China’s central government listed “boosting consumption…and stimulating domestic demand” as its first “major task” for 2025, at the recently closed “two sessions”.
As part of this focus – and amid slowing economic growth – the State Council made specific mention of China’s “two new” (两新) policy.
The policy was first announced in 2023, but was heavily promoted last year. President Xi Jinping reportedly “stressed the importance” of a national recycling company as part of the policy in 2024, because it “facilitates green, low-carbon and circular development”.
Carbon Brief explains what the policy is, how it works and what its impact will be. An abridged version of the article appeared in China Briefing on 20 March.
What is ‘two new’?
The “two new” policy is short for “large-scale equipment upgrades and trade-in of consumer goods”. It is designed to boost domestic demand to prop up growth, at the same time as improving the efficiency of equipment so as to lower emissions.
According to the Communist party’s leading magazine on ideology Qiushi, the idea was first raised in 2023 at an economic conference held by the State Council for “improving technology, energy consumption, emissions and other standards”.
It became well-known after Xi reiterated the idea in early 2024. In March 2024, the policy then became an “action plan – a document illustrating specific methods for executing a political goal.
Prof Bai Quan, director of energy transition at the Academy of Macroeconomic Research – a research institution under the direct supervision of the State Council – told Carbon Brief in 2024 that there are four aspects of “two new”:
- Updates to equipment such as large boilers, turbines, heat pumps and lighting used for manufacturing;
- Trade-in of consumer goods, including fridges and air conditioners;
- Recycling of old or high-emission items;
- Improving standards for product efficiency and emissions, as well as for recycling, “to prevent people from re-purchasing outdated equipment with low energy efficiency”.
He added that the first three aspects directly “promote carbon reduction” and the last one “indirectly serves energy saving and carbon reduction goals”.
Under the policy, government subsidies are provided for manufacturers and consumers to trade-in old inefficient goods and purchase new ones. Other financial and tax support is given to recyclers to increase recycling.
-
Sign up to Carbon Brief’s free “China Briefing” email newsletter. All you need to know about the latest developments relating to China and climate change. Sent to your inbox every Thursday.
In 2025, the State Council updated the “two new” policy and increased the funds available to consumers and businesses.
It also expanded the range of trade-in products, adding more and older petrol cars for instance, as well as pledging to release a more detailed trade-in standard covering 294 items by the end of the year.
Li Gang, an official from the Ministry of Commerce, is quoted by the state news agency Xinhua saying at the press conference on the expansion that it would “help stimulate consumer spending and boost domestic demand. All enterprises, domestic or foreign-funded, private or state-owned, are welcome to participate in the scheme.”
How does equipment upgrade work?
A fundamental mechanism of “two new” is providing funding that enables consumers and businesses to trade-in and upgrade goods, as well as recycling the old equipment.
For example, under the policy, a consumer can trade in an old, inefficient petrol car and receive subsidies to upgrade to a new electric vehicle (EV) instead.
The government “work report” delivered by premier Li Qiang at the “two sessions” says that “ultra-long special treasury bonds totaling 300bn yuan ($41bn) will be issued to support consumer goods trade-in programmes” in 2025.
Meanwhile, another 700bn yuan ($96bn) will be allocated for a sister programme, known as “two major [projects]” (两重), which supports infrastructure construction, including roads and railways.
In a more detailed “two new” paper, the State Council says it will provide about 90% of the funds and the rest shall be covered by local governments.
A sum of cash will be given when old “high-emission” goods, such as ships, trucks, tractors and buses, are sent for recycling, depending on the age and emission levels. Some discounts will also be given when purchasing new lower-emission replacements.
Separately, companies can apply for a low-interest loan for large-scale equipment upgrades.
The State Council paper also eases the rules around low-interest loans for equipment upgrades, making it easier for small and medium-sized enterprises to access them.
According to the paper, projects that can apply funds from the cash pool include “equipment renewal in the field, as well as energy conservation, carbon reduction and safety transformation in key industries”, such as transports and agriculture.
The policy also allocates around 7.5bn yuan ($1bn) for the “recycling and treatment of waste electrical and electronic products”. This extends beyond the list of trade-in items.
