As the plastics talks staggered towards a close without a deal on a new global treaty in sight on Friday, Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez had a straightforward request for the petrostates seen as blocking progress: “Get out of the way” if you’re not ready to compromise.
The stern message from Panama’s special representative pointed to a ramp up in political rhetoric from the large coalition of countries that is pushing for the inclusion of plastic production cuts in a UN pact designed to end plastic pollution.
A group of oil and gas-producing countries – led by Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran – have remained resolute in their opposition to manufacturing curbs. After half a day of backroom bargaining and closed-door sessions proved largely futile, delegates waited for a breakthrough, with fewer than 36 hours to go until the gavel is due to come down in the South Korean city of Busan.
In a bid to break the stalemate, the chair of the talks, Luis Vayas Valdivieso of Ecuador, penned a new draft text and released it mid-afternoon. The 23-page proposal is more fully formed than previous iterations, but still features wide-ranging options on several issues. For example, there are eight different definitions to choose from for what the word “plastic” should mean in the context of a future treaty.
Fossil fuel lobby secures “record” access to crunch talks on new plastics pact
On the fraught question of plastic production cuts, however, Valdivieso offered a stark binary choice: either nothing at all or an agreement to adopt “a global target to reduce the production of primary plastic polymers to sustainable levels”, which would be set at the first plastics COP (conference of the parties) after the deal in Busan.
The first option reflects the position of the petrostates arguing that manufacturing curbs fall outside the scope of the pact. That’s despite the fact that the original resolution underpinning the talks indicated the treaty should address “the full lifecycle of plastics” – meaning from production through to consumption and waste.
The second option is lifted straight from similar proposals put on the table on Thursday by an alliance of 102 countries across the developing and developed world, representing nearly 60% of all nations engaged in the talks.
This option would see all countries “take measures across the full lifecycle of plastics” and report data on their plastic supply chains. It also calls for the creation of a five-year review process similar to the global stocktake of climate action under the Paris Agreement.
‘Forget red lines’
Panama’s negotiator Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez. Photo: IISD/ENB – Kiara Worth
Appearing after the text’s release in his trademark hat, Panama’s Monterrey Gómez told reporters that the high-ambition group had already made compromises by dropping stricter targets and it was time for others to also “forget about red lines”.
“We are not here to negotiate a greenwashing recycling global treaty,” he added.
Sitting next to him, Andrew Yatilman, secretary of the department of environment and climate change for the Federated States of Micronesia, pleaded with petrostates to “give us a break”.
“The Gulf states want to protect their economy with fossil fuels,” he said, “but what about us? Our economy is based on fishing and that is getting destroyed by plastic pollution.”
Earlier in the day, campaigners stood in front of an art installation depicting a sperm whale stuffed with plastic waste for their most vocal action during the week so far. Holding signs with messages like “courage not compromise”, the activists warned that members of the “High Ambition Coalition” were “sleepwalking into a treaty that will not be worth the paper it will be written on”.
Campaigners deliver a statement in front of the venue for the UN talks in Busan, South Korea. (Photo: Markus Winkler)
“They must not compromise under pressure exerted by a small group of low-ambition states and hinge the life of our planet on unachievable consensus,” their spokesperson shouted, calling for countries to make decisions at the talks by voting rather than relying on consensus.
While the possibility of invoking a two-thirds majority vote remains open, on Friday night heads of country delegations were still trying to find a common path to a joint deal.
China could play a decisive role in building a bridge with the petrostates, three negotiators told Climate Home, adding that they are seeing encouraging signs from the Chinese delegation’s willingness to engage with discussions on plastic production.
Reliable finance sought
Money is the other – crucial – side of the coin. Developing and developed countries came into the final round of negotiations with polar-opposite views of what the finance package should look like.
The former united behind a proposal for a new independent multilateral fund financed by developed countries, with others only contributing on a voluntary basis. Rich governments want a mechanism within the Global Environment Facility (GEF) with all countries contributing voluntarily and money coming from “all sources”, including potential levies and the private sector.
The new text released on Friday calls on every country to provide funding “within its capabilities”. It also indicates that those “with capacity to do so shall take the lead”, while contributions from other sources “are encouraged”.
Production curbs needed for strong global pact on plastic pollution, campaigners say
Several observers think finding a finance text that unites ambitious developed and developing countries is critical to unlock a strong agreement.
