GE Vernova Restructures Offshore Wind Division
Allen, Joel, and Phil dissect GE Vernova’s restructuring of its offshore wind operations, potentially cutting 900 jobs globally. What will be the implications for the US and international wind energy markets? They also share key insights from the Sandia Blades Workshop, emphasizing the importance of prescriptive operations and digitizing tribal knowledge. Enter to win a bunch of Yeti and StrikeTape swag at https://weatherguardwind.com/yeti!
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Pardalote Consulting – https://www.pardaloteconsulting.com
Weather Guard Lightning Tech – www.weatherguardwind.com
Intelstor – https://www.intelstor.com
Allen Hall: Hello everyone. Joel and I have been traveling across America talking with GE2X wind farm operators about how strike tape can protect their blades against lightning damage. If you work on a GE2X site, you need to visit our new website. weatherguardwind.com/yeti. We’ll show you how your turbines can be protected against lightning with Strike Tape, and you can also register to win a nice Yeti Roadie 48 cooler, four Yeti mugs, and some Strike Tape swag.
Just visit weatherguardwind.com/yeti. Phil, have you been to the National Toy Hall of Fame in Rochester, New York?
Philip Totaro: I have not.
Allen Hall: Oh my gosh, you’re missing out because they have the finalists, the twelfth finalists for induction into the National Toy Hall of Fame this year. And they include, are you ready?
Drum roll please. Balloons, Pokemon cards, your own adventure books, which is a particular kind of interesting book. Hess toy trucks, which we see at Christmas time here in the United States. My Little Pony, which should have been an entrance a long time ago, honestly. How is that not already in there?
Exactly my point. Remote control vehicles, stick horses, trampolines, and probably one of Joel’s favorite, Transformers. I’m a Transformers fan.
Hang on, let’s go back to stick horses for a second, because again, how long has this museum been, or Hall of Fame been in business? I mean, are they, they’re digging up some pretty legacy toy technology there.
Stick horses are back. Have you seen those competitions of, where people are riding the stick horses over a competitive course where they’re hopping over things and running around?
Philip Totaro: There are some people that think that the United States Is not going in the right direction. I think these people are probably steering us in exactly where we don’t need to be.
Joel Saxum: Allen, when you said that the Toy Hall of Fame, I looked over at my bookshelf and I have to, I went and grabbed this toy, because to me, this is American Toy Hall of Fame material. This was, this toy was my dad’s when he was a kid. And this is the original Mound, Minnesota built Tonka trucks.
Allen Hall: I think we all need to take a moment and observe and salute the old Tonka truck.
I
Philip Totaro: will salute that.
Joel Saxum: Working tailgate, I’m telling you, that’s it right there.
Philip Totaro: That’s a toy.
Joel Saxum: It even says USA on the tires.
Allen Hall: Made out of American steel and the edges are sharp like they should be.
I’m Allen Hall and here are this week’s top stories. In a significant corporate development, the Spanish government has authorized BlackRock’s stake in Natergy. This follows BlackRock’s acquisition of GIP, which owns 20. 6 percent of the Spanish energy company. The approval comes with conditions, including support for energy transition projects and maintaining Natergy’s headquarters in Spain.
This move positions BlackRock as a major player in Spain’s energy sector. Denmark has inaugurated two new offshore wind farms. Vesterhavnord and Vesterhavnsyd, developed by Vattenfall, these farms feature 41 wind turbines with a combined capacity of 344 megawatts. Located between 5 and 10 kilometers from the Danish west coast, they will generate 1.
5 terawatt hours of electricity annually, enough to power 350, 000 households. This addition brings Vattenfall’s total offshore wind capacity in Denmark to 1. 5 gigawatts. Marking a substantial increase in the country’s renewable energy output and a boost for the North American wind industry. The Canadian port of Argentina has secured a contract to handle wind turbine blades for U.
S. East Coast offshore wind farms. The port will receive and store 220 wind turbine blades starting this fall and continuing into 2025. This agreement with ScanGlobal Logistics positions Argentina as a key player in the offshore wind supply chain, building on its previous contract for monopile marshalling and strengthening the infrastructure for wind energy development in North America.
In Canada, Marmot Energy is restarting wind tower manufacturing activities in Quebec. A new wind project will add 100 jobs to the facility and install 56 Vestas turbines generating 350 megawatts of renewable energy. The 1 billion project is set to begin construction in 2025 with commissioning planned for next year.
Moving to Hawaii, AES Hawaii reports success with a new bat deterrent system at its Kahuku Wind Farm on Oahu. The project uses an ultrasonic mechanism on its turbines to keep bats away. Since operations began in December 2020, only one bat strike has been recorded. The project’s eight turbines, reaching 40 stories high, generate enough power for 16, 000 homes.
Breaking news. And in the UK, an investigation is underway following a collision between a service operation vessel and a wind turbine at Oersted’s Hornsea One wind farm. The incident involved a Wind of Hope vessel carrying 72 people. No injuries or pollution were reported, but damage was sustained to the vessel and to the turbine base.
That’s this week’s top news stories. After the break, I’ll be joined by my co host, CEO and founder of IntelStor, Phil Totaro, and the Chief Commercial Officer of WeatherGuard Lightning Tech, Joel Saxum. As wind energy professionals, staying informed is crucial, and let’s face it, difficult. That’s why the Uptime Podcast recommends PES Wind magazine.
PES Wind offers a diverse range of in depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit PESWind. com today. In this quarter’s PES Wind Magazine, there’s a lot of good articles and you can check them all out at PESWind.
com. And if you’re over in Hamburg, And looking at the exhibitions all over the floors there, a big part of that exhibition is about offshore wind. And one of the issues with offshore wind is the tooling that has to live out there. And an article from Hamatro, who makes hydraulic tooling that’s made for offshore they have a really interesting description of what they do and all the processes and application tools that they have to have hydraulic tools in an offshore environment, because as Joel knows, anytime you get saltwater and moving hydraulics, it is a disaster.
