Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) Inc. has raised its 5-year regulated capital spending plan to potentially reach $21 billion as it focuses on investing in solar, energy efficiency, and grid projects. These investments aim to ensure reliability while striving to achieve the corporation’s net zero goals.
PSEG’s Trailblazing Net Zero Commitment
PSEG’s vision for climate action sets an ambitious net zero goal by 2030. This positions the company as a trailblazer among major utility and power generator firms. This goal comprises three core pillars:
- Net Zero Emissions for PSEG Operations: This encompasses the company’s utility arm, Public Service Electric & Gas, PSE&G’s utility operations (scopes 1 and 2), aiming to achieve net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2030.
- 100% GHG, Carbon-Free Power Generation: PSEG commits to transitioning its power generation to be entirely GHG and carbon-free.
- Contributions to Regional Economy-Wide Decarbonization: PSEG aims to make substantial contributions to broader decarbonization efforts within the regional economy.
PSE&G has already made significant strides in reducing GHG emissions by over 50% from 2005 levels. The group now aims to achieve net zero GHG emissions (scopes 1 and 2) by 2030.

This aim focuses not just on reducing emissions from operations but also addressing GHG emissions associated with natural gas use. It serves about 2 million customers across New Jersey for various crucial needs like space and water heating.
As seen above, the group plans to use carbon offsets to address their 2030 GHG emissions. Carbon offsets are from projects that reduce or remove carbon somewhere else. Each offset equals a tonne of carbon emissions.
New Jersey’s Accelerated Decarbonization Initiatives
In an investor update, PSEG detailed its regulated spending plans for 2024-2028, primarily tied to its utility subsidiary, PSE&G. The company highlighted that these investments are driven by the need for system modernization and align with New Jersey’s decarbonization and energy policy objectives.
In February 2023, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy announced the state’s ambition to achieve 100% clean electricity by 2035. This goal is accelerated from the initial target of 2050. The state also aimed to electrify 10% of commercial and residential buildings by the end of 2030.
Gov. Murphy further highlighted that:
“These bold targets and carefully crafted initiatives signal our unequivocal commitment to swift and concrete climate action today.”
The current Energy Master Plan (EMP) aimed at achieving the 100% benchmark by 2050, including a goal of 7,500 MW of offshore wind generation by 2035. By July 2022, the state had already exceeded its target of 3.75 GW of new solar generation by 2026. This secures 4 GW of solar power.
The state projects significant savings of $355 million annually and a reduction of 5.5 million metric tons of GHG emissions per year by 2030 through these endeavors and leveraging federal benefits provided by the Inflation Reduction Act.
Additionally, Executive Order No. 317 mandates the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) to devise plans for the future of gas utilities in the state. This will align their emissions with the goal of reducing statewide GHG emissions by 50% below 2006 levels by 2030.
Moreover, New Jersey announced initiatives to support the transition to electric vehicles (EVs). The state adopts the Advanced Clean Cars II program and allocates $70 million from its Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative funds to establish an incentive program for consumers switching to zero-emission vehicles.
As per their 2023 Sustainability Report, PSE&G has installed over 8,000 chargers through their EV Charging Program. The company has invested over $22 million in developing a smart charging infrastructure.
PSEG’s Expanded Clean Energy Capital Plan
Considering these goals and the increased demand for clean energy, electric reliability, and electrification, PSEG’s regulated capital plan saw a rise of over $2 billion, expanding from the earlier $16 billion to $18.5 billion plan for 2023-2027.
The updated plan encompasses a transmission project awarded to PSEG in December 2023 as part of PJM Interconnection’s grid upgrades. The goal is to accommodate data center growth and facilitate power plant retirements.
With that, PSEG’s total capital plan for 2024-2028 now ranges from $19 billion to $22.5 billion. This includes its power supply subsidiary PSEG Power LLC and other investments. The company affirmed that no new equity is needed to support this capital plan.
Moreover, PSEG sustained its 5% to 7% long-term annual earnings growth rate for 2024-2028, coming from its 2024 earnings guidance.
The projected 5-year EPS growth is underpinned by rate base expansion at PSE&G and the production tax credit for its unregulated nuclear fleet. The Inflation Reduction Act’s nuclear production tax credit offers up to $15/MWh for electricity generated by nuclear plants in service in 2024. PSEG Power holds interests in three nuclear plants in the PJM market.
Overall, PSEG’s $21 billion investment for net zero 2030 climate vision stands as a significant and comprehensive step forward in the energy industry. It shows its commitment to combating climate change and fostering a greener and more sustainable industry.
The post PSEG to Invest $21B for Net Zero Targets appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

