Connect with us

Published

on

Russia’s new climate plan justifies the use of natural gas as a “transition fuel” by referencing the controversial loophole that it pushed to have included in the COP28 pledge on shifting away from fossil fuels.

In a landmark agreement at the Dubai climate summit two years, governments agreed to call on each other to work on “transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems” as one of eight global efforts to fight climate change.

The hard-won agreement followed years of campaigning by climate activists and pro-climate action governments, and was hailed as “the beginning of the end” for the fossil fuel era by UN climate chief Simon Stiell.

But in a concession to some countries that were led by Russia – the world’s second-biggest gas producer, the COP28 agreement included a paragraph recognising that “transitional fuels can play a role in facilitating the energy transition while ensuring energy security”.

After it was agreed, Antigua and Barbuda negotiator Diann Black-Layne called it a “dangerous loophole” because natural gas is a fossil fuel “we need to transition away from”.

This year, all the signatories of the 2015 Paris Agreement are due to submit their emissions reduction targets up to 2035, and must say how their targets have “been informed by” the COP28 agreement.

Gas as “transition fuel”

Russia’s new climate plan says it is compatible with paragraph 28 of the COP28 agreement – which includes the language on transitioning away from fossil fuels – because Russia “continues to contribute to the global effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through national efforts to the greatest possible extent”.

It adds that the transition should be “based on independence and freedom of choice, the technological neutrality in designing the composition of energy mix and implementing climate policies in the energy sector”.

It then cites the COP28 language around transitional fuels to say Russia “uses natural gas as a transition fuel on the way towards a low-carbon economy” and gas “is the most environmentally friendly type of fuel among the types of conventional heat generation”.

    While burning gas for power releases less emissions directly than burning coal, whether or not it emits less overall depends mostly on how much gas leaks as it is transported from where it is produced to where it is consumed, energy experts say.

    Andreas Sieber, associate director of policy and campaigns at renewable energy advocacy group 350.org, said Russia was “wilfully misreading the global stocktake”.

    “Rebranding methane-heavy, flare-ridden gas as a ‘transition fuel’ is spin, not science [which] props up a regime whose political economy runs on petro-rents and aggression,” Sieber told Climate Home News, adding “any credible transition runs on renewables and efficiency, not on Russia’s gas”.

    Russian climate envoy Ruslan Edelgeriev told a UN climate summit last week the country’s commitment to reaching net zero by 2060 was firm and it “has moved from strategy to practical implementation”.

    Russia is not the only government to play down the COP28 language on transitioning away from fossil fuels. Shortly after COP28, the Saudi energy minister said the agreement in Dubai was just an “a la carte menu” from which governments could choose.

    And several African countries including Nigeria have set out plans to boost the use of fossil gas as a “transition fuel” in their updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).

    “Unambitious” target

    Russia’s plan aims to reduce emissions to 33%-35% below their 1990 levels by 2035. This adds to existing targets to cut emissions by 30% on 1990 levels by 2030 and reach net zero – when the country emits no more than it absorbs – by 2060.

    Russia’s emissions dropped by a quarter after the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s, making percentage reductions on 1990 levels much more achievable. US President Donald Trump noted this in a recent UN speech, saying “Russia was given an old standard that was easy to meet – 1990 standard”.

    Climate Action Tracker (CAT), a nonprofit which assesses governments’ climate plans and policies, said Russia’s new 2035 target “does not increase ambition beyond business as usual” because Russia’s current policies already put it on course to cut emissions 35% by 2035.

    CAT said that is at odds with a Paris Agreement principle that targets should reflect the “highest possible ambition”. “Russia’s 2035 target not only fails to reflect highest ambition, but does not increase ambition at all”, CAT said in an analysis on its website.

    Russia says the target is in line with the Paris Agreement’s goal to hold a temperature increase to 2C and pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5C. CAT said, however, that it was only compatible with warming of 4C or more.

      Under its climate plan, Russia says it will cut overall emissions through gas, nuclear, hydropower, renewables, carbon capture and storage and hydrogen. It will also aim to reduce the emissions which come from producing coal and oil, by capturing and selling gas rather than burning it as a waste product and by detecting and fixing pipeline leaks.

      CAT also accused Russia of taking too much credit in its carbon accounting for the emissions absorbed by its huge forests. UN guidelines say countries should only take credit for forests which they actively manage, giving governments discretion to decide which land falls into this category.

      Russia claims it manages nearly two-thirds of its vast forests, a percentage CAT said was “inflated”. Other heavily forested nations such as Guyana – which claims to be “carbon negative” – have been criticised by climate campaigners for similarly large assumptions about how much forest they manage.