How does ‘two new’ support recycling?
As the world’s largest renewable energy producer, China has so far built some 1,408 gigawatts (GW) of wind and solar capacity. About 35m tonnes of waste from decommissioned wind and solar equipment will need to be recycled in China by 2030.
A research paper in the journal Waste Management suggests building up sufficient capacity to recycle this waste could generate “significant economic benefits”.
However, Shanghai-based outlet the Paper reports that only a limited number of recyclers are on the market, due to the high costs and long payback periods.
Despite Beijing issuing policies in 2023 and 2024 to encourage businesses, a stronger recycling market is needed for “advancing” the “two new”, according to prof Du Huanzheng, director of the Circular Economy Research Institute of Tongji University.
In 2024, a state-owned recycling company, China Resources Recycling Group, was established to handle scrap steel, EV batteries and decommissioned renewable energy equipment.
But “challenge[s]” remain for private recyclers, Bai told Carbon Brief. One obstacle is missing a “first receipt”, which is the purchase receipt from manufacturers that enables recyclers to claim value-added tax deductions, he said.
A supporting policy for the “two new” from 2024 allows qualified recyclers to use their purchasing invoice in place of “first receipt” for tax claims.
Bai said this policy “solved the problem” and “is a very important incentive to meet the 2027 goals” of the “two new” policy.
The 2027 goals, written by the State Council, include a 25% increase in new equipment investment across key sectors and a doubling in the share of cars being recycled:
“By 2027, the scale of equipment investment in industries such as industry, agriculture, construction, transportation…will increase by more than 25% compared with 2023; the energy efficiency of major energy-consuming equipment in key industries will basically reach the energy-saving level, and the proportion of production capacity with environmental protection performance reaching Class A will be greatly increased…The amount of scrapped cars recycled will increase by about one-fold compared with 2023.”
How does trade-in work under ‘two new’?
Li Shuo, director of China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI), tells Carbon Brief that this is not the first time China used subsidies and “similar initiatives” to “stimulate consumption, address product oversupply and enhance energy efficiency”.
In 2025, the categories of eligible trade-in goods under “two new” is expanding from eight to 12, including mobile phones and fridges that are closely related to daily usage. Up to 500 yuan ($70) subsidies apiece can be applied when purchasing new digital products from 2025.
Electric vehicles (EVs), which can greatly decarbonise road transport, remain on the list. In addition, scrappage subsidies have been extended to more and newer types of petrol cars – including cars registered from 2012-14 rather than 2011-2013.
Li adds that the latest expansion of the policy “highlights the rapid pace of industrial upgrades in China and the mutually reinforcing dynamics of industrial productivity, a favorable regulatory framework, and the sheer scale of the Chinese market”.
Bloomberg says that “the cash-for-clunkers program gave a big boost to sales – especially of EVs and hybrids – after its introduction last year” and “manufacturers and investors had been eagerly waiting to see whether the subsidy” would be renewed in 2025.
The buyer rebates for vehicles, including EVs and more efficient petrol cars, remain at the same level as in the second half of 2024, after a rise last August.
Buyers can receive up to 20,000 yuan ($2,730) for EVs and plug-in hybrids or 15,000 yuan ($2,073) for petrol cars with an engine smaller than two litres.
(The Chinese EV industry receives a complicated range of subsidies, read more in Carbon Brief’s Q&A on the sector.)
What is the impact?
Xinhua says that the trade-in scheme boosted sales of cars in 2024, with new energy vehicles (NEVs, mainly EVs and plug-in hybrids) accounting for more than 60% of the new vehicles bought under the initiative in 2024.
Meanwhile, products certified with the “highest energy-efficiency level” made up more than 90% of sales by revenue under the home appliance trade-in scheme, adds the report.
An analysis by Goldman Sachs says the trade-in subsidies have “accelerated” the rising share of NEVs in Chinese car sales. It says the policy will help raise the NEV share from 48% in 2024 to about 60% in 2025.
Subsidies for NEVs under “two new” have amounted to 90bn yuan ($12bn), accounting for about 60% of the total “trade-in money”, according to Goldman Sachs.
