Connect with us

Published

on

English version below

Die letzte Woche unserer Expedition ist angebrochen und wir haben die Labradorsee in Richtung Osten verlassen. Die verbleibenden Tage werden wir mit Messungen der CTD-Rosette verbringen. Sie besteht aus einem Kranz von Flaschen, mit denen wir Wasserproben nehmen können und zusätzlichen Messgeräten, die darunter angebracht sind. Die eigentliche CTD (die Abkürzung steht für: Conductivity = Leitfähigkeit, Temperature = Temperatur, Depth = Tiefe) ist ein Messgerät an der Unterseite der Rosette. Zusätzlich gibt es noch eine kleine Kamera, die Bilder aufnehmen kann und ein Messgerät, das Fluoreszenz misst. An bestimmten Positionen müssen wir dann das Schiff anhalten und lassen die Rosette an einem Kabel bis zum Boden hinab. Bei Wassertiefen, die teilweise über 3000m betragen, kann es bis zu 2 Stunden dauern, bis die CTD-Rosette nach unten und wieder nach oben gefahren ist.

Die geplanten CTD-Stationen sollten uns Stück für Stück Richtung Grönländischer Küste führen. Die küstennahen Messungen sind dabei besonders interessant, um ähnlich wie in der Labradorsee den tiefen Randstrom zu untersuchen. Doch bei diesem Plan machte uns das Eis einen Strich durch die Rechnung. Auf der einen Seite freuten wir uns über die Schönheit der zahlreichen Eisschollen um uns herum, auf der anderen Seite verhinderten sie leider auch unser Vorankommen zu den küstennahen CTD-Stationen.

Foto: Fehmi Dilmahamod

Aus dem Film Titanic haben wir alle gelernt: So ein Eisberg kann zum fatalen Problem für ein Schiff werden. Aber ist das eigentlich noch aktuell? Laut Kapitän Björn Maaß, können Eisberge heutzutage durchaus noch Schiffe versenken. Wir haben allerdings einen Vorteil, gegenüber der Titanic: das Radar, auf dem man Eisberge sehr gut erkennen kann. Nicht so gut erkennbar sind allerdings die von Eisbergen abgebrochene kleinere Eisstücke, Growler genannt. Growler (wortwörtlich übersetzt Brummer) sind nach dem Geräusch benannt, das sie beim Aus- und Abtauchen in der See verursachen. Teilweise sind sie schon mehrere Jahre unterwegs, weshalb sie häufig aus härterem Eis bestehen und nicht so weit aus dem Wasser schauen, da sie schon rundgewaschen sind. Um auch die Growler im Blick zu behalten, ist es deshalb wichtig zusätzlich zur Radarbeobachtung auch aus dem Fenster zu schauen, um alles im Blick zu behalten.

Damit kommen wir zu dem Problem, das unsere CTD-Messungen verhinderte. Es ist nämlich nicht nur das Eis, sondern die Kombination aus Eis und schlechten Sichtverhältnissen, die zur Gefahr wird. Zu Beginn der Stationsarbeit hatten wir Nebel aber nur wenig Eis. Später klarte es auf und das Eis wurde mehr. Solange die Sicht gut ist, sind bis zu 70-80% Bedeckung der Wasseroberfläche mit Eis noch in Ordnung, so der Kapitän. Doch der erneut aufziehende Nebel verringerte die Sicht drastisch. Solange die CTD-Rosette im Wasser ist, ist das Schiff in der Manövrierfähigkeit eingeschränkt und könnte damit einem auf das Schiff zutreibenden Eisberg schlecht ausweichen. Selbst nah am Schiff vorbei treibende Eisberge können zur Gefahr werden. Wie allgemein bekannt, befindet sich der Großteil eines Eisberges unter Wasser. Durch Abtauen des Eises kann es zur Verlagerung der Gewichtsverteilung und damit zum Drehen oder Kippen des Eisberges führen. Sollte das in der Nähe des Schiffes passieren, kann es zu einer Kollision kommen.