Joel Saxum: Corrosion
Allen Hall: central.
Joel Saxum: Yeah. One of the things to think about or to understand here is that when you get in an offshore operating environment, not only like Allen says is the salt water, the wave heights, the bad, moving things around with lifts and all this stuff. It’s a very difficult environment to operate in, but almost everything.
And this is where it makes it difficult. Almost every tool you use offshore for construction or decommissioning for that matter is custom built. And you’re dealing with really large things. It’s not like you go to snap on and say, Hey, give me this tool or Milwaukee tool. Hey, give me this thing.
And we’ll, and yeah, we may, we make a hundred thousand of these and we’ll sell you one, every single piece of equipment that goes offshore in these large applications is custom built for the application. So whether it’s decommissioning or construction. You have to make it usually these things are designed in like a front end study.
So someone like home mantra will get involved with a wind farm that’s being built years. Sometimes ahead of when they actually think it’s out there, because they need to develop the tool. They need to build the tool. They need to test the tool. They need to get it ready to roll before that thing is.
Gets out moving that construction project because you don’t get to just run to Home Depot and buy a new tool. Everything has to be custom built. And the other side of this thing is what whole mottro does is their hydraulic specialists. In the offshore world, hydraulics is the only thing that you really can, Make the kind of power, create the kind of power that you need to cut, to move, to, straighten out a monopile or to crush something down or connect something because electric pumps or just don’t do it.
A lot of the times in a subsea environment, you’re having a, what’s called a work class ROV, the remotely operated vehicle, becomes the hands, the eyes, the ears, the everything in that subsea realm. And a work class ROV will usually be like 150 horsepower is what they call it, but that 150 horsepower Is driving hydraulic pumps.
And if you’ve ever seen like a house lifting jack or a car jack or something, that’s all hydraulics. And there’s the only way to control that kind of power. But these guys are a specialist, this Homatro company that’s in PS when this magazine this month, they’re specialists in creating these special, these.
Specific tools that are needed for specific actions on an offshore wind farm for from construction all the way through decommissioning. Yeah. 1 of the things that whole matro focuses on is in house R and D and innovation and that can go really far into making sure as a client of someone like this. So I’ve seen places where some of the engineering gets farmed out here.
Some of the engineering gets farmed out there. A piece gets built here. You put things together here and the companies that usually provide tools that just simply work and work day in and day out are the ones that have controlled the design and build and deployment process from start to finish. And that’s what Homatro does.
Bringing quality to the to the offshore wind market.
Allen Hall: So check out the latest PES wind magazine at PESwind. com. GE Vernova has announced a major restructuring of its offshore wind operations and the company plans to downsize its global workforce in the offshore sector, potentially affecting around 900 jobs out of an estimated 1700 employees involved in offshore.
In France, about 360 positions will be cut in two facilities that represents about 60 percent of the employees between those two facilities, somewhere 50 60%. The restructuring as it’s being explained today is in response to challenges in the offshore wind sector, obviously inflation, supply chain disruptions, and some project delays.
And with the offshore wind division having financial difficulties and expected to lose about 300 million dollars in the third quarter, the Vernova heads of the company are thinking about, Really reducing the offshore business greatly and Phil, I think this has a couple of implications Globally particularly in the US right now where GE has been selected to do a couple of offshore projects and then What’s happening internationally if for Nova reduces its offshore Manufacturing capability are they going to aggressively go after business or are they going to sit on the sidelines for a while?
Philip Totaro: No, I Allen I think it Indicates they’re potentially going to sit on the sidelines and they may still maintain, a sales force in, emerging markets that they want to be in, like Australia, for instance or even South Korea but operationally, I question how they’re going to be able to execute without getting the order book built up in those markets in the first place.
The reason why they’re largely targeting Europe and potentially the U. S. is there have been some, in the U. S. there have been some project cancellations where, G. E. turbines were going to be utilized. There are also projects where leading light that has delayed the project as a result of GE indicating that they’re not going to develop the 18 megawatt variant of the turbine, which to be blunt, I find a little curious because he, there’s not that much difference.
On LCOE between a 15 and a half megawatt turbine. Yeah, you’re gonna save yourself some capex on foundations, but it’s not actually that great of a gulf. So I’m getting the sense that maybe there’s something else going on there. But for GE’s benefit, they just haven’t been getting the orders, particularly in Europe.
So they’re getting through Dogger Bank. They’re getting through some of the, big and small projects that they have lined up in France. But after that, I am not seeing them getting significant orders in, for instance, Holland or Germany, where, and even some of the emerging projects in Sweden and Norway and elsewhere in Denmark, they want to be able to play in those markets, but they’ve been unsuccessful due to competition from Siemens Gomesa and or Festus.
So the industry keeps saying they want, multiple supply chain options, but if they’re not going to give GE the order book, then this is the inevitable consequence of that.
Joel Saxum: Yeah. In this press release that we’re following along with here, one of the things they say is they are experiencing lower than expected volume.
And that’s a and that part of that is delays in known projects, but some of it is just, they’re not getting the new ones. And we’ve talked before about other brands and when things happen that are, in the recent news, right? Like we’ve seen Vineyard win. We’ve seen the Dogger Bank blade issues.
They also go on to say in this press release that the company will continue to allocate resources to support existing projects, including quality control issues affecting its plates. So there’s they know they have that issue. And what that points to me is wounded brand, which we’ve used that comment before, but it’s something to look at, right?
If you’re going to be developing a project right now, and you’re picking your turbines, and you’ve seen 3 blade failures on the Haliide platform offshore for GE Vernova. You’re going to get the hair on your back of your neck up a little bit about that. So that is something also that’s driving that lower than expected volume of order book.
So it’s a tough spot to be in. I know as GE Vernova, the spinoff last spring from aerospace and health, and what they’ve done as a GE as a whole. But now we’ve seen massive layoffs at the on the LM side of things, some plants closing, GE getting rid of a bunch of other engineers. So they continue to whittle down at the massive tree that was GE to get to something more profitable.
