Welcome to Carbon Brief’s Cropped.
We handpick and explain the most important stories at the intersection of climate, land, food and nature over the past fortnight.
This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s fortnightly Cropped email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.
Key developments
Nature at COP28
BIODIVERSITY LINKS: COP28 came to a close last week and the interconnections between climate change and biodiversity featured heavily in the two-week summit. As Carbon Brief noted in an in-depth summary of the event, the global stocktake – the periodic global review of progress towards the aims of the Paris Agreement – contained eight references to “nature” and five to “biodiversity”. It also noted “the urgent need” to address climate change and biodiversity together and meet targets for both “in line” with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, the landmark agreement of the 2022 COP15 biodiversity summit. COP28 president UAE and COP15 president China released a Joint Statement on Climate, Nature and People, where countries committed to aligning their national climate plans and their national nature plans ahead of COP30 and COP16, respectively.
FOCUS ON ECOSYSTEMS: The global stocktake also noted the importance of “ensuring the integrity of all ecosystems”, including oceans, mountains and the cryosphere. During the summit, the Guardian reported that, even if the world reaches a phase-out of fossil fuels, achieving the 1.5C target will be impossible if humanity fails to conserve nature, according to Prof Johan Rockström, a leading climate scientist. Speaking to Carbon Brief in Dubai, David Cooper, acting executive secretary of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), said that while nature has featured in many pledges and voluntary announcements at climate COPs in recent years, COP28 saw “more recognition in the actual official texts”. This included a greater focus on ecosystems, he said, adding: “What I’d like to see more is greater recognition of the role of ecosystems beyond their role as carbon sinks.”
ROAD TO COLOMBIA: Shortly after COP28 ended, the CBD confirmed that the next UN biodiversity summit, COP16, will be held in a yet-to-be-announced city in Colombia from 21 October to 1 November 2024. Cooper told Carbon Brief that he was “very excited” for Colombia to host the event, as it is a “megadiverse country, it has very strong Indigenous peoples’ organisations [and] a very strong scientific base”. Colombia’s environment minister, Susana Muhamad, said in a statement: “This event sends a message from Latin America to the world about the importance of climate action and the protection of life.” At COP16, governments will review the implementation of nature goals and targets and also update their national biodiversity plans.
Food at COP28
ROADMAP: COP28 “confronted” the question of balancing the need to reduce emissions and to feed a growing population “like never before”, wrote New York Times international climate correspondent Somini Sengupta. She cited a number of “small, but significant steps” made at the summit, from the leaders’ declaration on food systems – covered in the previous issue of Cropped – to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s first-ever roadmap to 1.5C. That roadmap is “the most significant nudge” of the summit, the New York Times said, but added: “Roadmaps, of course, are only that until someone starts following the directions.” Action Aid’s climate justice lead Teresa Anderson told Carbon Brief that the roadmap’s “big problem is that it can’t bring itself to name the real issues at stake” and by “failing to name chemical fertilisers, factory farming or industrialised agriculture as the major sources of emissions and deforestation, its recommendations boil down to protecting the status quo”.
WASTE NOT: Among the recommendations in the roadmap is the need to reduce food loss and waste by 50% per capita by 2030, and to integrate all such waste “in a circular bioeconomy” by 2050. According to the not-for-profit Modern Farmer, the US Department of Agriculture released a draft of its new national strategy on food loss and waste at COP28. The announcement was accompanied by an initial investment of $30m and sets out goals for the federal government, including preventing food loss and waste, increasing the recycling of organic wastes and “to support policies that echo those aims”.
TAKING STOCK: Another major outcome for food at COP28 was the inclusion of “resilient food systems” in the global stocktake. Ag Insider noted that, although the stocktake “urges” countries to implement solutions towards resilience, it did so “without setting goals for the sector that produces one-third of global greenhouse gases”. A report published by WWF that assessed COP28’s action on food systems noted that a stocktake “that directly calls for food systems transformation to mitigate climate change would likely lead to higher prioritisation and increased amounts of climate finance for food”. The report said the summit “[fell] short of delivering robust outcomes [for food] in the negotiating rooms”. But, WWF added, “there are still grounds for optimism”, such as “the breadth of stakeholders determined to drive change” in the agrifood sector.
