a large share of the global cocoa, coffee, and palm oil market, do not carry the balance sheets to absorb yield shocks. When yields collapse, they exit. When they exit, your supply base shrinks, and the surviving suppliers raise prices. The risk is structural, not cyclical.
- Logistics and storage exposure to extreme weather. Hurricane disruptions to Gulf shipping, drought-driven Panama Canal restrictions, flooding in European inland waterways: each of these has moved input costs in the last three years, a pattern documented in Munich Re’s natural catastrophe data. The exposure shows up as a one-quarter event in the financial press but accumulates over time on the cost line.
TCFD and ISSB disclosure changes
The disclosure architecture has now caught up with the risk. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, whose recommendations are now embedded in the ISSB’s IFRS S2 climate standard, requires companies to disclose climate-related risks across physical and transition categories, with quantification where possible.
For physical risk specifically (the climate-linked supply chain risk you are reading about), the disclosure must address both acute exposures (extreme weather events) and chronic exposures (gradual changes in temperature, precipitation, and growing seasons). The disclosure must address the time horizon over which the risk is material, the parts of the value chain exposed, and the financial impact under different scenarios.
The CSRD imposes similar requirements under European law, with double materiality (both financial and impact materiality) embedded in the assessment. The practical effect: your auditors and your investor relations team now need a defensible answer to the climate-linked supply chain risk question, and the answer needs to be quantified.
What procurement and finance can do now
Three actions matter near-term.
Map your exposure. Most companies do not have a clear view of which tier-one and tier-two suppliers sit in which climate-vulnerable geographies. Without the map, you cannot quantify the risk, and without the quantification, you cannot disclose it credibly. The map is the foundation, and World Resources Institute climate risk research provides useful public tooling to start.
Diversify and deepen, in that order. Diversification across origins reduces concentration risk, but the deeper move is to invest in the resilience of the suppliers you already have. Regenerative practices, agroforestry, soil health interventions: these reduce yield volatility under climate stress and protect your input cost trajectory.
Embed the climate spend inside procurement, not outside it. Treating climate risk as a sustainability cost line subordinates it to the ESG budget. Treating it as a procurement and resilience investment puts it in the budget that matters, which is the cost-of-goods budget that the CFO defends quarterly.
Nature-based supply chain investments are the asset class designed for exactly this purpose. They sit inside the value chain, they reduce climate-linked supply risk, they generate verifiable Scope 3 reductions, and they produce the documentation an auditor and a regulator can both test.
If you are quantifying climate-linked supply chain risk in advance of the next earnings cycle or the next disclosure period, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help you map your exposure and structure a Dual-Value Model response that addresses reduction, resilience, and disclosure-readiness in a single program. Schedule a consultation.
More and more small and medium-sized businesses are hearing the same question from their larger customers: What is your carbon footprint? That question now travels down entire supply chains, and it arrives next to tender requirements, certification criteria, and rising customer expectations.
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy11 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits