Welcome to Carbon Brief’s Cropped.
We handpick and explain the most important stories at the intersection of climate, land, food and nature over the past fortnight.
This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s fortnightly Cropped email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.
Key developments
Food systems on the menu at COP29
MITIGATING METHANE: Yesterday was “food, agriculture and water day” at COP29, with a number of new initiatives and updates to existing initiatives announced. Down to Earth reported that more than 30 countries had endorsed the COP29 Declaration on Reducing Methane from Organic Waste, which includes a commitment to including sectoral targets in countries’ climate pledges. It added that the European Commission “welcomed the declaration, but did not endorse the pledge” due to a lack of time to consult with all member states.
PEACE AND HARMONIYA: The COP29 presidency also announced the Baku Harmoniya Climate Initiative for Farmers on Tuesday, in partnership with the UN Food and Agriculture Organization. The Harmoniya initiative has three stated priorities: creating a “streamlined knowledge hub” for improving collaboration and knowledge-sharing; making investment in food systems more attractive to both public and private investors; and empowering women and youth farmers to adapt to climate change. The declaration said: “Given the multitude of initiatives, there is a need for coherence, alignment and sharing of lessons learned to deliver greater impact.” No new commitments or funding accompanied Harmoniya’s release.
CHAMPIONING CHANGE: Food day also delivered an update on one of the key food-systems announcements from last year’s summit, the Alliance of Champions for Food Systems Transformation (ACF) – a group of six countries that had committed to taking stronger action on transforming food systems. During the summit, the ACF released a “progress snapshot” highlighting actions and policies each country had taken towards the priority action areas defined by the ACF. Tanzania confirmed its intention to join the coalition, the Guardian said. Vietnam also reportedly expressed their interest in joining.
AIM FOR THE SKY: Devex reported that the Agriculture Innovation Mechanism for Scale (AIM for Scale) initiative “has introduced its first package of investments”, which amounts to $1bn to strengthen weather forecasting for farmers. This “includes both new and existing investments from a consortium of global partners”, such as the World Bank, the US Agency for International Development and NASA. According to Emirates News Agency, investments in “climate-smart agriculture and food systems innovation” through the wider AIM for Climate initiative total $29.2bn to date. DeSmog previously reported concerns that the solutions pushed by AIM for Climate “are not the kinds of technology that will benefit small-scale farmers in Africa”.
‘Big ag’ in Baku
COP LOBBYING: Hundreds of “lobbyists for industrial farming” attended COP29, analysis from DeSmog and the Guardian found, with more than 200 delegates from agriculture companies and trade groups at the talks. Nearly 40% travelled with delegations of countries, such as Brazil, “giving them privileged access to diplomatic negotiations”, the Guardian noted. The number of industrial agriculture attendees dropped from “record highs” of 340 at last year’s summit, the newspaper said. They represent “some of the world’s largest agribusiness companies, including the Brazilian meatpacker JBS, the animal pharmaceuticals company Elanco and the food giant PepsiCo”, the Guardian said. DeSmog and the Guardian also revealed that a “record” 1,261 business and industry delegates registered to attend last month’s COP16 biodiversity summit.
OFFSET ADVICE: The UK released new guidelines for voluntary carbon and nature markets in Baku, BusinessGreen reported. These aim to give “clearer guidelines to companies involved in the purchase, sale and development of carbon offsets and nature credits”, the outlet said. One of the guidelines advises that credits should “complement” emissions-cutting and other climate action, not replace them. These represent a “vote of confidence in a largely experimental financial product that’s intended to protect biodiversity”, Bloomberg said. (Read Carbon Brief’s Q&A on biodiversity offsets.) Meanwhile, Brazil’s Congress signed off on a bill setting rules for a national carbon market, according to Reuters.
FARMER FUNDS: New analysis released during COP29 found that 14% of global public climate finance for agriculture and land use went to activities relevant to small-scale farmers in 2021-22. This is a small portion given that these farmers produce 70-80% of the food eaten in Africa and Asia, according to advisory company Climate Focus, which completed the analysis. Covering the report, Bloomberg spoke to Esther Penunia, secretary general of the Asian Farmers Association, who said: “[Climate change is] affecting our crops, our yields and therefore our incomes.” The Associated Press spoke to Penunia and others about climate finance for small farmers. Elsewhere, a policy paper found that “regenerative farming” has “shown promising results” in Africa and India, First Post said.
