Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, has taken another big step toward its clean energy goals through solar. The company announced a deal to buy 650 megawatts (MW) of solar power from AES, an American energy company. This new power purchase agreement (PPA) supports Meta’s fast-growing data centers in Texas and Kansas.
As Meta continues to expand its artificial intelligence (AI) services, it also increases its demand for energy. This latest solar deal highlights how the company plans to meet that demand with renewable energy.
A Big Push for Solar in the U.S.
Meta’s new agreement includes two solar-only projects developed by AES. These projects will supply 400 MW of energy from Texas and 250 MW from Kansas. The electricity will support Meta’s data centers, which need reliable and low-cost energy to run around the clock.
AES expects the projects to start operations in the next 2 to 3 years. The contracts will last 15 to 20 years, providing long-term clean energy. This type of agreement helps Meta meet its climate goals and also gives energy developers the confidence to build more renewable projects.
AES CEO Andrés Gluski explained why this partnership makes sense, noting:
“By providing energy solutions that offer fast time-to-power and low-cost electricity, we continue to be the partner of choice for companies, like Meta, at the forefront of artificial intelligence innovation.”
Urvi Parekh, Global Head of Energy, Meta, also remarked:
“We are thrilled to work with AES to bring forward these two solar energy projects. These solutions support our goal for 100% clean and renewable energy and will add new generation to the grid in these markets.”
Texas, in particular, has become a top spot for solar power. The state leads the U.S. in new solar capacity added in 2023 and 2024, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA). Developers like Texas because of its sunny climate, fast permitting process, and easy connection to the power grid.

Powering Meta’s AI and Data Expansion
Meta has been growing its renewable energy portfolio quickly. The company already claims more than 12 gigawatts (GW) of clean energy capacity. This includes solar and wind power projects across the United States.
Earlier in 2025, Meta signed several other deals in Texas:
- A 595 MW agreement with Zelestra
- Two 200 MW deals with Engie North America
- A 260 MW deal for Engie’s Sypert Branch solar project
Altogether, these efforts show how serious Meta is about running its operations with clean energy. As AI technology expands, companies like Meta must build more data centers — and each one needs a large and steady supply of electricity.

Data centers use a lot of power, often 10 to 50 times more energy per square foot than regular office buildings. By powering them with solar, Meta avoids using fossil fuels that release carbon into the atmosphere. These steps help Meta stay on track toward its climate goal: to reach net-zero emissions across its entire value chain by 2030.
A Long-Term Commitment to Clean Energy and Net Zero
As per its latest sustainability report, in 2023, Meta’s net emissions equaled 7.4 million metric tons of CO2. Key commitments include:
- Reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 42% by 2031, compared to a 2021 baseline, and ensuring that maximum suppliers adopt science-aligned GHG reduction targets by 2026.
- Keep Scope 3 emissions at or below 2021 levels by 2031.
- Since 2020, Meta has successfully maintained net-zero emissions in its operations, and it is on track to achieve net-zero across its entire value chain by 2030.
Meta’s clean energy journey began years ago. The company reached 100% renewable energy for its operations in 2020. Since then, it has kept investing in wind and solar to match its energy use and reduce its carbon footprint.

By the end of 2025, Meta expects to help add 9.8 GW of renewable energy to U.S. power grids. That’s enough electricity to power over 2 million homes. These projects support Meta’s needs as well as strengthen local energy systems and help nearby communities.
Long-term contracts like the 650 MW deal with AES are important for energy developers, too. They provide financial security and encourage the construction of more clean energy. This creates jobs, boosts local economies, and reduces pollution.
What It Means for the Energy and Tech Industries
Meta’s big solar push shows a wider trend in the tech world. More companies, especially those running large data centers, are investing in clean energy. These companies are often called “hyperscalers” because of their massive scale and energy use.
![]()
Why is this happening?
- AI growth: Artificial intelligence tools require large amounts of computing power, which means more electricity.
- Climate goals: Many companies have pledged to cut emissions and use renewable energy.
- Cost savings: Solar and wind power are now some of the cheapest forms of new energy.
According to BloombergNEF, corporate renewable energy purchases hit a record 46 GW globally in 2023. Tech companies like Meta, Amazon, Google, and Microsoft led the way.
Solar power is especially attractive because it’s quick to build and affordable. In sunny places like Texas, developers can build solar farms in a few months. The electricity is also cheap, which helps companies lower their energy bills.
In Meta’s case, the ability to phase in power — meaning that parts of the solar farm can start delivering energy before the full project is finished — helps meet growing energy demand faster.
AES pointed out that “fast time-to-power” is one of the main reasons hyperscalers are turning to solar. This makes solar a good match for tech companies that need power right away.
Looking Ahead: Clean Energy and AI Together
Meta’s recent solar deals show how the tech and energy worlds are coming together to tackle climate change. As AI continues to grow, so will the need for clean, reliable power.
Meta’s long-term investments in solar energy will help meet its goals and support a cleaner grid for everyone. By buying power through PPAs, Meta also helps speed up the energy transition.
At the same time, these deals send a message to the market: Big tech is serious about clean energy. This encourages more investment in solar and wind, helping the U.S. move closer to its climate targets. The future of technology is deeply tied to energy. And for Meta, that future is increasingly powered by the sun.
- READ MORE: SolarBank and CIM Group Announce $100M Financing to Power 97 MW of U.S. Renewable Energy Projects
The post Meta Invests in 650 MW of Solar Energy to Power AI and Data Centers appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