CONTRADICTORY AGENDA: An editorial in Nature Food cast doubt on Brazil’s ability to drive a sustainable agenda on food and climate after the nation announced its intention to join the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec+) at COP28. The piece noted that Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Lula) “has set the protection of the Amazon and Cerrado biomes as a priority” since regaining office. But the announcement that the country will join Opec+ in January, as well as its intention to auction several new blocks for oil drilling, “had a negative repercussion among environmentalists”. Nature Food noted that COP30 is set to be held in “the heart of the Amazon”, saying: “Domestically, this is an opportunity for Brazil to put itself on a different development pathway, fostering more sustainable food production and managing natural resources in a just and inclusive way.”
COP28 round-up
GLASGOW RECEIPTS: COP26 in Glasgow saw several major political declarations around deforestation. While deforestation was lower on the agenda this year, it achieved one notable first: the global stocktake was the first time the need for “halting and reversing deforestation and forest degradation by 2030” was enshrined in a major negotiated text under UN climate change. But, despite this, “countries are still no nearer to closing the ‘finance gap’ necessary to stop the destruction of rainforests”, Mongabay reported. The outlet added that the Democratic Republic of the Congo “says it has not seen any of the $500m pledged to it two years ago [at COP26] to protect the Congo Basin rainforest”. As Cropped editor Dr Giuliana Viglione reported at COP28, a group of NGOs released a call to create a “Glasgow Declaration Accountability Framework” to hold countries accountable for their deforestation pledges from COP26.
RESTORATION RECOGNISED: The global stocktake underlines the “vital importance of protecting, conserving, restoring and sustainably using nature and ecosystems” and encourages the implementation of nature-based solutions and ecosystem-based approaches, Carbon Brief reported. COP28 saw the announcement of updates to both the Mangrove Breakthrough and the Freshwater Challenge, two global commitments to restoring mangroves and rivers and wetlands, respectively. Another big outcome of the summit was the global goal on adaptation, a framework meant to help countries build resilience to climate change. The text included topics such as water, health and ecosystems, the Spanish outlet Climática reported. But, it added, the global goal on adaptation will not guarantee that 30% of ecosystems will be “maintained, improved or restored”, relying instead on targets such as “reach resilience” or “reduce impacts”.
INDIGENOUS RIGHTS: Despite being the UN climate summit with the largest delegation of Indigenous peoples ever, they remained marginalised in the discussions regarding financing, the Brazilian outlet InfoAmazonia reported. The outlet added that concerns about oil and gas auctions in the Amazon and the arrival of agricultural projects on Indigenous lands overshadowed the result of the summit. Carbon Brief reported that the global stocktake included nine mentions of Indigenous peoples; however, language in the text was considered weaker than hoped by experts. For example, the texts lack recognition of Indigenous people’s rights to give or withhold free, prior and informed consent to approve projects within their territories.
METHANE ROUNDUP: Several voluntary pledges and finance pushes at COP28 focused on cutting methane emissions – and while many centred on fossil-fuel production, some homed in on food systems and agriculture. On 5 December, six major food companies, including Danone, Nestlé and Kraft Heinz, committed to release information on methane emissions within their dairy supply chains and to put in place methane action plans by the end of 2024. There were also several announcements of funds aimed at cutting emissions of the potent greenhouse gas, including more than $200m in public and private finance for research into reducing methane from livestock.
News and views
JUMBOS IN JEOPARDY: Drought has killed “at least 100 elephants” in Zimbabwe’s largest national park in recent weeks, the Associated Press reported. Conservation groups and wildlife authorities have attributed the deaths to “the impact of climate change and El Niño”, while authorities warn that “more could die as forecasts suggest a scarcity of rains and rising heat” in areas including the Hwange National Park. Separately, the Hindu Business Line reported that nearly 500 elephants in India have died from “unnatural causes” over the past five years, mainly due to electrocution and train collisions. India’s power ministry, while continuing to expand its infrastructure in elephant habitat, has issued an advisory to “mitigate the impact of power transmission lines and other power infrastructure on elephants and other wildlife”, the outlet said.