Spotlight
The ups and downs of Brazil’s new climate pledge
Brazil released its new climate pledge at COP29 last week, committing to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 59-67% by 2035. Here, Carbon Brief speaks to two Brazilian experts about the implications of the new nationally determined contribution (NDC).
Dr Ane Alencar is the director of science at the Amazon Environmental Research Institute. Claudio Angelo is the coordinator of international policy at Observatório do Clima, a Brazilian network of civil-society organisations. The interviews have been edited for length and clarity.
For more on Brazil’s NDC, see Carbon Brief’s just-published article on the five key takeaways.
Carbon Brief: What is your opinion on Brazil’s new NDC?
Ane Alencar: Even with all the difficulties we have in Brazil, there is a commitment of the government to actually move forward and be more ambitious [on climate change]. I think they did that…even though I think it could be a little bit more. But I think this is an important step.
Claudio Angelo: Policy-wise, it’s a pretty good NDC…We can say that the NDC reflects a shift of gear for Brazil and that’s important. But, again, we’re talking about policies. We’re not talking about the target. And the target of the NDC is very weak. You can’t say it is 1.5-aligned…There are things Brazil is already doing, such as tackling deforestation in the Amazon…So, I would say [the] direction of travel is right, but the speed is totally wrong.
CB: How does the NDC compare to previous pledges made by the Brazilian government?
CA: If you look at what Brazil has already committed to doing – for instance, zero deforestation, the methane pledge, [which is a] 30% reduction in methane, just the sheer pace of increase of renewable energies in the energy mix…There’s a new sustainable fuels legislation that was just passed this year. If you put all those things together, Brazil could aim much higher than the current limits…We’re hoping to get an increased ambition ahead of COP30. I think there’s [a] margin for that in the NDC. We will certainly push for [the new NDC] to be the ambition floor, not the ambition ceiling.
CB: Are the NDC promises to combat deforestation strong enough?
AA: The government has done a very good job in the past to reach that important reduction of deforestation…However, we do have to deal with the fact that there are people who still can deforest legally. And what would be the incentives for these people to not deforest? The incentives that exist today seem not to be enough.
CB: Are pledges to boost “sustainable agriculture” sufficient to meet climate goals?
AA: I think the agriculture sector is one that can provide lots of contribution, by improving their practices, investing in technologies to reduce the cattle contributions and also with soil management…If the Brazilian agriculture sector really goes in the direction of sustainability, then I think it’s possible to actually fulfil the NDC targets.
News and views
G20 TALKS: At the G20 summit, Brazil’s president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, presented a new “alliance” to tackle poverty and hunger, Al Jazeera reported. It added that 81 countries signed the initiative. Before the summit, Joe Biden became the first US president to visit the Amazon rainforest, the Associated Press reported. In his speech, he said that the incoming administration of president-elect Donald Trump would not be able to halt his country’s progress on clean energy, the newswire added. Meanwhile, Mexico’s president, Claudia Sheinbaum, proposed allocating 1% of military expenditure to fund a global reforestation programme, which could free up $24bn annually to support 6m farmers to plant 15m hectares of trees.
‘GROUNDBREAKING’ DISCOVERY: The world’s largest coral, measuring more than 34 metres wide and 32 metres long, was discovered by a team of scientists in the Solomon Islands, Pasifika Environews reported. The outlet dubbed the discovery “groundbreaking” and noted that the coral structure is between 300 and 500 years old. It quoted Enric Sala, executive director of National Geographic’s Pristine Seas project, who stressed the urgency “for rich countries to invest significantly in reducing carbon emissions to combat threats like ocean warming and acidification” as negotiations at COP29 continue. Elsewhere, a “graveyard of corals” was found off an island on the Great Barrier Reef after months of extreme weather, the Guardian said.
AIRBORNE TOXIC EVENT: Air pollution in Delhi “hit 50 times the safe limit” this week, due in part to “farmers burn]ing] crop residue in agricultural areas”, according to the Associated Press. In response, the government has started enacting strict control measures, including banning most trucks from entering the city and moving school classes online. According to the Times of India, more than 1,250 agricultural fires were recorded in the state of Punjab on Monday, “the highest single-day tally of the season”. Delhi’s environment minister, Gopal Rai, said “the time has come for artificial rain to remove this smog cover and provide relief to the people”.