      The post Russia justifies fossil gas use by citing contentious COP28 loophole appeared first on Climate Home News.

      Russia justifies fossil gas use by citing contentious COP28 loophole

      Continue Reading

      Climate Change

      Leading scientists call for EPBC reforms to strengthen Great Barrier Reef protection

      Published

      on

      CANBERRA, Monday 27 October 2025 — More than 100 Australian scientists and researchers have called on the Labor Government to address deforestation in the new nature law reforms, warning that the impacts under the current Act “compound the damage caused by repeated mass bleaching events driven by climate change” to the Great Barrier Reef.

      Environment Minister Murray Watt will soon table the draft bill to reform Australia’s broken nature law, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. Leading environmental groups Greenpeace Australia Pacific, the Australian Marine Conservation Society, and the Australian Conservation Foundation coordinated the open letter with 112 leading Australian scientists, calling for the reforms to close loopholes in the Act that allow for rampant and unchecked deforestation, especially in the Great Barrier Reef catchment.

      Read the letter here.

      Elle Lawless, senior campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:

      “Now is the time to act decisively for nature, and design a nature-first nature law that will do what it is set out to do: protect our environment. Toxic runoff from deforestation in the Great Barrier Reef catchment is poisoning the reef and suffocating the precious and fragile marine ecosystem. The Great Barrier Reef is a global icon, and we need a strong, robust EPBC Act that will safeguard and protect it. This is one of the most important pieces of legislation our country and our environment has and, done right, has the power to make serious and desperately needed positive changes to protect nature.”

      Professor James Watson FQA, from UQ’s School of the Environment, said:

      “Australia’s State of the Environment report, released by the federal government in 2021, shows that our oceans, rivers and wetlands are in serious decline. That report, and the Samuel review of the EPBC, make the point that there is a desperate need for stronger national nature laws that help protect these precious places for generations to come.

      “Australia’s top environmental academics and experts have been sounding the alarm for decades: the large-scale destruction of Australia’s native woodlands, forests, wetlands and grasslands is the single biggest threat to our biodiversity. It’s driving an extinction crisis unlike anywhere else on Earth — and it’s threatening the Great Barrier Reef, one of the world’s seven natural wonders, right before our eyes.”

      Continued mass deforestation threatens the Great Barrier Reef’s World Heritage status. In 2026, the World Heritage Committee will review Australia’s progress in protecting the reef and may consider placing it on the World Heritage in Danger list if major threats like deforestation are not addressed.

      Recent figures from the Queensland Government show deforestation in Queensland is the worst in the nation and worsening under the current national environment law. Deforestation in the Great Barrier Reef catchment accounted for almost half (44%) of the state’s total clearing, an increase on the previous year.

      Greenpeace Australia Pacific is calling for the EPBC reforms to meet four key tests:

      1. Stronger upfront nature protection to guide better decisions on big projects, including National Environmental Standards.
      2. An independent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to enforce the laws and make decisions about controversial projects at arm’s length from politics.
      3. Closing deforestation loopholes that allow for harmful industries to carry out mass bulldozing across Australia.
      4. Consideration of the climate impacts on nature from coal and gas mines when assessing projects for approvals.

      “We will continue to engage with the government constructively in the reform process but also hold decision-makers to account over these critical tests,” Lawless said.

      —ENDS—

      Leading scientists call for EPBC reforms to strengthen Great Barrier Reef protection

      Continue Reading

      Climate Change

      Close Major Deforestation Loopholes in the EPBC Act

      Published

      on

      22 October 2025

      The Hon Anthony Albanese MP
      Prime Minister
      Parliament House
      CANBERRA ACT 2600

      Sent via email

      To the Prime Minister, Federal Environment Minister, and Members of the Albanese Government,

      As researchers who study, document and work to recover Australia’s plants and animals, insects and ecosystems, we are keenly aware of the value of nature to Australians and the world.

      Australia has one of the worst rates of deforestation globally. For every 100 hectares of native woodland cleared, about 2000 birds, 15,000 reptiles and 500 native mammals will die. As scientists and experts, we have sounded the alarm for more than 30 years that the large-scale destruction of native woodlands, forests, wetlands and grasslands was the single biggest threat to the nation’s biodiversity. That is still the case today, and it is driving an extinction crisis.

      New figures show that Queensland continues to lead the nation in deforestation. The latest statewide landcover and trees study (SLATS) report shows that annually 44% of all deforestation in Queensland occurs in the Great Barrier Reef catchment areas, where over 140,000 hectares are bulldozed each year.

