Anything worth achieving is hard. It requires dedication, focus, and perseverance. And sometimes a little luck. Osprey Wilds’ clean energy focus began 20 years ago. Yet, it wasn’t until this fall with the addition of a 716 kilowatt (kW) solar photovoltaic system that we finally reached our goal of producing 100% of our electricity on-site through renewable sources. As a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit environmental learning center, Osprey Wilds reaches over 15,000 people annually through our wide-ranging accredited environmental education programs. Located on Grindstone Lake, near Sandstone, MN, our campus resides on 783 acres of beautiful forests, prairies and wetlands. This ideal setting, accompanied by our overnight lodging and dining facilities, allows us to connect K-12 students, youth, family and adults to nature for multiple days at a time, providing truly immersive, meaningful connections to the environment. At our core, we believe it is our responsibility to model sustainable environmental practices for others to learn from. This includes how we steward the land, how we use energy, how we grow, raise and purchase food, and the products we use. Our goal is always trying to reduce our impact on the planet, lessen our carbon footprint, and teach our audience what they can do in turn with their lives. We strive to create environmental ripple marks and we achieve that through our mission of instilling a connection and commitment to the environment in people of all communities through experiential learning.
The path down our clean energy focus began in 2004, when we secured a federal Housing & Urban Development (HUD) grant to install a 65-ton geothermal ground-source heat pump system to cool and heat our two main buildings. This eliminated our usage of propane to heat the two buildings, and shifted our energy needs to run the heat pumps on electricity. With the realization that our overall energy usage was lower, but our electricity needs were now higher, we sought out adding renewable energy sources to produce the electricity we used. From 2005 to 2015, we were successful in obtaining grants to add over 39 kilowatts of solar photovoltaic arrays to supply about 20% of our total campus electricity needs. During that time, we also added 29 solar hot water panels for domestic use in heating the water used for our dormitory showers and sinks, and our commercial kitchen, made a campus-wide LED lighting upgrade, added blown cellulose insulation to improve the R-value of our buildings, and upgraded our HVAC control systems. But to cover the remaining 300,000 kilowatt hours of electricity we were still using annually, we knew we needed to do something big to achieve our goals of becoming carbon neutral.
In 2019, we reached out to a solar company to help us achieve that goal. Over the next several months, I worked with them on a plan of adding 248 kW of solar photovoltaic arrays, distributed across multiple solar-compatible locations on our property that would produce the kilowatts needed to cover our annual energy usage. We worked with our local bank to secure terms for a loan that would finance the cost of the system, and met with our local electric cooperative East Central Energy about how this could work. This proposed system would put us well over 40 kW on our account, the kW threshold in Minnesota for net-metering. Coming to the realization that this proposal wouldn’t allow for net metering with our system meant ultimately it wouldn’t work economically for Osprey Wilds, as we would have been reliant on the net-metered income for the months we overproduced to cover the loan expenses we were looking to take on to finance the project. If we could have purchased the system outright and not had to worry about cash flowing the loan, net metering wouldn’t have made a big difference. It was a learning process, and whetted my appetite to see if there was some other way we could collaborate with East Central Energy to achieve our energy goals and theirs.
We all know what happened in March 2020. The world came to a halt with the impact of COVID-19, and in many ways is forever changed from that pandemic. Our focus at Osprey Wilds shifted to institutional survival and how we could sustain as an organization that is designed around immersive, shared experiences with people. For a solid year, we had no program revenue from in-person K-12 schools, a devastating loss for us, only enhanced by the sadness in knowing that thousands of children looking forward to that multi-day nature experience at Osprey Wilds were missing out. We were fortunate to secure federal grants from the rescue packages passed, and stayed afloat. As things slowly began coming back and operations returned closer to normal, the time was right to re-engage with East Central Energy and their CEO Justin Jahnz to see what might be possible. Those talks in 2022 led to an idea – a three party power purchase agreement among Osprey Wilds, East Central Energy and a solar provider, with the solar provider owning and operating the system on Osprey Wilds property and selling the electricity to East Central Energy, who then would sell it to Osprey Wilds. For it to work, we needed a solar provider interested, selling the solar electricity generated at rates that would be make financial sense for East Central Energy to purchase, while still being high enough that it was profitable for the solar provider, yet also low enough that Osprey Wilds could afford to purchase the electricity from East Central Energy. It was a proposal that would require threading a needle to find financial terms that could work for all parties, but it was also exciting and definitely worth the effort to see if we could make it happen.
