Deep Sky, Canada’s leading carbon removal project developer, has kicked off operations at Deep Sky Alpha, its flagship commercialization center in Innisfail, Alberta. The facility has achieved a major industry milestone—North America’s first-ever underground storage of CO₂ captured directly from the atmosphere.
This breakthrough was made possible through a partnership with Skyrenu Technologies, a Quebec-based startup specializing in direct air capture (DAC). Skyrenu’s system successfully removed CO₂ from the air and, working with Deep Sky, permanently stored it underground. The event marks the first complete carbon removal cycle using a Canadian-developed DAC solution.
Alex Petre, Deep Sky CEO, commented,
“This is exactly what Deep Sky Alpha was built for. A product of Sherbrooke University, Skyrenu’s achievement shows that Canadian climate tech can lead on a global stage and that carbon removal is ready to scale today.”
Skyrenu: A Canadian Climate Tech Success Story
Skyrenu is not just another climate startup. Born out of Sherbrooke University and spun from the XPRIZE Carbon Removal competition, the company first gained attention after winning the student prize in 2021. It later ranked among the top 20 finalists worldwide in the competition.
The company builds compact, modular DAC systems designed for:
-
Low energy consumption
-
Scalable deployment
-
Rapid commercialization
By developing cost-efficient and flexible technology, Skyrenu is positioning itself as one of Canada’s strongest climate technology innovators. Its DAC unit, now operating at Deep Sky Alpha, has the capacity to remove 50 tonnes of CO₂ per year.
Gabriel Vézina, Skyrenu CEO,
“We’re incredibly proud to lead the way as the first Quebec-based DAC technology to capture CO₂ for permanent storage in North America. Our partnership with Deep Sky is a powerful example of how to accelerate DAC to climate-relevant scale. Deep Sky’s ability to integrate the full value chain—from CO₂ capture to sequestration—perfectly complements Skyrenu’s focus on designing and producing high-performance DAC units. Together, we can deliver impactful projects faster, generate high-quality carbon removal, and set a new benchmark for the industry. This first win proves that we have the model to lead the way in Canada and beyond.”
Deep Sky’s Vision: Gigaton-Scale Carbon Removal
Montreal-based Deep Sky has quickly emerged as a global leader in carbon removal project development. Unlike single-technology players, Deep Sky is tech-agnostic—bringing together multiple DAC and ocean carbon capture technologies under one roof.
With $130 million in funding from high-profile backers like Investissement Québec, OMERS Ventures, BDC Climate Fund, Breakthrough Energy Catalyst, and leading Canadian banks, Deep Sky is building the world’s largest pipeline of high-quality carbon credits.
Its long-term mission is clear: remove gigatons of carbon from the atmosphere and permanently store it underground.
Deep Sky Alpha: Canada’s First Carbon Removal Commercialization Center
Located on five acres in Innisfail, Alberta, Deep Sky Alpha represents a world first in cross-technology carbon removal testing. The facility runs entirely on solar energy and is built to accelerate the transition from prototype to full commercialization.
Key highlights of the Alpha project include:
-
3,000 tonnes of CO₂ capture per year capacity
-
100% renewable power supply
-
Permanent underground storage in Alberta’s saline aquifers, 2 kilometers below ground
-
Rapid deployment timeline—built in just 12 months
-
Economic impact—over 110 construction jobs created and 15 permanent roles
By combining several DAC technologies under identical conditions, Alpha enables real-world validation, scalability testing, and generation of verifiable carbon credits.

Why Alberta Is the Perfect Location?
Alberta’s geology makes it a prime site for permanent CO₂ storage. The province has abundant deep saline aquifers, rock formations capable of holding carbon safely for thousands of years.
Innisfail was chosen not only for its geology but also for its proximity to renewable energy sources and industrial infrastructure. This strategic setup supports cost-effective scaling of carbon removal projects while maintaining transparency and safety.
The First Step Toward a Global Carbon Removal Network
Deep Sky Alpha is more than just a standalone project—it’s the first step in a larger global rollout.
The company is already advancing large-scale carbon removal projects across Quebec, Alberta, and beyond. Its international ambitions are also backed by recent deals, including:
-
A $40 million grant from Breakthrough Energy Catalyst
-
Carbon credit purchase agreements with major buyers such as Microsoft and Royal Bank of Canada
With these partnerships, Deep Sky is laying the foundation for a global network of carbon removal hubs.
High-Quality Carbon Removal: Essential for Net Zero
As governments and corporations work toward net-zero goals, permanent carbon removal is becoming a non-negotiable part of climate action.
Unlike emission reductions alone, carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies provide a way to actively pull CO₂ out of the atmosphere. For hard-to-abate sectors like aviation, shipping, and heavy industry, solutions like DAC and geological storage are critical.
Skyrenu’s deployment at Deep Sky Alpha highlights the importance of homegrown, scalable, and verifiable CDR solutions. Each tonne of CO₂ captured and stored is measurable, permanent, and market-ready as a carbon credit.
Also moving on, Deep Sky’s selection of Skyrenu reflects the company’s rigorous criteria for technology partnerships. It seeks solutions that are:
-
Electrified: Must run entirely on clean electricity without relying on fossil-based heat sources.
-
Low-energy: Targeting 1,000 kWh per tonne of CO₂ or less to maximize efficiency.
-
Simple and focused: Technologies that concentrate purely on CO₂ capture rather than producing multiple byproducts, reducing logistical complexity.
This focus on scalability, simplicity, and efficiency helps Deep Sky fast-track technologies from lab prototypes to commercial solutions.
The Global Direct Air Capture (DAC) Market: Growing at Record Speed
Deep Sky’s work comes at a time when the Direct Air Capture market is booming.

-
The global DAC market is projected to reach USD 120,811 billion by 2034, up from USD 1,007 billion in 2024.
-
That’s a staggering CAGR of 61.4% between 2025 and 2034.
-
North America is leading the sector, with 48.3% market share.
This growth reflects rising demand for high-quality carbon credits and the urgent need to balance global emissions. Deep Sky Alpha positions Canada as a leader in this emerging trillion-dollar industry.
The post Deep Sky and Skyrenu Launch North America’s First Direct Air Capture (DAC) Storage Facility appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