TRILLION APOLOGIES: At COP28, ecologist and former chief scientific adviser to the UN’s Trillion Trees Campaign Prof Thomas Crowther “begg[ed] environmental ministers to stop planting so many trees”, Wired reported. Crowther’s 2019 study that suggested “global tree restoration as our most effective climate change solution to date” sparked a global “tree-planting craze by companies and leaders…from Shell to Donald Trump” who were “keen to burnish their green credential”, but not cut actual emissions, the story said. Crowther told Wired his “message was misinterpreted”. He added that he brought results from a new paper on preserving existing forests to COP28 in an attempt to “kill greenwashing”. One scientist on Twitter commented that Crowther should “retract the [original trillion trees] paper instead of doing PR”.
START YOUR ENGINES: Tractors took over the streets of Berlin as hundreds of farmers protested against German government plans to get rid of some agricultural subsidies and tax breaks, Reuters reported. The plans are part of wider federal government efforts to fill a €60bn hole in the country’s 2024 budget, the newswire said. The government said it will remove a partial tax refund on diesel for farm machinery and a tax exemption for agricultural vehicles, Reuters noted – adding that this is something “farmers said would threaten their livelihood”. The newswire said that the plans are aimed to reduce emissions from the agricultural sector, which amounted to “55.5m metric tonnes of greenhouse emissions last year, roughly 7.4% of the country’s total”.
TO BEE OR NOT TO BEE: Indigenous peoples in south-east Mexico are calling for the recognition of bees as legal persons, with Mayan communities as their guardians, the Spanish-language version of Wired reported. This came after rainforests in the region experienced “devastation” due to soya agriculture and the excessive use of pesticides, leading to “more and more” bees dying. Indigenous communities criticised the state for not yet granted such recognition. The outlet said that protecting bees “for their intrinsic value” is an “idea [that] comes naturally” to Indigenous peoples. This would not be the first time that nature received legal recognition, as the constitutions of Ecuador and Bolivia both consider nature as a separate and living entity.
DIET IMPACTS: Halving meat and dairy consumption alongside reducing fertiliser use and food waste are some of the best ways to cut agricultural nitrogen pollution in Europe, a new report found. The report – produced for the UN by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and other researchers – said that significant amounts of the nitrogen used to boost crop growth ends up leaking into the air, water and soils. The researchers looked at 144 scenarios and outlined ways to reduce these losses, which included halving the amount of meat and dairy the average European eats.
Watch, read, listen
IMPROVING CONNECTIVITY: El Espectador looked at how the movement of 26 bird species helped scientists identify key sites for conserving ecological connectivity in Colombia’s protected areas.
BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS: What makes a place more biodiverse? Jaron Adkins, a scientist at Utah State University, explored this question for Utah Public Radio.
KEEPING PACE: In her newsletter, Sustainability by numbers, Dr Hannah Ritchie examined whether agricultural innovation can keep up with climate change.
ROAD REVAMP: Ben Goldfarb, writing for Yale Environment 360, looked at “green roads” – a way of redesigning roads to reduce floods and catch excess water for irrigation.
FORAGING THROUGH FEAR: Writing for Vittles, anthropologist Dolly Kikon and writer Joel Fernandes connected the dots between land rights, new climate laws, conflict and foraging in landscapes of loss in India’s north-eastern state of Nagaland.
New science
COP28 initiatives will only reduce emissions if followed through
Climate Action Tracker
A new analysis of COP28 pledges found the “plausible” impact of its food and agriculture declaration on global emissions to be around 500m tonnes of CO2-equivalent by 2030. Climate Action Tracker assessed the emissions-reduction potential of five non-binding pledges made at COP28 and the extent to which those pledges overlap with already-promised reductions. The lack of “quantifiable targets in the initiative text” and “targets directly targeting emissions reductions”, result in a commitment “so vague as to risk becoming another talking shop”, the authors wrote. On deforestation, the assessment found that funding declarations in the hundreds of millions of dollars, as opposed to the billions needed to end deforestation in this decade, “are not truly new” and represent a “repeat of the commitments already made at COP26 in Glasgow”.