But as it sits right now, it’s tough to look forward in a crystal ball and see how, what’s going to happen in a few years or how they’re going to arrive at this profitability and then come out of it stronger.
Philip Totaro: GE Vernova was in a period where. They went through something similar with the onshore wind business as well, where they had supply chain pressures and other profitability pressures that caused them to really scale back the size of the business, the size of their product portfolio, et cetera.
I think with the lack of order book, it’s just again and an inevitable consequence of saying, all right, we’re going to focus more on profitability. And this is what that entails. We can’t employ, these 900 people globally, if we’re just not getting the order volumes, we anticipated part of that again is because of interest rates.
But I don’t it’s interesting because like in the past few days prior to this announcement, Wall Street was already, pumping up Vernova’s stock, and it’s almost like they had, some, maybe, knowledge that, that this sort of announcement was coming, because typically, Wall Street Actually likes layoffs because they think it leads to more profitability.
And so even as horrible as that sounds for the people, working in the factories that is the cold hard reality of, equity investors they like to see companies downsizing, if it means that they’re going to be more profitable and. That’s the direction that GE Vernova feels like they, they have to go at this point.
And, again, without the order book I can’t blame them. It’s basically a scenario where, again they’ll scale back up, either when interest rates come down more, and more capital starts flowing, But keep in mind as well, we can also pin this on, New York and New Jersey a little bit playing a lot of baseball with, project developers.
The factory commitments that GE had made a lot of the jobs that we’re talking about right here would have been either preserved or even increased had those factories moved forward. But project cancellations or delays in the U. S. has resulted in. A lot of this if you’re going to the voting booth in November, remember that when it comes time to tick the box for, the governors in the states of New Jersey and
Joel Saxum: New York.
I think the one thing that we need to make sure we focus on here as well as GE has stated for these projects that are under development. They’re going to have the resources that they need to fulfill the contractual obligations right there for the upcoming years. No problems with what’s going to happen to make sure that the things that they’ve got going right now are going to continue to they want to execute the projects in a timely manner, keeping safety and quality at the forefront.
This makes GE Varnova stronger. And
Allen Hall: the next couple of years.
Philip Totaro: It does, or it eliminates resources that they’re really going to need when the time comes to, execute on things it’s, you’re seeing this right now with some of these challenges that they do have with Vineyard Wind and Dogger Bank with the blades, because a lot of the engineers at LM that would be responsible for potentially designing and fixing some of these.
Again, whether they were operational issues or, manufacturing issues or what have you, you still need engineers to, to help you fix that you can’t lay everybody off and then just have salespeople say we’ll, still be able to maintain our contractual commitments.
You know the asset owners and operators and more importantly probably the insurance companies aren’t stupid So even though it looks good to investors you also have to balance that with actually being able to fill your contractual obligations
Joel Saxum: I think you’ll see that the same thing that you see in a lot of situations like this whether it’s wind or the Doesn’t matter aerospace sector or anything Is a lot of these people, as soon as that next project ramps back up, you’re going to see a bunch of contractors, quote, unquote, getting hired by GE, which is going to be the exact engineers that just laid off, just writing them contracts to come back and work temporarily.
Cause that’s the smarter way to do things right now.
Allen Hall: There’s a high demand for these skilled positions, engineering technicians, even people laying up blades. They’re hard to find. There’s a lot of opportunity out there. And if it’s not with GE Vernova today, it’s worth. One of the other manufacturers that will be going into offshore and I kind of wonder Phil if they intend to eventually sell off.
The factories that are in France and consolidate in Canada and in the U S
Philip Totaro: that’s complicated because they, going back about 10 years to when GE was merging with Alstom, there were a lot of promises made and the whole reason that the factories got built in St. Nazaire and Cherbourg and France.
Was because of the commitments that GE had to make to the French government not to lay people off in the first place. So we’re getting 10 years later and now a lot of those layoffs that, that potentially could have happened back then are happening now. But I, it’s, that gets tricky when you start talking about the unions in Europe especially, because they still have quite a lot of power.
Joel Saxum: The interesting thing we heard at Sandia this week, Allen, was one of our respected friends in the blade world looking for a new engineering colleague, and the end of the job thing, or job posting basically was, Do they know what glass fiber is? Perfect. We’ll train him on the rest.
Allen Hall: That’s the reality though, Joel, is that people who have that knowledge are already working somewhere and it’s hard to find people to come into the industry and you’re willing to take about anybody at the minute that has particularly an engineering degree or any technical training in composites.
It’s going to get pulled into a company.
Philip Totaro: I don’t think it’s just them necessarily trying to get trained up with other OEMs or supply chain companies in particular, there’s also a pretty big demand amongst independent service providers or potentially even owner operators who would want to staff up with somebody that’s got expertise, particularly in how certain models of blades or whatever were designed and manufactured.
Yeah, so that could afford some of these people an opportunity to go in there and continue scaling up in the services business or the aftermarket parts businesses that are seeing a tremendous amount of growth right now globally.
Allen Hall: Did the blade mold getting broken in Cherbourg
Philip Totaro: a couple of months ago kick off this process?
Hard to say. To be honest, it let’s put it this way, it doesn’t help, but that was probably more of just an industrial accident sort of a thing, but it came at an unfortunate time when they were already facing so much pressure to deliver on Dogger Bank. And that’s the reality of that.
I think it just was unfortunate timing.
Joel Saxum: It’s a lot of weight, right? You get enough things stacked, and stacked, that was the first one on the bottom of the pile, and then you lose a couple of blades offshore, and the global market situation, some other things, once they compound the sum of the parts It’s a lot heavier than the parts themselves.
Allen Hall: When we come back from the break, I want to talk about our experience at the Sandia Blades Workshop this past week. And all the things that Joel and I learned and saw, and hopefully we’ll see you again in two years, because it was a really good conference.
Lightning is an act of God, but lightning damage is not.