FARMER FURY: Thousands of farmers “descended” on Westminster in London to “protest a tax hike they say will deal a ‘hammer blow’ to struggling family farms”, the Associated Press reported. The UK government recently announced plans to get rid of a tax break that would introduce a 20% inheritance tax for farms worth more than £1m from 2026. (BBC News factchecked how many farms this might affect.) “Everyone’s mad” at this change, the co-organiser of the protest, Olly Harrison, told AP, adding that many “want to take to the streets and block roads and go full French”. (Farmers held a so-called “siege of Paris” earlier this year amid widespread EU farmer protests.) In ongoing farmer protests across the Channel, French farmers and their tractors blocked roads around the country to protest a trade deal between the EU and Mercosur countries in South America, according to Le Monde.
PUSHBACK: European lawmakers voted to “water down” and delay the EU’s anti-deforestation law, Reuters reported. The European Commission recently proposed a one-year delay for the law, which was due to take effect this December. This delay was backed by the European parliament in a 14 November vote, the newswire said, adding that politicians also voted to “add a new ‘no risk’ category of countries with far lighter controls”. This would “severely weaken” the law, BirdLife said in a statement, “making it inadequate to address global deforestation”. Elsewhere, BBC News said that Denmark signed off on the finer details of its world-first tax on farming emissions. (See Carbon Brief’s Q&A on the Danish plan.)
HIDDEN COSTS: Agrifood systems contain “hidden costs” – such as unaccounted for impacts on health and the environment – totalling around $12tn annually, the latest State of Food and Agriculture report from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization found. More than 70% of the costs stem from unhealthy dietary patterns and are linked to non-communicable diseases, such as heart disease and diabetes. The hidden environmental costs outlined in the report included emissions of greenhouse gases, nitrogen run-off and water pollution.
Watch, read, listen
GOING GREEN: Yale Environment 360 explored Brazil’s “bioeconomy”, which the country’s president hopes can act as a guide for other governments.
KITTENS CORRIDORS: A Mongabay podcast addressed why biological corridors are important for feline species in Latin America, such as puma, ocelot and jaguar.
PROMPTING TRANSITION: An NBC video showed how a nonprofit organisation helps farmers in North Carolina transition from traditional livestock to sustainable agriculture.
GO FISH: Scientists thought the Mekong giant salmon carp was extinct. But one scientist kept looking – and recently published evidence of its survival, the New York Times reported.
New science
- New research in Ecological Economics found that climate change-induced migration of Nigerian herders seeking new grazing sites is a “key driver” of conflict between the herders and farmers. However, the study added, respondents who understood climate as the driving factor behind the migration were more likely to support policies that integrated herders into their community.
- In the 2019-20 Australian “megafires”, plants and animals were worst affected in areas that were frequently burned or had recently burned in the past, according to a new Nature study. The “unprecedented” fires had a small, but overall negative impact on the abundance and occurrence of species, the researchers found.
- Reduced deforestation brings health benefits to Amazon populations, according to new research in Communications Earth and Environment. The study found that reduced deforestation pressure lowers the incidence of forest fires, lowering particulate matter concentrations and decreasing respiratory health problems for local communities.
In the diary
- 28 November: [Lecture] Towards a liveable planet: land, energy and food system transitions | Oxford, UK and Online
- 25 November-1 December: 5th session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution | Busan, South Korea
- 5 December: World Soil Day
- 2-13 December: COP16 of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification | Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Cropped is researched and written by Dr Giuliana Viglione, Aruna Chandrasekhar, Daisy Dunne, Orla Dwyer and Yanine Quiroz. Please send tips and feedback to cropped@carbonbrief.org.
The post Cropped 20 November 2024: Food at COP29; ‘Big ag’ in Baku; Brazil’s new climate pledge appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Cropped 20 November 2024: Food at COP29; ‘Big ag’ in Baku; Brazil’s new climate pledge
Climate Change
Trump Administration Abandons Fight Against Wind Energy as Clean Energy Output Surges
The clean energy sector is showing resilience despite challenges thrown at it by a hostile White House, a recent report found. A string of legal victories has further dampened the Trump administration’s efforts to halt wind and solar power.
The Trump administration has abandoned its effort to halt wind energy projects across the United States and dropped its challenge to the court ruling that tossed President Donald Trump’s order freezing federal permitting and leasing for wind projects. States that challenged the order hailed the development as one of the most significant legal victories against the Trump White House’s campaign against the energy transition.
Trump Administration Abandons Fight Against Wind Energy as Clean Energy Output Surges
Amid reports that the government could weaken the UK’s electric vehicle (EV) targets, Carbon Brief analysis reveals the nation’s EV drivers are saving more than £1,100 a year in fuel costs, compared with running a petrol car.