Foto: Fehmi Dilmahamod

Vielleicht fragt sich an diesem Punkt der ein oder andere: ist die Maria S. Merian nicht ein Eisbrecher? Wieso ist das Eis dann überhaupt ein Problem? In der Nord- und Ostsee, wo man es nur mit einjährigem Eis zu tun hat, kann sie tatsächlich bis zu 80cm Eis brechen. In dem Gebiet, in dem wir uns jetzt befinden, kann es aber durchaus sein, dass sich eingeschlossen im einjährigen Eis auch ältere Stücke befinden. Diese haben bereits einen oder mehrere Sommer überstanden und sind dadurch schon mehr verdichtet und damit härter. Versucht man dieses dann zu brechen, kann das Schiff beschädigt werden. Das führte mutmaßlich zum Untergang des Kreuzfahrtschiff Explorer 2007 in der Antarktis. Die Besatzung des Schiffes war auf der Nord- und Ostsee ausgebildet und damit nur im Umgang mit einjährigem Eis geschult.

Fassen wir also kurz zusammen: Eisberge sind auch heutzutage noch eine Gefahr für die Seefahrt. Dank Radar kann man das Eis zwar sehr gut beobachten, doch die Sichtverhältnisse sollten trotzdem möglichst gut sein, wenn man sich in einem Eisfeld befindet. Außerdem ist nicht jedes Eis gleich und muss auf Grund des Alters, der Form und der Größe differenziert betrachtet werden.

Foto: Neele Sander

Bleibt nur noch die Frage, was passieren würde, sollte unser Schiff die Maria S. Merian doch einmal mit einem Eisberg zusammenstoßen. Das kann auch der Kapitän nicht so leicht beantworten. Zuerst einmal ist die Geschwindigkeit des Schiffes ein wichtiger Faktor. Bei einer Kollision mit 2 Knoten Fahrt, würden die Eisstücke höchstwahrscheinlich nur zur Seite geschoben werden, während ein Zusammenstoß bei 10 Knoten Geschwindigkeit gefährlicher wäre. Außerdem hängen die Auswirkungen eines Zusammenstoßes noch von einigen weiteren Kriterien ab, zum Beispiel wie groß der Schaden ist und wo sich das Loch befindet. Da das Schiff in mehrere Sektionen unterteilt ist, die sie sich wasserdicht voneinander abschotten lassen, kommt es darauf an wie viele und welche Abteilungen volllaufen. Solange nicht Maschinenraum und Windenraum oder nur zwei Sektionen geflutet werden, bleibt die Maria S. Merian schwimmfähig. Für uns bleibt das eine hypothetische Überlegung. Am Ende hatten wir einen atemberaubenden Ausblick, der uns über die verpassten CTD-Stationen hinweggetröstet hat und wurden von der Brücke sicher wieder aus dem Eis herausmanövriert.

The downside of icebergs

The last week of our expedition has dawned and we have left the Labrador Sea towards the east. The remaining days will be spent with measurements of the CTD rosette. It consists of a wreath of bottles with which we can take water samples and additional measuring instruments attached underneath. The actual CTD (abbreviation stands for Conductivity, Temperature, Depth) is a measuring device on the underside of the rosette. In addition, there is a small camera that can take pictures and a meter that measures fluorescence. At certain locations we then have to stop the ship and drop the rosette on a cable down to the ground. At water depths, some of which are over 3000m, it can take up to 2 hours for the CTD rosette to go down and back up.

The planned CTD stations should lead us step by step towards the Greenland coast. The measurements near the shore are particularly interesting to study the deep margin current, as in the Labrador Sea. But with this plan, the ice broke our hearts. On the one hand we enjoyed the beauty of the numerous ice floes around us, on the other hand they unfortunately prevented our progress to the coastal CTD stations.

Photo: Fehmi Dilmahamod

We all learned from the movie Titanic: an iceberg like this can become a fatal problem for a ship. But is this really still relevant? According to Captain Bjorn Maas, icebergs can still sink ships today. However, we have one advantage over the Titanic: the radar, on which you can see icebergs very well. However, smaller pieces of ice broken off by icebergs, called growlers, are not so well visible. Growlers are named for the noise they make when they go out and dive in the sea. Some of them have been floating around for several years, which is why they often consist of harder ice and do not look as far out of the water as they have already washed around. In order to keep an eye on the growlers, it is therefore important to look out the window in addition to radar observation to keep an eye on everything.