Towards equity and justice in ocean sciences
npj Ocean Sustainability
A new review article examined progress towards equity in the ocean sciences and presented a pathway to addressing the gaps that remain in the field. A group of ocean scientists examined dozens of scientific papers on ocean equity and justice. They found that while the community has begun to identify and tackle existing power imbalances in ocean sciences over the past few years, “many issues still need to be addressed”. The authors called for “honest and transparent dialogue”, accompanied by “a significant shift in institutional cultures and norms” from scientists, professional societies, funders and other groups.
Are climate neutrality claims in the livestock sector too good to be true?
Environmental Research Letters
A number of scientific studies have “distorted understanding of the climate impact of livestock production”, a new “perspective” paper suggested. The researchers focused on the use of global warming potential (GWP) metrics, which standardise different greenhouse gases into one CO2-equivalent (CO2e). The “policymakers who wrote the Paris Agreement text” based its goals on “emissions pathways aggregated using GWP100”, the authors explained, which accounts for the warming caused by GHGs over a 100-year period and “does not differentiate between long-lived climate pollutants (LLCPs) and short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs)”. However, some recent studies “claiming that ruminant livestock sectors in developed economies are, or could readily be, climate neutral” have used the GWP* metric, which “accounts for the effect of changes in the rate of SLCP emissions on warming over time”. While the GWP* is a “useful complement” to other metrics, the claimed states of climate neutrality in specific sectors based on its use are “temporary and are not aligned to the wider outcomes of the Paris Agreement”, the paper concludes.
In the diary
- 20 December: Democratic Republic of the Congo general election
- 3-5 January 2024: Oxford Farming Conference | Oxford, England
- 15-19 January: World Economic Forum annual meeting | Davos, Switzerland
Cropped is researched and written by Dr Giuliana Viglione, Aruna Chandrasekhar, Daisy Dunne, Orla Dwyer and Yanine Quiroz. Please send tips and feedback to cropped@carbonbrief.org
The post Cropped 20 December 2023: COP28 special edition appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Climate Change
Brazil confident new rainforest fund will reach $10bn donor milestone
Brazil’s environment minister says he is “very optimistic” that the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) – a new rainforest fund to channel private and public finance to developing nations – can meet a key $10 billion funding target this year, and is not at risk from his country’s elections next month.
The TFFF, launched by Brazil at COP30 in the Amazon last November and co-led by Norway, is intended as an alternative to traditional grant-based forest finance. The fund aims to raise $125bn in public and private capital, invest it in bond markets, and then pay countries that keep their forests standing from the annual returns. Donor contributions needed to get it going have tailed off after an initial burst.
Speaking to Climate Home News on the sidelines of Climate Week in New York, Brazilian environment minister João Paulo Capobianco pointed out that in less than a year since its official launch, the TFFF has already secured $7.3bn from governments.
“How many other initiatives can say that?” he asked. “Of course, if you have $7 billion, it’s easier for more countries to consider their own contribution. And not just countries – non-governmental organisations also. We are expecting even more support.”
As its initial target, the TFFF aims to raise $10bn in seed capital from governments by the end of 2026, and still needs to fill a gap of $2.7bn. Its backers say that for each dollar in public funding, they can secure $4 from the private sector. Critics say the $10bn goal barely covers the fund’s expenses and would not allow it to make any significant payments to forest countries.
Because setting up its financial architecture, raising the starting capital and making the first investments will take time, experts say the TFFF is unlikely to generate any payments for developing countries before 2028.
Seeking new pledges
Capobianco told Climate Home News that Brazil is still in talks with potential new contributors to the fund, among them China, Korea and Japan, and said he hoped to see more pledges announced at the upcoming biodiversity and climate COPs in October and November. The Netherlands is expected to up its first small contribution and Canada may also come in, according to other sources close to the TFFF.