Actually, it’s very predictable and very preventable. StrikeTape is a lightning protection system upgrade for wind turbines made by WeatherGuard. It dramatically improves the effectiveness of the factory LPS. So you can stop worrying about lightning damage. Visit weatherguardwind. com to learn more, read a case study and schedule a call today.
Allen Hall: All right, Joel. So we just spent the week at the Sandia blade workshop in Albuquerque, New Mexico. And we met with a lot of colleagues. It was like the creme de la creme of blade and wind engineers in one place, particularly in the United States. Many good presentations. Some more on the technical side, but others on the operational side and the operational Part is the one I think you and I were drawn into the most.
Joel Saxum: Yeah. You bring together Sandia brings together a lot of academics. It brings together our national labs here in the United States. But what they’re doing at these labs is they’re working on all kinds of crazy projects. Some of these labs are ones that have, they’ve worked on DOD things for the military.
Or they’ve worked on nuclear energy for other purposes. They’re working on looking at things in the grid and what is next? And so you bring those people together. And the people that want to hear from what’s happening at these labs are some of the best, like Allen said, some of the best engineers in blades or anything to do with wind turbines from the bigger, biggest and small operators all over the United States.
When you put those people together, you start getting into DTU and TU Delft and all kinds of other Universities that are doing project as well. So you end up, that the thing is put on by Sandia National Lab So you hear about a lot about what they’re doing and some of the other national labs and some of those Presentations get really in depth On the projects that they’re working on.
And because some people, people want to come in here. What’s the next thing. But then you also, since you have those great engineers sitting there in the crowd of course they take advantage of them being there. And then those awesome engineers are sitting on panels and they’re talking about the things that they’re doing to help other people out in the crowd.
So you have, the likes of next era and RWE these big players sitting up on stage. Telling everybody, basically, these are the problems we’ve encountered, this is the solutions that we had from them, and that’s, that tribal knowledge gets spread out amongst the crowd, so it’s like a, we always like to say, floating or rising waters floats all ships.
It’s a great conference, and there’s a lot of good information that goes on there.
Allen Hall: The one repeating focus, I thought, was the need to be very prescriptive on operations. Whether that be in the factory or out in the field there was a lot of emphasis on almost a checklist mentality of how to approach any sort of construction, any repair effort, any supply chain issue, any real large manufacturing is to eliminate it.
Problems by and variability because it’s the number of people coming in and out of any job site, whether it be in the factory out in the field, which should delineate what has to happen up front and to be very precise and controlled over it. And Matt Segala gave a really good presentation from EDF.
About how to do this on repairs and wow, there’s a lot of emphasis on the work ahead of the work, all the preparation and knowing to plan ahead for, Hey, we may need another lightning receptor. So we should have those on stock when the truck, as we get out to the site, we’re probably going to need them.
That’s a learned experience, but if you haven’t done it, like Matt has. You wouldn’t know, and then you get to site and not have all the tools and the equipment you need. And that was a really great insight, I thought.
Joel Saxum: Yeah, Matt’s presentation, in my opinion, was the best one of the whole week. And he brought that, I’m gonna give a presentation, and I’m gonna tell you exactly what you need, or what you can do, to get the same kind of results that we have.
And part of that is, is, I said tribal knowledge a little bit ago. Part of that is, is taking tribal knowledge and turning it into process and into knowledge that can be passed down, right? Because if it just exists in Allen’s head, or Phil’s head, or Rosie’s head, or my head, and I go do a thing, then I’m the only one that has that information, and I’m the only one who can replicate it.
It doesn’t make sense for a large organization, especially when we see in the wind industry, we see so many people moving from place to place. We talk about it with technicians, but it happens with engineers a lot as well. Oh, this person was at this. Now they’re over here or they were at the OEM and now they work for this operator or whatever that may be.
They’re Matt and that team at EDF with Ken Lee and Trevor Angle and all these other guys over there are taking what they know, what they’ve learned from experience, and they’re writing it down. They’re putting roadmaps down, processes down. Being able to make sure that everybody can follow along and get the same results time after time and what he showed us With some statistics and some metrics at the end of that presentation shows that EDF’s fleet is benefiting greatly from what they’re doing in that process driven basically program.
Philip Totaro: So Joel, what you’re saying is a company that digitizes its tribal knowledge, whether it’s from a consulting business or an owner operator is probably ahead of the curve. Absolutely. You can quote that.
Allen Hall: Rhodes had done that too. Yannis Petroms had discussed what they do with the rooms because they deal with a lot of technology and new people coming in and out.
And the robots are really intricate. There’s a lot going on there. Video pressure sensors, they’re pushing out fluids, curing things. And yeah, they’re using a little on the phone checklist to make sure everything gets done properly. The one he mentioned in particular was making sure that the closeout was put back on, on the blade, make sure the doors were all closed and fastened before they left.
They had to physically take a photo and record it before they left the blade. And. Things like that don’t seem obvious until you have something go wrong, and then they become really obvious and then you implement them. Joel it’s a learned experience. So you gotta climb back up that
Joel Saxum: tower? And to put the blade closer on?
Yeah, that sucks. No, I think it’s I think it’s something that the industry can definitely benefit from, and at this conference, it was a technical conference, we didn’t talk about some of the issues that we normally talk about when you get industry professionals together What is the technician pool look like in the shortage of blade repair knowledge?
We didn’t really touch on those things, but this what we’re talking about here is digitizing and making processes and these kind of things that can actually help scale the industry because you’re removing some of those learning barriers by providing tools. For people to execute in their daily jobs.
Allen Hall: Yeah, it’s a good conference. And the next
Joel Saxum: conference is in two years Joel? Yeah, they do Sandia every two years. It’s in the same town. It’s in Albuquerque. The Sandia lab is right there. So that makes sense for less spending for the Sandia people to be there. But Albuquerque, man, we were there.
The weather was fantastic the whole time. We had a great time with a bunch of our industry colleagues. ISPs, operators, there’s some blade repair companies there. There was of course, some of the operators we regularly get with some drone companies and catching up with colleagues is always great, but what happens in the conference and the technical situations is fantastic.