“The current text is a starting point that gives us a chance,” Florian Titze, senior policy advisor for international biodiversity policy at WWF, told Climate Home. “But it needs to give assurances that the financial flows will be reliable and predictable if [developing countries] are asked to take stringent measures on production and waste management”.
As the clock ticked down, many wondered whether it would be possible to find the breakthrough solution that is sorely needed, or whether the only deals struck in Busan in the coming days will be at the International Children’s Book Fair hosted in the same sprawling convention centre as the UN talks.
(Reporting by Matteo Civillini; editing by Megan Rowling)
The post New plastics pact text reflects stark divide on production cuts appeared first on Climate Home News.
New plastics pact text reflects stark divide on production cuts
Mae Buenaventura is the manager of the debt justice programme of the Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development, a regional alliance of peoples’ movements, community organizations, coalitions, NGOs and networks
A potentially historic shift in public debt governance is set to unfold in Washington DC this week as Global South governments take a collective stand to stop a “silent killer” of development financing.
The first-ever UN-hosted borrowers’ forum will officially be launched on April 15 on the sidelines of the 2026 Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Led by five convening countries – Zambia, Egypt, Nepal, the Maldives and Pakistan – the initiative is one of the key wins of last year’s 4th Financing for Development Conference (FFD4) in Sevilla, Spain.
The forum’s mandate is to establish a platform for borrower countries, supported by a UN secretariat, “to discuss technical issues, share information and experiences in addressing debt challenges, increase access to technical assistance and capacity-building in debt management, coordinate approaches and strengthen borrower countries’ voices in the global debt architecture”.
Instead of facing lenders alone, these countries will now use a UN-backed platform to share technical expertise and coordinate their approach to a global debt system that is fundamentally broken.
Debt grips climate-vulnerable nations
The human cost of the current debt architecture is staggering. According to the UN trade and development agency, UNCTAD, more than 40% of the global population – roughly 3.4 billion people – live in countries where the government is forced to spend more on debt payments than on the health, education and social protection of its citizens.
In so-called low-income countries, governments spend an average of 7.5% of their total budgets on debt service, with interest payments consuming up to 20% of total government revenue in these regions.
The Philippines is a case study in this financial stranglehold. It is part of a global majority forced to watch its public services crumble and infrastructure lag while its wealth is siphoned off to satisfy foreign lenders.
The policy of automatic appropriations – a legacy of the rule of late former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. – mandates that debt servicing takes precedence over any other public expenditure, effectively placing the demands of lenders above the needs of the Filipino people. Even as it faces a $1.5 trillion regional financing gap to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, its hands remain tied by a legal framework that values credit ratings over human lives.
-
GEF raises $3.9bn ahead of funding deadline, $1bn below previous budget
Amid aid cuts, donor governments pledge less nature and climate funding to the Global Environment Facility (GEF), with the four-year package to be finalised in late May -
Charging worries, high prices put brakes on EV growth in Bangladesh
Sales of e-bikes and rickshaws are up amid queues at fuel stations, but a lack of charging infrastructure and high prices still deter many Bangladeshis from going electric
As a “middle-income country” (MIC), the Philippines is stuck in a frustrating purgatory. It is often deemed “too wealthy” for the G20’s debt-relief framework, yet too poor to absorb global economic shocks. Last year, Finance Undersecretary Joven Balbosa hit the nail on the head when he called for support that goes “beyond the simplistic income categorization” that ignores a country’s actual vulnerabilities.
Without an inclusive and equitable global debt architecture, nations including the Philippines are left to navigate catastrophic climate risks and economic shocks with zero fiscal breathing space.
No respite during climate disasters
The regional evidence of this systemic failure is everywhere. Take Pakistan, which in 2022 was hit by catastrophic flooding that submerged a third of the country and caused billions in losses. Despite this climate-driven disaster, World Bank data shows that Pakistan made payments in 2023 of $11.8 billion for public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) external debt, while its PPG external debt reached $93 billion that same year, surpassing pre-pandemic debt of $87 billion (2020).
Sri Lanka followed IMF prescriptions throughout 16 lending programs since 1991, only to become the first Asian country this century to default. Its MIC status prevents application for debt relief and restructuring measures. Today, the Sri Lankan people bear the brunt of harsh conditionalities, including raising VAT from 8% to 15%, slashing food and fuel subsidies, and the erosion of hard-earned worker pensions.
