New York-based clean energy startup Amogy has secured an additional $23 million in funding, bringing its total investment to $80 million. This latest round was led by the Korea Development Bank. The fresh capital will accelerate Amogy’s work on its ammonia-to-power technology, which generates clean electricity without emissions.
The company aims to deploy this technology mainly for powering ships and large energy systems across Asia.
Seonghoon Woo, co-founder and CEO at Amogy said,
“We’ve long recognized the strong demand for ammonia-to-power technology in the shipping industry, but we also see much broader opportunities to use ammonia as a clean fuel – especially with the growing demand for the ‘clean power’ globally. We’re ready to meet that market demand. Support for a hydrogen-based economy is especially strong in Asia, and as the most cost-effective hydrogen carrier, ammonia is quickly evolving into the leading zero-carbon fuel solution for these markets. We are deeply grateful for the strong confidence our investors have placed in our vision and growth trajectory. We are especially proud to partner with institutions like Korea Development Bank, whose deep expertise in scaling energy infrastructure brings significant value to our mission.”
Why Ammonia-to-Power is a Game-Changer
Unlike fossil fuels, ammonia produces no carbon dioxide when used this way. During power generation, only water and nitrogen gas are emitted. This makes ammonia a powerful tool for reducing emissions in industries like shipping, which accounts for about 2.5% of global CO2 emissions (3rd IMO GHG study).
Ammonia’s high energy density means it stores more energy in less space than hydrogen alone, and it’s easier and safer to handle—no extreme pressures or freezing required.
However, the environmental benefits depend on how ammonia is made. Currently, much of the world uses “gray ammonia,” produced from natural gas and releasing CO2. Amogy’s goal is to shift toward “green ammonia,” made using renewable electricity, closing the loop on carbon emissions.
In Asia, where coal and gas still dominate power generation, projects like Amogy’s 40 MW plant in South Korea could significantly cut pollution and carbon output. These systems can replace or support fossil fuel plants, improving local air quality and helping countries meet climate goals.
Amogy’s Cutting-Edge Tech Turns Ammonia Into Emission-Free Electricity
Its patented “ammonia cracking technology” is a game-changer for decarbonizing heavy industries. It efficiently converts ammonia (NH₃) into electric power without burning the ammonia directly. Instead, ammonia is fed into a reactor where a special catalyst “cracks” it into hydrogen and nitrogen at lower temperatures than other systems.
Next, the hydrogen and nitrogen gases pass through a purification step to remove any ammonia traces. The hydrogen then powers fuel cells or hydrogen engines, generating 100% carbon-free electricity. The nitrogen is safely released back into the air.
Amogy’s ammonia cracking technology

This process eliminates the need for diesel pilot fuel, lowers costs, and enables decarbonization of engines that currently rely on fossil fuels.
With this technology, Amogy targets sectors like shipping and heavy industry, which currently face big challenges in cutting emissions. So, cleaning up their energy use is critical to fighting climate change.

In 2024, Amogy unveiled the world’s first carbon-free, ammonia-powered ship, proving that ammonia can serve as a practical fuel. Now, the company plans a much bigger project: a 40-megawatt ammonia-powered energy plant in Pohang, South Korea, expected to be up and running by 2029.
Asia: The Strategic Hub for Amogy’s Growth
Asia is vital for Amogy’s expansion because energy demand there is growing fast, especially in countries like South Korea and Japan. These nations have limited natural resources and depend heavily on imports.
They also have strong policies promoting clean hydrogen and ammonia fuels, such as South Korea’s Clean Hydrogen Portfolio Standard, which aims for 2% of electricity from hydrogen and ammonia by 2030, and 7% by 2035.
By focusing on Asia and building partnerships there, Amogy is positioning itself as a leader in the ammonia fuel market. The Korea Development Bank’s backing adds both financial strength and local support to Amogy’s projects.
The Huge Market Potential for Ammonia Energy
The clean energy sector is booming, with the International Energy Agency estimating that more than $2 trillion per year must be invested by 2030 to hit net-zero targets. Ammonia is gaining ground as a way to store and transport hydrogen energy. It can also use existing fuel infrastructure, making it a versatile solution.
- Experts expect the ammonia market to surpass $90 billion by 2025, fueled by demand from shipping, energy, and heavy industries.
Amogy’s systems can power both new and retrofitted ships, as well as large facilities like factories and ports. This creates enormous market opportunities. With Asia’s rapid industrial growth driving power needs, Amogy is well placed to tap into one of the world’s most energy-hungry regions. Their successful ammonia-powered ship trial in September 2024 further shows the technology’s potential to scale.
Investor Confidence Runs High
With $80 million raised so far and a company valuation of $700 million, investor confidence in Amogy is strong. The latest round led by Korea Development Bank not only provides funding but also brings strategic guidance in a region keen to adopt green fuels.
Major industry players like Samsung Heavy Industries and Mitsui O.S.K. Lines have already teamed up with Amogy. These partnerships help speed up commercialization and provide real-world testing opportunities in shipping and energy infrastructure. Amogy plans to move from pilot projects to full commercial operations within the next four years.
By focusing on hard-to-abate sectors with few zero-emission alternatives, Amogy’s versatile ammonia-to-power solution gives it a competitive edge in the growing clean tech market.
Amogy’s Road Ahead: Powering the Net-Zero Future
Amogy is at a pivotal moment in clean energy innovation. Its ammonia-to-power technology offers a practical way to decarbonize some of the hardest energy challenges in the world. If it scales successfully and transitions fully to green ammonia, it could become a cost-effective solution that helps meet global net-zero goals.
Global policy trends and rising investments are aligned with Amogy’s mission. The next few years will be critical as the company expands projects, builds partnerships, and demonstrates its technology at larger scales, setting the stage to lead the future of clean power.
The post New York-based Amogy Accelerates Ammonia-to-Power Solutions with $23M Funding Boost appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测