The things that you can learn sitting around a table, having dinner with friends from different operators as well. We sat with. BP and Orsted and Nextera and Elite Clean Energy all around in one group and the things that you can learn from each other, just being able to share, to break bread with each other is fantastic as well.
Allen Hall: That’s going to do it for this week’s Uptime Wind Energy podcast. Thanks for listening and please give us a five star rating on your podcast platform and subscribe in the show notes below to Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter. And check out Rosie’s YouTube channel, Engineering with Rosie. And we’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.
https://weatherguardwind.com/ge-vernova-restructures-offshore-wind/
Renewable Energy
ECO TLP Brings Concrete Foundations to Floating Wind
ECO TLP Brings Concrete Foundations to Floating Wind
Nicole Johnson Murphy, CEO of ECO TLP, and Gordon Jackson join to discuss concrete floating wind foundations, production-line construction, and markets from Hawaii to Japan.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Welcome to Uptime Spotlight, shining Light on Wind. Energy’s brightest innovators. This is the progress powering tomorrow.
Allen Hall: Offshore wind obviously is a big deal right now. There’s a lot of, uh, countries looking at it and investigating it, doing it, uh, but not really at scale yet. And this is where ECO TLP comes in and. Nicole, let’s just start there with a background. What problem were you trying to solve when you started Eco TLP?
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: Yeah, so, so we were designing for, uh, a site off of Hawaii in 2011, uh, for the Hico RFP. And so we were designing for 300 meter water depth from the beginning. Um, so we were always trying to find a way to work with the ports, with the vessel, with the infrastructure that was existing off Hawaii. And with, and that worked with Jones Act vessels.
So we were always trying to meet that [00:01:00] requirement with, you know, and meet the cost, try to, we saw there were much tighter margins in offshore wind than in oil and gas, for example, at that water depth. So we’re trying to find something that was cost effective.
Allen Hall: Next question, obviously is what makes those deep water foundations so difficult?
Gordon Jackson: Well, it’s the water depth, uh, primarily, um, you know, uh, you need to put foundations down in, uh, extremely deep water. Um, and they’re gonna be pretty flexible. Um, so you’re trying to control the, the amount of motion that you get at the surface through your, uh, uh, you know, your deep water, uh, facility. So, um, it’s really.
Really that challenge, you know, and, uh, you know, the weight of components through the water depth, like, um, you know, likes of chain would be completely impossible. Um, in 300 meters of water. Uh, you need to use something that’s a little bit lighter. Yeah, to mow you to the, uh, to the seabed
Allen Hall: [00:02:00] because it does seem a little odd just not to make the foundations taller, basically.
More steel drive it down in, we know that process, we understand that process. It works offshore, uh, near shore in a, in a lot of locations. But once you get to what depth as it becomes financially or engineering wise, impossible
Gordon Jackson: for offshore wind, fixed, fixed structures in, I mean, maybe a hundred meters of water are gonna be.
Economic. Um, but you know, they’ll be costly compared to what’s been done now because, uh, you know, of all the extra structure you need for the, uh, for the deeper water. But, uh, I think you’ll see, you know, a crossover between fixed and floating, you know, around the, um, you know, 70 to a hundred meter water mark.
You know, that’s sort the range.
Allen Hall: Well, and that leads to the next question, which is. It’s all financial, right? At some point, the numbers [00:03:00] don’t work. If the cost of foundations don’t come down, especially in fixed bottom offshore or floating offshore, we lose a lot of offshore wind resource. Uh, Nicole can, can you gimme a scale at what we’re missing if we don’t get to a more economical solution for floating offshore?
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: So we’ve estimated for our market for, um, a very deep water market. So we, we now actually have a, a solution that goes across all water depths. So we’re starting with, um, you know, this, this gravity based structure now with, and, and Gordon’s team has been really involved in that, uh, development. And then now we can take that same slip form, concrete cylinder.
Format and take it across all the water depths. So, so we basically can hit every water depth now for a very low cost. It’s a very simple, just, you know, local, regionally designed and built, uh, system. We, we crowdsource the labor and the inputs. Um, and so we [00:04:00] try to, and we also try to give the procurement team of our clients their, you know, an ability to do their job and, and be able to bid out aspects of our design, um, across.
Different vendors. So you always wanna give, in construction, you always wanna give, uh, the procurement team a job to do so they can actually get that price, keep that price down on the installation.
Allen Hall: Yeah, that’s a unique look that eco TOP is putting to this problem. Which is moving away from steel, which is expensive obviously, and it’s sort of difficult to transport at times to a more localized solution, which is concrete.
And thinking about the problem a little bit differently, does that open up a number of doors then in terms of the countries that can get involved in, in floating or near shore, uh, wind projects, but just because you’re driving the cost down?
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: Absolutely. And I’ll let Gordon speak to the ax. He’s worked. His whole career in offshore concrete.
But I think it’s, I think it’s a, it’s a great, it’s the only way we would do it. We actually have shipyards in our companies, our partners own [00:05:00]shipyards, and we, we just would never probably ex try to try to create this many units across the world and scale and steel. We’d only do concrete.
Gordon Jackson: Yeah. My first concrete project sort of broke the mold of how you do, uh, construction of concrete offshore structures.
Uh, it was entirely built within a dry dock and, uh. After we’d gone on and delivered that project, um, that was in the late eighties. I spent the next 10 years, uh, working on projects all around the world, looking at doing the same sort of thing in different countries. Um, because you, you only needed, you know, 10, 12 meters of water, um, at the shore and you could, um, build a structure and um, you know, get it out there in the water.
Um. It really opened up the market for, for offshore concrete structures that, uh, that, uh, first project that we did.
Allen Hall: So using that first project as leverage and knowledge of how to do these things, how much advantage [00:06:00] does concrete give you over steel?
Gordon Jackson: It, it’s difficult to say because it bends country to country.
