Connect with us

Published

on

EV

For decades, oil was the backbone of global transport. It powered nearly every vehicle, pushing oil demand ever higher. Infrastructure significantly grew around extraction, refining, and distribution. But with mounting concerns over emissions and climate change, the search for cleaner alternatives gained momentum. Electric vehicles (EVs) have emerged as a game changer in this shift.

IEA recently published its Global EV Outlook 2025, where it has predicted,

  • By 2030, EVs are set to replace more than 5 million barrels of oil per day (mb/d) globally, with China’s expanding EV fleet making up half of that impact.

Let’s deep dive into this report and understand how the rise of EVs is impacting global oil demand.

The Rise of EVs and Its Impact on Global Oil Demand

By the end of 2024, the global electric car fleet reached nearly 58 million, more than triple the number in 2021. These EVs now make up about 4% of the global passenger car fleet.

The trend is strongest in China, where roughly 1 in 10 cars is electric. In Europe, the ratio is 1 in 20, but growing fast.

The UK, the second-largest car market in Europe, saw EVs take nearly 30% of new car sales in 2024. This rise was driven by the new Vehicle Emissions Trading Scheme, which required 22% of new car registrations to be battery electric or hydrogen fuel cell models.

With flexible credit borrowing allowed, manufacturers achieved nearly 20% EV sales. Norway led with near-total electrification. 88% of new cars sold were fully electric, and another 3% were plug-in hybrids.

As a result, Norway’s oil demand from the road fell 12% from 2021 to 2024. Denmark also saw a big jump, with EVs reaching 56% of new car sales in 2024 and nearly 100,000 units sold.

Meanwhile, Denmark is also seeing strong progress. In the latest figures, the share of electric cars jumped by 10 percentage points, reaching 56%, with nearly 100,000 EVs sold.

EV sales
Source: IEA

Oil Demand Drops as EV Fleet Grows Rapidly

Surge in EVs on roads came heavy on the oil industry. IEA says that electric vehicles slashed oil demand by over 1.3 million barrels per day (mb/d) in 2024.

It was a steep 30% jump from 2023, and the present figures are nearly equal to all the oil Japan currently uses for transportation.

Passenger cars and small vans classified as light-duty vehicles (LDVs) drive most of this shift. Today, they account for 80% of the oil displaced by EVs. By 2030, their share will slightly drop to 77% as electric trucks and buses gain traction.

This is because of the rapidly evolving batteries and stronger charging infrastructure, these heavy-duty vehicles will likely displace nearly 1 mb/d of oil within the decade.

EVs Cut Costs and Boost Energy Security

IEA analysts highlighted that even if global oil prices fall to $40 per barrel, EVs remain cost-effective especially with home charging. This way drivers can continue saving money by switching to electric vehicles.

In China, fast public charging costs about twice as much as charging at home. Yet, EVs still offer better fuel savings than gas-powered cars. As more people choose EVs, countries reduce their oil use and become less vulnerable to price shocks. This shift not only saves money but also strengthens national energy security.

Strong Policies Keep EV Adoption on Track

Although trade tensions, slow economic growth, and oil price drops may hurt overall car sales, these issues affect the market size more than the EV share. In China, steady government support and affordable EV prices continue to drive sales forward.

Meanwhile, in Europe, even though EVs cost more than traditional cars, long-term policies and past crisis responses help keep the market moving.

Additionally, Norway planned to raise taxes on traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) cars and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) from April. This was meant to boost EV sales and help the country reach its goal of 100% zero-emission car sales by the end of 2025.

The 2025 EV outlook shows strong momentum. Despite economic uncertainty, EVs continue to grow thanks to smart policies, lower battery costs, and better infrastructure. As countries push for cleaner transportation, EVs are helping the world move toward a more sustainable, low-carbon future.

With over 58 million electric cars already on the road by the end of 2024—and more to come—the transition is well underway. This shift not only transforms the oil market but also puts the world on a clearer, more energy-secure path forward.

Global Oil Demand: What the Forecasts Say

We found the latest oil demand forecast in the International Energy Forum’s monthly comparative analysis of the oil market report. It highlights the following:

OPEC

OPEC expects oil demand to grow by around 1.3 million barrels per day (mb/d) in both 2025 and 2026. Almost all this growth will come from non-OECD countries, where demand is expected to rise by 1.2 mb/d each year. In contrast, OECD countries will see only a small increase of 0.1 mb/d annually.

EIA

The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) recently increased its 2025 forecast by 0.1 mb/d compared to last month. It now expects demand to rise by 1.0 mb/d next year. However, this is 0.4 mb/d lower than the estimate made in January 2025. For 2026, the EIA sees demand rising more slowly, by 0.9 mb/d.