During this time period, Osprey Wilds also completed a conservation easement with the Minnesota Land Trust on over 460 acres of our campus. Permanently protecting over 85% of our campus was something our organization was proud to have accomplished, and aligned very strongly with our environmental values of treading lightly on the planet, and protecting natural resources in perpetuity. During this conservation easement process, I knew I wanted to leave open the ability to add a large solar photovoltaic system on our campus for the eventual goal of producing 100% of our electricity onsite. For an optimal solar capacity location, as well as a visually strong first impression, we landed on a 3-acre exclusion in our 20-acre tallgrass prairie, noticeable on your left hand side as soon as you pull into Osprey Wilds’ driveway. The 3-acre exclusion was large enough for a 250 kW system, capable of supplying all of our electricity needs.
But as we began working with East Central Energy on the RFP (request for proposal) for the solar project at Osprey Wilds, I learned that this was a relatively small space to work with, as providers would be interested in putting up a larger system to reach the economies of scale necessary to lower the cost of the project and make it financially attractive. Examining the size of the exclusion, it was determined that the largest a system could be was approximately 700 kW. While this seemed very large to me, many commercial solar installers are looking at systems with production levels two to ten times that size to make projects financially viable.
With that knowledge, I was worried if we would get any proposals that would fit within the financial parameters needed for it to work for East Central Energy and Osprey Wilds. In the spring of 2023, we received proposals back from multiple solar companies. But unfortunately and somewhat predictably, all the numbers were far higher than what East Central Energy could afford to purchase, and in turn, what Osprey Wilds could as well. With that deflating realization, we talked openly with the company that had been the closest in their proposal, Soltek, Inc., about our desire to find a way with this project. We shared the benefits we saw for their company to be able to partner with East Central Energy and an environmental learning center that hosts and educates thousands of participants each year, and the impact they could have on those individuals with this inspiring project. Shawn Markham, Soltek’s CEO, took that passion of ours to heart, and over the ensuing months kept diligently trying to find ways to reduce the cost of the project to make it viable.
In March of 2024, I got a message from Shawn that we should talk. Conditions had shifted dramatically within the solar industry in the past 12 months. Changes made by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in the fall of 2023 were taking effect April 15th that were reducing the daytime compensation for rooftop solar for homeowners by about 75%, making it much less affordable for individuals to add solar. As a result, the solar industry was struggling. Shawn now had access to materials and equipment that he could get for half the price he could a year ago, dramatically lowering the cost of the proposed Osprey Wilds system and thus lowering the rate at which he could sell electricity to East Central Energy. Concurrently, he had also applied for a Renewable Energy in America Program (REAP) grant through the USDA and was awaiting word on its status. By the end of June, Shawn got word that he’d received the REAP grant, and with the savings he was realizing with the lower priced materials for the project, he could offer a rate that fit for East Central Energy and their cooperative members, and for Osprey Wilds. The solar dream was going to happen!
Soon materials and panels were being delivered to Osprey Wilds, and all three parties worked on crafting power purchase and land lease agreements for project terms to become official. The end result would be a win-win-win. Soltek would own and operate the system, selling affordable electricity to East Central Energy, while creating a 30-year source of guaranteed income. East Central Energy would expand their ability to purchase affordable, clean, and locally sourced electricity for their members. Lastly, Osprey Wilds would achieve its carbon goals, and save money with favorable electricity rates secured for the next 30 years.
