Connect with us

Published

on

Today, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under President Biden’s leadership released an important set of pollution limitations for power plants that will improve people’s health and help preserve a stable climate. Specifically, four power plant rules are part of the package: limits on carbon dioxide emissions, mercury and air toxics, effluent limitation guidelines, and coal ash.

Taken together, the rules will reduce harmful pollution from America’s air and water, improve public health, and help preserve a stable climate. Collectively, they will save thousands of people’s lives, prevent thousands of people from developing asthma, and prevent other severe health outcomes. They will save Americans hundreds of billions of dollars that would otherwise be required for healthcare and missed work days, responding to climate change impacts, premature deaths, and more. Expert analysis shows that the rules will also help our nation to meet growing electricity demand reliably while supporting the deployment of modern electricity generation technology. The rules additionally safeguard the reliability of the electric grid by providing allowances for emergency situations and extreme weather events when the grid is stressed.

Of these rules, our focus at SACE has been on the rules limiting carbon dioxide pollution from power plants. Burning coal and gas for electricity generation emits about a quarter of all the climate pollution across the country, yet until now, this pollution has been essentially unregulated by the federal government. Today’s announcements begin to change that.

While we at SACE can’t precisely predict how the new rules limiting carbon pollution from power plants will affect what power plants get built in the future or how they will be operated, we recognize the rules will act as one of many drivers of the shifting nature of the landscape of the utility industry, as modern and clean energy resources supplant outdated fossil resources.

Ultimately, today’s announcement is a wake-up call to Southeast utilities, regulators, and lawmakers, that the status quo of building large unabated baseload fossil gas plants can’t continue. The power plant rules are substantive and final, and utilities and regulators need to treat them as such. Even though EPA has had the proposed version of these rules on the books for about a year, major utilities, including Duke, Georgia Power, TVA, Dominion Energy South Carolina, and Santee Cooper have failed to adequately plan to comply with the rules, while committing tens of billions of ratepayers’ dollars to gas projects subject to these rules. Today’s announcement sends a clear signal: utilities and regulators must rethink the reckless drive toward a risky gas-dominant future.

Breaking Down The New Carbon Rules

The new carbon dioxide rules are really two separate rules: one that covers existing coal plants, and another that covers new, yet-to-be-built gas plants. These two sources are responsible for a tremendous level of climate pollution. According to 2022 data, coal combustion for electricity generation is the source of about 14 percent of climate pollution across the country. Likewise, new gas plants stand to be a massive source of carbon pollution if and when the plants come into service. This is particularly true in the Southeast U.S., where our major utilities like TVA, Duke Energy, Georgia Power, and Dominion Energy South Carolina are proposing to build tens of thousands of megawatts of new fossil gas power plant capacity.

Carbon Limits at Existing Coal Plants:

Compliance pathways for existing fossil fuel steam generating units. Source: EPA presentation, April 25, 2024.

The rules for existing coal power units will base the stringency of pollution reduction on how long the units will run in the future. Coal units that retire by January 1, 2032 are not subject to the new rules. Units that will retire between 2032 and 2039 are designated as “medium-term” units, and will have to reduce emissions by 16% (the equivalent of co-firing with 40% gas) beginning in 2030. For units that stay online until 2040 or later (designated “long-term” units), they will have to reduce carbon dioxide pollution by 90%, by installing carbon capture equipment for example, beginning in 2032. 

To ensure compliance with the new rules for existing coal plants, individual states will have to create state implementation plans to achieve the new emission limit guidelines. The new rules contain several provisions to promote flexibility in implementation, depending on each state’s particular circumstances: compliance determination through annual averaging and alternative calculation methods (mass-based vs. rate-based), emissions trading and averaging across multiple facilities, one-year compliance extensions to account for circumstances outside of the owner/operator’s control, and more. While state implementation plans, which will be created over the next two years, will be the ultimate guide for how this rule is applied to existing coal units, the final rule published today establishes enough regulatory certainty that all utilities must integrate the rules into all planning processes. 

Carbon Limits at New, Yet-To-Be-Built Gas Units:

Compliance pathways for new gas power units. Source: EPA presentation, April 25, 2024.

The rule for new, yet-to-be-built gas units would primarily apply to gas units that run a lot. In recent years, utilities have increasingly justified the construction of new gas power plants citing their capabilities to balance out the intermittent characteristic of renewable energy generation–so that solar and wind can do the bulk of powering the grid when the sun is shining and wind is blowing, and gas can pick up the slack at other times. 

