The EU Commission made history by approving $380M (€350m) German scheme to bolster renewable hydrogen production in Germany. The scheme was released this month under the EU state aid rules. It would be operated exclusively through the European Hydrogen Bank’s “Auctions-as-a-Service” tool.
REPowerEU and The European Green Deal have set a concrete plan to move away from fossil fuels and embrace the EU’s industry for the net zero age. The scheme aligns with the objectives of these two entities. Most significantly, aiming to reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels while transitioning to the green future.
Unleashing the Potential of the German Green Hydrogen Scheme
The Background
The “auctions as a service” model encourages EU member states to support domestic renewable hydrogen production. It allows countries to subsidize hydrogen production within their borders by leveraging the existing system set up by the EU Commission.
The EU Commission’s 2022 Climate, Energy, and Environmental State Aid Guidelines (CEEAG) establish a flexible and useful framework to assist Member States. It offers the necessary support to achieve the Green Deal objectives efficiently and cost-effectively.
Media reports revealed that last year in December, Germany topped up the EU’s €800m ($876m) pilot auction for the European Hydrogen Bank. It secured €350m as a domestic fund under the “auctions as a service” model.
Yet, a forthcoming auction of €2.2 billion is set to launch in the spring of next year, i.e. 2025. This could amplify the new capacity’s budget and scale with the support of more member states.
Image: The Europe Green Hydrogen Market is expected to record a positive CAGR of ~40% during the forecast period (2022-2030)

Project Capacity and Future Goals
The German scheme will power the establishment of up to 90 MW of electrolysis capacity, incentivizing the production of approximately 75,000 tons of renewable hydrogen.
Currently, Germany has less than 100MW of electrolyzer capacity. With this funding, it aims to achieve approximately 10 GW of domestic electrolysis capacity by 2030.
It would also contribute to the EU target of producing a minimum of 42.5% renewable energy by 2030, and scale up to 45% later.
Fund Allocation: Role of CINEA and REPowerEU
The European Climate, Infrastructure, and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) is overseeing the competitive bidding process to allocate the aid. The bidding concluded on February 8th, and the Agency is currently evaluating and prioritizing project bids from all Member States. Companies aiming to build new electrolyzers in Germany can apply for support through this German scheme.
CINEA manages energy, environment, climate action, and transport programs under the EU. The agency monitors funding and project management to promote green initiatives, like decarbonization, green fuel, and other sustainability initiatives across the continent.
A snapshot of CINEA’S funding and responsibilities

Source: European Commission Annual Report 2022
The European Commission’s vice-president for the European Green Deal, Maroš Šefčovič expressed his pleasure in this deal, stating that,
“We will only achieve the transition to a climate-neutral EU and a decarbonized energy system if we join forces. I am very pleased to see Germany become the first Member State to use the Innovation Fund’s hydrogen pilot auction to support renewable hydrogen projects nationally.”
Moving on, the REPowerEU plan has necessitated substantial investments and reforms in the form of loans and grants. Priority allocations include ~ €10 billion for gas and LNG infrastructure to ensure energy security for all Member States. They would deploy approximately €2 billion to phase out Russian oil shipments.
Most importantly, the bulk funding- 95%, will be dedicated to driving the clean energy transition. The key focus would be on implementing a modern regulatory framework for hydrogen and establishing a hydrogen accelerator.
Beneficiaries of the German Scheme
Companies planning to build new electrolyzers within Germany will qualify for assistance. Furthermore, beneficiaries must adhere to the EU standards to produce renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs).
Additionally, the companies will receive the grant directly for 1 kilogram of renewable hydrogen generated, with a maximum duration of ten years.
Germany has further established sufficient measures to minimize the scheme’s influence on competition and business within the EU.
The European Green Deal and REPowerEU Lead the Green Hydrogen Mission
Since its inception, the Commission has effortlessly aimed to reshape the EU into a sustainable, resource-efficient, globally competitive economy, aligning with the Paris Agreement’s goals.
The EU crafted the European Green Deal to guide it towards these aspirations. Its primary aim is to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent in the world.
The EU has actively backed the establishment of infrastructure and technologies to curb emissions. One such initiative is such as supporting the shift to green hydrogen production.
In March 2022, EU leaders in the European Council unanimously decided to reduce Europe’s reliance on Russian energy imports. Thus, the concept of REPowerEU came into existence.
EU’s press release mentions,
“REPowerEU is about rapidly reducing their dependence on Russian fossil fuels by fast-forwarding the clean transition and joining forces to achieve a more resilient energy system and a true Energy Union.”
As per the latest reports, the two initiatives: REPowerEU and the European Green Deal have helped the EU to achieve the following outcomes:
- Reduced its dependency on Russian fossil fuels
- Saved ~ 20% of its energy consumption
- Introduced the gas price cap and the global oil price cap
- 2x additional deployment of renewables (clean hydrogen)

source: EU Hydrogen Strategy
With this analysis, we hope the EU Commission aptly uses the German Scheme funding to magnify its renewable hydrogen capacity and take the lead to a sustainable future.
- FURTHER READING: First Hydrogen Track Day with Europe and UK’s Largest Companies (carboncredits.com)
The post EU Commission Backs Germany’s Renewable Hydrogen Plan with $380M Funding appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