Installation of the eventual 716 kW prairie solar garden began late July and was completed in just three weeks. East Central Energy is currently in the final stages of installing their transfer station next to the system, which will feed into their phase three line only a few hundred feet away. The system will go live in October, and produce 1,000,000 kWh (1,000 megawatt hours) annually, more than three times Osprey Wilds’ current electricity demands. The large production level of the system will set us up for future campus expansions that can remain carbon neutral. In the meantime, the majority of the electricity generated will actually go to our neighbors, providing them with clean, locally produced electricity at no increased expense to them.
The prairie solar garden is nestled within prairie grasses and wildflowers, allowing native ecosystems to coincide with energy production. In addition, the solar garden is bordered by a woven wire fence perimeter, which will allow us to partner with local sheep producers to add pastured livestock and agriculture into the mix, creating three sustainable land uses simultaneously.
With this project’s completion, we will now boast the largest solar photovoltaic system of any nature center or environmental learning center in Minnesota and the Midwest. It is a tangible example of what can happen when you work with others – you are able to achieve something greater than you could on your own. A rising tide lifts all boats, and it is our hope that this project demonstrates to our guests our commitment to the planet, and that it inspires them to pursue ways they can reduce their carbon footprint and climate change impact. We share a beautiful planet, one of unimaginable beauty, that is worth fighting for. When you love something, you take care of it, and at Osprey Wilds, this prairie solar garden is our latest pledge to the Earth that we are doing what we can to take care of it. We encourage you to do what you can for the planet as well.
Osprey Wilds is open to the public with over 10 miles of hiking and cross country ski trails at no charge. Visit us to see our prairie solar garden, check out our live animal ambassadors, shop our gift shop, learn about upcoming programs, or simply enjoy a nature respite along the lake, in the woods, or on the prairie.
Bryan Wood strives to provide people with rewarding and meaningful environmental experiences. He has followed his passion for the outdoors through various positions over the years. Throughout all of them is rooted a deep desire to connect people to nature and inspire them to make a positive impact with their lives for the planet and its inhabitants.
The post Osprey Wilds Achieves 100% Solar Clean Energy Goal appeared first on Climate Generation.
Aviation is on track to be responsible for 80% of the UK’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2050, according to the Climate Change Committee (CCC).
Emissions from flying have more than doubled since 1990 – driven by rising passenger numbers – even as the climate impact of every other sector in the UK economy has fallen.
The UK does not have “credible” policies in place to reverse this trend of rising emissions, says the CCC in new advice to the government on future aviation policy.
The government has signalled its support for expanding Heathrow, the nation’s largest airport, while relying on “techno-fixes” such as “sustainable aviation fuels” (SAFs) to cut emissions.
Yet, even without Heathrow expansion, the CCC says aviation emissions are on track to be higher in 2050 than they are today – reaching 38m tonnes of CO2 (MtCO2).
As the chart below shows, this would account for most of the remaining CO2 from the UK economy, all of which would need to be removed from the atmosphere in order to meet the legal target of net-zero emissions.
Expanding Heathrow would add another 2.4MtCO2 in 2050, amounting to around 5% of all the UK’s emissions. (This would increase to 4.5MtCO2 when expansion is complete in 2054.)
With a final decision on Heathrow expansion expected by 2029, the government asked the CCC for its advice on whether the plan is compatible with the UK’s climate targets.
The CCC has concluded that the UK simply lacks sufficient policies to reduce aviation emissions and “expanding Heathrow would compound the problem”. In a press briefing, CCC chair Nigel Topping told journalists:
“The UK does not currently have a credible plan to reduce [aviation emissions] in line with net-zero, so that creates a serious challenge for meeting our climate commitments.”
The “jet-zero strategy”, launched by the previous Conservative government in 2022, set out plans to cut aviation emissions. However, the Labour government has since accepted that the strategy’s expectations for SAFs, electric planes and fuel-efficiency improvements were unrealistic.
