Freshwater, essential for ecosystems and human well-being, is becoming increasingly scarce.
Population growth, urbanisation and socioeconomic development are all driving greater demand for the world’s finite water resources. At the same time, climate change is altering precipitation patterns and affecting water availability.
Currently, approximately four billion people experience water scarcity for at least one month each year.
Irrigated agriculture – which accounts for nearly 90% of the world’s water consumption – is a major driver of this scarcity.
Without substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, global temperatures could rise by 3C by the end of the century, exacerbating water shortages and impacting an additional 0.8 to 2.2 billion people.
In our new study, published in Nature Communications, we quantify and map current “water gaps” – shortfalls where water demand exceeds supply – around the world, and project how 1.5C and 3C of warming will impact water availability.
We find that under 1.5C of warming, the global water gap will increase by nearly 6%. But under 3C of warming, the gap will grow by almost 15%.
Our work shows that mitigating climate change can help lessen future water shortfalls, but robust adaptation methods will also be necessary to secure water security in a warmer world.
‘Water gaps’
Traditionally, scientists have quantified water scarcity with a variety of indicators, which help assess water availability relative to demand.
For example, the Falkenmark Indicator, or water stress index, is a simple indicator, measuring the per-capita water availability. However, this approach says nothing about the quality of the water, the soil moisture (which is critical for agriculture) or the environmental flows. Other indicators include the water use-to-availability ratio and the water poverty index.
These indicators have been instrumental in highlighting resource limitations, but they are no longer sufficient for modern water management needs because they do not provide a quantitative assessment of the water volumes overused by humans.
In our study, we introduce the concept of “water gaps”, defined as the difference in water volume when demand exceeds supply.
We used historical water use data and water availability from a water-resources model to map the average global water gap between 2001 and 2010.
This approach has some advantages over traditional indicators.
By actually quantifying the volumes of water needed to solve water scarcity in a given location, decisionmakers can be better informed when designing solutions to solve it. For example, given a certain water gap, they can figure out how much desalination would be needed to solve water scarcity.
Water gaps represent the difference between the availability of “renewable” water resources and water consumption within a specific region and timeframe – where renewable water is that which can be replenished naturally through the water cycle.
When water availability falls below consumption, it signals a critical shortage and leads to unsustainable water use. These shortages threaten human needs, agriculture, industry, energy production and ecosystems – potentially leading to severe social, economic and environmental consequences.
We found that the current global water gap is approximately 458 cubic kilometres (km3) per year. (One cubic kilometre is equivalent to 1bn cubic metres.) The countries with the largest individual gaps are India, the US, Pakistan, Iran and China, but water gaps exist on every continent.
The map below shows the baseline average water gap, with lighter colours representing smaller gaps and darker colours representing larger ones. Light blue areas are areas where there is no water gap, and white areas show regions without human water consumption.

In areas with water gaps, humans must make up the shortfall by depleting groundwater, rivers, lakes and aquatic ecosystems.
Future shortfalls
We also look forward, projecting how water gaps might grow under future climate change.
We use five climate models from the sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) to obtain projections of climatic conditions, such as rainfall and temperature.We focus on two levels of warming: 1.5C, part of the long-term goal under the Paris Agreement, and 3C, which is a realistic level of warming for the end of the century under current climate policies.
Then, we use those climate outputs into a hydrological model to determine the availability of renewable water under each warming scenario.
Under 1.5C of warming, the global water gap is projected to increase by around 26.5km3 per year – an increase of 5.8% from the current baseline. A 3C warming scenario would see a more severe rise of 67.4km3 per year, or 14.7%.
The difference in the size of the water gap under these two warming scenarios underscores the critical need for ongoing climate change mitigation to minimise its impact on water resources.
Regional patterns
The regional variability in water gaps highlights the uneven impacts of climate change, with some countries and river basins facing significant vulnerabilities.
India, which has the largest baseline water gap of 124.3km3 per year, is also expected to see the most significant increase in water gaps. Other countries experiencing notable increases include China, Pakistan, the US, Spain and Turkey.
Substantial water gaps can currently be found in the Ganges-Brahmaputra basin in India and Bangladesh, the Sabarmati basin in India and the Tigris-Euphrates basin, which covers much of the Middle East. Under both warming scenarios, notable increases in water gaps are expected in the Ganges-Brahmaputra basin and the Mississippi-Missouri basin in the US.
While the climate models we used agree on worsening water gaps in most regions, some countries, such as Nigeria, Niger, Chad, Sudan, Ethiopia, Vietnam and the Philippines, are projected to see modest reductions in water gaps. Modest decreases are anticipated in the Sabarmati and Nile river basins.
The maps below show the projected changes in global water gaps under 1.5C (top) and 3C (bottom) of warming. Areas in blue are projected to have a decreased water gap in the future, while areas in red are projected to have an increased one.

No single solution can ensure global water security – effective solutions require both reducing water consumption and increasing water availability.
Reducing consumption can involve switching to less water-intensive crops, minimising food waste and enhancing irrigation efficiency. On the supply side, expanding water storage infrastructure, investing in seawater desalination technologies, and reusing treated wastewater can help augment freshwater resources.
A combination of these approaches, tailored to local needs, is essential for tackling water scarcity and ensuring long-term water security.
Our findings underscore the urgent need for robust adaptation and mitigation strategies to manage escalating water scarcity. By quantifying these future water gaps, decisionmakers can better understand regional vulnerabilities and develop targeted interventions.
The post Guest post: How the global ‘water gap’ will grow under climate change appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Guest post: How the global ‘water gap’ will grow under climate change
Climate Change
Coral reefs are not doomed – but policy must catch up with the science
Dr. Stacy Jupiter is the Executive Director of the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Global Marine Program. Melissa Wright is Bloomberg Ocean Initiative Lead at Bloomberg Philanthropies.
