With this blog post, we would like to introduce and launch our new cooperation with FYORD! FYORD is a joint network by CAU and GEOMAR initiated to connect and support Early Career Researchers of the marine sciences from Master’s to PostDoc level. After occasional exchanges in the past (see our blog here), we are very happy to establish a closer, long-term cooperation with FYORD.
One example of the support provided by FYORD is the Travel Grant. Any FYORD member can apply for funding to travel to conferences, workshops, and summer schools, or visit project partners or institutes. After returning from a funded trip, the FYORD members provide a short report about the event they participated in, to inspire and motivate others and share their experiences. As part of the newly established cooperation, OceanVoices will publish these reports on behalf of FYORD. Below you can find the first two reports, where Helene, Sayoni, and Xiaoqi share their experiences at the largest European geoscientific conference. Enjoy!
My experience of participating in the EGU assembly for the first time
I am Xiaoqi Xu, an exchange PhD student in GEOMAR, from the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. My major is meteorology, and my research is about the atmosphere-ocean-sea ice interaction over the Southern Ocean as well as the development of an ocean-sea ice coupled model.
Since starting my PhD studies, I have believed that academic communication is a crucial part of scientific research. With the scholarship supported by the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, I had an opportunity to go to GEOMAR for a one-year exchange program. Under the guidance of Torge Martin, a scientist in the Ocean Dynamics group in GEOMAR, I am studying the mechanism of the atmospheric response to freshwater input around Antarctica based on FOCI (the fully coupled climate model developed by GEOMAR).
I am delighted to have received funding from FYORD and was pleasantly surprised that guest students like me are eligible for the same benefits. I applied for funding to participate in the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU). EGU General Assembly is a fantastic event in the geoscience community, held annually in Vienna. This year, the conference featured 18,896 presentations, with early-career scientists accounting for 57%, making it an excellent platform for young researchers. Six months before the conference, I decided to organize my research with Torge and present it at this international event to promote our work. Since we didn’t have project funding related to this topic at the time, I learned about FYORD and applied for funding with the help and advice of colleagues, receiving a positive response quickly, which was a pleasant surprise.
-

Xiaoqi Xu giving her talk -

A crowded meeting room -

The exhibition hall
A month before the conference, I spent a lot of time and effort perfecting my presentation. The EGU venue is vast, with a lot of sessions and a tight schedule, so to attend the talks of interest, it’s essential to plan and bookmark them in advance. I gave an 8-minute oral presentation (plus 2 minutes for discussion), requiring careful management of my content due to the time constraints. Oral presentations provide an opportunity to systematically convey my research and enhance my presentation skills. For researchers, it’s crucial not only to conduct research but also to articulate it logically.
In addition to oral presentations, the poster sessions were a pleasant surprise for me because they allowed for more extended discussions (1-2 hours) with other scientists in similar fields. If given the chance, I would consider presenting a poster in the future.
During the conference, my days were filled with attending talks and visiting the poster sessions, where I could chat over coffee. This intense exchange of ideas, both giving and receiving, is a highlight. Although we cannot remember every detail of each talk, the main goal of such conferences is to know about what scientists worldwide are working on and what improvements are needed. Additionally, it’s a large social platform where you can meet your old friends, make new ones, and learn about various institutions, which can help in future career decisions.
The overall experience of the conference was very positive, and the venue was modern and well-organized. I highly recommend attending EGU. Of course, one small gripe is that lunchtime can be extremely crowded, with lines for food stalls exceeding 40 minutes, so bringing your own lunch might be a good idea to avoid missing out on sessions.
Xiaoqi Xu
Sayoni’s experience at EGU 2024
Hello, I am Sayoni Bhattacharya and I am currently working as a Ph.D. student in GEOMAR, Kiel. My topic of research is to develop an autonomous sensor for measuring Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) in seawater.
I applied for a travel grant from FYORD to attend the EGU 2024 conference. The conference was held in Vienna, Austria from 14-19th April 2024. EGU is considered one of the biggest conferences in Europe in the field of Earth Science. According to this year’s survey, almost 20,000 people attended from all over the world. EGU is a successful concoction of ocean, land, and space science, where curious scientists can develop a network with peers from similar expertise, or they can expose themselves to other genres of science to get a new flavour. There were parallel sessions of talks and posters for consecutive days. With the help of the EGU24 app, a curious person can navigate through all the sessions and choose to attend specific sessions. Moreover, several companies, and publishing houses e.g., Pyroscience, ThermoScientific, and Elsevier showcased their products in company booths. I was particularly interested in sensors which were commercially available to measure gases or liquids using different working principles.
-