The CCC says a “credible and robust net-zero policy framework for aviation” should be set out in a revised strategy, which is planned for 2027. Only then could Heathrow expansion be aligned with the net-zero goal, adds the committee.
As part of this new strategy, the CCC says the “aviation sector needs to take responsibility for its emissions”. It says policies should be designed based on the “polluter pays” principle, requiring the aviation industry to fund its own SAFs and CO2 removal.
Specifically, the committee says funding will be needed for “engineered removal” technologies, such as direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS).
These technologies are currently “not yet available at the scale required”, but are vital for the kind of permanent CO2 removal needed to mop up aviation emissions, says the CCC.
(“Natural solutions” such as tree planting are the other main way CO2 is expected to be removed from the atmosphere. However, the CCC envisages these removals offsetting the remaining methane emissions from livestock agriculture in the UK, whereas it says “engineered removals” would be required to remove and store CO2 from flights.)
The CCC acknowledges that placing decarbonisation costs on airlines would likely lead to higher ticket prices. It estimates that this could mean an increase, in 2024 prices, of around £150 for a return trip to Alicante, Spain, and £400 for a return trip to New York by 2050.
However, it says this is preferable to a public spending approach, which would result in the roughly 50% of the population who do not fly paying for flight-related CO2 removals.
In addition, the committee notes that higher costs would help to manage demand for flights, which would otherwise be expected to increase considerably over the coming decades.
related
The post CCC: Heathrow expansion could push flights to ‘80% of UK emissions by 2050’ appeared first on Carbon Brief.
CCC: Heathrow expansion could push flights to ‘80% of UK emissions by 2050’
A fifth of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions are linked to international trade in goods and services, a new tracker shows, spotlighting a little-studied issue that researchers say should be tackled by the UN climate process.
Currently, as part of the Paris Agreement, every country is responsible for counting and reducing the planet-heating emissions that are produced within its territory. Manufacturing countries, for example, may have high emissions even if what they make is exported for consumption elsewhere.
But new analysis from the European Climate Foundation (ECF) and climate consultancy Matière, based on the tracker’s data, shows that some countries have a high footprint of “imported emissions” from goods and services they ship in. These emissions are often ignored in the places where the products are consumed because they are not formally counted under greenhouse gas inventories.
In the European Union, for example, while domestic emissions have declined since 2015, imported emissions have remained unchanged, the analysis shows. In some countries, like Austria or Sweden, they are as high as the country’s entire annual carbon footprint.
-
Türkiye says it has “final decision” at COP31 despite Australia running negotiations
COP31 President-Designate Murat Kurum told journalists that, while the two countries have been working well together, Türkiye has the final say over the Antalya summit -
As science comes under attack at UN talks, climate movement splits over how to respond
A rift over how IPCC messages are produced and turned into policy is creating tensions in the world’s most influential coalition of climate NGOs
Former EU lead climate negotiator Jacob Werksman said that under the Paris Agreement, these traded emissions are accounted for in the countries where they are originally produced, but importing countries can also take responsibility for their consumption.
“It starts with a wide recognition by many jurisdictions around the world that we need to know the carbon content of these products, and we then need to agree what is a fair, effective, transparent and relatively easy-to-implement way of measuring that carbon in traded products,” he told a launch event for the trade emissions tracker, which contains data for different countries, sectors and gases.
Trade and its role in addressing climate change has become a higher priority at UN climate talks after a push led by emerging economies including China, India and South Africa led to the first trade and climate change dialogue held this year at the mid-year session in Bonn.
At the upcoming COP31 UN summit in Antalya, some voluntary initiatives like the Brazil-led Integrated Forum on Climate Change and Trade are expected to continue, but the issue does not feature in Türkiye’s Action Agenda of climate initiatives and formal negotiations are not scheduled on the topic.
China: the world’s top emissions exporter
As a manufacturing powerhouse, China ranks first in the new tracker as the world’s top-emitting country, but the data shows that a large chunk of the country’s carbon emissions – an amount larger than Brazil’s entire annual carbon footprint – are linked to products that are exported and consumed abroad.
