Connect with us

Published

on

Europe’s climate service said on Friday that 2024 was the hottest calendar year on record and the first in which average temperatures exceeded the key limit of 1.5C above pre-industrial times, raising the importance of efforts to protect people from dangerous impacts.

The confirmation – widely trailed before the announcement – came as wildfires made worse by drought conditions rampaged across Los Angeles, causing at least 10 deaths, large-scale evacuations and panic in Hollywood, the affluent centre of the US film industry.

The Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) said that all of the internationally produced global temperature datasets show that 2024 was the hottest year since records began in 1850. That individual year reached 1.6C above an estimate of pre-industrial temperatures.

Each year in the last decade is one of the ten warmest on record, C3S added – in line with what UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres recently described as “a decade of deadly heat” and “climate breakdown – in real time”.

C3S director Carlo Buontempo emphasised that “the underlying physics is very clear”, with the world’s warmer air and seas leading to more frequent and intense extreme events – from heatwaves to heavier rainfall and more destructive storms.

As a result, he said, “our traditional system to cope with and respond to extreme climate events is being tested to the limits. This is why adaptation is no longer an option – but a necessity.”

On the edge of 1.5C

Samantha Burgess, strategic lead for climate at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, which runs Copernicus, said the global temperature over the past two years – averaging 1.54C – had surpassed the internationally agreed aim of keeping warming to 1.5C, as set out in the 2015 Paris climate pact.

“We are now teetering on the edge of passing the 1.5C level defined in the Paris Agreement,” she said – although C3S emphasised that does not mean the flagship goal has been lost as it refers to an average over a period of at least 20 years.

“These high global temperatures, coupled with record global atmospheric water vapour levels in 2024, meant unprecedented heatwaves and heavy rainfall events, causing misery for millions of people,” Burgess added.

With drought-hardy cows, Botswana prioritises adaptation in new climate plan

Last month, researchers collaborating with the World Weather Attribution (WWA) and Climate Central projects said climate change had intensified 26 of the 29 extreme weather events they studied during 2024.

Those disasters killed at least 3,700 people and displaced millions – but were only a small sample of what was experienced on the frontlines of a hotter world. They included severe floods in eastern Spain, hurricanes in the US, drought in South America’s Amazon rainforest, and flooding across West and Central Africa.

‘Tested to the limits’

Government efforts to adapt to climate extremes – through measures such as installing alerting systems, preparing evacuation centres, strengthening homes and flood barriers, and protecting ecosystems – have lagged behind the gathering speed of impacts, leading to growing economic damage.

On Thursday, Munich Re, the world’s largest insurer, said hurricanes, storms, floods and other natural disasters caused an estimated $140 billion in insured losses in 2024, up from 2023 and one of the costliest years on record.

“We are facing very new climate challenges that our society is not prepared for,” C3S head Buontempo told a press briefing in response to a question from Climate Home. “The best we can do is build on the evidence we have and develop services and early warning systems that can deliver that protection and can improve our well-being effectively.”

He added that the tools, data and resources exist to make this happen, even though “it is a monumental challenge for society and… not easily implemented”.

Ambition and honesty: What Climate Home readers want in 2025

All-time high for greenhouse gases

C3S said the six datasets it had compiled showed that the global average temperature in 2024 was 15.1C, overtaking 2023 – the previous warmest year – by 0.12C. Last year was also the warmest on record for all continents except Antarctica and Australasia, and registered the highest global average temperature in a single day (on July 22 at 17.16C) as well as the highest annual average sea surface temperature (20.87°C).

While 2024 was characterised by an El Niño weather pattern – caused by warming of the Pacific waters – which contributed to higher global temperatures, the scientists laid most of the blame on the increase in greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere due to human activities.

In 2024, greenhouse gases saw their highest annual levels ever recorded in the atmosphere, with carbon dioxide concentrations reaching 422 ppm (parts per million) – 2.9 ppm higher than in 2023 – and methane increasing too.

Scientists stressed the need for stepped-up global efforts to cut those emissions – while also urging more adaptation measures to keep people safer from the consequences the world is already struggling with.

Mauro Facchini, head of Earth observation at the European Commission’s Directorate General for Defence Industry and Space, said some actions to adapt to a hotter planet are already underway through urban planning or managing land better to avoid flooding casualties, but bigger changes are needed.

“In the short-term we know that something is happening, and we have to adapt if we want to reduce the impacts on our daily lives,” he added.

(Reporting by Megan Rowling; editing by Sebastian Rodriguez)

The post Record-hot 2024 shows world must adapt to extremes, says EU climate service appeared first on Climate Home News.