In his 2024 analysis for Carbon Brief, Lauri Myllyvirta, lead analyst at the Centre lead analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), wrote that the trade-in subsidy scheme would “free up household cash for other types of spending, but it also directs household spending in the most energy-intensive direction”.
He tells Carbon Brief that the policy, after the 2025 expansion, is still a “much more limited measure than the kinds of income transfers that would be needed to substantially boost the role of household consumption in driving economic growth”. He adds:
“[It] targets the most energy-intensive part of household spending, purchases of energy-intensive manufactured goods, while leaving out spending on services and other less energy intensive sectors.”
Lynn Song, chief economist for Greater China from market research firm ING, tells Carbon Brief that it is “hard to quantify [the impact of ‘two new’] until we have more specifics rolled out such as what level of subsidies will be applied”. He says:
“The 300bn budget for the programme sounds a little small at first thought – under 1% of total retail sales last year – but it will boost sales beyond the 300bn [yuan] spent, so it should result in a fairly significant bump in my view.
“Looking at last year’s performance once the policies started ramping up in the second half of the year, we saw autos and home appliances easily outperform the headline retail sales growth.”
Song adds that the trade-in subsidies under “two new” can “lead to improved demand for these categories this year”.
In his 2024 interview with Carbon Brief, Bai called the “two new” a “sign” of the government using policy support to stimulate lower-carbon consumption. He added:
“Another vital policy is the ‘guidelines to ramp up green transition of economic, social development’… It is a blueprint of China’s transition in industry, building [construction], transportation, energy and many other areas. Together with the ‘two new’, which is an implementation document for this top-level design, we now have both a direction and a manual for the energy transition.”
The guideline aims to “achieve ‘remarkable results’ in the green transition” by 2030 and establish a “green, low-carbon and circular development economic system” by 2035.
(Read more about the guideline in China Briefing.)
An official release says that the “two new” policy “saved about 28m tonnes of standard coal and reduced carbon dioxide [CO2] emissions by about 73m tonnes” in 2024. It says the “effect” of supporting the low-carbon transition was “obvious”.
The post Q&A: How China’s ‘two new’ policy aims to help cut emissions appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Q&A: How China’s ‘two new’ policy aims to help cut emissions
A new storm recovery charge could soon hit Georgia Power customers’ bills, as climate change drives more destructive weather across the state.
Hurricane Helene may be long over, but its costs are poised to land on Georgians’ electricity bills. After the storm killed 37 people in Georgia and caused billions in damage in September 2024, Georgia Power is seeking permission from state regulators to pass recovery costs on to customers.
Gov. Mikie Sherrill says she supports both AI and lowering her constituents’ bills.
With New Jersey’s cost-of-living “crisis” at the center of Gov. Mikie Sherrill’s agenda, her administration has inherited a program that approved a $250 million tax break for an artificial intelligence data center.
Amid Affordability Crisis, New Jersey Hands $250 Million Tax Break to Data Center
Gabrielle Dreyfus is chief scientist at the Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development, Thomas Röckmann is a professor of atmospheric physics and chemistry at Utrecht University, and Lena Höglund Isaksson is a senior research scholar at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
This March scientists and policy makers will gather near the site in Italy where methane was first identified 250 years ago to share the latest science on methane and the policy and technology steps needed to rapidly cut methane emissions. The timing is apt.
As new tools transform our understanding of methane emissions and their sources, the evidence they reveal points to a single conclusion: Human-caused methane emissions are still rising, and global action remains far too slow.
This is the central finding of the latest Global Methane Status Report. Four years into the Global Methane Pledge, which aims for a 30% cut in global emissions by 2030, the good news is that the pledge has increased mitigation ambition under national plans, which, if fully implemented, could result in the largest and most sustained decline in methane emissions since the Industrial Revolution.
The bad news is this is still short of the 30% target. The decisive question is whether governments will move quickly enough to turn that bend into the steep decline required to pump the brake on global warming.