The new EPA rule reflects this industry trend by applying the most stringent requirements on gas units that run far more frequently than their purported grid balancing roles should require, and lenient requirements on gas units that truly serve the role of being grid backstops when electricity demand is very high. EPA designates the most frequently run units as “base load” units, meaning they run over 40% of the time, the peak-serving units as “low load” units, meaning they run less than 20% of the time, and an in-between category called “intermediate load” units that run 20-40% of the time. As gas plants are currently operated, most fall into either the “base load” category with usage rates approaching 70-80%, or the “low load” category where they are used only to meet peak energy demands and have usage rates of 5% or lower. While it might not be immediately obvious, even low load “peaker” units create significant amounts of carbon pollution due to their inherent inefficiency. 

The new rules require base load units to reduce 90% of their carbon dioxide emissions, with carbon capture equipment for example, by 2032. Low load units, on the other hand, will not be required to significantly reduce their carbon pollution. The “intermediate load” category requires units to merely operate “efficiently,” which is described as having emissions less than 1,170 lb CO2/MWh. This new standard for future generating units is actually more lenient than the average emissions rate of near-current gas power generation in the Southeast (averaging 856 lb. of CO2/megawatt-hour in 2021).

These rules apply to any new gas burning power facilities that have yet to break ground or those that have broken ground since the draft rule was proposed in May of 2023. 

What The New Carbon Rules Mean In The Southeast

In the Southeast, the new rules mean that utilities should rethink the many thousands of megawatts of gas fueled combined cycle power plants that they have proposed in recent and ongoing integrated resource plans. For example, it was reported early this year that TVA, Duke, and Georgia Power have collectively proposed more than 16,000 megawatts of new gas power capacity, and SACE’s internal analysis shows that there is much more than this in early planning stages. In fact, the major utilities in our region are proposing to build more new fossil gas power capacity than any other utilities in the country: TVA has the most aggressive plan through 2028, with Duke having the largest planned gas build overall, most of which is set to go online in the late 2020s and early 2030s. The majority of planned new gas capacity in the Southeast is combined cycle plants, which can run 80-90% of the time and would fall into the base load category with the most stringent emission standard. However, many of the other new units planned in the Southeast are combustion turbines, which would probably fit into the low or intermediate load categories.

To explore further how the new power plant carbon rules will affect the Southeast, please join us on our webinar on May 7 at 1:00 pm ET. We will be joined by Carrie Jenks, Executive Director of the Harvard Law School Environmental & Energy Law Program, to unpack the new rules, and SACE Research Director Maggie Shober will discuss regional context for the Southeast, including our major utilities’ current energy portfolios and proposals, such as Duke Energy, Southern Company, TVA, and Dominion Energy South Carolina.

Webinar Registration Here

The post Historic Federal Rules Will Curb Dangerous Power Plant Pollution appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

Historic Federal Rules Will Curb Dangerous Power Plant Pollution

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance

Published

on

ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance

Statement from American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) President and CEO Ray Long on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance:

“The American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) is deeply concerned that today’s Treasury guidance on the long-standing ‘beginning of construction’ safe harbor significantly undermines its proven effectiveness, is inconsistent with the law, and creates unnecessary uncertainty for renewable energy development in the United States.

“For over a decade, the safe harbor provisions have served as clear, accountable rules of the road – helping to reduce compliance burdens, foster private investment, and ensure taxpayer protections. These guardrails have been integral to delivering affordable, reliable American clean energy while maintaining transparency and adherence to the rule of law. This was recognized in the One Big Beautiful Act, which codified the safe harbor rules, now changed by this action. 

“We need to build more power generation now, and that includes renewable energy. The U.S. will need roughly 118 gigawatts (the equivalent of 12 New York Cities) of new power generation in the next four years to prevent price spikes and potential shortages. Only a limited set of technologies – solar, wind, batteries, and some natural gas – can be built at that scale in that timeframe.”

###

ABOUT ACORE

For over 20 years, the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) has been the nation’s leading voice on the issues most essential to clean energy expansion. ACORE unites finance, policy, and technology to accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy. For more information, please visit http://www.acore.org.

Media Contacts:
Stephanie Genco
Senior Vice President, Communications
American Council on Renewable Energy
genco@acore.org

The post ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance appeared first on ACORE.

https://acore.org/news/acore-statement-on-treasurys-safe-harbor-guidance/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Should I Get a Solar Battery Storage System?

Published

on

Frequent power outages, unreliable grid connection, sky-high electricity bills, and to top it off, your solar panels are exporting excess energy back to the grid, for a very low feed-in-tariff. 

Do all these scenarios sound familiar? Your answer might be yes! 

These challenges have become increasingly common across Australia, encouraging more and more homeowners to consider solar battery storage systems. 

Why? Because they want to take control of their energy, store surplus solar power, and reduce reliance on the grid.  

But then again, people often get perplexed, and their biggest question remains: Should I get a Solar Battery Storage System in Australia? 

Well, the answer can be yes in many cases, such as a battery can offer energy independence, ensure better bill savings, and provide peace of mind during unexpected power outages, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution.  