For years, the dominant story on coral reefs has been one of inevitable loss, with news headlines focusing on mass bleaching, ecosystem collapse, and catastrophic tipping points. As ocean temperatures continue to rise, many people have come to see the decline of the world’s reefs as unavoidable.
The threats are real and urgent, but new evidence points to a more complicated and useful conclusion: some reefs still have a meaningful chance to survive and recover, provided they are protected.
A major new analysis, published today with the support of Bloomberg Philanthropies, identifies more than 165,000 square kilometers of coral reefs, across 71 countries and 100 territories and jurisdictions, with the strongest potential to withstand and recover from climate impacts.
Drawing on more than 45,000 coral surveys, along with decades of climate and ocean data, the research finds that three times more reefs may be capable of surviving the climate crisis than previously understood. That has major implications for reef-dependent communities, food security, coastal protection, fisheries, tourism, and national economies.
Essential natural infrastructure for communities
The findings make clear that reefs will not all respond to climate impacts in the same way. Some are located in rare underwater cool spots that can help shield them from extreme heat. Some show greater resistance to bleaching and other climate-related stress. Others recover more quickly after severe disturbances. These differences matter because they show where protection can have the greatest long-term impact.
More than 500 million people depend on reefs for food, livelihoods, and coastal protection. For those communities, climate-resilient reefs are not an abstract conservation priority. They are essential natural infrastructure. They help protect coastlines, sustain fisheries, support local economies, and reduce climate risk. Because ocean currents move coral larvae and marine life between reef systems, some of these reefs may also help regenerate wider reef ecosystems after climate shocks.
This should change how governments, funders, and conservation partners prioritize action.
Climate change remains the greatest long-term threat to coral reefs. At the same time, many of the pressures pushing reefs closer to collapse are immediate and local. Sewage pollution, deforestation, agricultural runoff, destructive fishing practices, and poorly managed coastal development continue to damage reefs that are already under stress. Recent research shows that water pollution and fishing pressure are now among the leading local threats affecting nearly two-thirds of the world’s coral reefs.
These pressures can be reduced. Governments and local partners are already working to improve reef management, cut pollution, strengthen enforcement, and protect critical ecosystems. Those efforts need to move faster, alongside much stronger action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Prioritising climate-resilient reefs
The new maps of climate-resilient reefs give governments, communities, and reef managers a clearer basis for action. They show where reefs have the strongest potential to persist over time, and where protection can deliver the greatest benefits for people, coastlines, and economies.
Right now, only around 28 percent of the identified climate-resilient reefs fall within protected or conserved areas. If these reefs are among the most capable of surviving climate impacts and helping regenerate broader reef systems, they should be prioritized for protection, management, and investment.
The case for action is practical as well as ecological. Healthy reefs can reduce wave energy by up to 97 percent, helping protect coastlines from storms, flooding, and erosion. They support fisheries that feed millions of people, sustain tourism jobs and local economies, and help reduce climate risk for vulnerable coastal communities.
For many families, a healthy reef means food, income, and protection when storms hit. For Indigenous Peoples and coastal communities, reefs are also tied to culture, heritage, identity, and traditional knowledge systems.
Ocean conservation must catch up
Governments are beginning to recognize the urgency of protecting climate-resilient reefs. At last year’s UN Ocean Conference in Nice, 11 countries signed a declaration committing to stronger protection of these reefs, including action to address destructive fishing, pollution, and unsustainable coastal development.
As leaders meet in Kenya this week to discuss the challenges facing the world’s ocean, more governments should join the declaration and help build a broader coalition committed to safeguarding these critical ecosystems.
As coral reefs pass tipping point, ocean protection rises up political agenda
Some countries are already showing what this leadership can look like. Brazil has included corals in its national climate plans. The Bahamas is embedding reef protection into national policy and local stewardship systems. The declaration offers a way to build on these efforts and scale them globally.
But commitments will not be enough. Success will depend on implementation. That means stronger protection and management, reduced local pressures, increased investment, and meaningful support for the Indigenous Peoples and local communities stewarding these ecosystems.
The science is clear. Many reefs still have the capacity to persist and recover. The question is whether policy and investment will move quickly enough to protect them, so they can continue sustaining communities, economies, and coastlines for generations to come.
The post Coral reefs are not doomed – but policy must catch up with the science appeared first on Climate Home News.
Coral reefs are not doomed – but policy must catch up with the science
Climate Change
Months After a Jet Fuel Leak, No Agency Tested Waters Downstream of Piscataway Creek. So Community Groups Are Doing It Themselves.
Authorities that manage the Potomac River tributary did not sample the stretch where residents fish and recreate. One Indigenous leader sees the lack of response as part of a pattern of ongoing neglect.
In the five months after jet fuel started leaking from Joint Base Andrews into Piscataway Creek, no agency tested the water or sediment some 20 miles downstream, where the creek empties into the Potomac River and the shoreline community and anglers gather to fish and boat along the riverbank.
Climate Change
Trump Administration Abandons Fight Against Wind Energy as Clean Energy Output Surges
The clean energy sector is showing resilience despite challenges thrown at it by a hostile White House, a recent report found. A string of legal victories has further dampened the Trump administration’s efforts to halt wind and solar power.
The Trump administration has abandoned its effort to halt wind energy projects across the United States and dropped its challenge to the court ruling that tossed President Donald Trump’s order freezing federal permitting and leasing for wind projects. States that challenged the order hailed the development as one of the most significant legal victories against the Trump White House’s campaign against the energy transition.
Trump Administration Abandons Fight Against Wind Energy as Clean Energy Output Surges
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy8 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测