Russia, Brazil, the US and the EU rank as the top destinations for Chinese trade-related emissions, which are mostly linked to components for power generation, basic metals like copper and lead, and non-metallic minerals like graphite and phosphorus.
Yet China is also the world’s top emissions importer, related mostly to agricultural products, fossil fuels and minerals brought from the US, the EU, Japan and India, among others. The US ranks second by a close margin, with both countries importing about 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent.
China’s industrial engine starts to break its fossil fuel habit
Richard Baron, ECF’s industrial policy and trade director, said Chinese clean energy products are key for reducing emissions around the world, adding that Europe is “not able to do without those technologies” for its energy transition.
“China has an emissions trading system that counts CO2 differently there. But if China and the EU were to agree on some kind of translation mechanism to say ‘this is how we measure it’, and companies can understand the protocol to navigate both markets, that would set the tone for a lot of other conversations,” he said at the platform’s launch event last week.
The analysis suggests that if the EU and China aligned their climate requirements for products, the resulting standards could influence trade flows representing about 7% of global emissions.
Baron said there’s “a plethora” of multilateral spaces to hold these discussions, including the climate and trade dialogue at the UN climate talks or the Climate Club at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which seeks to cut industrial emissions.
Trade breaks into agenda of UN climate talks – but will it have teeth?
Controversial trade measures
Instruments like the Europe’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) – a recent piece of legislation that penalises emissions-heavy imported products – are one tool that could be used to address trade-related emissions, said Antoine Oger, executive director at the Institute for European Environmental Policy.
He said a significant portion of imported emissions in Europe are already covered by CBAM, as it includes sectors like cement, iron and steel, fertilisers and aluminium. This then allows the EU “to engage in constructive dialogue with our trade partners”, he added.
But across diplomatic summits, including at UN climate talks, emerging economies have pushed back heavily against the CBAM and other trade measures. The most recent BRICS declaration adopted on Saturday by 11 such countries – including China, India and Russia – condemns “protectionism under the guise of environmental objectives”.
The declaration calls for the “elimination of such unlawful measures”, which they argue have “far-reaching negative implications for the human rights, including the rights to development, health and food security” of vulnerable communities.
“The question of responsibility is a political question,” Oger said. “These emissions exist – they are emitted somewhere to make a product that will be consumed elsewhere. So you can debate responsibility but the idea is for the two parts to recognise there’s a problem.”
The aim, he added “is not to point fingers, but to accept this is a reality of our emissions profiles and ask what we can do about it”.
The post International trade linked to 20% of global emissions – but imports ignored appeared first on Climate Home News.
International trade linked to 20% of global emissions – but imports ignored
All the ambulance services in England experienced some of their busiest-ever days during this summer’s record-breaking June heatwave, according to data obtained by Carbon Brief.
In June, temperatures climbed past 37C in parts of the country as authorities declared only the second ever “red” extreme heat warning.
Four out of 10 NHS ambulance services, including London’s, responded to unprecedented numbers of life-threatening emergencies on at least one day from 23-27 June.
Another two services – in the south-west and east of the country – received their highest volume of 999 calls on record.
Ambulance services provided data on their busiest days since records began, in response to freedom-of-information (FOI) requests from Carbon Brief.
The results show how demand during the June heatwave exceeded levels seen during the traditionally busy winter season in other years – and even the height of the Covid-19 pandemic – for many services.
Heat demand
Extreme heat ramps up the risk of numerous life-threatening conditions, including heart disease and respiratory problems.
England experienced record-breaking temperatures at the end of June, with the whole country covered by amber or red “heat health alerts” from the government.
A red alert, which was issued for the entire Midlands and south of England, indicates “significant risk to life for even the healthy population”. This was only the second time such an alert has been triggered.
Researchers calculated that there were nearly 3,000 heat-related deaths in the UK this summer. There has also been unprecedented demand for A&E departments and some ambulance services.
