The semiconductor industry powers artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and modern data centers. Yet, it is also one of the most energy-hungry and resource-heavy industries. When Nvidia announced a $5 billion investment in Intel, with plans to co-develop chips that combine Nvidia’s AI technology with Intel’s CPU architecture, many see this as a big business move.
Adding to the spotlight, Nvidia also signed a $100 billion deal with OpenAI to supply advanced AI hardware for the next generation of AI models. However, these moves raise an important question: can such deals help reduce carbon emissions and improve sustainable computing?
The High Cost of Silicon: Why ESG Matters
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues now play a major role in how technology companies are judged. Making chips requires huge amounts of water, energy, and chemicals.
Once built, the chips power data centers and AI systems that consume even more electricity. This makes sustainability a challenge for both chip production and chip use.
Both Intel and Nvidia have set ambitious climate goals. Intel has pledged to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions for Scope 1 and Scope 2 operations by 2040. The company further aims for net-zero upstream Scope 3 emissions by 2050. It also targets net-positive water use and zero waste to landfills by 2030.

Nvidia, which outsources chip production, promises to lower emissions in its products. It also wants suppliers to set science-based climate goals.
By the end of fiscal 2025, Nvidia used 100% renewable electricity in all its offices and data centers. This move cut its Scope 2 emissions to zero. In fiscal 2024, the company emitted 3,692,423 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent. This total includes emissions from Scopes 1, 2, and 3, showing its environmental impact.

Nvidia surpassed its supplier engagement goal. It worked with partners covering over 80% of Scope 3 Category 1 emissions, up from the initial target of 67%.
By joining forces with Intel, Nvidia gains access not only to its production capacity but also to its sustainability practices. Intel aims for cleaner supply chains and greener manufacturing. This effort could lower the impact of new joint chips.
- RELATED: Intel Stock Surges 9.8% on $2B SoftBank Deal: Can Its Net-Zero Push Power the Future of Chips?
Nvidia is “fabless” and usually relies on partners like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). This partnership gives Nvidia more control over how chips are made, packaged, and delivered.
The recent OpenAI deal further emphasizes Nvidia’s role in high-powered AI while keeping sustainability in mind. The company will provide energy-efficient chips for OpenAI’s large AI tasks. This shows the importance of balancing AI development and reducing carbon emissions.
Power-Hungry AI: Cutting Emissions per Computation
The environmental impact of chips is not limited to their production. In fact, much of the emissions tied to semiconductors come from how they are used in practice. Large-scale AI training, for example, requires massive computing power and electricity.
As demand for AI continues to surge, the energy needs of data centers are climbing quickly. The International Energy Agency predicts that global data center electricity demand may double by 2030. This raises concerns about the carbon footprint of AI-driven growth.

Here, the Nvidia-Intel partnership could play a vital role. Intel has set a target to improve the energy efficiency of its processors by 10 times by 2030. Nvidia is also focusing on efficiency. They aim to cut emissions for each computation. This includes lowering carbon dioxide equivalent per petaflop of processing power.
The OpenAI deal adds another layer. Nvidia will supply AI chips to power massive models while aiming to maintain energy efficiency. This ensures that even as AI workloads grow dramatically, emissions per computation can stay lower than older technologies.
“Compute infrastructure will be the basis for the economy of the future,” said Sam Altman, cofounder and CEO of OpenAI. “We will utilise what we’re building with Nvidia to both create new AI breakthroughs and empower people and businesses with them at scale.”
- RELEVANT: NVIDIA Stock (NVDA) Surges: Driving AI Mobility and Cloud Growth with OpenAI and Oracle Partnerships
Nvidia and OpenAI: The $100 Billion AI Hardware Deal
Under its $100 billion deal with OpenAI, Nvidia will provide AI hardware for the next generation of large AI models. This agreement names Nvidia as the main supplier of specialized GPUs and AI chips for OpenAI’s large computing tasks.
The deal includes support for AI training infrastructure. It also covers software optimization and ongoing maintenance of data center operations.
Nvidia’s fine print states it will provide advanced GPUs over the years. This way, OpenAI can grow its AI systems smoothly and without delays. OpenAI will also commit to using Nvidia’s energy-efficient chips and adopt best practices to limit energy use per computation. Both companies will closely track power use and emissions. They will link efficiency gains to contract milestones.
The companies will work together to build advanced AI supercomputing systems, starting with the Nvidia Vera Rubin platform in the second half of 2026. They plan to roll out 10 gigawatts of computing power, creating one of the largest AI infrastructures ever.
This partnership emphasizes two points:
-
AI demand is growing at an unprecedented speed, and
-
There is increasing pressure to meet that demand while minimizing carbon emissions.
Nvidia is using high-performance, energy-efficient hardware to support OpenAI’s bold AI projects. This helps keep energy use and emissions low. The deal further boosts Nvidia’s role in driving sustainable AI growth. It aligns with its ESG and supply-chain efforts.
Following this announcement, Nvidia’s stock experienced a significant uptick. Shares surged over 4%, making it a top performer on major indices including the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P 500. This surge reflects investor optimism about Nvidia’s strengthened position in the AI infrastructure market.