IEA

The IEA has a more cautious view. It expects global oil demand to grow by 0.7 mb/d in 2025, even though OECD demand may fall by about 120,000 barrels per day. For 2026, the IEA sees demand increasing by 0.8 mb/d. According to its latest data, average yearly demand growth between 2022 and 2024 was just 0.3 mb/d.

oil demand
Source: IEF

To simplify it, the gap between the highest and lowest global oil demand forecasts is 0.6 mb/d for 2025 and 0.5 mb/d for 2026. These differences highlight the uncertainty that still surrounds future oil demand.

Furthermore, as electric vehicles gain popularity, governments are starting to feel the financial impact. Fuel taxes, which have been a key source of public funding for roads and transport, are shrinking. In 2022 alone, the global shift to EVs resulted in an estimated $9 billion drop in fuel tax revenues.

The post How EV Adoption is Reshaping Global Oil Demand: IEA’s 2025 Outlook and 2030 Forecast appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

The new SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard: what it means for business

Published

on

On 11 June 2026, the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) published the most substantial revision of its flagship corporate framework since its introduction. The SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard Version 2.0 takes effect on 1 February 2027 and reshapes the way companies approach their net-zero targets.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How cookstove carbon credits deliver value to buyers, communities, and nature

Published

on

In a kitchen in rural Kenya, a mother kneels beside a three-stone fire to cook the day’s ugali (a starchy staple food). The flames are open, the smoke is thick, and her youngest child sits close by, breathing it in. This scene plays out in millions of homes every morning, and it is also where a measurable carbon credit can begin.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

The Environmental Impact of Industry: Causes, Effects & Solutions

Published

on

Since the Industrial Revolution, human activities have left a significant and growing mark on the natural world. Pollution, carbon emissions, and altered land use have degraded ecosystems, contaminated water supplies, and pushed global temperatures to record highs. These are not distant consequences. They affect the air people breathe, the food they eat, and the stability of the climate every community depends on.

Understanding the environmental effects of industry is the first step toward meaningful change. When we grasp the full picture of how industrial practices damage the planet, we can make better decisions at every level, from individual choices to corporate policy to government regulation.

This guide covers the origins of industrial pollution, its specific environmental impacts, which industries carry the heaviest footprint, and the solutions that are already making a difference. We also highlight companies leading by example and explain how businesses of all sizes can take action today.

How Did the Industrial Revolution Cause Environmental Pollution?

The Industrial Revolution began in England in the 18th century before spreading through Europe and across the world. Nations shifted from agrarian economies to industrial ones, and fossil fuels were burned on a massive scale to power that transition. The environmental deterioration that followed has been compounding ever since.

Land use changed dramatically alongside industrial growth. As factories and urban centers expanded, farmland shrank and agriculture itself became industrialized. Industrial farming introduced fossil-fuel-powered machinery, synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and concentrated livestock operations. The result was soil deterioration, widespread air and water pollution, and a significant rise in greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector alone.

Deforestation and urbanization compounded the damage by eliminating natural carbon sinks. Forests and wetlands that once absorbed carbon dioxide from the atmosphere were cleared for development, removing the land’s natural ability to absorb carbon and leaving more greenhouse gases concentrated in the air.

The numbers tell the story clearly. Atmospheric CO2 was consistently around 280 parts per million before industrialization began. According to the IEA, CO2 concentrations reached approximately 427 parts per million in 2025, more than 50% above pre-industrial levels, with total energy-related emissions hitting a record high of nearly 38.4 billion tonnes. That figure has risen every decade since the Industrial Revolution began.

Industrialization continues today in developing nations, many of which lack the financial infrastructure to adopt clean energy and rely instead on coal, oil, and petroleum to power their growing economies. Even many developed nations remain heavily dependent on polluting industries, continuing to add to global greenhouse gas concentrations.

What Are the Environmental Impacts of Industry?

Industrial pollution creates environmental damage at every scale, from local waterways to the global atmosphere. The consequences affect ecosystems, human health, and the long-term stability of the climate. Below are the three primary categories of environmental impact driven by industry.

Pollution

Industry causes pollution across water, air, and soil, the three foundations of life on Earth. Each type of pollution carries its own chain of consequences.

Water pollution occurs in both freshwater systems and oceans. Water used in industrial processes becomes contaminated when it contacts metals, chemicals, or radioactive waste, and that water is often discharged into rivers and waterways. The result is contaminated drinking water, damaged aquatic ecosystems, and crops irrigated with polluted water that can become harmful to consume. Globally, 80% of wastewater is still released untreated into the environment.

