Greenland, the world’s largest island, is attracting serious global attention. It lies between the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans which makes it strategically important. In 2019, President Donald Trump made waves by suggesting that the U.S. purchase Greenland. Although his proposal was rejected by both Greenlandic and Danish leaders, it highlighted the growing international interest in the icy island.
However, history seems to be repeating itself, as Trump has once again expressed a strong interest in purchasing Greenland during his second tenure.
The idea of the U.S. buying Greenland stemmed from its advantageous location in the Arctic. As climate change melts ice, new shipping routes are opening, making Greenland an even more valuable asset.
Beyond its geographical importance, the island is rich in untapped resources such as rare earth metals, oil, gas, and minerals—critical for industries like technology and defense. With its vast mineral wealth, military significance, and new opportunities brought by climate change, Greenland is rapidly becoming an exciting and attractive place for investment, particularly in the mining sector.
Additionally, securing access to Greenland’s resources could reduce U.S. reliance on imports from countries like China.
Though Trump’s plan didn’t move forward, it highlighted Greenland’s growing geopolitical importance and opened doors for investments, especially in its mining industry. In this article, we’ll highlight three companies to watch in Greenland’s booming mining industry as 2025 unfolds.
Amaroq Minerals, founded in 2017, provides sustainable mineral solutions to meet global energy demands. Specializing in gold exploration, the company is actively exploring Greenland’s vast mineral resources. It holds an impressive license portfolio covering 6,072.5 km² in South Greenland.
As of January 2025, Amaroq’s market capitalization stands at around CAD 827 million. This reflects a remarkable growth of over 200% in the past year. The company’s recent accomplishments include discovering high-grade gold at its Eagle’s Nest Exploration Project and starting production at the Nalunaq Mine, one of Greenland’s oldest and richest gold deposits.
Moving on, Amaroq aims to minimize its environmental impact. The company focuses on responsible resource management and conserving biodiversity. By committing to sustainable mining practices, it plays a significant role in the global energy transition.
Critical Metals Corp is a pioneer in the mining of rare earth elements and critical minerals. The company focuses on recycling industrial by-products, including lithium batteries, to extract valuable metals for the energy transition. This approach supports the European lithium battery supply chain and promotes a circular economy.
One of Critical Metals’ most significant projects is the Tanbreez Rare Earth Mine in Southern Greenland. The mine holds some of the world’s highest-grade rare earth elements, including gallium, a metal used in the electronics and renewable energy industries. Critical Metals has been making strides in advancing sustainable mining processes, including partnerships to improve the recovery of these critical materials.
As of January 2025, Critical Metals has seen a tremendous surge in its market cap, reaching approximately $670.63 million—a staggering increase of over 550% from the previous year. The company’s growth shows investor trust in its ability to provide key metals for Europe’s electrification and energy storage needs.
Greenland Resources Inc. is advancing the Malmbjerg Molybdenum Project in eastern Greenland. This world-class deposit of molybdenum, with copper nearby, is vital for several industries, including steel manufacturing and defense. As of January 2025, its market capitalization is approximately CAD 90.15 million, a 43.92% increase over the past year.
The company has made significant progress in obtaining the necessary environmental and social approvals for its project. The company is also working closely with partners like Rasmussen Global to secure funding from supranational organizations such as NATO’s Innovation Fund.
Molybdenum is critical for military defense and technology, and Greenland Resources’ Malmbjerg Project could supply up to 25% of the EU’s molybdenum needs for decades. Talking about sustainability, the company is using wind and solar power to supply energy to the mine.
While these three companies are the top players, others are also exploring opportunities in Greenland’s mining sector. Brunswick Exploration Inc., for example, is an early-stage venture focused on lithium and other metals critical for renewable energy. The company recently applied for additional licenses in Greenland following promising discoveries of spodumene, a key lithium-bearing mineral.
Another notable company, Bluejay Mining plc, is advancing its Dundas Ilmenite Project in Greenland. It’s a crucial project for titanium, which is used in various industrial applications. Although recent updates have been limited, Bluejay’s continued efforts show Greenland’s vast mining potential.
“Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.”
As said before, Greenlandic and Danish leaders rejected the idea of Greenland becoming a U.S. territory, but the discussion highlighted the island’s rising geopolitical importance amid global power shifts and climate changes.
Despite Trump’s past comments about potentially using force or economic pressure to acquire Greenland, Egede expressed willingness to strengthen cooperation with Washington. He acknowledged why Trump might find the island appealing, given its strategic Arctic location.