This brings us to the problem that prevented our CTD measurements. It is not just the ice, but the combination of ice and poor visibility that becomes the danger. At the beginning of the station work we had fog but only a little ice. Later, it cleared up and the ice became bigger. As long as visibility is good, up to 70-80% coverage of the water surface with ice is still fine, according to the captain. But the re-emerging fog drastically reduced visibility. As long as the CTD rosette is in the water, the ship is limited in maneuverability and could thus badly dodge an iceberg drifting towards the ship. Even icebergs drifting close to the ship can become a hazard. As is common knowledge, most of an iceberg is underwater. By thawing the ice, it can shift the weight distribution and thus turn or tip the iceberg. If this happens close to the ship, there may be a collision.

Photo: Fehmi Dilmahamod

At this point, some may wonder: isn’t the Maria S. Merian an icebreaker? Why is ice a problem? In the North and Baltic Seas, where you only have to deal with one year old ice, it can actually break up to 80cm of ice. In the area in which we are now, however, it may well be that there are older pieces trapped in the one-year ice. These have already survived one or more summers and are therefore already more compacted and thus harder. If you try to break it, the ship can be damaged. This led to the sinking of the cruise ship Explorer in Antarctica in 2007. The crew of the ship was trained in the North and Baltic Seas and thus trained only in handling one year’s worth of ice.

So let’s summarize briefly: icebergs are still a danger to shipping today. Thanks to radar you can observe the ice very well, but the visibility should still be as good as possible when you are in an ice field. In addition, not all ice cream is the same and needs to be considered differentiated based on age, shape and size.

Photo: Neele Sander

The only question left is what would happen if our ship, the Maria S. Merian, collided with an iceberg. The captain can’t answer that easily. First of all, the speed of the ship is an important factor. In a collision at 2 knots, the pieces of ice would most likely only be pushed aside, while a collision at 10 knots speed would be more dangerous. In addition, the impact of a collision depends on a number of other criteria, such as the size of the damage and where the hole is located. Since the ship is divided into several sections, they are sealed off watertight from each other, it depends on how many and which sections are full. As long as engine room and windroom are not flooded or only two sections are flooded, the Maria S. Merian will remain floating. For us, this remains a hypothetical consideration. In the end, we had a breathtaking view that consoled us over the missed CTD stations and were safely maneuvered out of the ice again from the bridge.

Die dunkle Seite der Eisberge

Ocean Acidification

FYORD Travel Grant Reports: November 2025

Published

on

Hi! I am Riel Carlo O. Ingeniero from the Chemical Oceanography Department at GEOMAR. I recently had the opportunity to attend ICON 9 (International Conference on Nitrification and Related Processes) last July 2025, one of the leading conferences focused on advances in the nitrogen cycle. It was an honour to be selected to present my research twice – first during the Early Career Workshop on the opening day, and then through a poster presentation on the second day of the main conference.

ICON 9 brought together many of the most prominent names in marine nitrogen cycle research. I was fortunate to meet and engage with inspiring scientists, including Dr. Boran Kartal, Dr. Hanna Marchant from the Max Planck Institute in Bremen, Dr. Claudia Frey from the University of Vienna, Dr. Scott Wankel from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Dr. Bo Thamdrup from the University of Southern Denmark, and Dr. Qixing Ji from HKUST. I also had the chance to see Dr. Bess Ward in person, someone whose work I’ve long admired.

The conference was hosted by the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Bremen, a place that holds deep personal significance. I first visited it 13 years ago during a DAAD International Summer School Biodiversity: Diversity of Ecosystems, Genes, and Species at the University of Osnabrück. That visit, including a tour of the Max Planck Institute and MARUM led by Prof. Dr. Rudolf Amann, played a pivotal role in my decision to pursue a career in marine science.

I recently completed my doctorate at Kiel University in June this year, and I am incredibly grateful for the excellent education and world-class research environment that Germany offers. Under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Hermann W. Bange and funded by the DAAD Research Grants – Doctoral Programmes in Germany and the SO305-BIOCAT-IIOE2 project, I have had the opportunity to work on cutting-edge research in marine biogeochemistry, with a particular focus on nitric oxide (NO) dynamics in the ocean.

Presenting in front of over 100 participants during the ICON 9 was not only a rewarding experience but also excellent preparation just days before my doctoral defense and oral examination. Overall, ICON 9 was a meaningful and inspiring milestone, a full-circle moment in my scientific career. 