Sayoni at EGU 2024 -

Discussion research during the poster session
In EGU 2024, I applied for a short talk but in the end, my abstract was selected for a poster presentation and I presented my Ph.D.-related work. I communicated with many scientists, from early career scientists like myself to well-known professors. In each interaction, I felt that I explored a new way of thinking about my own work and I can translate that idea to my next discussion. I felt that the poster sessions were more active and dynamic than talks.
My overall feeling about EGU 2024 is bittersweet. I like the idea of connecting scientists of different backgrounds from any corner of the world and making it a successful event without any visible problems. On the other hand, it felt robotic, as from getting the ID badge to hovering around a session is all done without any human interaction. Finally, from my very personal feeling, I would like to say that the cost to attend EGU is very expensive and no food was served (except for drinks at a few specific times).
Sayoni Bhattacharya
A short report on visiting Europe’s largest geoscience conference
My name is Helene-Sophie Hilbert and I am a doctoral researcher at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel. My research belongs to the field of marine geophysics, a discipline which studies the physical processes and the physical properties of the Earth within the marine environment. My main work focuses on the back-arc basin and active volcanic island arc in the Mariana Subduction zone in the north-western Pacific. I am fascinated by these geologic settings because they are regarded as highly dynamic regions encompassing oceanic and continental domains. While island arcs are considered prime locations for the growth of continental crust, back-arc basins play a major role in the opening and closure of ocean gateways. To gain information about the structures in the crust and upper mantle in the Marianas, I use ocean bottom seismometers that record seismic signals on the seafloor and analyse these signals by generating a seismic tomography (a bit more abstract version of computer tomography, you may know from your doctor).
-

Some FYORD travel grand recipients -

Helene presenting her Poster
From 14-19 April 2024, I now had the opportunity to present my research about the youngest back-arc basin, the Mariana Trough, at the European Geoscience Union (EGU) General Assembly in Vienna. The EGU General Assembly is Europe’s largest and most prominent geoscience event with more than 20,000 participants this year from all over the world. I presented my research results in the form of a scientific poster in a session focusing on the geological processes inside subduction zones during their initiation and later evolution. This presentation format gave me the chance to have in-depth discussions with other experts on the individual aspects of my interpretation. Due to the nearly 19,000 presentations during the EGU General Assembly, it was possible to get a wide overview of the current hot topics in the geoscience community and to meet scientists from all kinds of disciplines and institutes. Although the programme was very tightly scheduled, there was still plenty of time for networking. For me personally, it was quite extraordinary and sometimes overwhelming due to the sheer flood of information. But I would still recommend to every geoscientist to have this experience and benefit from the direct exchange with the community. I am therefore grateful that I was given this opportunity thanks to the support in the form of the FYORD Travel Grant.
Helene
FYORD Travel Grant Reports: Impressions from the largest European geoscientific conference
Ocean Acidification
First Week of Cruise MSM142 – Into the Labrador Sea
After a slight delay of the Maria S. Merian caused by late-arriving containers our research cruise MSM142 finally got underway. By last Tuesday (24.03.2026), the full scientific team had arrived in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland, and the ship reached port on Wednesday (25.03.2026) morning. That same day, scientists and technicians moved on board and immediately began preparations, assembling and testing our instruments. Although the mornings on Wednesday and Thursday were grey and overcast, the afternoons cleared up beautifully. This gave us valuable time to organize equipment on deck and store empty boxes back into the containers before departure.