Because the fund was not created as part of the UN climate talks and is hosted by the World Bank, developing countries can contribute without taking on wider donor responsibilities for climate finance. Brazil and Indonesia – both large emerging rainforest nations – have each pledged $1bn to the TFFF.
Earlier in September, the UK became the latest country to pledge funding – promising a loan of £400 million (about $540 million). Capobianco welcomed the contribution and noted that Britain has also said it will keep “under review” the possibility of putting in more.
Currently the largest donor is Norway, which announced a $3bn pledge last year at COP30 in Belém. However, that pledge came with conditions, among them that the fund must reach $10bn in sponsor capital by 2026, and that Norway’s contribution can’t make up more than 20% of that total. Over the longer term, this means the fund must raise $15bn from governments to unlock Norway’s full investment.
Comment: UK’s budget juggling trick with rainforest loan for bus-fare cap needs transparency
Speaking at a forest finance event in New York, Norway’s environment minister Sigrun Aasland said the country’s pledge was made not “only out of solidarity but because of shared interests”, adding that protecting rainforests is critical for climate and biodiversity goals as well as for national security.
“Tropical deforestation matters to people in the Amazon and in the Congo. But let’s not forget that it also matters to global food production and to the cost of living in Oslo or in London,” she said.
At the event, Guyana’s minister of natural resources Vickram Bharrat said the TFFF is “one in a menu of options” to finance forest protection in developing countries. He added that to boost its capital “maybe we should put some amount of pressure on oil companies to contribute to the fund”.
Upcoming election “not a risk”
Brazil, which has been pivotal to getting the fund off the ground, is now heading into a national election that could see the country swing back to an anti-climate stance if right-wing candidate Flávio Bolsonaro beats current left-wing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Capobianco, however, said the election result does not pose a risk to the TFFF.
“It’s a global initiative, not a Brazilian initiative. We proposed the first idea, but nowadays it’s a global initiative,” he said. “We believe the investor countries and the tropical countries together have the possibility to continue this process.”
In Brazil, the first round of voting is scheduled for Sunday, October 4. If no candidate wins more than 50% of valid votes, a run-off ballot will take place on October 25.
COP30 roadmap to end deforestation will invite countries to draft domestic plans
In July, the TFFF board adopted a charter, which outlines the instrument’s objectives and values, including that 20% of the payments made to tropical countries will go directly to Indigenous people and local communities.
The charter also says the TFFF board may comprise up to 12 member countries during the initial phase. Currently, seven seats are filled by the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Germany, Brazil, France, the Netherlands, Norway and Indonesia.
The board has also formally incorporated the Tropical Forest Investment Fund (TFIF) – the TFFF’s investment arm that will trade bonds in financial markets – hosted in Luxembourg.
The post Brazil confident new rainforest fund will reach $10bn donor milestone appeared first on Climate Home News.
Brazil confident new rainforest fund will reach $10bn donor milestone
Climate Change
COP31 must aim higher to cut emissions from the use of materials
Patrick Schröder is a senior research fellow at Chatham House’s Environment and Society Centre.
A climate summit serious about implementation cannot afford to leave major emissions reductions off the table. Yet, that is the risk COP31 faces unless it makes reducing raw material use central to the way countries decarbonise their economies.
On the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York last week, COP31 host Türkiye laid out proposals to accelerate emissions cuts in the next decade. Its plans include global goals to increase the share of recycled products in material use to at least 15% (up from 6.9% in 2025) and halve waste generation by 2035.
COP31 offers an opportunity to connect efforts to improve material circularity with stronger national climate commitments and mitigation pathways. But these targets could be a lot more ambitious.
The case for circularity
The Paris Agreement cannot be delivered through cleaner electricity alone. We must also reduce the emissions that are embedded in the way we extract resources, manufacture products, build infrastructure and dispose of waste.
Circularity principles are pivotal to credible mitigation pathways: designing technologies and products to last, repairing and reusing them, and reducing demand for virgin resources.
The scale of the opportunity is striking. A recent European Environment Agency review found that adopting such principles could deliver average global emissions reductions potential of 52% in the waste sector against a business-as-usual scenario, 48% in construction and buildings, 28% in transport and mobility, 26% in industry and 24% in agriculture.
These figures make a compelling case for raising circularity ambitions across the economy, offering the promise of far more than better recycling bins.
In fact, recycling minerals used in cleantech equipment, for example, illustrate the extent of the emissions savings available. The carbon footprint of minerals and metals recovered from secondary sources is up to 80% lower than those produced from new mining and processing, according to the International Energy Agency.
A major EU-funded project estimates that recovered materials could substitute up to 56% of Europe’s primary critical raw material requirements by 2050, provided they achieve the necessary quality. The main takeaway goes beyond Europe: yesterday’s products can become tomorrow’s strategic resources while mitigating climate change.
In this light, a target to increase the share of recovered material use to 15% isn’t enough.
The evidence-based Circularity Gap Report found a 17% target by 2032 is possible and could unlock additional emissions reductions amounting to several gigatonnes of CO2.
Reducing material demand
A higher circularity metric is only part of the answer, however. An economy can increase its recycling rate at the same time as extracting more primary materials if total material demand keeps growing.
The tougher issue governments need to address is identifying what reductions in primary material use are needed.
The Circularity Gap Report uses an indicative benchmark of eight tonnes of virgin materials consumed per person annually. This is already being translated into policy: Germany’s 2024 circular economy strategy aims to reduce primary resource consumption, with the German Federal Environment Agency identifying six to eight tonnes per person as an ambitious target.

Reducing primary material demand will require a closer integration of energy and resource policies. Efficient EVs charged with solar power can complement better public transport and walkable cities, while batteries designed to be repaired and reused for stationary energy storage before being recycled will reduce the materials footprint of transport and clean energy services.
Coordinated infrastructure development and urban planning can prevent unnecessary overbuild, while renovating existing building stock reduces demand for new steel, cement and aluminium, which are emissions-intensive to produce. Connecting industrial waste heat to district heating networks can further reduce energy demand and emissions.
What governments should agree at COP31
COP31 can translate this approach into three concrete commitments.
First, governments should agree a stronger circularity ambition, supported by material-footprint indicators and milestones. The presidency should seek recognition of these priorities in negotiated outcomes, alongside concrete delivery partnerships under its COP31 Action Agenda.
Second, countries should include quantified circular economy measures in their updated nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and implementation plans. Such measures should include reuse, material efficiency and circularity targets, as well as transparent estimates of emissions savings that avoid double counting across sectors. By the end of 2025, countries had developed 101 national circular economy roadmaps and action plans, yet these often remained disconnected from their NDCs.
Third, climate finance should support the delivery of circular solutions such as material recovery at scale, investments into circular critical mineral value chains beyond mining, developing a circular plastics economy, and designing buildings and cities that support material reuse. Developing countries need technology, affordable finance and support to deliver these ambitions, including for the informal workers whose livelihoods depend on recovering and recycling materials.
The test for COP31 is to reach an agreement that can start the transformation of our production and consumption systems and how they are financed.
A headline circularity target will achieve little without policies that address absolute resource demand and deliver measurable emissions cuts. But COP31 offers an opportunity to make circularity a central element of climate policy, with targets strong enough to matter and institutions equipped to deliver them.
The post COP31 must aim higher to cut emissions from the use of materials appeared first on Climate Home News.
COP31 must aim higher to cut emissions from the use of materials
Climate Change
As El Niño intensifies, we should be investing more in the world’s farmers
An exceptional El Niño is building. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) says it has intensified to very strong levels and is likely to last at least through February 2027. If its current trajectory holds, it could become stronger than anything seen since WMO monitoring began four decades ago.
That is bad news for agriculture. El Niño – a naturally occurring weather phenomenon – can scramble rainfall patterns across the world, bringing drought to some regions and floods to others. And this time it is unfolding against the backdrop of a significantly hotter climate, with farmers already contending with unreliable growing seasons, extreme heat and less predictable rainfall because of global warming.