Special thanks to FYORD and Kiel Marine Science for supporting my growth as an early-career marine scientist.

Riel Carlo


ICP is a conference with a unique size and structure. It takes place only every three years, and everyone in the field is looking forward to the meeting – indeed, it rather feels more like a “big get-together” than a conference. The program is linear, with one topic per day and no parallel sessions. This allows for focus and provides more room for discussions. I also had the feeling that this format is more comfortable for Early Career Scientists. You don´t have to plan a lot in advance, and you never feel like you´re missing out on anything. But perhaps the best way to capture the spirit of ICP is to take you on a walk through a typical day:

The days started with a short ride in one of the green-yellow tuk-tuks to the conference venue, which was located in one of the few green spots of the city on the campus of the Indian Institute of Science. The mornings were covered by talks by invited speakers. Actually all talks at ICP are only given by invited speakers, and you can only be selected for a talk once in a lifetime! Accordingly, we were able to enjoy some excellent presentations. Before lunch, there was a long plenum discussion with the five speakers from the morning. It was not only a great opportunity to hear different opinions on specific sub-topics, but also to show the connections between different talks, highlighting the most urgent research topics and gaps different groups are currently working on.

During lunch break, we could choose between a variety of typical Indian foods. Even though the chefs took care that the food was not too spicy for the foreign wimps, you never knew if you would sweat after the next bite. The highlight was definitely the daily Dosa, a South Indian speciality: It´s a thin, savory and crispy fried pancake made from fermented dough served with chutneys and sambars.

Long poster-sessions took place in the afternoons. All posters were put up during the whole week, which is also a big difference from huge conferences, where you usually just have a slot of one day or a few hours. It was enough time to look at the other posters, get inspired and exchange ideas. I also presented a poster with the results of the first two years of my PhD, in which I investigate climatically controlled changes in sedimentation at a site in the Southern Ocean close to Antarctica. We were able to link these changes on glacial-interglacial time scales with the ocean circulation and gain insights into the evolution of deep-water formation during times of rapid warming. Onall days, I had fruitful discussions about my work with experts in the field.

Each day was concluded with a perspective lecture by leading scientists fromthe different fields. These lectures were inspiring and an amazing summary, as they provided a broader context and deep insights into challenges and directions of palaeoceanographic research.

With the end of the scientific program, networking was not over yet, but had just started. The evenings offered a great opportunity to approach people and get into contact in a casual atmosphere. Whether at the icebreaker, conference banquet or at the Palaeomusicology Concert – another ICP tradition, which goes back to Nicholas Shackleton, paleoceanographer and skilled clarinet player. It´s an evening where the musical ones among the scientists show their skills. Singing, bagpipes, and even a small spontaneously formed band made the evening unforgettable!


My name is Igor Duarte, and I am a third-year PhD student at the Marine Symbiosis Lab, where we explore the origins and molecular novelties of close associations between bacteria and marine animals. The partnership I am mostly focused on in my PhD is between a free-living, mouthless flatworm from the genus Paracatenula, and the chemosynthetic bacteria from the genus Candidatus Riegeria that live inside its cells. In this system where no mouth is present to let nutrients in, the bacteria and are chemosynthetic, which means. After hundreds of millions of years of coevolution, this highly specialised symbiosis is now the only way by which each of these organisms can survive, and a topic of high interest to understand the evolution of such longstanding partnerships.

The FYORD Travel Grant programme supported my participation in the Gordon Research Conference (GRC) in Animal-Microbe Interactions, which this year took place in Portland, Maine, USA. Throughout the five days of the Conference, about 180 attendees from all over the world shared their main findings from the field of symbiosis, including the topics microbiome, intracellular microorganisms, parasitism, and evolution and molecular novelties of symbiotic associations. Additionally, the event was combined with a Gordon Research Seminar, which allowed early-career researchers to network more freely and exchange experiences from each one’s PhD and postdoctoral trajectories. I had the opportunity to present a poster entitled “Clade-specific genome evolution of Ca. Riegeria, the obligatory endosymbiont of a mouthless flatworm”, where I summarised the latest results from my PhD project.