Given the forecast of harsh conditions outside the fjord, we carried out the mandatory safety drill while still in harbour. This included practicing emergency procedures and boarding the lifeboat. After completing border control, we were finally ready to leave Nuuk. We set sail on March 27th, heading into the Labrador Sea to begin our mission. Even before starting scientific operations, we tested the setup for deploying our gliders without releasing them during the transit out of the fjord. Once we reached open waters, we were met by high waves the following morning. For some on board, this was their first experience under such rough sea conditions. Seasickness quickly became a challenge for a few, while scientific work had to be temporarily postponed due to the strong winds and sea conditions. Together with the crew, we discussed how best to adapt our measurement plans to the given weather conditions. On March 29th, we were finally able to begin our scientific program with the first CTD deployment. A CTD is an instrument used to measure conductivity, temperature, and depth, which are key parameters for understanding ocean structure.


During the following night, we continued with additional CTD stations and successfully recovered two moorings: DSOW 3 and DSOW 4, located south of Greenland. These moorings carry instruments at various depths that measure velocity, temperature, and salinity. DSOW 4 was redeployed on the same day, while DSOW 3 followed the next day. In addition, the bottles attached to the CTD’s rosette can be used to collect water samples from any desired depth. These samples can be used, for example, to determine the oxygen content, nutrient levels, and organic matter.


Both are part of the OSNAP array, a network of moorings spanning the subpolar North Atlantic. On these moorings are a few instruments, for example microcats which measure temperature, pressure and salinity.
We then conducted around 25 CTD stations spaced approximately 3 nautical miles apart across an Irminger ring identified from satellite data. This high-resolution sampling was necessary to capture the structure of an Irminger Ring, which had a radius of about 12 km wide.

The days leading up to April 2nd were marked by very rough weather conditions. Life on board became both challenging and, at times, unintentionally entertaining sliding chairs were not uncommon. During the night from April 1st to April 2nd, winds reached 11 Beaufort with gusts up to 65 knots, forcing us to pause our measurements. Fortunately, conditions improved by morning, allowing us to resume our work. As well as with the help of the crew we had to adapt to the harsh weather conditions to continue our scientific work. On the 3rd of April, we were able to deploy a few gliders and one float. An ocean glider is an autonomous underwater Vehicle, which you can steer remotely and send to different locations, while it is measuring oceanographic key parameters.


This research cruise focuses on understanding small-scale processes in the ocean and their connection to the spring bloom, an essential phase in marine ecosystem in subpolar regions. Despite the challenging start, we have already gathered valuable data and look forward to the weeks ahead in the Labrador Sea.
Ocean Acidification
All About False Killer Whales
Despite their dramatic name, false killer whales aren’t an orca species. These animals are dolphins—members of the same extended family as the iconic “killer whale” (Orcinus orca). Compared to their namesake counterparts, these marine mammals are far less well-known than our ocean’s iconic orcas.
Let’s dive in and take a closer look at false killer whales—one of the ocean’s most social, yet lesser-known dolphin species.
Appearance and anatomy
False killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) are among the largest members of the dolphin family (Delphinidae). Adults can grow up to 20 feet long and weigh between 1,500 and 3,000 pounds, though some individuals have been recorded weighing even more. For comparison, that’s roughly double the size of a bottlenose dolphin—and slightly larger than a typical sedan.
These animals are incredibly powerful swimmers with long, torpedo-shaped bodies that help them move efficiently through the open ocean in search of prey. Their skull structure is what earned them their name, as their head shape closely resembles that of orcas. With broad, rounded heads, muscular jaws and large cone-shaped teeth, early scientists were fascinated by the similarities between these two marine mammal species.
Although their heads may look somewhat like those of orcas, there are several ways to distinguish false killer whales from their larger namesake counterparts.
One of the most noticeable differences has to do with their coloration. While orcas are known for their iconic black-and-white pattern with paler underbellies, alternatively, false killer whales are typically a uniform dark gray to black in color—almost as if a small orca decided to roll around in the dirt. If you’ve ever seen the animated Disney classic 101 Dalmatians, the difference is a bit like when the puppies roll in soot to disguise themselves as labradors instead of showing their usual black-and-white spots.
Their teeth also present a differentiator. The scientific name Pseudorca crassidens translates almost literally to “thick-toothed false orca,” a nod to their sturdy, cone-shaped teeth that help these animals capture prey. Orcas tend to have more robust, bulbous heads, while false killer whales appear slightly narrower and more streamlined.