There are circumstances where a battery may not be necessary or even cost-effective. 

In this guide, we’ll break down when it makes sense and all the pros and cons you need to know before making the investment.

Why You Need Battery Storage Now?

According to data, Australia has surpassed 3.9 million rooftop solar installations, generating more than 37 GW of PV capacity, which is about 20% of electricity in the National Electricity Market in 2024 and early 2025.  

Undoubtedly, the country’s strong renewable energy targets, sustainability goals, and the clean‑energy revolution have brought solar power affordability, but the next step in self‑reliance is battery storage. 

Data from The Guardian says that 1 in 5 new solar installs in 2025 now includes a home battery, versus 1 in 20 just a few years ago, representing a significant leap in adoption.  

Moreover, the recent launch of the Cheaper Home Batteries program has driven this uptake even further, with over 11,500 battery units installed in just the first three weeks from July 1, and around 1,000 installations per day. 

Overall, the Australian energy market is evolving rapidly. Average household battery size has climbed to about 17 kWh from 10–12 kWh previously.  

Hence, the experts are assuming that 10 GW of new battery capacity will be added over the next five years, competing with Australia’s current coal‑fired capacity.

What Am I Missing Out on Without Solar Batteries?

Honestly? You’re missing out on the best part of going solar. 

Renewable sources of energy like solar, hydro, and wind make us feel empowered. For example, solar batteries lower your electricity bills, minimize grid dependency, and also help to reduce your carbon footprint 

But here’s the catch! Without battery storage, you’re only halfway there! 

The true magic of solar power isn’t just in producing clean energy; it’s storing and using it efficiently.  

A solar battery lets you store excess energy and use it when the sun goes down or the grid goes out. It’s the key to real energy independence. Therefore, ultimately, getting a battery is what makes your solar system truly yours.

Why You Need Battery Storage Now

Here’s a list of what you’re missing out on without a solar battery: 

  1. Energy Independence 
  2. Batteries help you to stay powered even during blackouts or grid failures. With energy storage, you don’t have to think of fuel price volatility and supply-demand disruption in the  Australian energy market. 

  3. Maximized Savings  
  4. Adding a solar battery to your solar PV system allows you to use your own stored energy at night instead of repurchasing it at high rates. It also reduces grid pressure during peak hours, restoring grid stability. 

  5. Better Return on Investment ROI 
  6. Tired of Australian low feed-in-tariff rates 

    Make full use of your solar system by storing excess power at a low price rather than exporting it. Solar panel and battery systems can be a powerful duo for Australian households.  

  7. Lower Carbon Footprint 
  8. Despite the steady growth in solar, wind, and hydro, fossil fuels still dominate the grid. Fossil fuels supplied approximately 64% of Australia’s total electricity generation, while coal alone accounted for around 45%. 

    These stats highlight why solar battery storage is so valuable. By storing surplus solar energy, homeowners can reduce their reliance on a grid that still runs on coal and gas.  

  9. Peace of Mind 
  10. Enjoy 24/7 uninterrupted power, no matter what’s happening outside.  

    Besides powering urban homes and businesses, batteries also provide reliable power backup for off-grid living at night when your solar panel can’t produce, ensuring peace of mind. 

What Size Solar Battery Do I Need?

While choosing the battery size, it isn’t just about picking the biggest one you can afford; it’s about matching your household’s energy consumption pattern. There is no one-size battery that will make financial or functional sense for everyone. 

Nevertheless, if you have an average family of four with no exceptional power demands, you may get by with a 10kWh to 12kWh battery bank as a ready-to-roll backup system.  

Well, this is just an estimation, as we have no idea of your power needs, because selecting a battery is highly subjective to the household in question. 

With that being said, you can get a good idea of how much power you use on average by analyzing your electric bill copy. Also, keeping track of which appliances you use the most and which ones require the most power will help you.  

So, to figure out the ideal battery size for your home, you need to consider three most important things: 

  1. Your Daily Energy Usage

Check your electricity bill for your average daily consumption (in kWh). Most Australian homes use between 15 to 25 kWh per day. 

  1. Your Solar System Output

How much excess solar energy are you generating during the day? That’s the power you’ll store to use later rather than exporting. 

  1. Your Nighttime Power Usage

A battery is most useful at night or during grid outages. So, estimate how much power you typically use after sunset. However, by using a battery, you can also get the freedom of living off the grid. 

Sizing Up: The Ideal Home Battery for Aussies! 

  • For small households and light usage, a 5 kWh battery will be suitable. 
  • For average Australian households, adding a 10 kWh battery would be enough. 
  • Large homes and high-energy users will need a 13 to 15 kWh system. 
  • For full independence, off-grid living, or blackout protection, you may require a larger battery size of 20+ kWh. 