Egede further reaffirmed Greenland’s stance at a press conference with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen in Copenhagen, noting,
“Greenland is for the Greenlandic people. We do not want to be Danish, we do not want to be American. We want to be Greenlandic.”
If we see the brighter side, Greenland’s importance is only growing. The island is becoming an even more attractive destination for mining companies looking to secure valuable resources. With companies like Amaroq Minerals, Critical Metals, and Greenland Resources leading the charge, 2025 is set to be a transformative year for Greenland’s mining sector.
The post From Trump’s Pursual to Mining Boom: Top 3 Greenland Stocks to Watch in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Disseminated on behalf of Surge Battery Metals Inc.
The global Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) market is growing at a rapid pace. The expansion is driven by the rise of renewable energy, the increasing need for grid stability, and the growth of electric vehicles (EVs).
BESS allows electricity to be stored when supply exceeds demand and released when demand is higher than supply. This technology is becoming essential for utilities, commercial users, and residential applications.
J.P. Morgan’s recent analysis shows that shipments of stationary energy storage batteries will rise by 50% in 2025 and 43% in 2026. This surge is causing the lithium supply to move into a deficit.
Analysts estimate that BESS will account for about 30% of global lithium demand by 2026, rising to 36% by 2030. Global lithium demand in lithium-carbonate-equivalent (LCE) terms could reach ~2.8 million tonnes by 2030.
Demand is rising not only from energy storage but also from the EV sector. J.P. Morgan has increased its forecast for EV-related lithium demand by 3–5% for the years 2025 to 2030. This change shows that more people are adopting electric vehicles globally.
The rising demand is further amplified by policies encouraging renewable energy adoption. Many countries are setting goals for renewable energy and cleaner grids. This opens up new chances for energy storage.
Utilities are using BESS more widely. They do this to manage peak loads, integrate renewable energy, and offer services like frequency regulation and black-start capability.
Despite growing demand, supply faces significant constraints. Many lithium producers hesitate to restart idle production. They want prices to rise enough for them to profit.
J.P. Morgan highlights that prices of $1,200–1,500 per tonne of spodumene are needed to bring new supply online. Spot prices have already risen from around $800/t to ~ $950/t, highlighting tightness in the market.
Lithium price forecasts have also been upgraded to reflect these market conditions:
Higher price levels boost the economics of lithium projects. This benefits companies with strong ties to the BESS market. Higher prices also create incentives for new players to enter the market and expand existing projects.
The BESS market is evolving rapidly with several structural trends:
J.P. Morgan says that high demand and limited supply are creating a structural deficit in the lithium market. This is pushing prices up and making companies that supply lithium for BESS applications more appealing.
Surge Battery Metals (TSXV: NILI | OTCQX: NILIF) is advancing the highest-grade lithium clay resource currently reported in the United States. With this level of grade and consistency, the Nevada North Lithium Project (NNLP) represents the type of high-quality, domestic lithium supply that battery makers and grid-scale energy storage developers have been looking for – an “American-made” resource that strengthens U.S. supply chains and reduces dependence on imported material.
With the lithium market emerging from a prolonged downturn, high-quality projects with strong fundamentals are beginning to stand out. Surge Battery Metals is well-positioned in this environment as the company has:
These advantages – combined with a high-grade, near-surface deposit located in mining-friendly Nevada – position Surge as one of the few lithium explorers with the potential to advance meaningfully toward production as market conditions improve. Demand for BESS is rising quickly, which boosts its potential advantage.
The BESS market is expected to continue growing sharply over the next decade. According to J.P. Morgan, stationary energy storage will account for 30–36% of lithium demand by 2030. Utility-scale projects will lead this growth. However, commercial and residential installations will also play a big role.
Price trends are likely to remain supportive for suppliers. Spot prices are near $950/t, with long-term forecasts at $1,300/t. Companies that produce and supply lithium efficiently can capture significant value.
Industry analysts also highlight several emerging trends:
These trends should boost the flexibility, efficiency, and sustainability of power networks globally.
Surge Battery Metals is positioned to benefit from these industry dynamics. Its focus on high-quality lithium assets aligns with the rising demand for BESS. Key strategic considerations for the company include:
Surge Battery Metals is currently advancing lithium exploration at its Nevada North Lithium Project with the goal of defining resources that could support future production. Its metallurgical testing has shown promising results. These include lithium carbonate of 99% purity, but the company is still working toward a full feasibility study. If development proceeds as planned, Surge could become a significant future supplier for the BESS market, although current supply remains limited.
Battery Energy Storage Systems are no longer a niche market. The growing use of renewable energy, the rise of electric vehicles, and updates to the grid are increasing the demand for lithium and other battery materials.
Moreover, the outlook for BESS is positive. Demand growth, tech improvements, and policy support all suggest the market will keep expanding. Supply limits and higher prices are opening doors for companies that can deliver lithium effectively.
By 2030, BESS could account for more than one-third of global lithium demand. Surge Battery Metals and similar companies are key to this shift. They help create cleaner, stronger, and more efficient electricity systems.
As the market grows, execution, timing, and partnerships will decide which companies benefit the most. Surge Battery Metals can shine in the energy storage market by focusing on high-quality lithium resources, smart development, and staying aligned with market trends.
DISCLAIMER
New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com (“We” or “Us”) are not securities dealers or brokers, investment advisers, or financial advisers, and you should not rely on the information herein as investment advice. Surge Battery Metals Inc. (“Company”) made a one-time payment of $50,000 to provide marketing services for a term of two months. None of the owners, members, directors, or employees of New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com currently hold, or have any beneficial ownership in, any shares, stocks, or options of the companies mentioned.
This article is informational only and is solely for use by prospective investors in determining whether to seek additional information. It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Examples that we provide of share price increases pertaining to a particular issuer from one referenced date to another represent arbitrarily chosen time periods and are no indication whatsoever of future stock prices for that issuer and are of no predictive value.
Our stock profiles are intended to highlight certain companies for your further investigation; they are not stock recommendations or an offer or sale of the referenced securities. The securities issued by the companies we profile should be considered high-risk; if you do invest despite these warnings, you may lose your entire investment. Please do your own research before investing, including reviewing the companies’ SEDAR+ and SEC filings, press releases, and risk disclosures.
It is our policy that information contained in this profile was provided by the company, extracted from SEDAR+ and SEC filings, company websites, and other publicly available sources. We believe the sources and information are accurate and reliable but we cannot guarantee them.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information generally can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “plan,” and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations of management; however, it is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.
These factors include, without limitation, statements relating to the Company’s exploration and development plans, the potential of its mineral projects, financing activities, regulatory approvals, market conditions, and future objectives. Forward-looking information involves numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, market volatility, the state of financial markets for the Company’s securities, fluctuations in commodity prices, operational challenges, and changes in business plans.
Forward-looking information is based on several key expectations and assumptions, including, without limitation, that the Company will continue with its stated business objectives and will be able to raise additional capital as required. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, or intended.
There can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Additional information about risks and uncertainties is contained in the Company’s management’s discussion and analysis and annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2024, copies of which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
The forward-looking information contained herein is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking information reflects management’s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to the Company. The forward-looking information is made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances except as may be required by applicable law.
The post How BESS and Lithium Demand Are Shaping Energy Storage: Global Shipments to Surge 50% in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
In 2025, China’s automotive maker BYD became the world’s largest seller of electric vehicles (EVs), overtaking U.S. EV pioneer Tesla for the first time. Data from multiple industry trackers shows that BYD sold about 2.26 million battery electric vehicles (BEVs) in 2025.
In contrast, Tesla delivered about 1.64 million EVs in the same year, marking a decline from its 2024 figures. This shift marks a major change in the global EV market.
BYD’s EV sales showed strong momentum throughout 2025. Its pure battery electric vehicle deliveries rose by roughly 28% year on year, reaching more than 2.25 million units worldwide. This steady growth allowed BYD to move ahead of Tesla in total annual BEV sales.
Tesla, by comparison, reported a decline of about 9-10% in overall vehicle deliveries versus the previous year. As a result, 2025 marked the first full calendar year in which BYD sold more battery electric vehicles than Tesla.
The gap became more visible in the second half of the year. Demand for EVs softened in some of Tesla’s key markets, particularly as higher interest rates and reduced incentives affected consumer spending. BYD, however, continued to benefit from strong demand in China and improving sales abroad.
By year’s end, the gap in total EV deliveries between the two companies grew to several hundred thousand units. This marked a clear shift in market leadership.
Quarterly data reinforced this trend. In the fourth quarter of 2025, Tesla delivered around 418,000 vehicles, representing a 15–16% drop from the same period in 2024. This decline reflected slower sales growth and increased competition.
BYD’s fourth-quarter BEV deliveries, in contrast, continued to rise. Its consistent quarterly growth helped push its full-year sales past Tesla’s and confirmed its position as the world’s largest EV seller by volume.
Several factors helped drive BYD’s expansion in global EV sales during 2025. A key driver was strong domestic demand in China, the world’s largest electric vehicle market.
Chinese automakers lead in local EV sales. This is thanks to consumer trust in domestic brands and a strong charging network in big cities. BYD benefited directly from this environment.