Battery EVs (BEVs) are roughly four times more efficient than combustion-engine cars, making them far cheaper to run – particularly since the Iran crisis caused a spike in fossil-fuel prices.
The savings from driving BEVs are also more than three times higher than for “plug-in” hybrids (PHEVs), which evidence shows are mostly driven with their combustion engines.
In total, the more than 2m BEVs, 1m PHEVs and 100,000 electric vans on UK roads are saving drivers around £3bn a year, Carbon Brief’s analysis shows, as illustrated in the figure below.
In addition, these EVs are avoiding the need for nearly 2.5bn litres of fuel and cutting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by nearly 7m tonnes each year.
Despite recent news that EVs are now cheaper to buy than petrol cars, as well as having far lower running costs, BBC News says the government is “set to water down” its EV sales targets.
The broadcaster explains that the current goal, under the UK’s “zero-emissions vehicle” (ZEV) mandate, is for 80% of new car sales to be BEVs by 2030.
It says that the government is set to consult on weakening this to between 50% and 70%, following “lobbying” by carmakers and trade unions.
According to the Sunday Times, prime minister Keir Starmer “is understood to have overruled the energy secretary [Ed Miliband] after sustained pressure from industry, the Unite union and Peter Kyle, the business secretary”.
The car industry has consistently claimed there is insufficient demand for BEVs to meet the targets under the ZEV mandate, yet the government says manufacturers have “over-complied” to date. Independent analysts say the industry is on track to continue beating the ZEV mandate goals.
The industry has been able to beat its targets by using a wide range of “flexibilities”, which were introduced after a previous round of lobbying. These allow carmarkers to meet part of their EV targets by selling more efficient combustion cars, such as hybrids and plug-in hybrids.
The ZEV mandate is the single-largest part of the government’s plans to meet its legally binding climate goals over the next decade.
The advisory Climate Change Committee (CCC) previously warned that the extra flexibilities would result in a larger number of hybrids being sold, at the expense of battery EVs.
When it consulted on the ZEV mandate in 2023, the then-Conservative government noted that PHEVs do not deliver the cost and CO2 savings they are advertised with.
It pointed to “dramatic” differences between the performance of PHEVs in test cycles and what they deliver under real-world conditions.
In practice, less than a third of miles driven in PHEVs are fuelled by electricity, with petrol making up the rest. As a result, cost and CO2 savings from BEVs are three times larger than for PHEVs.
The post Analysis: UK’s EV drivers are now saving £1,100 each a year – and £3bn in total appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Analysis: UK’s EV drivers are now saving £1,100 each a year – and £3bn in total
Civil society groups have called for an investigation into the first carbon credits approved under a new UN mechanism, alleging the project is linked to Myanmar’s military junta – which the UN says is guilty of human rights abuses – and has “massively” overstated its climate impact.
The programme, which aims to cut emissions by distributing efficient cookstoves across Myanmar, received approval to issue around 650,000 carbon credits from the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body in February, in a landmark moment for the Paris Agreement’s carbon market. Only two projects have been given the green light by the mechanism’s regulator so far.
But two reports published last week, led by the Global Forest Coalition and Brussels-based NGO Carbon Market Watch, raised serious concerns about the project’s implementation in conflict zones where civilians have faced airstrikes and mass displacement as well as its emission-reduction calculations.
Project continued after military coup
Myanmar has been ravaged by a brutal civil war since the country’s military overthrew the democratically elected government in a coup d’état in February 2021. The military regime has attacked civilian populations, persecuted ethnic minorities and committed widespread sexual violence, among other serious human rights violations, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar said in April.
The cookstove programme started in 2018 under the previous UN-run carbon offsetting scheme – the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) – as a partnership between Myanmar’s Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation (MONREC) and the Climate Change Center (CCC), a South Korean NGO, with investment from private South Korean firms.
-
European, island states seek clear future for global roadmap to cut fossil fuels
Some European, small island and other nations argue the forthcoming roadmap should be part of UN climate talks, while Russia has resisted this idea
The project continued operating after the coup. For most of the period between 2021 and 2022 in which the issued credits were generated, MONREC was led by Colonel Khin Maung Yi, who was sanctioned by the European Union in 2021 for supporting the military regime, the Global Forest Coalition report said.
CCC acknowledged engaging with government authorities after the coup but said this “should not be interpreted as political endorsement” of the junta. The South Korean NGO added that abandoning the programme when political circumstances changed “would not necessarily have been the most responsible outcome for the households involved”.