To investigate the strain facing ambulances, Carbon Brief sent FOI requests to the 10 NHS ambulance trusts in England, asking for lists of their busiest days.
This covered both the total volume of 999 calls and “category 1” responses – referring to incidents involving “life-threatening injuries and illnesses”, such as heart attacks.
The chart below shows the busiest days on record for England’s ambulances, including both total calls and category 1 responses. Most services were able to provide records back to the 2010s. (See: Methodology.)
The five-day period from 23-27 June is overrepresented in these results, with at least two heatwave days ranking in the top 20 for every service in the country.
This trend is especially pronounced in the south and east of England, where June temperatures exceeded 36C and even approached 38C in some regions.
London, South East Coast, South Central and North East ambulance services all reported daily records for responding to life-threatening emergencies during the heatwave.
For the South East Coast and South Central services – which cover a region stretching from Oxfordshire to Kent – 25, 26 and 27 June all saw unprecedented numbers of category 1 callouts.
South Western and East of England services both saw record numbers of 999 calls on 26 June, the same day the highest-ever June UK temperature was reported in Norfolk.
It is worth noting that demand for ambulance services – including category 1 calls – has been growing for many years, driven by factors such as an ageing population, more complex health conditions and growing mental-health pressures.
This helps to explain why dates from before the 2020s are rare in the top rankings provided to Carbon Brief.
Beyond the heatwave, 2026 as a whole is on track to be a record year for ambulance demand.
‘Stifling heat’
On 26 June, the busiest day of the heatwave, ambulances across England responded to 4,084 life-threatening emergencies.
The average daily volume of such incidents is normally around 2,500 during the summer months.
Stu Holliday, head of emergency preparedness, resilience and response at North East Ambulance Service, tells Carbon Brief:
“During periods of hot weather, we typically see an increase in calls from people affected by dehydration, heat exhaustion and heatstroke, as well as those whose existing health conditions, particularly heart and respiratory illnesses, can be made worse by prolonged high temperatures.
“Older people, young children and pregnant people can be especially vulnerable.”
Ambulance teams are generally busier in the winter because cold weather and seasonal illnesses drive up the number of severe medical emergencies.
However, the data from June shows that extremely hot days are starting to match or even edge out cold ones as the busiest days. This is a trend seen across the healthcare system.
While not every service provided records back to 2019, the data broadly shows that ambulances were busier during the heatwave than at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.
As well as patients, heatwaves put pressure on ambulance workers. The UNISON union has warned of crews facing “stifling heat with faulty or no air conditioning” and “back-to-back callouts” due to increased demand.
Methodology
Carbon Brief requested data on the top 50 busiest days for England’s 10 main ambulance services.
These are: London; South East Coast; South Central; South Western; West Midlands; East Midlands; East of England; North East; Yorkshire; and North West.
Data was requested for as far back as service records go. Most were able to provide records going back to some point in the 2010s, with the exception of North East and South Central, which only had records from 2021 and 2022 onwards, respectively.
Rising annual demand for ambulance services means that most of the busiest days for ambulances have been in the 2020s. For example, all but four of the busiest days for category 1 emergencies reported to Carbon Brief were in the 2020s.
Carbon Brief requested data on ambulance demand for all the UK nations. In Scotland and Northern Ireland – where temperatures are cooler – services did not see call volumes reach the top 50 rankings during the June heatwave. The Welsh Ambulance Service did not respond to Carbon Brief’s request.
related
Revealed: More than 1,000 NHS operations cancelled due to record UK heatwaves
Climate change is driving a ‘shift’ in childhood malaria risk across Africa
Q&A: How heat-related deaths are counted by scientists and public health authorities
Guest post: France’s June heatwave caused more than 2,700 heat-related deaths
The post Revealed: England’s June 2026 heatwave sparked record demand for ambulances appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Revealed: England’s June 2026 heatwave sparked record demand for ambulances
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy11 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits