Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL), led by President & CEO Takeshi Hashimoto, is advancing in carbon removal. The Tokyo-based company is the first Japanese shipping firm to retire 2,000 tons of technology-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) credits through the NextGen CDR Facility. These credits come from a biochar project in Bolivia, run by Exomad Green.
This move is part of MOL’s effort to back new carbon removal technologies that store CO₂ for a long time. While these credits don’t cut MOL’s emissions directly, they help tackle emissions at a societal level. This approach is called Beyond Value Chain Mitigation.
Technology-Based CDR Credits: High-Quality Carbon Removal Solutions
MOL secured CDR credits from tech-based solutions. Unlike traditional offsets like tree planting, these methods remove CO₂ through engineered processes. They include biochar, Direct Air Capture (DAC), and BECCS. In Bolivia, the biochar method converts biomass into stable carbon. This process locks carbon in the soil, enhancing both carbon removal and soil health.
These solutions are new and costly. Few companies invest in them now, but demand is rising as firms chase net-zero goals. By being an early buyer, MOL signals to innovators and helps scale these crucial technologies.
MOL stated that while tech-based credits are currently limited, interest is growing quickly. The company’s involvement builds trust. It also encourages more projects and helps create a strong carbon removal market.
Supporting Net Zero with the MOL Group Environmental Vision 2.2
This initiative supports MOL’s Environmental Vision 2.2. It aims for net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. A key goal is to mitigate 2.2 million tons of CO₂ by 2030.

With its recent CDR credit retirement, MOL is moving closer to this target. The company views these purchases as essential for offsetting unavoidable emissions in the future and advancing overall decarbonization.
MOL’s carbon strategy is part of its broader sustainability plan- the MOL Sustainability Plan (MSP). It fits into the group’s management framework, BLUE ACTION 2035. This strategy highlights five key sustainability issues, including protecting oceans and the planet. They address these challenges as vital for long-term success.

NextGen CDR Facility: Backing Large-Scale Carbon Removal Projects
MOL’s CDR purchase was made through the NextGen CDR Facility, a partnership between South Pole and Mitsubishi Corporation. Founding buyers like Boston Consulting Group and UBS support NextGen’s goal to build a large, diverse portfolio of carbon removal credits.
NextGen has pre-purchased over 193,000 tonnes of carbon removal credits from various projects:
-
1PointFive’s DAC Project (Texas): Will capture and store up to 500,000 tonnes of CO₂ each year.
-
Summit Carbon Solutions (Midwest US): This $5.1 billion BECCS project will capture over 9 million tonnes of CO₂ yearly.
-
Carbo Culture’s Biochar Project (Finland): Aiming to remove 2.5 million tonnes of CO₂ by 2030.
All credits will be verified under ICROA-endorsed standards to ensure quality and permanence.
MOL’s investment in Exomad Green’s biochar project supports NextGen’s larger goals. This project uses pyrolysis to turn biomass into quality biochar. It’s a tech-based way to remove carbon.
Carbon removal demand is growing, but the market is still developing. Technology-based CDR credits provide lasting carbon storage. They can last for centuries. This durability sets them apart from traditional offsets. Traditional offsets can reverse due to deforestation or changes in land use.
However, these solutions are costly and complex, keeping many buyers away. MOL’s early support can help reduce prices later, and it’s doing this by encouraging investment and innovation.
As a leader in the maritime sector, MOL is acting on durable carbon removal. The company aims to achieve net zero by cutting emissions and then actively removing them.
Driving Market Growth for Long-Term Carbon Storage Solutions
Mitsui expects strong demand for quality, long-term CDR credits. The market is growing rapidly. Projects like biochar, DAC, and BECCS are now essential. This is vital for sectors with hard-to-abate emissions.

MOL is actively taking steps to cut future emissions and support carbon removal, as it sees both as crucial to reaching global climate goals and building a low-carbon society. Thus, overall, by investing in technology-based CDR credits, it’s not only advancing its own sustainability targets but also accelerating the growth of a scalable market for climate solutions.
- FURTHER READING: TotalEnergies, Petronas, Mitsui to Develop CCS Hub in Southeast Asia
The post MOL Becomes the First Japanese Shipping Firm to Retire Tech-Based CDR Credits Through NextGen appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