Um, and, um, you know, quite often you’re competing against, um, you know, steel built in some, uh, very low cost fabrication countries. Um, so if you’re in a high cost, you know, high labor cost country, like, you know, I worked in Australia, um, and um, you know, the labor cost there was extremely high. So concrete wasn’t particularly cheap, but the overall solutions that we came up with, um, were cheap.
You know?
Allen Hall: So does that involve basically like slip forms or how are you, how are you thinking about that problem? Because it’s a huge engineering task and you only learn. By doing it on some level because all great plans, uh, always run into trouble as soon as you try to implement them. So you took all that previous knowledge and then applied it to this problem, and now you have, uh, uh, basically [00:07:00] trimmed or, or slimmed, uh, the design down into, you have a, a very economical model, even in more uneconomical economies because of labor laws and cost of labor and access and those kind of things.
What does that look like now? And what’s your thought process on, Hey, this is what it’s gonna look like? Can we get, uh, keyside, how do we do this and how do we keep this thing simple?
Gordon Jackson: Uh, well the key thing is we’re looking at, uh, a production line approach, which has been, you know, it’s tried and tested for, um, for marine, for marine concrete construction, you know, construction of key walls and um, and you know, the like, um, we’re using exactly that same system.
We’ve just been tried and tested to create a production line of, um, eco TLP units or eco GBS units where we’re building, you know, onshore and where we’re going from station to station, doing a task at each station. [00:08:00] So it’s exactly like a production line, um, you know, that you’re be familiar with and, you know, you load out the completed structure onto a, a barge, um, and then you.
Submerge that barge and your structure floats off and that’s, that’s the real key to getting the, uh, the economy from the, the concrete basis.
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: Yeah, and I’ll say that the opex is really something we focus a lot on because it’s, it’s not just what you’re doing on the CapEx and the development and the port, it’s actually that 30 year lifetime maintenance.
And this is a, when you, we fully submerge our floater, which is basically inert in the ocean. It’s, it’s very eco-friendly with the ocean. There’s no paint, there’s no, you know, maintenance on the floater over the lifespan. You’re, you’re monitoring those, the moorings and the, the weight of any marine, you know, buildup on those moorings and things like that.
But generally it’s a very low maintenance solution and it’s very heavy and kind of like a comfortable car [00:09:00] ride for the turbine. It, it really has slow motions. It, it’s, um, almost like a, you know, a high skyscraper in the water. You know, you’re just the top of that skyscraper is moving a little bit. But you’re, um, you’re really giving it that comfortable, slow ride over its lifetime.
It’s not hitting a lot of turbulence, like a, a different type of odor.
Allen Hall: Yeah. It is a different concept, really, right? That you have this mass at the bottom and you have this mass at the top, which is the, the cell on the wind turbine. And if you can design it just right, everything dampens becomes stable.
Even in turbulent water. How long did it take you to figure out that aspect of the design? Because it does seem like a lot of projects hit a, an end point right there because the motion of the turbine is not good for the lifetime of the turbine.
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: We, we look at it as a, a kind of hybrid spar, CLP, so, so the original design came from my late father who was, who had designed echo fis for children’s [00:10:00] petroleum in the early.
Uh, late sixties, I guess. And, um, so he’d come from oil and gas and he’d come from that concrete, uh, construction background. And, and he is very comfortable with it. And I think, um, Gordon, that’s part of why I like working with Gordon. ’cause Gordon has that same, uh, sort of long-term view on, on these construction principles.
Um,
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: and I think that, that what we saw though is the margins are so different from oil and gas, and so you have to have almost a poor man’s TLP is what we would call it because it’s. It’s gotta be a very simple version of A TLP that can roll out in mass quantities. And, and as you know, coming up with a company that, you know, business plan, you’d wanna be able to, to really scale the business.
And so we had to come up with something that you can make. In different parts of the world at the same time, you’re not tied to one shipyard or one construction.
Allen Hall: Well, even in terms of ship usage, you’re going to reduce the size of the ship considerably. You’re not using big dedicated ships that are really [00:11:00] expensive to operate or to keep in the area, even just to have them there as a lot of money.
You’re thinking about, uh, a different design in terms of. Simple ships that you can find locally. How much does that really lower the cost of deployment?
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: Quite a lot actually. I, I mean, it depends on, you know, so the other, there’s this other, other aspect of installing the wind turbine on the foundation. So we have this fixed to fixed platform concept where you come further, a little bit further offshore and, and give you that, that draft depth that we need.
And then we have a fixed platform that just stays in place and, and we bring the turbines to it and, and float them out. It’s all a self floating. Unit, whether it’s the GBS that, um, Gordon’s been working with us and or the eco TLP. So we, so we we’re really independent of those large vessels. Um, for the most part, you know, we’re, we’re really try and then you, once you install the turbine, you can tow the entire unit out with two tugs.
Two to three tugs.
Allen Hall: That’s remarkable. So essentially because you [00:12:00] used, uh, a basic. Uh, Henry Ford type process to, to create these foundations and to think about the problem differently. Not only can you deploy it, uh, easier than a lot of things we’re doing right now on top of it, it works over a variety of depths and I think that’s a the hard thing for people to grasp because when we talk about offshore particularly start getting off the continental shelves here, you’re talking about.
More than a hundred meters typically of water. But you also have a, the gravity based system and the TLP system are all sort of interconnected into the basic philosophy. Can you, can you explain like the, the, the backbone of how that engineering works?
Gordon Jackson: Uh, well it’s essentially, it’s, um, we’re using the same structural form in both, both fixed and floating.
It’s, it’s basically, it’s two cylinders, uh, you know, one inside the other. A little bit of structure, which joins the two cylinders together. Um, that’s it.
Allen Hall: Gord, you make it sound so simple, but the, the [00:13:00]engineering is complicated to get to that point. And once you get to that level of, oh, that design actually works in a variety of depths, that opens up your customer base quite a bit.