The Fine Print: Supply Chains and Scope 3 Hurdles
Even with progress, the semiconductor industry faces significant challenges in reducing its environmental footprint. Making advanced chips requires temperatures over 1,000°C. It also requires special chemicals and rare materials such as gallium, cobalt, and indium.
Modern fabs use a lot of energy. For example, one Intel fab can use up to 150 million kWh of electricity each year. This results in about 50,000 metric tons of CO₂ emissions annually.
Globally, semiconductor manufacturing produces over 400 million metric tons of CO₂ each year. This is about 1% of all global emissions. With demand for AI chips and cloud services growing, efficiency gains risk being offset.
McKinsey & Company’s analysis suggests that the industry must reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by at least 4.2% annually from 2020 levels to align with a 1.5°C trajectory by 2030. However, even with full implementation of current decarbonization measures, emissions could reach 89 million tons of CO₂e by 2030, falling short of the 54 million tons needed for net-zero by 2050.

Supply chains are an even bigger hurdle. Scope 3 emissions cover raw material extraction, supplier manufacturing, packaging, and logistics. They can account for 70–80% of a chipmaker’s total carbon footprint.
Nvidia has already engaged suppliers covering over 80% of Scope 3 Category 1 emissions, exceeding its initial 67% target. Yet, emissions from mining, wafer fabrication by foundries, transportation, and overseas assembly are still significant. For example, shipping a single ton of semiconductor wafers internationally can add up to 20 metric tons of CO₂.
Energy sourcing is also critical. Chips remain high-emission if produced or operated in regions reliant on fossil fuels. Training a large AI model, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4 or the future GPT-5, can use up to 1,000 MWh of electricity. This process may emit hundreds of metric tons of CO₂, depending on the energy source. It does not even include the energy for using the AI model.

A coal-powered data center with an efficient chip generates 17 kg of CO₂ per teraflop. In contrast, renewable-powered setups only produce 4–5 kg per teraflop. The Nvidia–OpenAI deal focuses on providing GPUs and AI hardware.
This new tech aims to boost energy efficiency. It could cut emissions per computation by 30–50% compared to older hardware. This shows that while chip-level efficiency is essential, a full lifecycle approach is necessary.
Emissions reduction relies on several factors. It depends on processor design, energy sources for manufacturing, supplier practices, and how data centers operate. Without cleaner grids and good supply chain management, much of the carbon-saving potential from new chips and AI workloads may be wasted.
Beyond Business: A Climate Play in Disguise
These partnerships show that top chipmakers now see sustainability as part of growth. Investors, customers, and regulators are increasingly focused on the carbon footprint of technology. Linking climate goals to high-profile deals shows that Nvidia and Intel view emissions reduction as a strategic priority.
The Nvidia-Intel partnership and Nvidia’s OpenAI deal could shape the chip industry’s climate impact. Intel’s clean manufacturing record and Nvidia’s efficient AI hardware can help reduce emissions in production and use.
Still, the results will depend on whether efficiency matches demand and if energy sources move to renewables. For now, these collaborations highlight how innovation and sustainability can go hand in hand.
The post NVIDIA’s Mega Deals with OpenAI and Intel Fuel Stock Performance and Sustainable Tech in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