Behavior and diet
False killer whales are both highly efficient hunters and deeply social animals. It’s not unusual to see them hunting together both in small pods and larger groups as they pursue prey like fish and squid.
Scientists have even observed false killer whales sharing food with each other, a behavior that is very unusual for marine mammals. While some dolphin and whale species work together to pursue prey, they rarely actively share food. The sharing of food among false killer whales spotlights the strong social bonds within their pods. Researchers believe these tight-knit social connections help false killer whales thrive in offshore environments where they’re always on the move.
Maintaining these close bonds and coordinating successful hunts requires constant effective communication, and this is where false killer whales excel. Like other dolphins, they produce a variety of sounds like whistles and clicks to stay connected with their pod and locate prey using echolocation. In the deep offshore waters where they live, sound often becomes more important than sight, since sound travels much farther underwater than light.
Where they live
False killer whales are highly migratory and travel long distances throughout tropical and subtropical waters around the world. They prefer deeper waters far offshore, and this pelagic lifestyle can make them more difficult for scientists to study than many coastal dolphin species.
However, there are a few places where researchers have been able to learn more about them—including the waters surrounding the Hawaiian Islands.
Scientists have identified three distinct groups of false killer whales in and around Hawaii, but one well-studied group stays close to the main Hawaiian Islands year-round. Unfortunately, researchers estimate that only about 140 individuals remained in 2022, with populations expected to decline without action to protect them. This is exactly why this group is listed as endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and is considered one of the most vulnerable marine mammal populations in U.S. waters.
Never Miss An Update
Sign up for Ocean Conservancy text messages today.
Current threats to survival
False killer whales are currently listed as Near Threatened on the IUCN Red List. From climate change-induced ocean acidification and harmful algal blooms to marine debris and fishing bycatch, false killer whales face the same mounting pressures that are impacting marine ecosystems around the world. As their prey becomes scarce due to increasing threats, populations of top predators like these decline, serving as a powerful signal that the ocean’s overall health is in critical need of protection.
Here at Ocean Conservancy, we’re working daily to confront these threats head-on and protect the ecosystems and wildlife we all cherish so dearly. But we can’t do it without you. Support from ocean lovers is what powers our work to protect our ocean, and right now, our planet needs all the help it can get. Visit Ocean Conservancy’s Action Center today and join our movement to create a better future for our ocean, forever and for everyone.
The post All About False Killer Whales appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.
https://oceanconservancy.org/blog/2026/03/31/false-killer-whales/
Ocean Acidification
It’s been a long time since I posted here!
A lot has happened in the meantime: I became an Associate Professor at the University of Southern Denmark, we all lived through the Corona period, then slowly adjusted to the post‑pandemic stability, only to find ourselves again in turbulent political times. I am now affiliated with the Marine Research Center in Kerteminde, a beautiful coastal town on the island of Fyn. My plan is to share small updates on my research and activities every now and then. So let’s start with yesterday’s sampling trip for benthic phytoplankton, carried out by my colleague, Prof. Kazumasa Oguri. The sampling will help prepare for the first‑semester bachelor students who will join his small but fascinating project. This project is all about the benthic diatoms that form dense, photosynthetic communities on tidal‑flat sediments. Their daytime oxygen production enriches the sediment surface and allows oxygen to penetrate deeper, supporting diverse organisms that rely on aerobic respiration. The project will explore how oxygen distribution and oxygen production/consumption in sediments change under different light conditions (day, night, sunrise/sunset). The team will incubate benthic diatom communities in jars and measure oxygen profiles using an oxygen imaging system under controlled light regimes.
Yesterday, we visited several potential sampling sites where students can carry out their fieldwork. I encourage all PIs in our group to define at least one small project related to Kerteminde Fjord, where our laboratories are located. Over time, I hope we can build a more integrated dataset describing the marine and coastal ecosystems of the area.
Another activity currently in preparation is a project on marine invasive species in Kerteminde, which will feed into a course I will run in July and a master’s thesis project. More will come later.
Let’s hope for a more continuous blog from here on, keeping track of our activities, with or without jellyfish!



-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