Have you had inquiries from sort of nearshore people? Or fixed bottom people thinking like, whoa, I could actually save myself a bunch of time and money, which is the, the real limiting factor on offshore wind at the moment. Are you starting to see some momentum there that, uh, operators, developers are starting to rethink this problem and not just do what they did last week?
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: Absolutely. I mean, one of the ways we came about the g you know, taking the Ecot P and transforming it to the eco GBS was, was recommended by a client, was, you know, that was their, their ask actions. That’s, that’s always the best way to start. A product development cycle because, you know, somebody’s interested.
Um, and I think, you know, and part of the reason I found Gordon to work with early on in our, um, the life of our company is, is his background in, in GBS development. He did, he developed the gravitas, uh, GBS [00:14:00] 10 years ago. So I think we, we got lucky that our, uh, civil structural engineering partner with AUP was, was already really comfortable with, you know, looking at this.
Allen Hall: Um,
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: so I think that’s, that’s part of, you know, you always want the clients to be interested, you know, before you start investing. You know, you don’t wanna design a product that’s in your head or your, you know, in your, in your company lunchroom without a real ask for it.
Allen Hall: Right? And I, I think also you have a, once you have the engineering pretty well done and.
Obviously do now you’re trying to touch a number of countries and every culture has its own way of, of one of the construction business to do it slightly differently. South Korea does it different than Scotland, for example. You are working across cultures and trying to make the the same design. Uh, apply to all those different areas.
Are, have you learned [00:15:00] some things from that? Is it, are you able to basically set the same assembly line in every place? Or, or are there different, different kinds of concrete, different kinds of access, different kinds of ports that you have to deal with? What are those variables there that, that change the way you do business?
Gordon Jackson: All the characteristics, ports are, uh, you know, obviously different. Um, but you know, really you just need space. Um. And access to reasonably deep water. Um, you know, from, from that, uh, from that space. And, uh, you know, it can get surprisingly difficult to find that, um, certainly in the UK and, uh, you know, in Northern Europe, people wanna build marines and, uh, waterfront living, uh, rather than having, uh, you know, an industrial facility, uh, you know, on the doorsteps.
So, you know, in, you know, developed countries. Um. It can be hard to find that space. But, um, you know, in some, some parts of the world, you know, there’s lots of [00:16:00] space, um, available. Um, some good port facilities that can be, can be utilized. Uh, and then it’s just in, in all civil engineering works, you know, um, you go to do the job, you go wherever the job is, you mobilize there.
Um. You know, you put in the systems, uh, and equipment that you need to build, build a structure, and then normally you go away at the end of the job, you know, you hand it over to the client. Um, you know what, what, um, what would be good here is if we could set up some regional centers where you’ve done the, done the investment in the yard, um, and then you can, uh, you can amortize those costs of development over a number of projects.
Then you should start to see, uh, you know, real, real good cost savings.
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: Just one thing, you know, our footprint of our, of our cylinders is about a third of the footprint of a semi sub, for example. So, [00:17:00] so our footprint on the land port is very small.
Allen Hall: Well, I think that makes sense because if you watch the fixed bottom projects, particularly in the United States.
The first thing they had to do is rebuild the ports. The ports weren’t set for the scale and so they needed to expand the ports. That means you have to acquire land, you’ve gotta develop it. There’s a lot of processes involved. ’cause you’re talking about city, state, and federal government being involved.
Obviously federal in the United States is a problem. Uh, so just getting the port developed was a huge process for. Fixed bottom. You’re thinking about that differently though, because the, the reduced amount of space, the, uh, you don’t have to be in a huge industrial area, but all obviously it would be nice, but you do run against that problem.
Are you thinking, uh, when you talk about regional centers, are you thinking kind of Mediterranean, west Coast, us, Australia, one in Japan? How do you think about that problem? Because. [00:18:00] Once you get a a site established, it does seem like because of the, how fast you can move these things around that it’ll become a pretty good job center for a lot of people.
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: Yeah. There’s a long-term maintenance, you know, crew that needs to be developed while we build these. Um, yeah, I think, I think, you know, it’s been a moving target of what’s really gonna develop in offshore wind. It’s like Lucy and Charlie Brown with football. I think we, we constantly try to, you know, get lined up to, to kick football and then it falls.
It’s more of the developers I, I feel for on that ’cause they’re these investing tremendous amount of money for these, these development sites. Um, so, you know, we are open to any, you know, we’ve been, we’ve looked at, um, some developers are looking at steel production and concrete production, you know, two different reports servicing.
An array and we’re really flexible. It doesn’t, doesn’t matter. When we first started on that Hawaii project, we were gonna do floating pla, you know, floating, um, [00:19:00] barges to slipform. And, and we talked about that with Arab. Some still this floating dock idea and, and submerging that dock. And it’s just a matter of finding the right, uh, a large enough, um, dock for that type of, so then you’re not even using the land base port.
You’re learn, you’re using kind of just to. Maybe a 400 foot frontage on the, on the, along the port.
Allen Hall: Well, that’s amazingly small, right? Because if you look at some of these ports right now that are doing, uh, fixed bottom offshore, they’re massive, they’re huge sites. You’re talking about something roughly a 10th of the scale to get the same end result, which is turbines in the water
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: for our part of it.
I mean, we still, you still have the components and, and those are, that’s a, it’s another logistical challenge, and so I understand why the ports are. Looking at a lot more lay down space and things, but you know, maybe at a certain point these components are so large that they just stay on a vessel and they, and we, we take them off of a vessel directly and load them in.
Allen Hall: Yeah, I think that’s one of the, the considerations [00:20:00] is do you really tie it to land in, in terms of needing a, a massive amount of space, acres of space, thousands of square meters of space. Do you need that or is this, or can you do it much more efficiently because that overhead adds up over time. Not only are you trying to save on, on the ships and the, especially the dedicated ships, you’re also looking at smaller footprints on shore and doing it a lot more economically.
What does that future look like now, because it does seem like we’re at a precipice where floating wind is no longer just being discussed. In theory, it’s, it’s going to be implemented. What are those next steps here for Eco TLP?