Air pollution is any physical, biological, or chemical change to the atmosphere that reduces air quality. Gas, smoke, and fine particulate matter from burning coal or natural gas cause respiratory and cardiovascular disease in humans and threaten ecosystems globally. Air pollution now contributes to approximately 7.9 million premature deaths per year worldwide, making it one of the leading environmental causes of mortality. Airborne contaminants also cause acid rain, which ruins crops and acidifies freshwater bodies.

Soil pollution occurs when chemical levels in the ground exceed safe thresholds and present a threat to human health or ecosystems. Soil becomes polluted through industrial waste, chemical pesticides and fertilizers, oil spills, and landfills. Heavy metal contamination from industrial waste currently affects an estimated 20% of global agricultural land. Contaminated soil reduces crop yields, harms wildlife, and can lead to serious health problems in humans and animals living in affected areas.

Ecological Consequences

Pollution and altered land use place severe strain on ecosystems in ways that ripple outward for generations. Three interconnected effects stand out.

Habitat destruction results from deforestation, urban expansion, and industrial development. When natural habitats are destroyed or fragmented, plants and animals lose the environments they need to survive. Species are pushed into shrinking territories, forcing greater competition for resources and raising extinction risks. According to current data, 33% of global soils are degraded due to pollution and erosion, compressing the productive land available to both agriculture and wildlife.

Slower environmental recovery is another consequence of the cumulative strain on ecosystems. Natural disasters like wildfires and hurricanes are growing more frequent and severe as the climate shifts, and ecosystems already weakened by pollution and habitat loss take longer to recover from each new event. Industrial accidents, such as oil spills or chemical leaks, add further damage that can persist in an environment for decades.

Biodiversity loss continues to accelerate as species go extinct at rates far above natural baselines. The combination of habitat destruction, pollution, climate change, and resource depletion creates overlapping pressures that many species cannot adapt to quickly enough.

Atmospheric Changes

Industrial practices release large quantities of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, driving global warming and climate change. These two phenomena are distinct but deeply linked.

Global warming occurs when greenhouse gases like CO2 and methane accumulate in the atmosphere and trap heat that would otherwise radiate into space. Burning fossil fuels is the primary driver of CO2 buildup. Agricultural practices and landfills release significant quantities of methane, a greenhouse gas with more than 80 times the short-term warming power of CO2.

Climate change is the broader set of consequences that follows from global warming. Rising temperatures shift rainfall patterns, intensify storms, accelerate glacial melting, raise sea levels, and make agricultural conditions less predictable. Every fraction of a degree of additional warming increases these risks. The remaining carbon budget for limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius is now projected to be exhausted by 2029 at current emission rates.

What Industries Have the Largest Environmental Impact?

Green Energy Claims Image of Smoking Factory Plant

Some industries carry a disproportionately large environmental footprint. Researchers evaluate environmental impact across six key components: greenhouse gas emissions, water use, waste generation, land and water pollutants, air pollutants, and natural resource use. The industries that dominate these categories are as follows.

Energy and electric utilities are the most polluting sector on Earth, generating approximately 15.83 billion tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions annually. The energy sector ranks highest in four of the six environmental impact categories: greenhouse gas emissions, waste, air pollutants, and natural resource use. As long as coal and natural gas remain central to electricity generation, this sector will continue to lead all others in environmental damage.

Transport is the second most polluting industry globally, responsible for around 8.43 billion tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions each year. Road transport accounts for the majority of that figure, while aviation and shipping contribute significantly. The sector is under growing pressure to electrify and adopt cleaner fuels.

Manufacturing and construction generate approximately 6.3 billion tonnes of emissions annually and consume vast quantities of raw materials including metals, sand, and timber. This sector appears across all six environmental impact categories, reflecting its broad footprint across pollution, resource use, and land disruption.

Food production ranks as the highest non-utility industry in water use and land and water pollutants. Industrial agriculture is responsible for the majority of freshwater withdrawals globally and is a leading driver of deforestation, soil degradation, and chemical runoff into waterways.

How Can the Environmental Impact of Industry Be Reduced?

Meaningful solutions to industrial pollution already exist. The challenge is implementing them at speed and scale. Below are the most impactful approaches available to businesses and industries today.

Better Waste Management

Improperly handled industrial waste is one of the most direct and preventable causes of environmental pollution. When waste is not treated and disposed of correctly, it contaminates waterways, soil, and groundwater. Industries that invest in proper waste treatment and disposal systems can eliminate a significant portion of their local environmental impact. This is also an area where regulation has historically produced measurable results.