      Deforestation in Great Barrier Reef catchments is devastating one of Australia’s most iconic natural wonders. When forests and bushland are bulldozed, erosion causes debris to wash into waterways, sending sediment, nutrients and pesticides into the Reef waters. This smothers coral, fuels crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks, and reduces water quality. These impacts compound the damage caused by repeated mass bleaching events driven by climate change.

      The Great Barrier Reef sustains precious marine life, supports local and global biodiversity, and underpins tourism economies and coastal communities that rely on its survival. Continued mass deforestation threatens these values and could jeopardise the Reef’s World Heritage status. In 2026 the World Heritage Committee will review Australia’s progress in protecting the Reef and may consider placing it on the World Heritage in Danger list, if key threats to the Reef, including deforestation, are not addressed.

      This mass deforestation happens due to a loophole in the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act, our national nature law. Exemptions allow deforestation to continue largely unregulated by the EPBC Act through a grandfathering clause from 2000 known as “continuous use”. Without meaningful reform, deforestation will continue to drive massive biodiversity loss. This loophole must be closed as part of the proposed EPBC Act reforms. The law is meant to safeguard our wildlife and our most precious places like the Great Barrier Reef. Please support closing major deforestation loopholes in the EPBC Act as an urgent and priority issue for the Federal Government.

      Sincerely,

      Professor James Watson, University of Queensland

      Dr. Michelle Ward

      Mandy Cheung

      Mr Lachlan Cross

      Timothy Ravasi

      Gillian Rowan

      Dr Graham R. Fulton, The University of Queensland

      Dr Alison Peel

      Dr James Richardson University of Queensland

      Luke Emerson, University of Newcastle

      Dr Hilary Pearl

      Dr Tina Parkhurst

      Dr Kerry Bridle

      Dr Tracy Schultz, Senior Research Fellow, University of Queensland

      Dr. Zachary Amir

      Prof David M Watson, Gulbali Institute, CSU

      Naomi Ploos van Amstel, PhD candidate

      David Schoeman

      Associate Professor Simone Blomberg, University of Queensland

      Professor Euan Ritchie, Deakin University

      Dr Ian Baird, Conservation Biologist

      Paul Elton (ANU)

      Melissa Billington

      Hayden de Villiers

      Professor Brett Murphy, Charles Darwin University

      Professor Sarah Bekessy

      Professor Anthony J. Richardson (University of Queensland)

      Prof. Winnifred Louis, University of Queensland

      Dr Yung En Chee, The University of Melbourne

      Dr Jed Calvert, postdoctoral research fellow in wetland ecology, University of Queensland

      A/Prof Daniel C Dunn, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland

      Lincoln Kern, Ecologist

      Professor Corey Bradshaw, Flinders University

      Dr. Viviana Gonzalez, The University of Queensland

      Prof. Helen Bostock

      Dr Leslie Roberson

      Bethany Kiss

      Assoc. Prof Diana Fisher, UQ, and co-chair of the IUCN Marsupial and Monotreme Specialist Group

      Dr Jacinta Humphrey, RMIT University

      Professor Mathew Crowther

      Christopher R. Dickman, Professor Emeritus, The University of Sydney

      Fiona Hoegh-Guldberg, RMIT University

      Dr Bertram Jenkins

      Dr Daniela ParraFaundes

      Dr Jessica Walsh

      Dr. GABRIELLA scata – marine biologist, wildlife protector

      Katherine Robertson

      Professor Jane Williamson, Macquarie University

      William F. Laurance, Distinguished Professor, James Cook University

      A/Prof Deb Bower

      Dr Leslie Roberson, University of Queensland

      Ms Jasmine Hall, Senior Research Assistant in Coastal Wetland Biogeochemistry, Ecology and Management, Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University

      Dr Kita Ashman, Adjunct Research Associate, Charles Sturt University

      Genevieve Newey

      Matt Hayward

      Jessie Moyses

      Natalya Maitz, PhD Candidate, The University of Queensland

      Christina Ritchie

      Liana van Woesik, PhD Student, University of Queensland

      Benjamin Lucas, PhD Researcher

      A/Prof. Carissa Klein, The University of Queensland

      Conrad Pratt, PhD Student, University of Queensland

      Dr Ascelin Gordon, RMIT University

      Professor Nicole Graham, The University of Sydney

      Professor Murray Lee, University of Sydney Law School

      Dr Tracy Schultz, Snr Research Fellow, University of Queensland

      Libby Newton (PhD candidate, Sydney Law School)