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: So next week we’re headed to Tokyo, to Japan for the wind. Expo and, um, Eric is also presenting at the Asia Wind Offshore Show.
Um, I think we’re, you know, we’re, we’re good to learn. I mean, there’s just so much to learn about each culture, and I think this is something that, you know, Gordon and I’ve talked about in terms of these international [00:21:00] projects, you’ve, you’ve gotta understand your culture that you’re moving into and you’ve gotta understand how to mediate across those different companies that come in.
Our company has seven different. Countries represented in our team. So right now, so, so we’re, we’re a US company, but we’re barely, you know, we’re just kind of by name, but I think most of our team members are, are not in the us and, and that’s international collaboration is something, um, I, I really, I really loved working on it.
And I think, so when we go to Japan next week, it’s really mainly just to learn. You know, we don’t. We have a lot to learn about Japan, and, and that’s what’s fun about each of these, these regions.
Gordon Jackson: And that’s where we can help because, uh, you know, we’ve got a presence in Japan. We’ve been doing offshore wind in Japan, so we’re there, we’re there to help eight to eco TLP with our, those little contacts and uh, you know, h do business, uh, uh, in Japan and things like that.
So, you know, [00:22:00] we have a big international network, so you know, it can help. Some, uh, in some areas, you know, open some doors and, uh, forge some, uh, some friendships between, uh, count companies.
Allen Hall: Courtney did a big project out in Perth, Australia, which is a difficult place, right. Australia is a very difficult place to manufacture things.
What are some of the lessons learned and and what was that process like?
Gordon Jackson: So he had a, a client, uh, a very small client who was prepared to. Seed responsibility for delivering his project to a, to a team, an alliance team. Uh, and he just, um, interviewed a number of teams and, uh, we were lucky enough to be selected, uh, as the team to deliver their project.
There was no tendering, uh, it was just done on, you know, how the, how the client felt about the, the individuals that he met. Um, and that, that was [00:23:00] very new to me. Um, and, um, the whole project was delivered, uh, by companies from the uk, from from Australia, from Singapore, uh, from be Netherlands, you know, the Marine, uh, the marine, uh, vessels.
You know, a lot of ’em are coming from, uh, from, uh, Northern Europe, uh, even though you’re in Australia. Um, and, um, you know, every company wants to do things differently and they all want to look after their interests, but the big thing about this alliance project was that, uh, you were, you were focused on one particular project and we were, um, we were coached and, and facilitated, and trained to, um, to throw away our, you know, our company affiliations and work together.
And, uh, you know, to collaborate together. And, um, [00:24:00] you know, we’re all working towards the, the end goal of delivering a particular product. And I think that’s, I think it’s got a lot of, um, lot of potential to be used in the offshore wind sector. This, this was, uh, you know, uh, an oil platform that we were gonna build on the, uh, the northwest shelf of Australia, um, which happened to be built in concrete, um, because the client.
The client came to us with a, with a, a notion of, of doing something in concrete, um, which we, we took his idea, uh, decided we could do something a little bit cheaper and more straightforward and, um, you know, went on to deliver it. We were given the opportunity to deliver it. And, uh, yeah, I, it was my best project.
Uh, it was a tremendous experience for all the companies involved. And you know, everyone made money so everyone’s happy.
Allen Hall: That is difficult, right? You, you do see on these offshore projects, people coming from around the world to [00:25:00] work on this one big effort, a lot of money, and at times, thousands of people involved.
You see companies stu stumble there, uh, obviously because you’re trying to tie cultures, you’re trying to tie companies together, but at the end of the day, you have to get this project done. Are, are there some top level lessons learned from that of, of how to bridge those differences?
Gordon Jackson: Well, I did another project, uh, this was a, a steel project, um, where we had a, a US oil company.
Uh, and, um. The successful contractor was Hyundai in Korea. And they said to, said to me over the course of the project,
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: uh,
Gordon Jackson: we always lose money with, um, with American oil companies. You know, why, why are we doing business with them? Uh, and it, and it all came down to the, you know, the, the approach to the [00:26:00]contract.
You know, um, Hyundai used to. Working in a more collaborative way with our clients, whereas, you know, this project, you know, this is what the contract says, this is what you’ve taken on to do, you know, there’s no negotiation, you know, you’ll do it and that’s how much money you’re getting. And, uh, you know, um, but they find that very difficult.
And, uh, it was at the time when they were sort of opening up their business more internationally. Um, and I think it was a big learning experience for them. Um. So, yeah. Um, I think a lot of the offshore wind tried to follow the same path and, um, yeah, I think more collaborative working is to be encouraged for me.
Um, you know, more talking to each other and negotiating rather than, uh, you know, imposs.
Allen Hall: Where should developers go to find out more about Eco TLP? [00:27:00] Because you have a gravity based system. You got attention lake platform, there’s a, there’s a lot inside of the company. What’s the first stop? Should they visit your website?
Should they connect with you on LinkedIn? Where do they go?
Nicole Johnson-Murphy: The LinkedIn where website is great.
Allen Hall: So go visit Eco TLP. It’s E-C-O-T-L-P. Com, Nicole and Gordon, this has been a great discussion. I’ve learned a lot. It’s very exciting because I think you’re on the precipice of something great. So thank you for joining me today.
Gordon Jackson: Thank you. Thank you.
Renewable Energy
Trump’s War in Iran
The meme here depicts where the United States has gone recently. Our president starts an illegal and unnecessary war.
Can he stop it? Neither quickly nor easily.
Does he deserve the Nobel Peace Prize? Absolutely.
Renewable Energy
Trump Faces Opposition from Our Top Entertainers
In case it’s not already clear, Trump supporters buy virtually zero of Neil Young’s music, if only because it’s aggressively anti-racist, e.g. “Southern Man,” and “Alabama.”
Imagine you’re a white person living in the Deep South, and you come across these lyrics: “Alabama, you have the rest of the union to help you along. What’s going wrong?”
How large is your appetite for this man’s music?
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
