The National Bank of Canada (NBC) will increase renewable energy lending to $20 billion by 2030, as revealed in its latest sustainability report. This move strengthens its net-zero emissions strategy despite the ongoing shift in U.S. clean energy policies.
In this context, NBC plans to add nearly $10 billion in new renewable loans over the next six years, but some of its existing loans will be partially or fully repaid during this period. The final lending total accounts for both the new loans and the repayments of old ones.
NBC is Backing Major Renewable Projects in the U.S.
Since 2019, the bank has tripled its renewable energy funding to reach $15 billion. In 2023, its renewable energy loans exceeded its non-renewable energy exposure for the first time. This shift shows its strong commitment to clean energy.
Despite the U.S. government’s shifting stance on clean energy and Trump’s unfavorable stance on clean energy, National Bank continues to invest heavily in renewable projects.
In 2023, it played a crucial role in financing two major U.S. renewable energy initiatives, namely the SunZia wind and transmission project and the Solar Landscape community solar portfolio
By 2030, the bank aims to reduce the intensity of emissions in its power generation financing by one-third. To reach this goal, it continues investing in large wind, solar, and hydro projects. However, it restricts coal-related financing.
NBC Emission Reduction Targets

SunZia Wind and Transmission Project
The bank underwrote $775 million for the $8.8 billion SunZia project. Pattern Energy Group LP is developing this 3.5 GW wind farm and 550-mile transmission line. It will be the largest clean energy project in U.S. history.
SunZia will send wind power from New Mexico to Arizona and the western U.S. This will help fix transmission problems and improve grid reliability. The project will deliver affordable, fuel-free energy to millions of homes. On a larger scale, it supports the shift away from fossil fuels.
Solar Landscape Community Solar Portfolio
The bank acted as the green structuring agent and lead arranger for a $283 million green loan. This loan helps Solar Landscape LLC with its 107 MWdc rooftop solar projects in New Jersey. This includes 101 solar rooftops. It also adheres to the state’s Community Solar Energy Program rules
This project is a great initiative to expand New Jersey’s community solar access. At least 51% of the affordable clean energy will go to the low- and middle-income subscribers. Additionally, Solar Landscape will track and report usage.
NBC’s Emission Reduction Targets Across High-Carbon Sectors
The bank is committed to cutting carbon intensity by 33% by 2030 from 2019 levels. This effort reinforces its leadership in North America’s clean energy shift.
To reduce emissions, the bank has set interim targets for high-carbon sectors. In 2021, it introduced targets for oil and gas. A year later, it expanded its focus to commercial real estate and power generation.
Oil and Gas Sector Transition
Oil and gas production contributes 26% of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions. The bank supports this sector’s transition by setting ambitious reduction targets.
- As of 2024, the bank has already achieved a 32% drop in Scope 1 and 2 emissions and an 18% drop in Scope 3 emissions
-
By 2030, it aims to cut emissions across all scopes by 31%
Strong governance and strategic credit policies have kept its oil and gas portfolio aligned with its 2030 and 2050 targets.

Commercial Real Estate and Energy Efficiency
Due to their heating, cooling, and lighting demands, buildings have a major impact on climate change. However, energy-efficient technologies and sustainable designs can significantly reduce emissions.
In 2022, the bank set an interim target focused on commercial buildings, including offices, retail spaces, and multi-family housing.
- By 2024, it had already reduced these emissions by 25% and aims to cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50% by 2030.

Power Generation and Clean Energy Goals
As said before, the bank’s power generation portfolio is diverse. Apart from solar and wind, it also includes hydro, nuclear, and biogas and natural gas while limiting coal-related financing. It provides loans to support both new and existing power projects.
Since 2019, it has cut scope 1 emissions intensity in power generation by 29%, reaching 0.10 tCO₂e/MWh as of October 31, 2023.
- By 2023, it had already achieved a 29% reduction. Its 2030 target is to reduce Scope 1 emissions by 33% from 2019 levels.

Cutting Ties with Coal: Stronger Funding Restrictions
The bank will not fund new thermal coal mines or lend to new clients earning over 25% of their revenue from coal mining. However, it will continue supporting existing clients who commit to reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 or phasing out coal operations.
It will also avoid funding new coal-fired power plants. The bank will not finance new clients that generate over 10% of their power from coal unless the money helps them transition to clean energy. It will support clients acquiring coal power assets only if they have clear plans to phase out coal or achieve net zero.
Notably, in the oil and gas sector, the bank will not fund exploration, extraction, or production in the Arctic.

NBC continues to enhance its sustainability strategy, focusing on investments that create lasting environmental impact. Its goal is to support North America’s clean energy transition and contribute to a net-zero future.
The post National Bank of Canada Targets $20 Billion in Renewable Energy Lending by 2030 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

