Global financial services group HSBC is launching a new business unit, HSBC Infrastructure Finance (HIF), to focus on infrastructure financing and project finance advisory opportunities tied to the transition to a low-carbon economy. The bank has appointed former UK Member of Parliament Danny Alexander as CEO of the new unit.
HIF aims to secure a significant share of deals in major markets. It will also integrate elements from the bank’s Global Banking Real Asset Finance team.
Taking the Helm and Driving Infrastructure Finance in Transition Markets
The new unit plans to expand HSBC’s debt origination and distribution businesses by building new relationships with both public and private sector entities.
Greg Guyett, CEO of Global Banking and Markets at HSBC, remarked on the announcement, noting that:
“We have a leading presence in the regions where infrastructure needs to be developed and financed to enable a just transition to a low carbon economy. We also look to support the UK government’s program to build critical infrastructure in Britain to grow the economy whilst decarbonizing it.”
Danny Alexander, currently the vice president for policy and strategy at the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and a former UK government minister, will lead the division.
Alexander’s appointment is intended to accelerate collaboration with governments, multilateral development banks, and companies, including supporting the UK government’s new initiatives.
In his post announcing the appointment, Alexander expressed his excitement about leading HIF and pursuing significant infrastructure financing and advisory opportunities related to the low carbon transition in strategic markets.
HSBC’s Net Zero Plan
The launch of HIF follows HSBC’s release of its first Net Zero Transition Plan earlier this year, detailing its strategy to finance and support the transition to net zero. The bank set a 2050 net zero target in 2020, committing to align its financing activities with the Paris Agreement’s goals.
In 2021, HSBC made the transition to net zero one of the 4 key pillars of our corporate strategy. Since 2020, the global financier has taken several steps to begin executing its net zero ambition and managing climate risks. The banking company’s net zero journey is below.
HSBC NET ZERO JOURNEY

The bank’s transition plan covers the HSBC Group and it focuses primarily on the sectors and customers where they anticipate making the most significant impact on emissions reductions.
For each sector, the bank describes the necessary technologies, investment needs, and external dependencies for a viable net zero by 2050 pathway, and identifies where a 1.5°C-aligned 2030 pathway is most at risk. The company also outlines its related portfolio, aims, targets, and actions to support sector decarbonization.
HSBC’s emissions from its own operations and supply chain are relatively small compared to its financed emissions, but reducing them is crucial for becoming a net zero bank.
HSBC Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Own Operations

The bank aims to achieve net zero in its own operations and supply chain by 2030, including 100% renewable electricity and minimizing its direct impact on nature. This involves cutting emissions across energy consumption, travel, and supply chains.
In 2022, HSBC exceeded targeted reductions by achieving a 58.5% decrease in energy and travel emissions compared to 2019 levels. This accomplishment was driven by the bank’s three key efforts:
- A 24% reduction in energy consumption achieved through optimizing building use and strategically reducing office space and data center operations.
- Purchasing 48% of energy from renewable sources by leveraging renewable tariffs and engaging with landlords.
- An 85% reduction in business travel, primarily attributed to Covid-19-related international travel restrictions.
Looking forward to 2030, HSBC aims for a further 50% reduction in energy consumption. High-quality carbon removal or offsets will be used only for residual emissions that cannot be otherwise reduced from 2030 onwards.
The financier engages with market participants to develop carbon credits and support initiatives for a credible carbon market. Climate Asset Management, HSBC’s joint venture, is sourcing high-quality carbon removals. The bank also participates in HKEX’s International Carbon Market Council and advocate for integrity in the voluntary carbon market through initiatives like the Integrity Council.
Aligning Financing with Global Climate Goals
To achieve GHG emissions reduction targets and reach net zero, HSBC is implementing a plan, focusing on these three areas:
-
Supporting Customers
HSBC is prioritizing the transition of its customers to net zero by providing finance, services, insights, and tools. The bank is engaging with corporate customers on their transition plans and offering products and services to facilitate this shift.
-
Transforming Operations
In 2021, HSBC made the “transition to net zero” one of the four pillars of its corporate strategy. This integration into the corporate strategy has led to embedding net zero considerations into sustainability risk policies, risk evaluation, decision-making tools, and processes. The bank aims to be net zero in its own operations and supply chain by 2030.
-
Partnering for Systemic Change
HSBC is engaging with stakeholders across geographies to support policies, regulations, and partnerships that facilitate the transition to net zero. The bank is a signatory of the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and advocates for climate risk disclosures.
The bank also pledged to prioritize financing and investment that contributes to the low carbon transition, aiming to support customers with $750 billion to $1 trillion in finance and investment by 2030.
The post HSBC Opens New Unit For Low-Carbon Finance, Alongside $1 Trillion Pledge appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