Want help calculating your exact needs? Just drop your daily usage and solar output, and we’ll do the math for you! Cyanergy is here to help!  

Sizing Up: The Ideal Home Battery for Aussies! 

  • For small households and light usage, a 5 kWh battery will be suitable. 
  • For average Australian households, adding a 10 kWh battery would be enough. 
  • Large homes and high-energy users will need a 13 to 15 kWh system. 
  • For full independence, off-grid living, or blackout protection, you may require a larger battery size of 20+ kWh. 

Want help calculating your exact needs? Just drop your daily usage and solar output, and we’ll do the math for you! Cyanergy is here to help! 

How Much Do Solar Batteries Cost?

How Much Do Solar Batteries Cost

Previously, you would have to pay between $3000 and $3600 for the battery alone, plus the cost of installation, for every kWh of solar battery storage.  

However, you can currently expect to pay between $1200 and $1400 for each kWh of solar battery storage. That is a price reduction of approximately 52%, and things will only get better from here. 

Does that imply solar batteries are cheap now? Not really, but the cost is well justified by the pros of having a battery storage system. 

Also, while paying for solar batteries, you have to consider many other factors like the type of battery, your solar panel system configurations and compatibility, brand, and installation partner.  

These will significantly influence the price range of battery storage. 

Is a Solar Battery Worth It | Pros and Cons at a Glance

It’s okay to feel a little overwhelmed while deciding to invest your hard-earned money in a battery.  

So, here we’ve listed the pros and cons of having a solar battery to help you in the decision-making process. 

Benefits of Solar Battery Storage 

  • Solar batteries help you become self-sustaining. 
  • You don’t have to care about power outages anymore 
  • In the event of any natural disaster, you will still have a power source 
  • Battery prices are dropping significantly as we speak 
  • During peak hours, grid electricity prices increase due to high demand; you can avoid paying a high price and use your battery. It’s essentially free energy, as solar generates energy from the sun. 
  • Reduced carbon footprint as the battery stores energy from a renewable source. 

Advantages of battery for the grid and national energy system: 

  • Batteries support Virtual Power Plants (VPPs). In 2025, consumers get financial bonuses (AUD 250‑400) for joining, plus grid benefits via distributed dispatchable power.  
  • Grid‑scale batteries like Victoria Big Battery or Hornsdale Power Reserve are increasing system resilience by storing large amounts of renewable energy and reducing blackout risk. 

Drawbacks of Solar Battery Storage 

  • One of the biggest barriers is that solar batteries have a high upfront cost, which makes installation harder for residents. 
  • Home batteries require physical space, proper ventilation, and can’t always be placed just anywhere, especially in smaller homes or apartments. 
  • Most batteries, like lithium-ion batteries, last 5 to 15 years, meaning they may need replacement during your solar system’s lifetime. 
  • While many systems are low-maintenance, some may require software updates, monitoring, or even professional servicing over time. 
  • Battery production involves mining and processing materials like lithium or lead, which raise environmental and ethical concerns.   

Should You Buy a Solar Battery?: Here’s the Final Call!

You should consider buying a solar battery if several key factors align with your situation.  

First, it’s a strong financial move if you live in a state where federal and state incentives can significantly reduce the upfront cost. This can make the investment far more affordable.  

A solar battery can be especially worthwhile if you value having backup power during outages, lowering your electricity bills, and gaining a measure of energy independence from the grid.  

Additionally, you should be comfortable with taking a few extra steps to get the most value out of your system, such as joining a virtual power plant (VPP), which allows your battery to participate in grid services in exchange for modest returns.  

Finally, it’s worth noting that rebates decline annually, and early adopters get the most value.  

Takeaway Thoughts

Installing a solar battery in Australia in mid‑2025 offers substantial financial, environmental, and energy‑security benefits, especially if you qualify for multiple subsidies and have good solar capacity.  

With rebates shrinking after 2025 and demand surging, early movers stand to benefit most. 

By helping balance the grid and reduce dependence on fossil fuels, home battery adoption contributes significantly to Australia’s national goals of 82% renewable energy by 2030 

It’s not just about savings; it’s about being part of a smarter, cleaner, more resilient electricity future for Australia. 

Looking for CEC-accredited local installers?  

Contact us today for any of your solar needs. We’d be happy to assist!  

Your Solution Is Just a Click Away

The post Should I Get a Solar Battery Storage System? appeared first on Cyanergy.

Should I Get a Solar Battery Storage System?

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Wine Grapes and Climate Change

Published

on

I just spoke with a guy in the wine industry, and I asked him how, if at all, climate change is affecting what we does.

From his perspective, it’s the horrific wildfires whose smoke imbues (or “taints”) the grapes with an unpleasant flavor that needs to be modified, normally by creative methods of blending.

Wine Grapes and Climate Change

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com