      Hannah Thomas, University of Queensland

      Professor Richard Kingsford, Director of the Centre for Ecosystem Science, UNSW Sydney

      Dr Anna Hopkins

      Lena van Swinderen, PhD candidate at the University of Queensland

      Professor Jodie Rummer, James Cook University

      Dr Nita Lauren, Lecturer, RMIT University

      Dr Christina Zdenek

      Madeline Davey

      Dr Rachel Killean, Sydney Law School

      Dr. Sofía López-Cubillos

      Dr Claire Larroux

      Dr Alice Twomey, The University of Queensland

      Zoe Gralton

      Dr Robyn Gulliver

      Ryan Borrett, Murdoch University

      Adjunct Prof. Paul Lawrence, Griffith University, Brisbane Qld

      Professor Susan Park, University of Sydney

      Dr Holly Kirk, Curtin University

      Deakin Distinguished Professor Marcel Klaassen

      Dr Megan Evans, UNSW Canberra

      Dr Amanda Irwin, The University of Sydney

      Dr Keith Cardwell

      Professor Don Driscoll, Deakin University

      Susan Bengtson Nash

      Distinguished Professor David Lindenmayer

      Dr Madelyn Mangan, University of Queensland

      Dr Isabella Smith

      Geoff Lockwood

      Dr Paula Peeters, Paperbark Writer

      Prof Cynthia Riginos, University of Queensland

      Dr. Sankar Subramanian

      Associate Professor Zoe Richards

      Dr Jessie Wells, The University of Melbourne

      Professor Gretta Pecl AM, University of Tasmania

      Dr April Reside, The University of Queensland

      Oriana Licul-Milevoj (Ecologist)

      Dr Yves-Marie Bozec, University of Queensland

      Dr Julia Hazel

      Dr Judit K. Szabo

      Ana Ulloa

      Dr Andreas Dietzel

      Philip Spark – North West Ecological Services

      Jonathan Freeman

      Dr/ Mohamed Mohamed Rashad

      Close Major Deforestation Loopholes in the EPBC Act

      Continue Reading

      Climate Change

      The Ocean We’re Still Discovering

      Published

      on

      The recent discovery of Grimpoteuthis feitiana, a new species of Dumbo octopus found deep in the Pacific, is a reminder of something both humbling and urgent: we still know so little about the ocean that shapes our lives. This fragile, finned creature, gliding silently more than a kilometer beneath the waves, has lived in these waters long before we mapped them, and its story is only now coming to light.

      A still taken from the Greenpeace animation on the destructive mining of the deep sea. What if we could go back in time and stop a destructive industry before it even started?
      A still taken from the Greenpeace animation on the destructive mining of the deep sea. What if we could go back in time and stop a destructive industry before it even started?

      What moves me most about this discovery is not just the Dumbo octopus itself, but how it bridges science and culture. Its name draws inspiration from the flying apsaras of China’s Dunhuang murals, those graceful, winged figures that seem to dance through air and imagination. It reminds me that the deep sea has always held a place in our collective human story, — not only in myths and art, but in the ways we relate to nature, learn from it, and find meaning within it.

      Pasifika connection to the ocean

      For us in the Pacific, the ocean is more than a body of water. It is our identity, our culture, our history. Our ancestors read the seas to navigate, to survive, to connect communities scattered across islands. Discoveries like this Dumbo octopus awaken something deeper in me, — a sense that the ocean is alive with stories and wisdom we are only beginning to rediscover. And with that understanding comes a responsibility to protect it.

      Confronting James Cook Vessel in the Pacific Ocean. © Martin Katz / Greenpeace
      Greenpeace International activists peacefully confronted UK Royal Research Ship James Cook in the East Pacific waters as it returned from a seven-week long expedition to a section of the Pacific Ocean targeted for deep sea mining. © Martin Katz / Greenpeace

      Each new species like the Dumbo octopus, each glimpse into the deep, is a warning as much as it is a wonder. The creatures of the abyss live slow, deliberate lives in fragile ecosystems, shaped by balance and patience. Deep-sea mining, pollution, and climate change threaten to erase them before we even learn their names. Protecting the Pacific’s oceans is not an abstract act of conservation; it is an act of cultural preservation, of love for our home, and for the unseen life that sustains us all.

      Grimpoteuthis feitiana is more than a scientific discovery. It is a reminder that the ocean is still full of life, mystery, and wisdom — and that we have a duty to ensure these depths remain wild, healthy, and alive, for us and for the generations yet to come.

      Reflection by Raeed Ali
      Pacific Community Mobiliser

      The Ocean We’re Still Discovering

      Continue Reading

      Trending

      Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com