Currently, the global rules of lending and borrowing are set by a “creditors’ club” composed of the IMF, the World Bank and the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable it set up, and the Paris Club.
These institutions measure “debt sustainability” through a narrow lens of a country’s capacity to make timely repayments. They largely ignore internal economic inequalities, gender disparities and the existential threat of climate change.
Crises should trigger debt service cancellation
By organising the new borrowers’ forum, the Global South is signalling that the era of passive “standard-setting” by lenders is over.
The ultimate goal for global civil society and debt justice movements is the establishment of a UN Debt Convention; a democratic, binding and inclusive framework that governs both lenders and borrowers. This mechanism would ensure that debt restructuring and cancellation are sufficient to allow countries to fulfill their international human rights obligations and implement necessary climate actions.
Green Climate Fund picks locations for five developing country hubs
To be truly transformative, debt sustainability analyses must align with human rights and sustainable development needs. This means conducting impact assessments – both before and after loans are issued – to identify “illegitimate” debts that do not benefit the public.
Crucially, we need an automatic debt service cancellation mechanism that triggers during extreme climatic, environmental or health shocks. We also need a binding global debt registry to ensure that every loan is transparent and subject to public scrutiny.
Whether the borrowers’ forum becomes a true milestone depends on its courage to challenge the status quo. We can no longer allow debt to act as a “silent killer” of our future. It is time to demand a financial system that serves humanity, not just the balance sheets of the powerful.
The post Broken debt system must be fixed to confront future climate shocks appeared first on Climate Home News.
Broken debt system must be fixed to confront future climate shocks
Greenpeace and allies will be protesting outside Woodside’s Annual General Meeting to show the WA and federal governments strong community opposition to Woodside’s proposal to drill for gas at Scott Reef.
What: Protest outside Woodside Energy’s Annual General Meeting
When: 8am Thursday 23rd April 2026Where: Kagoshima Park (on the corner of Great Eastern Highway and Bolton Avenue)
What’s at stake
Scott Reef is a pristine ocean ecosystem off the north-west coast of Australia.
It is home to endangered and endemic species, including pygmy blue whales and the dusky sea snake, and a nesting ground for green sea turtles. Scott Reef is a place of extraordinary natural beauty, and a vital marine environment that supports a wide range of marine life.
What Woodside is proposing
Dirty fossil fuel corporation, Woodside Energy, is seeking approval to drill more than 50 gas wells underneath and around Scott Reef as part of its Browse project.
The gas would be extracted and transported to the Burrup Hub, the most polluting fossil fuel project in Australia. This proposal would industrialise the doorstep of Australia’s largest freestanding oceanic reef system – threatening the marine life that relies on it and the climate.
Why this can’t go ahead
The WA Environmental Protection Authority has already identified the risks of this project as “unacceptable”, issuing a preliminary rejection.
Serious concerns include:
- The risk of an oil spill
- Impacts on pygmy blue whales
- Damage to green sea turtle nesting grounds
These risks are severe, and potentially irreversible. But the decision hasn’t been made yet. The project is still being assessed.
The Federal Environment Minister is approaching a decision that will determine whether Scott Reef is protected – or vulnerable to decades of industrial gas destruction.
This is a defining moment.
Make opposition visible
Across Australia, people are speaking out to protect Scott Reef and oppose Woodside’s Browse project.
Showing that opposition is visible, coordinated and growing helps increase pressure on decision-makers ahead of this critical decision.
Join the protest
A protest outside Woodside’s AGM is a key public moment to demonstrate opposition and help protect Scott Reef.
Kagoshima Park (on the corner of Great Eastern Highway and Bolton Avenue)
8am, Thursday 23rd April 2026
Join the protest and help show how many people support protecting Scott Reef before the government makes its decision.
Join Greenpeace to save Scott Reef from Woodside’s dirty gas
As demand for whale meat declines at home, Norway exports it to Japan, markets it to tourists and sells it online as dog food.
Norway reopened its annual whale hunting season earlier this month, continuing a practice most countries abandoned decades ago.
Norway Reopens Annual Whale Hunt Despite Pressure to End Commercial Whaling
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits