The European Union (EU) has taken a major step toward climate neutrality. The European Commission adopted the first certification methodologies under the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation. These rules define how projects that permanently remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere can be verified and certified across Europe.
Wopke Hoekstra, European Commissioner for Climate, Net-Zero and Clean Growth, stated,
“The European Union is taking decisive action to lead the global effort in carbon removals. By establishing clear, robust voluntary standards, we are not only fostering responsible and climate action within Europe but also setting a global benchmark for others to follow. This is a vital step toward achieving our climate neutrality targets and ensuring a sustainable future.”
Why Certification Is Critical for Carbon Markets
Carbon removals are key to meeting climate goals. Even with big emission cuts, some sectors will still release greenhouse gases, and removals can offset them.
Trust is crucial. Without clear rules, companies could overstate their climate claims, investors may hesitate, and policymakers risk losing confidence. The CRCF methodologies solve this by defining how to measure removals, ensure permanence, and manage risks. This builds credibility and reduces greenwashing.
The CRCF Regulation creates the EU’s first voluntary system to certify carbon removals, carbon farming, and carbon storage in bio-based products. It sets clear rules for what counts as a verified tonne, how to keep it permanent, and how to handle risks.
By turning carbon removals into a structured market, the framework supports innovation, attracts investment, and strengthens the EU’s path to net zero by 2050.
Progress towards achieving climate targets in the EU-27

Three Carbon Removal Technologies Covered
The news release revealed that the Commission selected three carbon removal pathways for the first certification methodologies. These technologies are mature and can scale in the near term.
-
Direct Air Capture with Carbon Storage (DACCS)
DACCS removes CO₂ directly from ambient air. Machines capture CO₂ and store it underground in geological formations. This approach is highly permanent because the CO₂ stays locked away for thousands of years.
DACCS is expensive today, but it has strong long-term potential. Clear certification rules could accelerate private investment and government support.
-
Biogenic Carbon Capture and Storage (BioCCS)
BioCCS captures CO₂ from biomass-based processes, such as bioenergy plants. Since plants absorb CO₂ as they grow, capturing and storing emissions can result in net negative emissions.
This pathway could help industries decarbonize while producing energy or materials.
-
Biochar Carbon Removal (BCR)
Biochar is a stable form of carbon produced by heating biomass in low-oxygen conditions. When applied to soil, biochar can store carbon for centuries and improve soil health.
This method links climate mitigation with agriculture and soil restoration.
From Policy Design to Real Project Deployment
With the certification framework in place, carbon removal projects can now apply for EU certification. This marks a shift from rule-setting to real-world implementation.
Certification schemes must apply for recognition by the European Commission. The Commission will assess them using a standardized protocol that checks compliance with EU climate rules and audit standards.
Once certified, projects can issue verified carbon removal credits. These credits could attract corporate buyers, governments, and financial institutions that want high-quality climate offsets.
Upcoming Rules for Carbon Farming and Bio-Based Construction
The Commission plans two additional delegated regulations by 2026. These will expand the CRCF framework beyond industrial carbon removals.
One regulation will cover carbon farming practices such as improved agricultural methods, agroforestry, peatland rewetting, and afforestation. These rules could allow farmers and foresters to earn payments for storing carbon, helping them diversify income and adopt resilient practices.
Another regulation will cover carbon storage in bio-based construction materials. This will help building owners prove the carbon storage performance of buildings and encourage the use of circular bioeconomy materials in construction.
EU Buyers’ Club and Funding Support
To jumpstart the voluntary carbon removal market, the Commission announced an EU Buyers’ Club. This initiative will connect buyers with certified carbon removal projects and help create early demand.
The EU is also exploring ways to mobilize public and private finance. Existing funding tools such as the European Innovation Council and the Innovation Fund already support innovative carbon removal technologies.
Together, policy support and financing could accelerate the deployment of carbon removal solutions across Europe.
Governance, Audits, and Transparency
The CRCF framework builds on earlier EU rules that define certification bodies, audit procedures, and governance structures. Certification schemes must meet strict requirements for quantification, permanence, and sustainability.
The methodologies were developed with input from the Carbon Removal Expert Group. All preparation documents and meeting recordings are publicly available, which improves transparency and trust.
This governance structure aims to ensure environmental integrity while keeping administrative complexity manageable.
Carbon Removals and the EU’s Net Zero Strategy
The EU’s goal of climate neutrality by 2050 is legally binding under the European Climate Law. Carbon removals play a critical role in reaching this target because some emissions are hard to eliminate.
The CRCF framework aligns with the European Green Deal and the EU’s commitments under the Paris Agreement. It also supports the EU’s long-term climate strategy submitted to the United Nations.
Emissions Trends Highlight the Challenge Ahead
Recent data shows the difficulty of balancing economic growth and emissions reduction. EU greenhouse gas emissions reached about 900 million tonnes of CO₂-equivalent in the first quarter of 2025, up 3.4 percent from the previous year. During the same period, GDP grew by 1.2 percent.

This shows that economic activity can still drive emissions upward, even with climate policies in place. The EU Emissions Trading System has helped reduce emissions from power and industry by 51 percent since 2005. However, aviation emissions have rebounded close to pre-pandemic levels.
The EU aims to cut ETS-covered emissions by 62 percent by 2030 compared to 2005. Carbon removals will complement these policies and help close the remaining gap to net zero.
Fig: Historical and projected emissions from stationary installations covered by the EU Emissions Trading System in the European Economic Area

What This Means for Industry and Investors
The CRCF methodologies create a structured market for carbon removals. This could attract startups, large companies, and institutional investors. To summarize:
- Certified carbon removals provide high-quality offsets for net-zero strategies and reduce reputational risk for companies.
- Clear rules reduce uncertainty and improve project evaluation for investors.
- The framework provides a scalable tool for responsibly managing negative emissions for policymakers.
Despite progress, challenges remain. Carbon removal technologies are still expensive and require large infrastructure investments. Long-term liability for stored CO₂ remains complex and requires legal clarity. Demand for carbon removals is still uncertain, especially outside voluntary markets.
However, the CRCF framework provides a strong foundation for addressing these issues and building a credible market.
Final Take: A Global Benchmark for Carbon Removals
The EU’s move positions it as a global leader in carbon removal governance. Only a few regions have such detailed certification rules. Other countries may adopt similar frameworks, and global standards could emerge.
The post EU Sets Global Benchmark for Permanent Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story
Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.
For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.
As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.
A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use
Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.
That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.
The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.
When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls
Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.
Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.
This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.
Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter
Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.
A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.
Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.
The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.
Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies
Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:
- Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
- Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
- Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.
These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.
- MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold
Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System
Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.
This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.
On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.
In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.
Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future
Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.
Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.
Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.
As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.
The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.
The post Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up
The post LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Chanel Reveals First Climate Transition Plan: How the Luxury Giant Aims to Hit Net-Zero
Chanel has unveiled its first comprehensive climate transition plan, charting a clear path to net-zero emissions by 2040. Building on its earlier “Mission 1.5°” strategy, the plan aligns with global climate standards and follows the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means Chanel must reduce at least 90% of its emissions and remove the remainder.
The move shows a bigger change in luxury brands. They face more pressure from investors, regulators, and customers to take real climate action. Many companies now publish detailed transition plans to show how they intend to meet their net-zero commitments.
For Chanel, climate considerations are no longer immaterial—they now inform core business decisions, from risk management to opportunity assessment.
Breaking Down Chanel’s 1M Tonnes Carbon Footprint
In its Climate Transition Plan, Chanel reported total emissions of about 1.12 million tonnes of CO₂e in 2024. Most of these emissions do not come from its own stores or offices. Instead, they come from its supply chain.
- Scope 1 and 2 emissions: 2% of total (about 24,071 tonnes)
- Scope 3 emissions: 98% of total (about 1.1 million tonnes)

This shows a key challenge. Like many fashion brands, Chanel’s biggest impact is upstream. That includes raw materials, manufacturing, and logistics. The largest source is purchased goods and services, which account for over 626,000 tonnes of CO₂e.
Other major sources include:
- Capital goods: about 222,000 tonnes
- Transport and distribution: over 114,000 tonnes
- Business travel: over 53,000 tonnes
These figures highlight how complex the fashion supply chain is. It also shows why cutting emissions is harder than in other sectors.
Clear Targets: 2030 and 2040 Milestones

Chanel has set both near-term and long-term net-zero targets to tackle its carbon footprint. By 2030, the company aims to:
- Cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50%, and cut Scope 3 emissions by 42%.
By 2040, the goal is deeper:
- Cut all emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3) by 90%, and remove the remaining emissions through carbon removals.
Specific targets also cover land-based emissions associated with raw materials like leather and cashmere, with reductions of 30.3% by 2030 and 72% by 2040.
Importantly, Chanel does not rely on carbon offset credits to meet its targets. Instead, it focuses on real emissions cuts. This aligns with stricter global standards. Many frameworks now limit the use of offsets in net-zero plans.
Progress So Far: Renewable Energy and Supply Chain Improvements
The French luxury brand has already achieved measurable progress. Direct emissions have fallen 22% since 2021, driven primarily by the use of renewable energy. By 2024, 99% of the company’s electricity came from renewable sources, and the goal is to reach 100% by 2025.

Long-term power purchase agreements, including solar projects across Asia and Europe, have supported this transition.
Scope 3 emissions have also improved, declining 10% relative to 2021. Raw material emissions dropped 20% in 2024, thanks to changes in sourcing and the adoption of lower-impact inputs such as sustainable leather and cashmere.
How Chanel Plans to Cut Emissions and Reach Net Zero
The company’s strategy to tackle its emissions focuses on six main areas:
- optimizing operations,
- adopting lower-impact materials and packaging,
- implementing sustainable design in construction and events,
- shifting to low-emission logistics,
- promoting electric mobility, and
- engaging closely with suppliers.
Since Scope 3 emissions dominate the total footprint, supplier engagement is crucial.

Innovation also plays a key role. Chanel supports initiatives that reduce energy consumption in manufacturing, such as a project that lowered energy use by 27% at a supplier site. Circular design is another focus, with investments in repair services and durable products to extend product life.
Beyond Emissions: Climate Investment and Social Impact
Chanel’s climate plan extends beyond emissions reductions. The company invests in nature and climate projects, including the LEAF Coalition for forest protection, sustainable agriculture programs, and community-based climate initiatives.
In 2024, Chanel committed $125 million to Fondation Chanel, part of which funds women-led climate programs, tying environmental action to social impact. This approach embodies a “just transition,” ensuring that climate action also benefits workers and communities.
The Luxury Sector Shifts: Chanel Sets the Bar for Fashion
Chanel’s plan reflects a wider shift in the fashion and luxury sector. The industry faces growing pressure to act on climate. Fashion accounts for an estimated 2% to 8% of global emissions, based on various global studies.

Supply chains are complex and global, making change harder. At the same time, regulations are tightening. New rules in Europe and other regions require companies to disclose emissions and transition plans.
Many brands are now setting net-zero targets. But not all have detailed plans. Chanel’s transition plan stands out because it includes:
- Full emissions data
- Clear reduction targets
- A roadmap for action
Still, challenges remain. Cutting Scope 3 emissions is difficult. It depends on suppliers, technology, and costs. There is also a risk of slow progress. New materials, clean energy, and circular systems take time to scale.
Looking Ahead: A Long Road to Net-Zero
Chanel’s transition plan represents a significant step in addressing over 1 million tonnes of emissions. Progress in operations and energy use is evident, but the supply chain remains the most difficult hurdle.
Achieving net-zero by 2040 will require transforming material sourcing, deep collaboration with suppliers, and investment in new technologies.
As consumer demand for low-carbon products grows and investors increasingly scrutinize climate risks, transition plans have become a business imperative. Chanel’s strategy highlights a key trend: climate action is no longer a peripheral responsibility—it is integral to growth, risk management, and long-term value creation.
The post Chanel Reveals First Climate Transition Plan: How the Luxury Giant Aims to Hit Net-Zero appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy2 years ago
GAF Energy Completes Construction of Second Manufacturing Facility