From January to November, industry estimates China’s NEV wholesale sales are about 13.78 million units. This shows a 29% increase compared to last year, and BYD captured a dominant 32% domestic share. This home-market strength fueled its global BEV leadership.
The product range also played an important role. BYD offers a wide lineup of EV models, including many lower-priced options that appeal to cost-conscious buyers. These vehicles attracted customers looking for practical electric cars rather than premium models. This broader appeal helped BYD reach a larger customer base than some competitors.
At the same time, BYD’s exports hit 1.05 million units in 2025, up 200% from the previous year. Europe and Latin America are key drivers of this growth. Globally, BYD claimed 12.1% of the BEV market in 2025, ahead of Tesla’s 8.8% and Volkswagen’s 5.2%, cementing the competitive shift.
Competitive pricing and improving vehicle quality helped BYD gain traction in these markets. Policy support also contributed, as incentives and trade policies in several regions made imported EVs more competitive.
Together, these factors allowed BYD to sustain sales growth even as demand softened for some rival brands.
Tesla’s sales declines in 2025 were linked to several challenges, including:
Tesla remains a major EV maker, but it saw its first consecutive annual drop in deliveries. By contrast, BYD increased its volume while expanding into new regions.
The global EV market continues to grow, with total EV sales rising annually as more countries push toward cleaner transport. Analysts see strong demand for electric cars continuing this decade. Climate goals and stricter emissions rules in many areas support this trend.
Industry forecasts say global EV deliveries might keep growing until 2030. This growth is due to lower battery costs and more models from various automakers.
Industry forecasts project global EV sales reaching 40–50% of total car sales by 2030, up from ~20 million units in 2025. Battery pack prices have fallen to $115/kWh in 2024. They could further drop to $80–$99/kWh by 2026 (50% decline), enabling price parity with gas cars.
Nations in Europe and Asia are pushing zero‑emission vehicle targets as part of their climate commitments, which may further expand EV adoption.
Europe targets 90% CO2 cut by 2035 for new cars (easing from 100%, allowing some e-fuels/PHEVs). China aims for ~60–90% EV/NEV sales by 2030.
Still, challenges remain. EV buyer incentives vary by country and can affect sales patterns, as seen in the U.S. when federal credits expired. Some regions face infrastructure gaps, like limited charging networks, which can slow growth. Continued cost reductions and broader infrastructure rollouts will be key to sustaining EV adoption long term.
Electric vehicles are central to efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport by 70–90% over their lifecycle compared to gasoline cars. This holds even with current grids.
Global transport represents 24% of CO2 emissions (8 GtCO2e). EVs could slash this by 40% by 2030 at 40% adoption. Clean grids, renewables >60% by 2030, boost EV advantage to near-total decarbonization.
Also, EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions and can lower overall carbon output when charged with renewable electricity. As more power grids shift toward clean energy sources, the lifetime emissions advantage of EVs grows.
BYD’s sales surge contributes to this global transition. As one of the largest EV producers, its growth means more EVs are on the road worldwide. This supports international efforts to cut emissions from passenger cars, which remain a major source of global greenhouse gases.
However, the environmental impact of EV manufacturing, especially battery production, remains a focus of industry and policy discussions. Sustainable practices in sourcing materials and recycling batteries will be crucial to maximizing the environmental benefits of EV growth.
BYD’s rise to the top reflects broader changes in the global auto sector:
The shift also highlights how consumer preferences are evolving, with buyers showing strong interest in different EV brands and models beyond traditional market leaders. As EV technology matures, more brands are expected to capture market share and expand globally.
The post BYD Overtakes Tesla as World’s Biggest EV Seller in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
The United States is taking a decisive step to rebuild its nuclear fuel supply chain. The Department of Energy has announced a $2.7 billion investment over the next decade to expand domestic uranium enrichment. This move aims to strengthen energy security, reduce dependence on foreign suppliers, and support the next phase of nuclear power growth.
The announcement also reflects a shift in how the U.S. views nuclear energy. Once seen mainly as a legacy power source, nuclear is now positioned as a strategic solution for rising electricity demand, artificial intelligence growth, industrial resilience, and long-term climate goals.
Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said:
“President Trump is catalyzing a resurgence in the nation’s nuclear energy sector to strengthen American security and prosperity. “Today’s awards show that this Administration is committed to restoring a secure domestic nuclear fuel supply chain capable of producing the nuclear fuels needed to power the reactors of today and the advanced reactors of tomorrow.”
To understand why this matters, it helps to look at how DOE is deploying the funding and at where the U.S. stands today.
