Singapore has announced that it will buy about US$76.4 million worth of carbon credits from international projects in Ghana, Peru, and Paraguay. The move reflects the country’s growing role in the global carbon market and its strategy to meet national climate targets. The credits will come from nature-based projects such as forest conservation and reforestation, which reduce or capture greenhouse gas emissions.
The government stated:
“These projects aim to reduce carbon emissions from deforestation, increase carbon sequestration of soil organic carbon stock in grasslands through sustainable management practices, and remove carbon emissions through the reforestation of degraded pastureland.”
Buying Carbon, Growing Climate Impact
The carbon credits will be bought through agreements signed under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This article allows countries to trade emission reductions across borders.
Investing in projects abroad helps Singapore reach its climate goals. It also supports other nations in funding sustainable development.
The total contract amounts to S$104 million (US$76.4 million), or about 2.175 million tonnes worth of credits. These credits will come from projects that protect rainforests, restore damaged land, and capture carbon in nature. Each credit represents one metric ton of carbon dioxide reduced or removed from the atmosphere.
Officials have emphasized that all credits must meet strict quality standards. Projects need to show that emission reductions are real, measurable, and verified by independent groups. They must also show benefits for local communities and biodiversity.
Why Singapore Is Buying Carbon Credits
Singapore is a small, urban country, ranked as the world’s 57th-biggest emitter by Global Carbon Atlas. It has little space for renewable energy or big nature projects. The nation is investing in solar power, efficiency measures, and new technologies. However, it still can’t meet its climate targets on its own.
Carbon credits allow Singapore to close this gap. By supporting projects overseas, the country can compensate for emissions it cannot cut at home. Officials have stressed that credits are not a substitute for domestic action. Instead, they are a way to complement local measures and move faster toward climate goals.
Singapore has pledged to cut emissions to 60 million tons of CO₂ equivalent by 2030, down from about 52 million tons in 2021, and to reach net zero by 2050. Buying high-quality credits is part of that plan.

The Role of Nature-Based Projects
The credits Singapore will buy focus on nature-based solutions. These include protecting forests, restoring ecosystems, and preventing land degradation. Such projects are critical because they deliver both climate and social benefits.
Forests, for example, absorb carbon dioxide while also providing habitat for wildlife and resources for local communities. Reforestation creates jobs, improves soil health, and supports water cycles. Protecting land in Ghana, Peru, and Paraguay keeps these benefits going. It also helps avoid emissions from deforestation.
Analysts say nature-based credits are among the most popular in the voluntary carbon market (VCM). In 2024, they made up over 40% of global credits traded. They often sold for higher prices than energy-related credits.
Singapore’s Hub Ambition in Carbon Markets
The global carbon market is growing quickly. The VCM was valued at about US$2 billion in 2024 and could reach US$50 billion by 2030 if demand keeps rising.
Compliance markets, such as the European Union’s Emissions Trading System, are even larger. Singapore’s early participation positions it to benefit from this growth and to shape global standards.
Singapore has positioned itself as a regional hub for carbon trading and finance. In recent years, the country launched the Climate Impact X (CIX) exchange, a platform for trading high-quality credits. It also signed bilateral carbon credit agreements with countries such as Papua New Guinea, Bhutan, and Morocco.
Partnerships Stretching Across Continents
Singapore’s US$76.4 million purchase from Ghana, Peru, and Paraguay is part of a broader plan. This strategy aims to create a strong network of carbon credit partnerships under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. These deals focus on getting high-quality credits. They also aim to boost climate cooperation and keep environmental integrity.
A key milestone was the Implementation Agreement with Ghana in May 2024. This agreement sets the rules for generating and transferring credits. It also required that 2% of credits be canceled at issuance and 5% of proceeds be directed toward Ghana’s climate adaptation.
In August 2025, Singapore signed its first transfer agreement with Thailand, its first such deal in Southeast Asia. This opens the way for Thai mitigation projects to supply credits for Singapore’s climate targets.
In September, a request-for-proposal boosted activity from four projects in Ghana, Peru, and Paraguay. They have support from GenZero, AJA Climate Solutions, Boomitra, and Mercuria Asia Resources.
Beyond these deals, Singapore is working with Bhutan, Chile, Vietnam, Papua New Guinea, and Rwanda on new agreements. These partnerships strengthen Singapore as a carbon market hub. They also direct funding into global climate action.
Through this growing network, Singapore is positioning itself as a trusted player in global carbon markets. It also supports partner nations in attracting funding for climate and conservation projects.

Benefits for Host Nations and Their Communities
For Ghana, Peru, and Paraguay, the deal brings funding for sustainable development. Forest protection projects often struggle with limited resources. Selling credits helps these countries pay for activities like patrols against illegal logging. They can also fund community programs and build infrastructure to support conservation.
Carbon finance also creates jobs in rural areas. Planting trees, restoring land, and managing conservation areas all require local workers. Communities can gain from revenue-sharing programs. These programs can help schools, health care, and water access.
By linking their projects to Singapore’s market, these countries gain more visibility and credibility. This can attract further investment from other governments or private companies seeking high-quality credits.
Global Signals From a Small Island Nation
The deal shows how international carbon markets are starting to scale. Under the Paris Agreement, countries can trade credits to meet national targets. This allows funds to move from rich countries with few natural resources to those with big forests and ecosystems.
Experts say such cooperation is essential. Meeting global climate goals will require both deep domestic emission cuts and large-scale protection of natural ecosystems. Carbon markets provide a way to finance the latter.
Singapore’s move could inspire other small but wealthy nations to follow. If successful, the model may become a blueprint for how developed economies can support climate action in developing regions while also meeting their own goals.
The purchase also boosts Singapore’s role as a carbon market hub and highlights the rising importance of international carbon finance. Credit quality and long-term effects remain a challenge. However, strict standards help this deal show that global partnerships can boost climate action and support sustainable development.
The post Singapore to Buy $76.4M Worth of Nature-Based Carbon Credits appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测