Conflict prevents on the ground verification
The Global Forest Coalition report raised particular concerns about the project’s implementation in Myanmar’s central Dry Zone, including Sagaing Region, an anti-junta resistance stronghold that has been most heavily affected by the conflict and routinely targeted by airstrikes and violent attacks. The region accounts for more than a third of Myanmar’s 3.8 million internally displaced people.
The NGOs said that, in addition to ethical concerns about carbon credits being produced by the military government in an area actively affected by its attacks, this raises questions over the ability to effectively verify the climate integrity of the projects.
Before carbon credits are issued, external auditors need to validate the claims made by project developers and confirm that the emission reductions claimed are correct. This process usually includes site visits to a representative sample of households to check how the improved cookstoves are being used.
But, because of the “volatile political situation” in Myanmar, the auditing team was not able to leave the capital Yangon and could only speak to project participants remotely via Zoom, project documents show.
“Due to ongoing armed conflict on the ground, the data currently used to justify carbon credit issuance in Sagaing by the Burmese military junta is unverifiable and highly likely fraudulent,” said Zaw Tuseng, founder and president of the Myanmar Policy Institute, which contributed to the report, in a written statement. “This demands an immediate suspension of credit transfers until a neutral, conflict-sensitive audit can be conducted.”
“Exceptional circumstances”
CCC told Climate Home News that, although it recognises that on-site verification is “generally preferable, particularly in complex operating environments”, the decision to opt for remote controls was not taken “as a discretionary shortcut, but as an approved alternative under exceptional circumstances”.
The South Korean NGO added that it reviewed the feasibility of the project at community level “on an ongoing basis” and it “did not identify conflict-related incidents that directly affected project implementation activities in participating communities during the monitoring period”.
A spokesperson for the UN climate change body told Climate Home News that, when site access is not possible, the UN carbon credit mechanism allows for “alternative verification approaches while still maintaining conservative assumptions and environmental integrity safeguards”. “These provisions ensure that crediting can only proceed where evidence is reliable,” they added.
Contested methodology
Carbon markets are seen as an important channel to raise money to help low-income communities in developing countries switch to less polluting cooking methods, both reducing CO2 emissions and improving air quality. But several cookstove offsetting projects have faced criticism from researchers and campaigners who argue that climate benefits are often exaggerated and weak monitoring can undermine claims of real emission reductions.
The project in Myanmar uses a contested methodology developed under the earlier Kyoto Protocol that was rejected last year by The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM), a watchdog that issues quality labels to carbon credit types, because it found it “insufficiently rigorous”.
EU carbon credits could supercharge world’s clean cooking push, France says
After transitioning from the CDM to the new mechanism, the project was required to apply “more conservative” assumptions to calculate emission reductions, which resulted in 40% fewer credits being issued, according to the UN climate change body.
“The result is consistent with environmental integrity requirements and ensures that each credited tonne genuinely represents a tonne reduced and contributes to the goals of the Paris Agreement,” Mkhuthazi Steleki, the South African chair of the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, which oversees the mechanism, said in February.
Too many credits issued
But Carbon Market Watch claimed in a second report last week that, despite the adjustment, the project is still likely to issue seven times more credits than its real climate impact justifies, comparing its calculations with values from peer-reviewed scientific literature.
The biggest driver of the credit inflation, the group said, is the failure to account for “stacking” – the widespread practice of households using multiple stoves at the same time, including more polluting ones the project does not monitor.
Peer-reviewed science considers a stacking rate of 68% a conservative assumption, but the methodology used by the Myanmar programme makes no allowance for it at all, the report said.
CCC disputed those findings. In a written response to Climate Home News, it said the project was developed under methodologies approved within the UN climate framework and that external recalculations by researchers are not “determinative of the level of crediting achieved”.
The credits are expected to be used primarily by major South Korean polluters to meet obligations under the country’s emissions trading system – a move that will also enable the government to count those units toward emissions reduction targets in its nationally determined contribution (NDC), the UN climate body told Climate Home News.
Myanmar will use the remaining credits to achieve in part the goals of its own national climate plan under the Paris Agreement.
“Over-crediting, at any magnitude, cannot be compatible with the climate ambition of a world striving to limit global warming to 1.5ºC,” said Isa Mulder, an expert at Carbon Market Watch.
The post UN’s first Paris Agreement carbon credits face human rights and climate concerns appeared first on Climate Home News.
UN’s first Paris Agreement carbon credits face human rights and climate concerns
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy8 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测