What I liked most about participating in this conference was how nicely it was conceptualised, with the goal of creating a relaxed environment to foster relevant connections between new and veteran attendees. In such a set-up, not only was I introduced to cutting-edge methods which are being used to answer relevant questions from the field, but I also had the opportunity to discuss them directly with the authors. Another positive aspect was that the speakers were encouraged to share problems that they faced during their experiments to show what real science looks like and to showcase how such issues can be overcome. Overall, I believe the conference was a game-changer for my PhD as I could get to know the main researchers in the field, whom I had so far only read about, and build the feeling of being part of a diverse community of symbiosis-enthusiasts.

Igor

FYORD Travel Grant Reports: November 2025

Continue Reading

Ocean Acidification

Drifting in the Post-PhD Current

Published

on

Delivering

Five years into my PhD and I still wasn’t done. To be fair, I hadn’t exactly had an easy ride, starting just weeks before COVID lockdowns were announced, becoming a mother in my second year, and trying to build a new model system from scratch (Pipefish and their male pregnancy are adorable, but they don’t always make life easy). My work was trial and error, and it took me more than a year just to find a story worth telling. But eventually, the words came together. I had a draft for my first chapter. It was written! Only… was it enough? Basic research with no direct application, no flashy headline — just curiosity-driven science. Many of us know that creeping voice: does this even matter?

So, instead of calling it finished, I dove into one more dataset. In a rush of determination, I moved back into my old childhood bedroom at my parents’ house, spending days and nights analysing, writing, rewriting. By mid-November I had a plan: “Done by Christmas.”

Of course, life had other ideas. A hand surgery in between (note to future PhDs: don’t do that with a deadline). But somehow, even with one hand and one finger sticking out of a cast, I wrote. Introduction. Synthesis. Outlook. Acknowledgements.

By Christmas I wasn’t done, but close. My mother stepped in to take care of my daughter while I revised paragraph after paragraph under the Christmas tree. And then, in early January 2025, the moment came: university reopened, I submitted my dissertation, and it was gone. Done. Crazy. For two days, I let myself breathe and celebrate. Then reality hit: only six weeks until my defence.

Defending

Days passed and my defence presentation kept growing. Twenty slides, then thirty, then sixty. Every time I thought it was enough, I added more — extra data, backup information. Not because I wanted to show it all, but because I wanted to be ready for those tough questions. At the same time, I knew this wasn’t just about surviving the defence. I wanted to celebrate it. I booked a big conference room, reserved a restaurant table, and sent out invitations. And suddenly it felt real: my family travelling in from far away, a friend making the trip from abroad, old classmates and colleagues all saying yes. That was overwhelming in the best way. Practising my talk became part of my daily routine. Alone in my office and in front of colleagues or friends. I have to admit: I’ve always liked presenting more than drowning in raw data, so this part was actually… fun.

The morning of the defence, I woke up to an email that made my heart stop: Water pipe leakage at university. All buildings evacuated. No exams allowed. Seriously? After weeks of preparing, was it all about to fall apart? What I hadn’t expected was the incredible support around me. Within minutes, my PI had secured a new venue. Huge shout-out to the Marine Science Campus for stepping in and hosting me! And somehow, despite the last-minute chaos, everyone showed up. 

During the defence itself, my brain switched to autopilot. Over forty pairs of eyes were on me, waiting for me to present and defend five years of work. The questions that followed were tough and sometimes tricky, but also sparked real conversations. Ninety minutes passed in a blur. Then it was done. I was done. A doctor of natural sciences – me? Hell yeah. The rest of the day was exactly what I had dreamed of: celebrating, telling stories, reliving the journey with the people who had been part of it. Finally enjoying this thing, I had worked toward for over five years. Relief and happiness like I had never felt before. And, as the cherry on top, I got the nicest doctoral hat that I could have imagined – with a glowing giant microbe and two crocheted guinea pigs perched proudly on top.

The great relieve, successfully defended!

Drifting

The night of my defence, I went to bed expecting to wake up reborn – full of joy, energy, freedom. Instead, I woke up tired. Deeply tired. And strangely quiet inside. There was still paperwork to finish before I could officially call myself a doctor, and manuscripts waiting for submission. But the constant pressure, the expectations, the dependence on PIs, the weight of proving myself worthy of a title that even shows up in your passport, was suddenly gone. In its place came exhaustion, but also a growing sense of lightness. I gave myself a week to move slowly: sleeping, recharging, joining a retreat with my colleagues. Bit by bit, relief started to settle in. I really made it.

And the moment it truly sank in wasn’t the defence or the party, but a few weeks later. Walking out of the administration building at Kiel University with my PhD certificate in hand – that was the moment it felt real. 

Kim

Drifting in the Post-PhD Current

Continue Reading

Ocean Acidification

How are Sharks Affected by Plastic Pollution?

Published

on

It’s one of the best weeks of the year: Shark Week. As our finned friends get a lot of extra attention this week, I am reflecting on my love of sharks and the threats they’re facing. In fact, before I was an ocean plastics guy, I was a shark guy. And sadly, on a perfect sunny day in the tropics while searching for sharks, I also found plastics.

Two decades ago, I was researching these magnificent animals in the crystal-clear waters of the Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI) at the School for Field Studies. Each day, we’d take our research boats out in hopes of tagging juvenile lemon sharks to better understand their movements, site fidelity and nursing habitats in the shallow waters surrounding South Caicos. Every interaction with these animals was exhilarating, and quite often we’d get the bonus of spotting or tagging other species like bonnethead sharks, Caribbean reef sharks and even the awe-inspiring tiger shark—my personal favorite!

While out on shark patrol one Sunday afternoon along the eastern reef of South Caicos, I first encountered plastic pollution on a magnitude I had never previously seen. Due to the steep cliffs that backed the beach and the shallow reefs that protected it seaward, piles of plastics and debris that drifted over the reef and onto the sand remained stranded. And with little to no human access to these beaches in the early 2000s, the accumulations grew with each passing day.

Sharks are increasingly threatened by plastic pollution, primarily through entanglement and ingestion. At least 34 species have been reported entangled in plastic debris, although actual numbers are likely much higher due to underreporting. The most common item causing entanglement is abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear (also known as “ghost gear”), though plastic strapping bands also pose a major risk. Looped plastics like strapping bands can constrict sharks, interfering with feeding and breathing.

Sharks are at risk from eating plastics, too. Plastic bags, plastic packets and even a boot have been found inside shark stomachs. And scientists believe microplastics may pose a particular risk to filter-feeding species like whale sharks, although hundreds to thousands of microplastics have been documented inside individual tiger and hammerhead sharks as well. There is still much more to learn and understand about the interactions and effects of plastics on sharks, but what is known raises concerns about the long-term impacts of plastic ingestion on shark health and ocean health more broadly.

Never Miss An Update

Sign up for Ocean Conservancy text messages today.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Name(Required)







By providing your mobile number you consent to receive recurring text messages from Ocean Conservancy from 52551 for donations to protect our ocean from today’s greatest global challenges. Message and data rates may apply. Reply HELP for more information or STOP to cancel. Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

This field is hidden when viewing the form
SMS Opt-in: Selected(Required)

It was on that same reef in South Caicos in 2006, during a break from shark patrol and long before joining Ocean Conservancy where I first participated in the International Coastal Cleanup® (ICC). And like the millions of ICC volunteers around the world who participate each year, I too collected data on every item I picked up. And with each item, I was more and more curious, asking the questions: “Where did these plastics come from? “How the heck did they end up here?” and “This can’t be good for ocean animals, can it?”

I would later learn that the piles of debris that littered that stretch of coast came from all over the Caribbean. This was also my first glimpse of how the brands and languages on plastics provide valuable information to trace where trash comes from, an approach I still use to this day in fieldwork around the world. Further, it showcased the interconnectedness of the waters and people throughout the Caribbean Sea and North Atlantic Ocean.

These early, formative encounters with ocean plastics have stuck with me over the past 20 years, as have the sights of sharks effortlessly navigating their natural environments in those TCI waters. It is something that is forever lodged in my memory, something I never forget or tire of. Sharks have existed in our ocean for more than 400 million years, and over this time, they have perfected every aspect of their design. However, sharks were never meant to contend with the plastic pollution that now overwhelms every dimension of their marine environment.

Today, the most harrowing fact this Shark Week is that the plight of sharks has never been greater. And the scariest thing in the ocean isn’t a shark, it’s plastic pollution. Join Ocean Conservancy for Plastic Free July and beyond and call on your elected leaders to phase out wasteful, harmful single-use plastics.

The post How are Sharks Affected by Plastic Pollution? appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

How are Sharks Affected by Plastic Pollution?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com