What the data really show
Assessing progress requires comparing three benchmarks: the level of emissions today relative to 2020, the trajectory projected in 2021 before methane received significant policy focus, and the level required by 2030 to meet the pledge.
The latest data show that global methane emissions in 2025 are higher than in 2020 but not as high as previously expected. In 2021, emissions were projected to rise by about 9% between 2020 and 2030. Updated analysis places that increase closer to 5%. This change is driven by factors such as slower than expected growth in unconventional gas production between 2020 and 2024 and lower than expected waste emissions in several regions.
Gas flaring soars in Niger Delta post-Shell, afflicting communities
This updated trajectory still does not deliver the reductions required, but it does indicate that the curve is beginning to bend. More importantly, the commitments already outlined in countries’ Nationally Determined Contributions and Methane Action Plans would, if fully implemented, produce an 8% reduction in global methane emissions between 2020 and 2030. This would turn the current increase into a sustained decline. While still insufficient to reach the Global Methane Pledge target of a 30% cut, it would represent historical progress.
Solutions are known and ready
Scientific assessments consistently show that the technical potential to meet the pledge exists. The gap lies not in technology, but in implementation.
The energy sector accounts for approximately 70% of total technical methane reduction potential between 2020 and 2030. Proven measures include recovering associated petroleum gas in oil production, regular leak detection and repair across oil and gas supply chains, and installing ventilation air oxidation technologies in underground coal mines. Many of these options are low cost or profitable. Yet current commitments would achieve only one third of the maximum technically feasible reductions in this sector.
Recent COP hosts Brazil and Azerbaijan linked to “super-emitting” methane plumes
Agriculture and waste also provide opportunities. Rice emissions can be reduced through improved water management, low-emission hybrids and soil amendments. While innovations in technology and practices hold promise in the longer term, near-term potential in livestock is more constrained and trends in global diets may counteract gains.
Waste sector emissions had been expected to increase more rapidly, but improvements in waste management in several regions over the past two decades have moderated this rise. Long-term mitigation in this sector requires immediate investment in improved landfills and circular waste systems, as emissions from waste already deposited will persist in the short term.
New measurement tools
Methane monitoring capacity has expanded significantly. Satellite-based systems can now identify methane super-emitters. Ground-based sensors are becoming more accessible and can provide real-time data. These developments improve national inventories and can strengthen accountability.
However, policy action does not need to wait for perfect measurement. Current scientific understanding of source magnitudes and mitigation effectiveness is sufficient to achieve a 30% reduction between 2020 and 2030. Many of the largest reductions in oil, gas and coal can be delivered through binding technology standards that do not require high precision quantification of emissions.
The decisive years ahead
The next 2 years will be critical for determining whether existing commitments translate into emissions reductions consistent with the Global Methane Pledge.
Governments should prioritise adoption of an effective international methane performance standard for oil and gas, including through the EU Methane Regulation, and expand the reach of such standards through voluntary buyers’ clubs. National and regional authorities should introduce binding technology standards for oil, gas and coal to ensure that voluntary agreements are backed by legal requirements.
One approach to promoting better progress on methane is to develop a binding methane agreement, starting with the oil and gas sector, as suggested by Barbados’ PM Mia Mottley and other leaders. Countries must also address the deeper challenge of political and economic dependence on fossil fuels, which continues to slow progress. Without a dual strategy of reducing methane and deep decarbonisation, it will not be possible to meet the Paris Agreement objectives.
Mottley’s “legally binding” methane pact faces barriers, but smaller steps possible
The next four years will determine whether available technologies, scientific evidence and political leadership align to deliver a rapid transition toward near-zero methane energy systems, holistic and equity-based lower emission agricultural systems and circular waste management strategies that eliminate methane release. These years will also determine whether the world captures the near-term climate benefits of methane abatement or locks in higher long-term costs and risks.
The Global Methane Status Report shows that the world is beginning to change course. Delivering the sharper downward trajectory now required is a test of political will. As scientists, we have laid out the evidence. Leaders must now act on it.
The post Curbing methane is the fastest way to slow warming – but we’re off the pace appeared first on Climate Home News.
Curbing methane is the fastest way to slow warming – but we’re off the pace
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits