The world’s richest people are likely to have already used their fair share of the annual global carbon budget, according to research by international NGO Oxfam.
Based on data from 2019, Oxfam have estimated that the 77 million people in the global top 1% of earners, with an income of $310,000 or more per year, use 2.1 tons of carbon dioxide each in just ten days. In contrast, it takes those in the world’s poorest 50% nearly three years to pollute that much.
According to the global carbon budget estimated by the United Nations Environment Programme, 2.1 tons per year is the full individual budget each person can emit by 2030 before breaching 1.5C of global warming.
Oxfam GB’s senior climate justice policy adviser Chiara Liguori said: “The future of our planet is hanging by a thread, yet the super-rich are being allowed to continue to squander humanity’s chances with their lavish lifestyles and polluting investments.”
She added: “Governments need to stop pandering to the richest polluters and instead make them pay their fair share for the havoc they’re wreaking on our planet. Leaders who fail to act are culpable in a crisis that threatens the lives of billions.”
Billionaires tax
Measures to tax the super-rich to fund climate action have risen up the agenda in recent years. Last year, the Brazilian government used its presidency of the G20 group of big economies to promote a proposal that aims for governments to tax billionaires at least 2% of their wealth.
Economists working on this proposal said it could raise $250 billion a year, which could be used to tackle poverty, hunger and climate change.
G20 leaders agreed at a November leaders summit in Rio De Janeiro to “engage cooperatively to ensure that ultra-high-net-worth individuals are effectively taxed” and said that discussions on this would be continued in the G20 and other forums.
Speaking ahead of that summit, Brazil’s climate change secretary Ana Toni told Climate Home that the proposal had been “really well received” and had changed the global debate on how to fund climate action. France, South Africa and Spain were among the nations in support of it.
Solidarity levies
The Brazilian government will host the COP30 summit in November and is co-chairing with Azerbaijan the Baku to Belem roadmap, which will look into how to scale up finance for climate projects and may include measures like a tax on the super-rich and particularly polluting sectors of the economy.
Seperately, a Global Solidarity Levies Taskforce coordinated by France, Kenya and Barbados will also look into these kind of measures including taxes on shipping, private air travel, fossil fuels and financial transactions.
With drought-hardy cows, Botswana prioritises adaptation in new climate plan
It will announce working groups for each measure by the end of March 2025 and produce preliminary impact assesments by the time of the IMF and World Bank spring meetings in April and final impact assesments by the Financing for Development summit at the end of June.
The task force will then aim to get countries to sign up to implement some of these proposals by COP30.
Friederike Roder, director of the taskforce’s secreteriat, told Climate Home that Oxfam’s research reinforces that the rich must “contribute their fair share to fund the fight for development and against climate change, especially in the poorest and most vulnerable countries”. “What we need now is action,” she added.
(Reporting by Joe Lo; editing by Sebastián Rodríguez)
The post Oxfam: Super-rich have already burned more than their fair share of carbon for 2025 appeared first on Climate Home News.
Oxfam: Super-rich have already burned more than their fair share of carbon for 2025
Climate Change
The Climate Change Culprits Not Addressed by Global Policy
A new paper suggests that 15 percent of global warming comes from overlooked pollutants.
Record-high global temperatures aren’t driven only by well-known greenhouse gas culprits.
Climate Change
Trump’s EPA Unlawfully Cancelled Environmental Justice Grants, Judge Rules
The decision voided the EPA guidance to terminate the $2.8 billion grant program. But it stopped short of requiring the agency to resume administering it.
A federal judge in South Carolina ruled this week that the Trump administration’s termination of environmental justice grants was “illegal.” The decision dealt a setback to efforts to dismantle a Biden-era program that funded projects addressing environmental and public health challenges in underserved communities across the country.
Trump’s EPA Unlawfully Cancelled Environmental Justice Grants, Judge Rules
Climate Change
A Commercial Space Race Prompts a Thorny Question: Who Owns the Sky?
The surge in satellites brings pollution and risks of repeating destructive colonial practices, experts warn.
The starry night sky has always anchored humanity’s sense of place in a vast universe. It’s a map guiding travelers, a calendar for migrations and harvests, a wellspring of stories. But a surge of commercial satellite launches into the upper fringes of Earth’s atmosphere threatens the relationship between people and the celestial commons by crowding the night sky and polluting the atmosphere, scientists warn.
A Commercial Space Race Prompts a Thorny Question: Who Owns the Sky?
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy8 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