Improved Recycling and Water Reuse

Unnecessary pollution occurs when recyclable materials and reusable water are instead discarded. Industrial water recycling, for example, keeps contaminated water within closed systems rather than releasing it into rivers and oceans. Expanding recycling programs across manufacturing sectors reduces both raw material extraction and waste generation, addressing two environmental problems at once.

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Carbon Offsetting

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from industrial processes is the single most important lever for slowing climate change. Switching to renewable or clean energy cuts emissions at the source. Gas capture programs reduce methane and other potent greenhouse gases that would otherwise escape from operations like landfills and agricultural sites. For emissions that cannot yet be eliminated, verified carbon offset programs allow businesses to fund reforestation, methane capture, and renewable energy projects that compensate for their remaining footprint. Understanding the social cost of carbon helps businesses make the case internally for these investments.

Smarter Land Use

Industrial site selection and land management have lasting ecological consequences. Businesses should choose locations that minimize habitat disruption and avoid high-risk areas where accidents like fires or spills could cause catastrophic environmental damage. Reducing resource extraction on sensitive lands and funding environmental restoration projects, including reforestation and wetland rehabilitation, helps offset the land-use impact of ongoing operations. Carbon removal credits are one mechanism businesses can use to support these restoration efforts directly.

Advancing Technology

Older industrial technologies are often energy-inefficient and generate disproportionately high levels of pollution. Upgrading to newer equipment and processes allows industries to reduce emissions and resource consumption simultaneously. Switching to renewable energy, adopting AI-driven energy management, and investing in cleaner production technologies are all practical steps that industries can take now. The companies seeing the most progress are those that have embedded sustainability goals into their technology roadmaps rather than treating them as separate initiatives.

Environmental Awareness and Impact Assessment

Education and measurement underpin all other solutions. Industries that conduct regular environmental impact assessments, track their resource consumption and emissions, and train employees on sustainability practices are better positioned to identify problems early and respond effectively. Measuring and managing your carbon footprint is as essential for businesses as financial reporting, and increasingly, regulators and investors are requiring exactly that.

What Companies Are Reducing Their Environmental Impact?

Several major companies have made substantial commitments to reducing their environmental footprint and serve as benchmarks for the rest of the corporate world. Their progress, and in some cases their setbacks, offer useful lessons for any business navigating the transition to more sustainable operations.

Microsoft has been carbon neutral since 2012 and has set more ambitious targets since then. The company’s 2025 Environmental Sustainability Report outlines its goals to become carbon negative, water positive, and zero waste by 2030. Microsoft charges an internal carbon fee to business units and reinvests those funds into carbon reduction and removal initiatives. The company achieved its goal to protect more land than it uses by 2025 and has invested in renewable energy across 16 countries, including its first large-scale nuclear energy agreement.

Intel aims to be net positive on water use and achieve 100% renewable energy for its global operations by 2030. Intel links a percentage of employee compensation to corporate sustainability metrics, recognizing that achieving environmental goals requires company-wide participation rather than top-down mandates alone.

Alphabet (Google) has made significant progress on data center efficiency, reducing data center energy emissions by 12% in 2024 despite a 27% increase in overall electricity consumption, driven largely by AI workloads. Google’s data centers now provide six times more computing capacity per unit of electricity compared to five years ago. In 2024, Google signed agreements for more than 8 gigawatts of clean energy, the highest annual volume in the company’s history. The company has also pioneered AI-driven cooling systems for its data centers that dramatically reduce energy waste. It is worth noting that all three of these companies face the growing challenge of rising energy demand from AI infrastructure, a reminder that sustainability commitments require continuous adaptation as business models evolve.

Changing the Environmental Impact of Industry

More than two centuries of large-scale industrial activity have given us a clear view of the consequences. Pollution, ecological damage, and atmospheric change are not side effects we can manage around. They are the defining environmental challenge of our time, and the window for meaningful action is narrowing.

The good news is that solutions are no longer theoretical. Renewable energy is now cost-competitive with fossil fuels in most markets. Carbon capture and offset programs are funding real-world emissions reductions. Companies across every sector are finding that sustainable practices often improve efficiency and reduce long-term costs alongside their environmental benefits.

Whether you run a business or simply want to understand your own role in this picture, the path forward starts with knowing where you stand. Visit Terrapass to learn how you can measure your carbon footprint, reduce your emissions, and support verified projects that make a difference.

Brought to you by terrapass.com

The post The Environmental Impact of Industry: Causes, Effects & Solutions appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com