Connect with us

Published

on

What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you think of Santos? If you’re a cycling fan or an Adelaide local, it might be the Tour Down Under – the pro-cycling race happening this month in South Australia of which Santos is the major sponsor.

However the fossil fuel company got far less attention for another big event that took place earlier this month: a court date for an oil spill that took place a few years ago.

Santos: Spiller Down Under

On January 6 2025, Santos pleaded guilty and was convicted of substandard operations leading to an oil spill in 2022 off the coast of Western Australia, where 25,000 litres of oil were released into the Indian Ocean. The spill took place in waters which hold significant cultural importance for the Ngarluma and Yindjibarndi people. Dead dolphins and other sea creatures were also found in the affected area shortly after the oil spill. For all of this damage the multi-billion dollar corporation was fined a measly $10,000 – nothing but a slap on the wrist.

For comparison, the maximum fine for an individual person in South Australia dumping only 50L worth of litter is up to $30,000, or 6 months in jail. Why are multi-billion dollar corporations allowed to get away with this?

This oil spill in 2022 is just one example on a long list of spills, leaks, and explosions on Santos projects that have harmed workers, marine life, and the environment.

In January 2023 another pipeline in South Australia had a major explosion. And in 2011 Santos was fined for breaching workplace safety laws after an explosion at the Moomba gas plant, on New Year’s Day in 2004. Come to think about it, this year’s fine was also a few days after new years in 2025. Are court cases and exploding pipelines becoming a new years tradition for the Adelaide headquartered company?

Also in 2023, a terrifying video from a Santos offshore gas project in WA shows several rope access technicians narrowly missing serious injury or death after a lift went badly wrong.

We could go on, but we’ll stop there for today.

The Great Cover Up: community sponsorships

The reason that major companies like Santos are sponsoring community events like the Tour Down Under is to bolster their reputation. They’ll go to great lengths to be associated with ‘helping out the community’ – almost as great as the lengths they will go to cover up their environmental damage.

When Santos spilled 25,000L of oil into the ocean in 2022, they failed to report it. A year later, an anonymous whistleblower accused Santos of a coverup.

“In defiance of their obligations, Santos had not mobilised environmental assessors to the island until a week after the incident,” said the whistleblower. “They could not have known the real scale of impact, it was never checked.” He also noted that he “was appalled at the culture and management within Santos, which demonstrated such wilful refusal to accept responsibility.”

Santos is not an anomaly. Many fossil fuel corporations have spills and explosions that they try to evade responsibility for, including Woodside – who now wants to be trusted to drill for gas near Scott Reef, threatening endangered whales, turtles, and sea snakes.

Companies like Santos and Woodside frequently sponsor community events because doing so buys them power. It smooths the way to their project approvals, and it makes communities reliant on the very fossil fuel companies who are responsible for the huge costs that then fall on communities when they have to clean up after environmental or climate disasters.

Fossil fuel companies like Santos are making climate change worse

It’s not just Santos’ spills and explosions that are causing harm, it’s the fossil fuels it produces for a profit.

Just 78 companies and state entities are responsible for over 70% of the toxic carbon pollution that’s driving climate change, but they’re leaving the rest of us to foot the bill for the massive cost of disasters they’ve helped to cause. Everyday Australians are currently paying $13 billion per year to clean up the impacts of climate change.

Let’s not forget that in 2022 alone, Santos raked in over US$3.8 billion.

We shouldn’t let billion-dollar companies profit off polluting while buying back social license from sponsoring local swim teams and sports competitions. Coal, oil and gas companies are the biggest contributors to climate change. They cause the damage – they should be paying to fix it.



Coal Fired Power Plant


Stop New Coal, Oil and Gas Projects

Sign the petition to demand the Australian Government stop new coal, oil and gas projects now.


Sign petition

https://www.greenpeace.org.au/article/santos-tour-down-under-why-fossil-fuel-companies-should-be-best-known-for-their-pollution-not-their-sponsorships/

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Climate-Fueled Wildfires and Dust Storms Drove Up Air Pollution Around the World Last Year

Published

on

A new report shows air pollution threatens the majority of the world’s population, while information gaps increase the risks.

A new report on global air pollution shows that the majority of the world’s population breathes unhealthy air, and climate change is making the problem worse.

Climate-Fueled Wildfires and Dust Storms Drove Up Air Pollution Around the World Last Year

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Australia must not follow dystopian US-style data centre path of Big Tech overreach and emissions blow out

Published

on

SYDNEY, Monday 23 March 2026 — Greenpeace Australia Pacific has labelled the Federal government’s new expectations for data centres and AI infrastructure released today as seriously inadequate, failing to address the massive impacts of the facilities on our energy systems and society, and enabling US-style Big Tech overreach and deregulation.

Greenpeace says the dizzying scale of new AI data centre development in Australia threatens to derail the energy transition by prolonging reliance on polluting fossil fuels, increasing electricity prices and consuming enormous quantities of water — all to power an industry which may be enabling socially harmful outcomes.

Joe Rafalowicz, Head of Climate and Energy at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “The frenzied build out of AI data centres in Australia is breathtaking, and following a dangerous US-style path where Big Tech corporations have carte blanche to drain local energy and water, and build new, polluting gas and diesel-powered plants to fuel their operations.

“Australia is following the US down the same dystopian path of unregulated AI data centre expansion and overreach by Big Tech corporations that are at best driving significant climate and environmental harm and at worst, generating illegal explicit images or supporting the US military to bomb civilians in Iran.

“These billionaire-run companies like Amazon, Open AI, Meta have time and again shown themselves to be morally impaired, with not even the best interests of humanity, let alone Australians, at the core of their decisions. Expecting them to just do the right thing because we ask nicely is baffling.

“We’re also seeing vested-interest lobby groups like the newly formed Data Centres Australia aggressively pushing to cut regulations that would protect Australians from the climate, environmental and social impacts of data centres.

“Last year, the Albanese government abandoned its own recommended AI guardrails when it announced its National AI Plan — a move applauded by these lobby groups.

“The gas lobby has also now seized on data centre growth to justify extracting more gas, just as the world needs to rapidly phase out fossil fuels for energy security and to tackle the climate crisis.

“We have a short and closing window to choose a different path in Australia — without strong guardrails, we risk replicating the US pattern where Big Tech corporations make huge profits at the expense of locals. The government must not roll out the red carpet to these corporations without adequate, legislated protections and scrutiny — not just ‘nice-to-haves’.”

ENDS

Media contact:

Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org

Australia must not follow dystopian US-style data centre path of Big Tech overreach and emissions blow out

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Courts’ Fight Over ‘Cop City’ Protests Raises Questions About Terrorism Laws and Environmental Activism 

Published

on

A years-long legal fight tied to protests over Atlanta’s Public Safety Training Center could shape how states wield terrorism laws against environmental protest movements.

ATLANTA—On a recent March morning, a large monitor at the front of a DeKalb County courtroom flickered to life as Superior Court Judge David B. Irwin appeared over Zoom. The hearing—with attorneys and out-of-state defendants joining remotely—centered on a question with national implications: Can activists who protested Atlanta’s controversial police training center be prosecuted as domestic terrorists?

Courts’ Fight Over ‘Cop City’ Protests Raises Questions About Terrorism Laws and Environmental Activism 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com