El Niño expected to bring next record-hot year as soon as 2027
We are seeing the consequences already. In Sri Lanka, drought linked to El Niño has dried wells and reservoirs and cut into crops and farmer incomes. Indonesia is experiencing its worst wildfire season in 11 years, with prolonged drought and extreme heat exacerbated by El Niño. And in Peru, authorities are preparing for the opposite extreme: intense rains, flooding and landslides which the national civil-defence agency says could affect around 1.2 million people.
These impacts will multiply as El Niño intensifies.
And yet, just as the risks to food production are rising, the money available to help farmers withstand them is shrinking.
10% funding decline in 2024
A forthcoming analysis from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) shows that climate-related development finance for agrifood systems is moving in the wrong direction. In 2024, the latest year for which data is available, it fell by 10 percent compared with a 2 percent overall decline. The sectors that put food on our tables — crops, livestock, forestry and fisheries — received just 5 percent.
Yet this is precisely the moment when climate investment in agriculture needs to grow, not shrink. It can help communities adapt, build resilience and protect food security, while unlocking larger flows of public and private finance. Agriculture feeds us, supports the livelihoods of well over a billion people, and is often the first sector hit by drought, floods and extreme heat. Cutting that investment now is a false economy.
One failed harvest can plant the seed for the next crisis, forcing farmers to eat the seed they have saved for planting, sell livestock or tools, or take on debt. It can also deepen food insecurity, disrupt supply chains and drive up prices, showing up months later in supermarket aisles far away.
The Central American Dry Corridor, stretching through much of the region, shows both how exposed farmers are, and what investment can do. Based on an analysis of 41 years of satellite observations, FAO finds that some crop and pasture areas there face more than a 50 percent chance of agricultural drought over the coming months.
About half of Central America’s 1.9 million producers of maize, beans and other basic grains live in the Dry Corridor. Many grow food both for sale and for their own families. When a harvest fails, they lose both income and dinner.
El Salvador project conserves water and soil
In El Salvador, which lies within the Dry Corridor, more than 50,000 farmers have adopted practices to better withstand drought and increasingly unreliable rainfall through RECLIMA, a project financed by the Green Climate Fund and implemented by FAO in partnership with the government of El Salvador. It has substantial national co-financing, including from the country’s Environmental Investment Fund.
El Niño can intensify El Salvador’s annual mid-season dry spell, known as the canícula, turning it into a longer, harsher drought just as maize needs water most.


For María Cristina Corvera de López, a second-generation farmer in rural Nahualapa, adapting means changing how every drop of rain is captured and used. She plants trees alongside her crops to provide shade and minimise evaporation and uses simple irrigation channels and a homemade drip system to conserve water. Instead of burning stalks, leaves and husks after harvest, as generations before her did, she turns them into mulch to hold moisture in the soil.
“The effects of climate change are a constant challenge,” she says. But the new techniques have made her farm more resilient to El Niño as well. Where she once harvested about 50 bags of maize per acre, she now gets around 80, even during droughts. It’s enough to feed her family and sell the surplus.
Managing risk now cuts future costs
Together, these adaptations can mean the difference between losing a crop and getting through a dry season with enough food, seed and income to plant again. They are also the result of climate finance invested before disaster strikes.
RECLIMA shows what that kind of adaptation investment can buy. Adaptation accounted for 45 percent of climate-related development finance to agrifood systems in 2024, and multilateral development banks are directing more agricultural finance towards resilience. That shift reflects a growing recognition that adaptation is a form of risk management, not just a development cost.
We need much more of it. The same investments that help farmers withstand El Niño also enable them to adapt to a hotter, more unpredictable future. Cutting investment in the people who produce our food just as climate risks intensify does not save money. It simply pushes a much larger bill into the next harvest, the next food crisis, and the next El Niño.
The post As El Niño intensifies, we should be investing more in the world’s farmers appeared first on Climate Home News.
As El Niño intensifies, we should be investing more in the world’s farmers
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy11 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Climate Change2 years agoAnalysis: China’s CO2 falls 1% in Q2 2024 in first quarterly drop since Covid-19