Last year, the DOE signed contracts with six enrichment companies, allowing them to compete for future work. Now, the department has awarded task orders to three companies under a strict milestone-based structure to ensure accountability.
Together, these projects will help maintain fuel supplies for the nation’s 94 operating nuclear reactors. At the same time, they will create a foundation for future advanced reactors that are still moving through development and licensing.
Importantly, this funding not only supports fuel production. It also drives job creation, strengthens domestic manufacturing, and restores confidence in the U.S. nuclear ecosystem.
Uranium enrichment plays a critical role in nuclear power. Most U.S. reactors operate on low-enriched uranium, or LEU. However, advanced reactors, including small modular reactors and next-generation designs, require high-assay low-enriched uranium, known as HALEU.
For years, the U.S. relied heavily on foreign enrichment services. In fact, the country currently performs less than 1% of global uranium enrichment. This reliance has raised serious concerns about energy security and supply reliability, especially as new rules will restrict imports of Russian uranium starting in 2028.
As a result, rebuilding domestic enrichment capacity has become urgent. The DOE’s $2.7 billion investment directly addresses this vulnerability by accelerating U.S.-based production of both LEU and HALEU.
While enrichment capacity is expanding, upstream uranium production still faces challenges.
EIA revealed that, in the third quarter of 2025, U.S. uranium concentrate production fell to 329,623 pounds of U₃O₈, a sharp drop from the previous quarter. Production came from only six facilities, mainly located in Wyoming and Texas.
This decline highlights a broader issue. Rebuilding the full nuclear fuel cycle requires coordinated growth across mining, processing, enrichment, and fuel fabrication. Progress in one area must be matched by investment in others.
One of the most significant projects tied to the DOE funding is Orano’s planned enrichment facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Known as the IKE project, the facility will provide a new domestic source of enriched uranium. Orano plans to finalize contracts and submit its license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the first half of 2026.
Once operational, the plant will help U.S. utilities comply with regulations that ban Russian uranium imports after 2028. It will also support rising electricity demand linked to AI, data centers, and broader electrification.
Nicolas Maes, Chief Executive Officer of Orano, commented,
“This is excellent news for Orano and a decisive step forward on our project for an enrichment plant in the USA! This recognition by the US authorities is an illustration of the confidence they have in our expertise and our capacity to deploy our technology to ensure robust security of supply to our customers.”
Beyond energy security, another powerful force is shaping this investment: artificial intelligence.
As AI systems grow more complex, demand for computing power continues to surge. Data centers require vast amounts of electricity that must be reliable, affordable, and available around the clock. Renewable energy alone often cannot meet this need without firm backup power.
This is where advanced nuclear reactors come into play. General Matter has highlighted that AI leadership depends on expanding both compute capacity and electricity production. Gen IV small modular reactors, fueled by HALEU, can provide steady power either directly to data centers or through the grid.
By powering AI infrastructure behind the meter, nuclear reactors reduce pressure on public grids while delivering low-carbon electricity. As a result, nuclear fuel is increasingly seen as a critical input for the digital economy.
Nuclear energy powers U.S. manufacturing, supplying factories, refineries, and heavy industries with stable, affordable electricity. Disruptions can slow production and raise costs, so a reliable LEU supply is essential. Today, reactors provide nearly 20% of U.S. electricity and almost half of emissions-free power.
Small, containerized microreactors fueled by HALEU are emerging for remote or harsh locations, including military bases, mining sites, and disaster zones. These systems run long with minimal maintenance, delivering dependable power and driving demand for HALEU, strengthening America’s domestic nuclear fuel infrastructure.
To support long-term innovation, the DOE also awarded $28 million to Global Laser Enrichment (GLE). The company is advancing the SILEX laser enrichment technology, which promises higher efficiency and lower energy use compared to traditional methods.
GLE has reached Technology Readiness Level 6 and has submitted a full license application for its Paducah facility. If deployed commercially, laser enrichment could significantly improve the economics and flexibility of nuclear fuel production.
Taken together, these developments signal a strategic reset. The DOE’s $2.7 billion investment reflects a clear decision to treat nuclear fuel as a national priority. By strengthening domestic enrichment, supporting advanced reactors, and backing innovation, the U.S. is positioning nuclear energy as a cornerstone of its future energy system.
In an era defined by AI growth, rising electricity demand, and climate pressure, nuclear power is no longer just part of the mix. It is becoming a central pillar of American progress.
The post DOE’s $2.7 Billion Push for Uranium Enrichment Rebuilds U.S. Energy Security appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
US SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