Record-hot 2024 shows world must adapt to extremes, says EU climate service

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Equity, Benefit-Sharing and Financial Architecture in the International Seabed Area

Published

on

A new independent study by Dr Harvey Mpoto Bombaka (Centro Universitário de Brasília) and Dr Ben Tippet (King’s College London), commissioned by Greenpeace International, reveals that current International Seabed Authority revenue-sharing proposals would return virtually nothing to developing countries — despite the requirement under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) that deep sea mining must benefit humankind as a whole.
Instead, the analysis shows that the overwhelming economic value would flow to a handful of private corporations, primarily headquartered in the Global North.

Download the report:

Equity, Benefit-Sharing and Financial Architecture in the International Seabed Area

Executive Summary: Equity, Benefit-Sharing and Financial Architecture in the International Seabed Area

https://www.greenpeace.org.au/greenpeace-reports/equity-benefit-sharing-and-financial-architecture-in-the-international-seabed-area/

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Pacific nations would be paid only thousands for deep sea mining, while mining companies set to make billions, new research reveals

Published

on

SYDNEY/FIJI, Thursday 26 February 2026 — New independent research commissioned by Greenpeace International has revealed that Pacific Island states would receive mere thousands of dollars in payment from deep sea mining per year, placing the region as one of the most affected but worst-off beneficiaries in the world.

The research by legal professor Dr Harvey Mpoto Bombaka and development economist Dr Ben Tippet reveals that mechanisms proposed by the International Seabed Authority (ISA) for sharing any future revenues from deep sea mining would leave developing nations with meagre, token payments. Pacific Island nations would receive only USD $46,000 per year in the short term, then USD $241,000 per year in the medium term, averaging out to barely USD $382,000 per year for 28 years – an entire annual income for a nation that is less than some individual CEOs’ salaries. Mining companies would rake in over USD $13.5 billion per year, taking up to 98% of the revenues.

The analysis shows that under a scenario where six deep sea mining sites begin operating in the early 2030s, the revenues that states would actually receive are extraordinarily small. This is in contrast to the clear mandate of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which requires mining to be carried out for the benefit of humankind as a whole.[1] The real beneficiaries, the research shows, would be, yet again, a handful of corporations in the Global North.

Head of Pacific at Greenpeace Australia Pacific Shiva Gounden, said:
“What the Pacific is being promised amounts to little more than scraps. The people of the Pacific would sacrifice the most and receive the least if deep sea mining goes ahead. We are being asked to trade in our spiritual and cultural connection to our oceans, and risk our livelihoods and food sources, for almost nothing in return.

“The deep sea mining industry has manipulated the Pacific and has lied to our people for too long, promising prosperity and jobs that simply do not exist. The wealthy CEOs and deep sea mining companies will pocket the cash while the people of the Pacific see no material benefits. The Pacific will not benefit from deep sea mining, and our sacrifice is too big to allow it to go ahead. The Pacific Ocean is not a commodity, and it is not for sale.”

Using proposals submitted by the ISA’s Finance Committee between 2022 and 2025, the returns to states barely register in national accounts. After administrative costs, institutional expenses, and compensation funds are deducted, little, if anything, remains to distribute [3].

Author Dr Harvey Mpoto Bombaka of the Centro Universitário de Brasília said:

“What’s described as global benefit-sharing based on equity and intergenerational justice increasingly looks like a framework for managing scarcity that would deliver almost no real benefits to anyone other than the deep sea mining industry. The structural limitations of the proposed mechanism would offer little more than symbolic returns to the rest of the world, particularly developing countries lacking technological and financial capacity.”

The ISA will meet in March for its first session of the year. Currently, 40 countries back a moratorium or precautionary pause on deep sea mining.

Gounden added: “The deep sea belongs to all humankind, and our people take great pride in being the custodians of our Pacific Ocean. Protecting this with everything we have is not only fair and responsible but what we see as our ancestral duty. The only equitable path is to leave the minerals where they are and stop deep sea mining before it starts. 

“The decision on the future of the ocean must be a process that centres the rights and voices of Pacific communities as the traditional custodians. Clearly, deep sea mining will not benefit the Pacific, and the only sensible way forward is a moratorium.”

—ENDS—

Notes

[1] A key condition for governments to permit deep sea mining to start in the international seabed is that it ‘be carried out for the benefit of mankind as a whole’, particularly developing nations, according to international law (Article 136-140, 148, 150, and 160(2)(g), the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea).

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Kimberley Bernard on +61407 581 404 or kbernard@greenpeace.org

Pacific nations would be paid only thousands for deep sea mining, while mining companies set to make billions, new research reveals

Continue Reading

Climate Change

North Carolina Regulators Nix $1.2 Billion Federal Proposal to Dredge Wilmington Harbor

Published

on

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers failed to explain how it would mitigate environmental harms, including PFAS contamination.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can’t dredge 28 miles of the Wilmington Harbor as planned, after North Carolina environmental regulators determined the billion-dollar proposal would be inconsistent with the state’s coastal management policies.

North Carolina Regulators Nix $1.2 Billion Federal Proposal to Dredge Wilmington Harbor

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com